11:40 a.m.
Hello,
I don't understand why you start discussion from start... there were some additional
facts.
So first answer:
No we cannot assume we own the machine nor own the apache, nor own the postgresql. These
assumptions made in the past were plain wrong and cause more harm than good, and
eventually saved no resources nor efforts.
At master we altered the ajp proxy configuration to be less intrusive[1][2].
We split the http configuration into three:
1. Install ajp proxy per our URIs[1].
2. Optionally set root redirection from / to /ovirt-engine
3. Optionally configure mod_ssl with our certificate.
The mandatory apache configuration[1] does not alter any configuration file, hence the
chance of conflict is the chance of conflict between ovirt-engine URIs and other product
URIs.
ovirt-engine URIs:
---
/UserPortal
/OvirtEngineWeb
/webadmin
/docs
/spice
/ca.crt
/engine.ssh.key.txt
/rhevm.ssh.key.txt
/ovirt-engine-style.css
/console.vv
/api
/ovirt-engine
---
As we have done this without cooperation of developers we kept URIs as-is.
URIs that cannot be changed until next major:
/engine.ssh.key.txt
/rhevm.ssh.key.txt
/ca.crt
/api [I guess, although we can provide migration path alternative]
All the other can be moved into /ovirt-engine with cooperation of developers, especially
UI and Virt developers, it should be easy to do this, and reduce the chance of conflict.
Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/13318/
[2] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/14304/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 6:32:08 PM
Subject: [Engine-devel] 3.3 scratch or upgraded installation must use Apache proxy
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/905754)
Hi,
I'm working on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/905754, trying to have Apache
proxy in all 3.3 installations.
I'm looking in the code and I've found a point where I'm in doubt about
how to handle the case.
The current engine-setup implementation perform some checks that change
the behavior of the installer documented as:
1. Check whether the relevant httpd configuration files were changed, as
it's an indication for the setup that the httpd application is being
actively used, Therefore we may need to ask (dynamic change) the user
whether to override this configuration.
2. Check if IPA is installed and drop port 80/443 support. What the
script really do is setting OVERRIDE_HTTPD_CONFIG default to False in
both cases and just for case 2 call also setHttpPortsToNonProxyDefault.
About 1, if we can consider Apache "owned" by the engine we can drop any
question to the user, else I think we need to ask what to do or abort
the setup considering the configuration as unsupported.
About 2, it seems that the best solution for that is to abort the setup
if IPA is found on the same system where
we're installing the engine.
As far I've understood having IPA and engine on the same host is not a
supported configuration.
What do you think about this?
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel