I just had the "aha" moment and i"m sorry. I think I'll take a nap.
In jenkins the local directory is mounted into the container in order to
get the code there. This includes the `.kitchen` dir which has all the
state information. So the 2nd run of `kitchen ...` will have the dir and
try to use the vagrant state information.
Disregard, it's one of those stupid problems you have when you run things
in parallel/isolation and dont question how isolated it actually is.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Marc Young <3vilpenguin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is where the ID is retrieved and stored:
https://github.com/myoung34/
vagrant-ovirt4/blob/master/lib/vagrant-ovirt4/action/create_vm.rb#L79
workflow is: create, wait til disks are OK, wait until vm status is
"down", create network interfaces[1], start vm[2], wait until up[3]
[1]
https://github.com/myoung34/vagrant-ovirt4/blob/
master/lib/vagrant-ovirt4/action/create_network_interfaces.rb#L53
[2]
https://github.com/myoung34/vagrant-ovirt4/blob/
master/lib/vagrant-ovirt4/action/start_vm.rb#L83
[3]
https://github.com/myoung34/vagrant-ovirt4/blob/
master/lib/vagrant-ovirt4/action/wait_till_up.rb#L43
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Juan Hernández <jhernand(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 03/07/2017 06:06 PM, Marc Young wrote:
> > Completely isolated docker containers. Jenkins basically runs two
> > separate calls to docker...
> >
> > [vagrant-1.9.1] $ docker run -t -d -u 997:994 -v
> /opt/gemcache:/opt/gemcache -w /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oun
> g34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ
> -v /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKV
> M5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:/var/lib/
> jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPE
> CFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:rw -v
> /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKV
> M5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:/var/
> lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ
> 5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:rw -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** --entrypoint cat myoung34/vagrant:1.9.1
> > [Pipeline] [vagrant-1.9.1] {
> >
> >
> >
> > [Pipeline] [vagrant-1.9.2] withDockerContainer [vagrant-1.9.2] $
> docker run -t -d -u 997:994 -v /opt/gemcache:/opt/gemcache -w
> /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKV
> M5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ -v
> /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKV
> M5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:/var/lib/
> jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ5BGPE
> CFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ:rw -v
> /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKV
> M5TQ5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:/var/
> lib/jenkins/workspace/oung34_vagrant-ovirt4_PR-79-7BRKVM5TQ
> 5BGPECFMXYIEOYZOICCET4GY37WXT4D65NSV4F5TADQ@tmp:rw -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e
> ******** -e ******** --entrypoint cat myoung34/vagrant:1.9.2
> >
> >
> > Each of those containers in turn runs:
> >
> >
> > +gem build *.gemspec
> > +/usr/bin/vagrant plugin install *.gem
> > +bundle install --path /opt/gemcache --without
> development plugins
> > +bundle exec kitchen destroy all
> > +rm -rf .kitchen
> > +sleep \$(shuf -i 0-10 -n 1) #i did this to see if maybe
> i could
> > stagger the creates
> > +export VAGRANT_VERSION=\$(echo ${vagrantVersion} | sed
> 's/\\.//g')
> > +bundle exec kitchen test ^[^singleton-]
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Juan Hernández <jhernand(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:jhernand@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 03/07/2017 05:42 PM, Marc Young wrote:
> > > I've been fighting this for roughly two days and I'm starting
to
> think
> > > that possibly it's not my code but an interaction with the server.
> > >
> > > I'm using test-kitchen[1] with the kitchen-vagrant[2] driver to
> spin up
> > > vagrant machines and run tests against them. I'm using Jenkins to
> run
> > > kitchen in containers in parallel.
> > >
> > > Basically Jenkins runs a docker container with ruby + vagrant
> 1.9.2 and
> > > runs kitchen test all at the same time as another container with
> ruby +
> > > vagrant 1.9.1.
