On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:56:49PM -0400, Brian Proffitt wrote:
All:
I spoke with KB at CentOS about maintaining the qemu package for the Virt SIG. He has
expressed concerns that if oVirt curates the qemu package in order to have the
snapshotting flag turned on, then there might arise a situation where each project within
the SIG would be getting their own versions of qemu.
To help mitigate against such an occurrence, KB suggested that oVirt take ownership of
not the RHEL distro-specific version of qemu, but a more upstream version instead. Upon
discussion with Douglas Landsgraf and Itamar, it seemed to make more sense to keep
downloading from CentOS repo and rebuilding it with flag enabled and either sharing that
with the SIG or inside our own oVirt repository.
Basically, KB's issue that if oVirt does wish to curate this package on behalf of the
SIG, that we as a project would be willing to manage all requests from the rest of the SIG
participants (such as the example he raised, which was his personal wish that the vdi and
Microsoft vpc formats be turned on as well, so he can build Azure images more easily). If
we were willing to take on such a responsibility for the SIG, then this would mitigate
multiple versions of qemu appearing.
From my side, I believe this is a reasonable expectation, given that we are going to get
what we need within CentOS and still can be a responsible community player within the SIG.
I put the question to the developers: is this something we want to undertake, or should
we simply maintain our version of qemu within an oVirt-specific repository?
Personally I wonder why it's that important. With RHEL7 out and CentOS7
expected soonish, why not aim at supporting that. I'm sure that qemu is
new enough to support snapshots.