Re: [Engine-devel] SSH Soft Fencing

From: "Martin Perina" <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; To: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 11:23:12 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] SSH Soft Fencing So let me summarize it: We have come to agreement in those questions: 1) SSH Soft Fencing logic should be extracted from VdsNotRespondingTreatment command to its own SshSoftFencingCommand 2) VdsNotRespondingCommand should be refactored so it's not inherited from VdsRestartCommand, but it should run SshSoftFencingCommand or VdsRestartCommand based on defined fencing flow These questions has not been resolved yet: 3) Should SSH Soft Fencing be executed also for hosts without PM configured? 4) Should SSH Soft Fencing execution for hosts without PM configured be enabled by default and admin can turn off these feature using configuration options SshSoftFencingWithoutPmEnabled (or something like that)? 5) Should SshSoftFencingWithoutPmEnabled be a global option or a cluster wide option (can be turned off for specific cluster version) or a VDS option (it can be turned off for each host)? Personally I would suggest: ad 3) Yes, SSH Soft Fencing should be executed also for hosts without PM configured ad 4) Yes, SSH Soft Fencing for hosts without PM configured should be enabled by default ad 5) I don't see any significant reason why someone would like to turn off SSH Soft Fencing for hosts without PM configured. But if someone would like to do that, I think he would like to turn it off only for specific hosts, so VDS level option makes sense for me

Martin _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel