Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID

On 28/05/12 21:31, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 05/28/2012 02:35 PM, Ori Liel wrote: >> Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it >> explicitly, so I'll just go with that. >> >> If someone feels strongly against, please reply. > > I still like 'label' better. > it doesn't have the context of a unique id, and is much more correct to > what this is - allows the user to label a command (or a set of commands). > but also doesn't imply it's unique in any way (i.e., it's like a "tag", > just a better, non overloaded term for it). > I think that flow-id is confusing. This id has nothing to do with flow, it can aggregate multiple commands and it is not associated with a specific user flow. Correlation-Id is a common name for such Id, we took it from the terminology used in JMS queues, but Microsoft and Oracle are using CID too. * http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=23842 * http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/blogs/GetThePoint/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?I... * http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B14099_19/integrate.1012/b25709/com/oracle/bpel...