Thanks Martin.
I will follow once merged and report the next failure so we can have a
better view.
I'm not going to merge it, but I will try to execute OST with it until
failure.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:07 AM Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:04 AM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Marcin :) I am also adding Didi to see if he knows of any
>> changes.
>> Anton, who from Engine/api side can help to take it from here?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:37 AM Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> so the thing boils down to this:
>>>
>>>
>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/471/artifact/...
>>> This is 'httpd' log file from the most recent job that failed
>>> 'add_master_storage_domain'.
>>> At the end of the log file, we can see:
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:38 -0400] "GET
/ovirt-engine/api/hosts?search=datacenter%3Dtest-dc+AND+status%3Dinstalling+or+status%3Dinitializing
HTTP/1.1" 200 11845
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:41 -0400] "GET
/ovirt-engine/api/hosts?search=datacenter%3Dtest-dc+AND+status%3Dinstalling+or+status%3Dinitializing
HTTP/1.1" 200 11847
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:44 -0400] "GET
/ovirt-engine/api/hosts?search=datacenter%3Dtest-dc+AND+status%3Dinstalling+or+status%3Dinitializing
HTTP/1.1" 200 11847
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:47 -0400] "GET
/ovirt-engine/api/hosts?search=datacenter%3Dtest-dc+AND+status%3Dinstalling+or+status%3Dinitializing
HTTP/1.1" 200 5959
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:47 -0400] "GET
/ovirt-engine/api/hosts?search=datacenter%3Dtest-dc+AND+status%3Dup HTTP/1.1" 200
7826
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:47 -0400] "GET /ovirt-engine/api
HTTP/1.1" 200 5112
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.1 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:48 -0400] "GET
/ovirt-engine/api/hosts?search=datacenter%3Dtest-dc+AND+status%3Dup HTTP/1.1" 200 65
>>>
>>> 192.168.202.2 - - [28/Mar/2019:11:05:50 -0400] "POST
/ovirt-engine/sso/oauth/token-info HTTP/1.1" 200 223
>>>
>>> The first batch of 'status=installing or status=initializing'
requests
>>> and the first 'status=up' request is 'verify_add_hosts'.
>>> The second 'status=up' request is the one that comes from
>>> '_hosts_in_dc' call from 'add_master_storage_domain'.
>>> They are executed with a 1 second time difference, yet the results are
>>> not the same - 7826 bytes vs 65 bytes.
>>> I went through every line of 'engine.log' from that 1 sec interval
and
>>> couldn't find anything, that would indicate the host is going down.
>>> I've asked Ravi for help yesterday and I've found out, that the
results
>>> of these requests are queries to our postgres db and they are somehow
>>> cached.
>>> I see 2 options here - either something really changed the db contents
>>> during that 1 second or there's a bug in our API/cache that returns the
>>> wrong info.
>>> I think we can eliminate the first option by adding collection of
>>> postgres db to our OST suites and looking at it's history after a
failure.
>>> I don't really have a solution for the second possibility - any help
>>> from someone who knows engine's code better would be appreciated.
>>>
>>
> I've created
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/99027 to add logging of hosts and
> statuses return by those search queries, so we should have more data what's
> exactly returned
>
>
>>> On 3/26/19 5:37 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>
>>> We never remove any packages from tested :)
>>> I am actually suspecting a problem that is caused by something that is
>>> shared by all projects like the api.
>>> we currently have 3 different tests that are randomly failing because
>>> of engine/host communication and I am starting to think they are all
>>> connected.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:03 PM Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:56 PM Sandro Bonazzola
<sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno mar 26 mar 2019 alle ore 14:42 Marcin Sobczyk <
>>>>> msobczyk(a)redhat.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, maybe I've found something. I was comparing two sets of
log
>>>>>> files - one for basic-suite-4.3 run that succeeded and one that
did not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The deployment procedure for host-1 is not complete in the
>>>>>> unsuccessful case. The last log entry is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2019-03-22 17:54:49,973-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (VdsDeploy)
[6f2e097b] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509), Installing Host
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1. Starting vdsm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the successful case we can see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:31,789-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509), Installing Host
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1. Starting vdsm.
