On 18/04/12 14:04, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 04/18/2012 09:51 AM, Ofer Schreiber wrote:
> Ever wondered why the version of oVirt's first release is 3.0.0_0001?
> The answer is simple - We use ovirt-engine jar's version as our "main"
release version.
>
> Personally, I think the current versioning scheme is ugly. Actually, I can't name
even one open-source project using "_" in it's version.
>
> What can we do about it? We have couple of options:
> 1. Leave the engine alone, and use a separate versioning scheme (e.g - use just 3.1.0
as the main version for next release)
> 2. Remove "_" from engine jars
> 3. Do nothing.
>
> I'd like to hear your thoughts, as well as the reasons to use such an unusual
versioning scheme.
>
> ---
> Ofer Schreiber
> oVirt Release Manager
> _______________________________________________
> Arch mailing list
> Arch(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
From my point of view using the 0001 suffix in the names of the jar
files is not a big problem, but I agree that using it in the release
number is ugly, and it produces issues/discussions during packaging. I
vote for option #1: use 3.1.0 for the next main version.
The original versioning scheme was due to a bug in maven2.
Juan, I've read some of the Java packaging concepts, but didn't see
(or missed) thoughts about modular versioning (ie- artifacts).
Here are the things to consider here;
- Current RPM's are using the version declared in the POM files.
Should this concept remain?
* I think it should remain, as other packaging systems should
be able to use it as well and end-up is the similar project version.
- Do we want to expose oVirt engine artifacts in a Maven repo
for others to consume?
* If we do, we'll need to make sure we have a scheme that works both for
Maven and for packaging (RPM) comparisons.
One last thing...
I know most of the packaging work now is RPM based. Still, I'm
asking you to leave enough room for non-RPM distro's to join in.
--
/d
"Forty-two," said Deep Thought, with infinite majesty and calm. --Douglas Adams,
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy