On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Adam Litke <alitke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 29/03/16 21:01 +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the Vdsm call, we discussed a way to expose vdsm errors to its clients
> (e.g, engine, hosted engine agent/setup).
>
> The idea is to have a vdsmapi package, holding:
> - errors.py - all public errors
> - events.py - all events sent by vdsm
> - client.py - library for communicating with vdsm
> - schema.py - the client will use this to autogenerate online help and
> validate messages
> - schema.yaml - we probably need several files (gluster, events, etc.)
>
> This will allow other projects talking with vdsm to do:
>
> from vdsmapi import client, errors
> ...
> try:
> client.list(vmId="xxxyyy")
> except errors.NoSuchVM:
> ...
>
> (this is a fake example, the real api may be different)
>
> Engine can build-require vdsmapi, and generate java module with the
> public errors from
> vdsmapi/errors.py module, instead of keeping this hardcoded in engine,
> and updating
> it every time vdsm adds new public error.
>
> Vdsm will use this package when building response to clients.
>
> Edi was concerned about sharing the errors module, so maybe we need a
> package:
>
> vdsmapi/
> errors/
> network.py
> virt.py
> storage.py
> gluster.py
>
> We can still expose all the errors via errors/__init__.py, so clients
> do not have to care about
> the area of the application the error come from.
>
> Thoughts?
Seems like a fantastic idea. Would engine builds of the master branch
always fetch the errors module from vdsm's master branch or would
there be some synchronization points?
I guess the synchronization points would be the version of the package you
are targeting. Engine master will requires vdsmapi-4.0-gitxxxyyy, and
engine 4.0 will
use vdsmapi-4.0 etc.
Nir