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy) [3add0cac] Got: **%EventEnd STAGE
closeup METHOD otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vdsm.packages.Plugin._start
(odeploycons.packages.vdsm.started)
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy) [3add0cac] Got: **%EventStart
STAGE closeup METHOD otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vmconsole.packages.Plugin._start
(None)
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy) [3add0cac] Got: ***L:INFO
Starting ovirt-vmconsole-host-sshd
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:38,257-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy) [3add0cac] nextEvent: Log INFO
Starting ovirt-vmconsole-host-sshd
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:38,261-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (VdsDeploy)
[3add0cac] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS(509), Installing Host
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1. Starting ovirt-vmconsole-host-sshd.
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 06:16:39,479-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.otopi.dialog.MachineDialogParser] (VdsDeploy) [3add0cac] Got: **%EventEnd STAGE
closeup METHOD otopi.plugins.ovirt_host_deploy.vmconsole.packages.Plugin._start (None)
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like ovirt-host-deploy plugin did not respond?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The timing of:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98762/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> kinda aligns with my patch which was merged for vdsm-4.3 and was
a
>>>>>> suspect:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98748/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sandro, are you aware of any issues on ovirt-host-deploy plugin
that
>>>>>> might have caused these?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really see how a patch touching the automation
configuratin
>>>>> for STDCI v2 can be the cause of this but please go ahead and
blacklist
>>>>> last build.
>>>>> It should differ from previous one only by the timestamp of the rpm
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ehhhh, yeah, I'm so tired of looking at log files I'm starting to
see
>>> patterns everywhere...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you want to verify a specific version of an RPM works , you can use
>>>> the manual job for it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dafna, can we temporarily blacklist the latest version of
>>>>>> ovirt-host-deploy to see if it fixes CQ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marcin
>>>>>> On 3/25/19 2:45 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes. I suspect this is the problem.
>>>>>> In the host I can see in the yum log the times the vdsm packages
are
>>>>>> installed:
>>>>>> [dron@dron post-002_bootstrap.py]$ less
>>>>>> lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1/_var_log/yum.log |grep vdsm
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:48:49 Installed:
vdsm-api-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:48:52 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:00 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-common-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:00 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:38 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-network-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.x86_64
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:38 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-python-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:39 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-client-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:39 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-jsonrpc-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:39 Installed:
vdsm-http-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:42 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-hook-openstacknet-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:57 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-hook-vmfex-dev-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:58 Installed: vdsm-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.x86_64
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:58 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-hook-ethtool-options-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>> Mar 25 07:49:58 Installed:
>>>>>> vdsm-hook-fcoe-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and in the engine you can see that the engine already failed
>>>>>> installation:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,920-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Running command: AddVdsCommand internal: false.
Entities affected : ID: 319fcdf5-5941-46b1-a75c-d335bf500f82 Type: ClusterAction group
CREATE_HOST with role type ADMIN
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:35 PM Dafna Ron <dron(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am also adding didi
>>>>>>> should this not be logged in host-deploy?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:33 PM Marcin Sobczyk
<msobczyk(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed in my failed job, I can see, that
'vdsm-python' is
>>>>>>>> installed *after* engine's attempt to run
'vdsm-tool':
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1/_var_log/yum.log
>>>>>>>> 403:Mar 22 17:54:12 Installed:
vdsm-python-4.30.11-23.git276b602.el7.noarch
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine/_var_log/ovirt-engine/engine.log
>>>>>>>> 1580:2019-03-22 17:53:03,793-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[d86d9b56-2564-44a9-a8d4-01a4d7f5a529] Executing: '/usr/bin/vdsm-tool vdsm-id'
>>>>>>>> 1581:2019-03-22 17:53:04,043-04 WARN
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[d86d9b56-2564-44a9-a8d4-01a4d7f5a529] Failed to initiate vdsm-id request on host: Command
returned failure code 127 during SSH session 'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/25/19 2:22 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and its only failing on one host as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:17 PM Marcin Sobczyk <
>>>>>>>> msobczyk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, that would suggest, that 'vdsm-tool'
command is not found
>>>>>>>>> on the host. There was no work done around
'vdsm-tool's 'vdsm-id' recently.