> > >
> > > If I run these in parallel, on some occasions the server seems to
> > > respond with the wrong creation information. If you look at the
> logs
> > > here:
http://home.blindrage.us:8080/
> job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovirt4/view/change-requests/job/PR-79/41/console
> > <
http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovi
> rt4/view/change-requests/job/PR-79/41/console>
> > > <
http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovir
> t4/view/change-requests/job/PR-79/41/console
> > <
http://home.blindrage.us:8080/job/myoung34/job/vagrant-ovi
> rt4/view/change-requests/job/PR-79/41/console>>
> > >
> > >
> > > the container for vagrant 1.9.1 created a VM
> `vagrant-dynamic-1.9.1:
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.1] Bringing machine 'default' up with
> 'ovirt4' provider...
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.1] ==> default: Creating VM with the
> following settings...
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.1] ==> default: -- Name:
> dynamic-1.9.1
> > >
> > >
> > > And the container for vagrant 1.9.2 (nearly the same time)
> created a VM
> > > `vagrant-dynamic-1.9.2`:
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: Creating VM with the
> following settings...
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: -- Name:
> dynamic-1.9.2
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: -- Cluster: Default
> > >
> > >
> > > If you look at the ss:
> > >
> > > the container 1.9.1 will wait for dynamic-1.9.1 and try to
> contact it at
> > > 192.168.2.54
> > >
> > > the container 1.9.2 will wait for dynamic-1.9.2 and try to
> contact it at
> > > 192.168.2.55
> > >
> > > But if you look at the logs, the 1.9.1 container started trying
> to work
> > > with 192.168.2.55 by creating a new key then talking to it:
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.1] default: Key inserted!
> Disconnecting and reconnecting using new SSH key...
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.1] Waiting for SSH service on
> > 192.168.2.55:22 <
http://192.168.2.55:22>
<
http://192.168.2.55:22>,
> > retrying in 3 seconds
> > >
> > >
> > > Because 1.9.1 inserted a generated key into that box, the 1.9.2
> > > container which _should_ be talking to it cannot now:
> > >
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] ==> default: Rsyncing folder:
> /home/jenkins/.kitchen/cache/ => /tmp/omnibus/cache
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] SSH authentication failed! This is
> typically caused by the public/private
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] keypair for the SSH user not being
> properly set on the guest VM. Please
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] verify that the guest VM is setup with
> the proper public key, and that
> > > [vagrant-1.9.2] the private key path for Vagrant is
> setup properly as well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Via the ruby sdk I create the VM and store the ID it responded
> with.
> > > Then to get the IP:
> > >
>
> Can you share this ^ code that creates and stores the ID of the virtual
> machine?
>
> > > server = env[:vms_service].vm_service(env[:machine].id)
> > > nics_service = server.nics_service
> > > nics = nics_service.list
> > > ip_addr = nics.collect { |nic_attachment|
> > >
env[:connection].follow_link(nic_attachment).reported_devices.collect
> {
> > > |dev| dev.ips.collect { |ip| ip.address if ip.version ==
'v4'
> } }
> > > }.flatten.reject { |ip| ip.nil? }.first rescue nil
> > >
> >
> > Is this code running inside the same Ruby process for both virtual
> > machines? In multiple threads?
> >
> > > Given this code I can't think of any way that I would get the
> wrong IP
> > > unless somehow the server responded incorrectly, since the NIC's
> i've
> > > scanned and compiled across are tied directly to the server I
> created.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts? This only happpens randomly and it seems to happen
> if I
> > > bombard the server with a bunch of VM creations simultaneously
> > >
> > > [1]
https://github.com/test-kitchen/test-kitchen
> > <
https://github.com/test-kitchen/test-kitchen>
> > > [2]
https://github.com/test-kitchen/kitchen-vagrant
> > <
https://github.com/test-kitchen/kitchen-vagrant>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Devel mailing list
> > > Devel(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Devel@ovirt.org>
> > >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > <
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>