From: "Francesco Romani" <fromani(a)redhat.com>
To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
Cc: devel(a)ovirt.org, Users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 6:56:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [QA] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
> To: Users(a)ovirt.org, devel(a)ovirt.org
> Cc: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>, "Eyal Edri"
<eedri(a)redhat.com>,
> "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>, "David
> Caro" <dcaroest(a)redhat.com>, "Yair Zaslavsky"
<yzaslavs(a)redhat.com>,
> ykaplan(a)redhat.com, "Tal Nisan"
> <tnisan(a)redhat.com>, "Mooli Tayer" <mtayer(a)redhat.com>,
"Francesco Romani"
> <fromani(a)redhat.com>, "Adam Litke"
> <alitke(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:43:40 PM
> Subject: [QA] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status
>
> Hi,
> tomorrow we should compose oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 starting at 08:00 UTC
> We still have the following blockers list:
> 1127460 virt NEW VM abnormal stop after extending when using thin
> provisioning on block storage
[...]
Analysis doesn't show yet a bug on VDSM, which seems to behave correctly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127460#c6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127460#c7
NEEDINFO requests to QEMU and LVM maintainers are been sent, no answer yet.
Since this was marked as blocker, I'll invest more time on this and will look
for a workaround,
if possible, within the end of the week.
This is very bad bug, but not a vdsm regression. It is broken in vdsm 3.4
and it will be still broken in vdsm 3.5, since getting fixes from qemu/kvm/lvm
takes lot of time.
Nir