>>>>>>>>> On 3/25/19 2:08 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, I can see in engine that it is trying to
start vdsm
>>>>>>>>> installation on the host:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) [] Entered
SsoRestApiAuthFilter
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiAuthFilter authenticating with sso
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiAuthFilter authenticating using BEARER header
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiAuthFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiAuthFilter successfully authenticated using BEARER header
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,123-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter] (default task-1) []
Entered SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,124-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.aaa.filters.SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter] (default task-1) []
SsoRestApiNegotiationFilter Not performing Negotiate Auth
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,143-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getclusterforuserbyclustername(?, ?, ?)}]
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,143-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[GetClusterForUserByClusterName] compiled
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,145-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] method: runQuery, params: [GetClusterByName,
NameQueryParameters:{refresh='false', filtered='false'}], timeElapsed:
7ms
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,161-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [] Compiled stored procedure. Call string is [{call
getvmstaticbyname(?)}]
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,161-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [] SqlCall for procedure [GetVmStaticByName] compiled
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,206-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getvdsbyname(?)}]
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,206-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[GetVdsByName] compiled
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,223-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] method: getByName, params:
[lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1], timeElapsed: 20ms
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,225-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getvdsbyhostname(?)}]
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,225-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[GetVdsByHostName] compiled
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,252-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.DebugLoggingInterceptor] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] method: getAllForHostname, params:
[lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1], timeElapsed: 28ms
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,254-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Compiled stored procedure. Call
string is [{call getstorage_poolsbyclusterid(?)}]
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,254-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.PostgresDbEngineDialect$PostgresSimpleJdbcCall]
(default task-1) [6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] SqlCall for procedure
[Getstorage_poolsByClusterId] compiled
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,262-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Connecting
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,461-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Connected:
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,467-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Authenticating:
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,599-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Authenticated:
'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,600-04 DEBUG
[org.ovirt.engine.core.uutils.ssh.SSHClient] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Executing: '/usr/bin/vdsm-tool vdsm-id'
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,902-04 WARN
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Failed to initiate vdsm-id request on host: Command
returned failure code 127 during SSH session 'root@lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1'
>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25 07:48:33,920-04 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.AddVdsCommand] (default task-1)
[6baa2a84-b322-42fd-855d-b25272a19a23] Running command: AddVdsCommand internal: false.
Entities affected : ID: 319fcdf5-5941-46b1-a75c-d335bf500f82 Type: ClusterAction group
CREATE_HOST with role type ADMIN
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:53 PM Dafna Ron
<dron(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> we have another failing patch with the same
test:
>>>>>>>>>>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/360/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> its obviously not related to the patch but there
is something
>>>>>>>>>> that is causing these failures randomly.
>>>>>>>>>> From what I can see in the current failed job,
you are correct
>>>>>>>>>> and host-1 and engine does not even try to deploy
host-1.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i can see host-1 is getting error 127 in lago for
ntpd and I can
>>>>>>>>>> see network manager errors in the host messages
log
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In the host messages log I can see several
messages that I
>>>>>>>>>> suspect may cause issues in communication between
engine and host:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:09 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
sasldblistusers2:
>>>>>>>>>> _sasldb_getkeyhandle has failed
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:10 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
saslpasswd2: error
>>>>>>>>>> deleting entry from sasldb: BDB0073 DB_NOTFOUND:
No matching key/data pair
>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:10 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
saslpasswd2: error
>>>>>>>>>> deleting entry from sasldb: BDB0073 DB_NOTFOUND:
No matching key/data pair
>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:10 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
saslpasswd2: error
>>>>>>>>>> deleting entry from sasldb: BDB0073 DB_NOTFOUND:
No matching key/data pair
>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ces/12)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel: bonding:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-UMJa2S is being created...
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel: bonding:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-UMJa2S is being deleted...
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
>>>>>>>>>> NetworkManager[2658]: <info>
[1553514613.7774] manager: (bondscan-UMJa2S):
>>>>>>>>>> new Bond device
(/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/13)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> (unregistered net_device) (unregistering):
Released all slaves
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel: bonding:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being created...
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option fail_over_mac: invalid
value (3)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option ad_select: invalid value
(3)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option lacp_rate: mode
dependency failed, not supported in
>>>>>>>>>> mode balance-rr(0)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option arp_validate: invalid
value (7)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option xmit_hash_policy: invalid
value (5)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
>>>>>>>>>> NetworkManager[2658]: <info>
[1553514613.8002] manager: (bondscan-liwvMR):
>>>>>>>>>> new Bond device
(/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/14)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option primary_reselect: invalid
value (3)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option arp_all_targets: invalid
value (2)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel: bonding:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being deleted...
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> (unregistered net_device) (unregistering):
Released all slaves
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel: bonding:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being created...
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option fail_over_mac: invalid
value (3)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option ad_select: invalid value
(3)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option lacp_rate: mode
dependency failed, not supported in
>>>>>>>>>> mode active-backup(1)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option arp_validate: invalid
value (7)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
>>>>>>>>>> NetworkManager[2658]: <info>
[1553514613.8429] manager: (bondscan-liwvMR):
>>>>>>>>>> new Bond device
(/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/15)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option xmit_hash_policy: invalid
value (5)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option primary_reselect: invalid
value (3)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR: option arp_all_targets: invalid
value (2)
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel: bonding:
>>>>>>>>>> bondscan-liwvMR is being deleted...
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 25 07:50:13 lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1
kernel:
>>>>>>>>>> (unregistered net_device) (unregistering):
Released all slaves
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:24 AM Marcin Sobczyk
<
>>>>>>>>>> msobczyk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the failed job, the engine didn't
even try to deploy on
>>>>>>>>>>> host-1:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/339/artifact/...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martin, do you know what could be the reason
for that?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can see in the logs for both successful and
unsuccessful
>>>>>>>>>>> basic-suite-4.3 runs, that there is no
'ntpdate' on host-1:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25
10:14:46,350::ssh.py::ssh::58::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Running d0c49b54 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1: ntpdate -4 lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine
>>>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25
10:14:46,383::ssh.py::ssh::81::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command d0c49b54 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 returned with 127
>>>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25
10:14:46,384::ssh.py::ssh::96::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command d0c49b54 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-1 errors:
>>>>>>>>>>> bash: ntpdate: command not found
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On host-0 everything is ok:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25
10:14:46,917::ssh.py::ssh::58::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Running d11b2a64 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-0: ntpdate -4 lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine
>>>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25
10:14:53,088::ssh.py::ssh::81::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command d11b2a64 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-0 returned with 0
>>>>>>>>>>> 2019-03-25
10:14:53,088::ssh.py::ssh::89::lago.ssh::DEBUG::Command d11b2a64 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-host-0 output:
>>>>>>>>>>> 25 Mar 06:14:53 ntpdate[6646]: adjust time
server 192.168.202.2 offset 0.017150 sec
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/25/19 10:13 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Still fails, now on a different component. (
>>>>>>>>>>> ovirt-web-ui-extentions )
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/339/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:59 PM Dan
Kenigsberg <
>>>>>>>>>>> danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:21 PM Marcin
Sobczyk <
>>>>>>>>>>>> msobczyk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dafna,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 'verify_add_hosts' we
specifically wait for single host to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be up with a timeout:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 144 up_hosts =
hosts_service.list(search='datacenter={} AND status=up'.format(DC_NAME))
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 145 if len(up_hosts):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 146 return True
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The log files say, that it took ~50
secs for one of the hosts
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be up (seems reasonable) and no
timeout is being reported.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just after running
'verify_add_hosts', we run
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'add_master_storage_domain',
