Not sure what are they using to identify people, are these GitHub
usernames?
This feels a bit like lock-in.
@usernames or emails
It might be better to enforce using email addresse in the file.
Should work according to the article.
Is actually prefer if there was a way to keep this out of the code,
or if
they'd adopted Kubernetses format for this instead of inventing thier own.
It is the same format.
Martin
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> בתאריך 8 בספט׳ 2017 14:18, "Martin Sivak" <msivak(a)redhat.com> כתב:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently noticed GitHub enabled a feature that allows specifying
> code owners for different pieces of code:
>
>
https://github.com/blog/2392-introducing-code-owners
>
> It should supposedly automatically
>
> add the proper reviewers to patches.
>
>
Not sure what are they using to identify people, are these GitHub
usernames?
This feels a bit like lock-in.
>
It might be better to enforce using email addresse in the file.
>
Is actually prefer if there was a way to keep this out of the code,
or if
they'd adopted Kubernetses format for this instead of inventing thier own.
>
>
> We have similar feature enabled in Gerrit and it might make sense for
> our GitHub specific projects to do the same.
>
>
> Sure, why not. Its been very useful in Gerrit.
>
> (It might even make sense
> to follow the same format in Gerrit)
>
>
> If soneone would contribute a parser to the GitHub format (which is to say,
> something that would scan a commit and yield a list of addresses). We could
> make it work with a hook or a Jenkins job.