which calls '_hosts_in_dc' function.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That function does the exact same
check, but it fails:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 113 hosts =
hosts_service.list(search='datacenter={} AND status=up'.format(dc_name))
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 114 if hosts:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 115 if random_host:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 116 return
random.choice(hosts)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it is relevant to
our current failure; but I
>>>>>>>>>>>> consider random_host=True as a bad
practice. As if we do not have enough
>>>>>>>>>>>> moving parts, we are adding intentional
randomness. Reproducibility is far
>>>>>>>>>>>> more important than coverage -
particularly for a shared system test like
>>>>>>>>>>>> OST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 117 else:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 118 return sorted(hosts,
key=lambda host: host.name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 119 raise
RuntimeError('Could not find hosts that are up in DC %s' % dc_name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm also not able to reproduce
this issue locally on my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> server. The investigation
continues...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that it would be fair to take the
filtering by host
>>>>>>>>>>>> state out of Engine and into the test,
where we can easily log the current
>>>>>>>>>>>> status of each host. Then we'd have
better understanding on the next
>>>>>>>>>>>> failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/22/19 1:17 PM, Marcin Sobczyk
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure, I'm on it - it's weird
though, I did ran 4.3 basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suite for this patch manually and
everything was ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/22/19 1:05 PM, Dafna Ron wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are failing branch 4.3 for test:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
002_bootstrap.add_master_storage_domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that in one of the hosts,
the vdsm is not starting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing in vdsm.log or in
supervdsm.log
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CQ identified this patch as the
suspected root cause:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/98748/ -
vdsm: client: Add
>>>>>>>>>>>>> support for flow id
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milan, Marcin, can you please have a
look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> full logs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/326/artifact/b...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only error I can see is about
host not being up (makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sense as vdsm is not running)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stacktrace
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run
>>>>>>>>>>>>> testMethod()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest
>>>>>>>>>>>>> self.test(*self.arg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 142, in
wrapped_test
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 60, in wrapper
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return func(get_test_prefix(),
*args, **kwargs)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 417, in add_master_storage_domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> add_iscsi_storage_domain(prefix)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 561, in add_iscsi_storage_domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>> host=_random_host_from_dc(api,
DC_NAME),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 122, in _random_host_from_dc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return _hosts_in_dc(api, dc_name,
True)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-4.3_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-4.3/test-scenarios/002_bootstrap.py",
line 119, in _hosts_in_dc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise RuntimeError('Could not
find hosts that are up in DC %s' % dc_name)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Could not find hosts that are up
in DC test-dc\n-------------------- >> begin captured logging <<
--------------------\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: start task:937bdea7-a2a3-47ad-9383-36647ea37ddf:Get
ssh client for lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine:\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: end
task:937bdea7-a2a3-47ad-9383-36647ea37ddf:Get ssh client for
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine:\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: Running c07b5ee2 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine: cat /root/multipath.txt\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: Command c07b5ee2 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine returned with 0\nlago.ssh: DEBUG: Command c07b5ee2 on
lago-basic-suite-4-3-engine output:\n
3600140516f88cafa71243648ea218995\n360014053e28f60001764fed9978ec4b3\n360014059edc777770114a6484891dcf1\n36001405d93d8585a50d43a4ad0bd8d19\n36001405e31361631de14bcf87d43e55a\n\n-----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list --
devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/J4NCHXTK5ZY...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/ULS4OKU2YZF...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Eyal edri
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> MANAGER
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> RHV/CNV DevOps
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>> <
https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED.
TRUSTED.
>>>>>>>>>>> <
https://redhat.com/trusted>
>>>>>>>>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018
>>>>>>>>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>>>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>>>>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>>>>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/XOP6ZCUIDUV...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>>>>>
>>>>> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com
>>>>> <
https://red.ht/sig>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>>>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>>>>
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>>>>> List Archives:
>>>>>
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/SR7YJIIZHM3...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> <div dir="ltr"
>>>>
class="gmail-m_-929359959023254178gmail-m_-3007985368740475924gmail-m_-3898735433743
>>>>
>>>