[QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.1 RC status - postponed
by Sandro Bonazzola
Hi,
We were supposed to start composing oVirt 3.5.1 RC today *2014-12-02 08:00 UTC* from 3.5 branch.
We have still blockers for oVirt 3.5.1 RC release so we need to postpone it untill they'll be fixed.
The new tentative date for 3.5.1 RC composition is set to *2014-12-09 08:00 UTC
The bug tracker [1] shows 2 open blocker:
Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary
1168689 infra ASSIGNED Upgrading from 3.4.4 to 3.5.1 snapshot the vdsm rpm throw an exception
1160846 sla NEW Can't add disk to VM without specifying disk profile when the storage domain has more than one disk profile
In order to stabilize the release a new branch ovirt-engine-3.5.1 will be created from the same git hash used for composing the RC.
Maintainers:
- Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot allow to create VMs before *2014-12-08 15:00 UTC*
- Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release before *2014-12-08 15:00 UTC*
- If any patch must block the RC release please raise the issue as soon as possible.
There are still 69 bugs [2] targeted to 3.5.1.
Excluding node and documentation bugs we still have 46 bugs [3] targeted to 3.5.1.
Maintainers / Assignee:
- Please add the bugs to the tracker if you think that 3.5.1 should not be released without them fixed.
- Please update the target to 3.5.2 or later for bugs that won't be in 3.5.1:
it will ease gathering the blocking bugs for next releases.
- Please fill release notes, the page has been created here [4]
Community:
- If you're testing oVirt 3.5 nightly snapshot, please add yourself to the test page [5]
[1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1155170
[2] http://goo.gl/7G0PDV
[3] http://goo.gl/6gUbVr
[4] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5.1_Release_Notes
[5] http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/oVirt_3.5.1_Testing
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
10 years
oVirt Node Weekly Meeting Minutes - December 2nd 2014
by Fabian Deutsch
Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-12-02-14.06.html
Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-12-02-14.06.txt
Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-12-02-14.06.log.html
=================================
#ovirt: oVirt Node Weekly Meeting
=================================
Meeting started by fabiand at 14:06:16 UTC. The full logs are available
at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2014/ovirt.2014-12-02-14.06.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Agenda (fabiand, 14:06:42)
* oVirt 3.5 (fabiand, 14:07:53)
* oVirt 3.5 (fabiand, 14:08:23)
* Other Items (fabiand, 14:09:56)
* oVirt 3.5 (fabiand, 14:11:26)
* Latest Node scratch build is the one from two weeks ago (fabiand,
14:13:51)
* LINK:
https://fedorapeople.org/~fabiand/node/3.5/ovirt-node-iso-3.5.0.ovirt35.2...
(fabiand, 14:14:37)
* Some stabilizing patches got merged (fabiand, 14:14:53)
* Most work focused on the hosted-engine feature (fabiand, 14:15:48)
* many HE related patches got reviewed and merged during the last few
days (fabiand, 14:18:36)
* Basic HE features seems to work fine (fabiand, 14:18:48)
* Joining an existing HA HE is not yet supported (fabiand, 14:19:03)
* Targetting 3.5.1 to include ovirt-node. ovirt-node-plugins-vdsm and
ovirt-node-plugin-he rpms (fabiand, 14:21:06)
* ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm is looking good (fabiand, 14:22:42)
* vdsm-plugin also needs an update to address an el7 issue (fabiand,
14:24:11)
* Other Items (fabiand, 14:24:49)
* Jenkins (fabiand, 14:26:03)
* tlitovsk working on jenkins automation (fabiand, 14:29:27)
* working on local builders, once working, pushing those changes to
upstream (fabiand, 14:29:46)
* Next-Gen Node (fabiand, 14:31:06)
* Start thinking about next-gen node and 3.6 (fabiand, 14:44:15)
* generic registration is a potential feature for 3.6 (fabiand,
14:44:26)
* Using puppet for configuration changes should get investigated
(fabiand, 14:44:37)
* Seperating the insatller from the TUI (packaging) is something for
3.6 (fabiand, 14:44:49)
* Possibly re-visit other cfg mgmt systems like ansible and chef
(fabiand, 14:51:22)
* systemd has good sides. (fabiand, 14:52:38)
* tlitovsk has the idea of baking a configuration into an ISO
(fabiand, 14:58:48)
* fabiand would liek to reuse existing tools for next-gen node
modifications (fabiand, 14:59:20)
* tlitovsk and fabiand to speak about where to do decision making
(fabiand, 15:00:29)
* fabiand would like to separate rootfs from delivery format (ISO)
(fabiand, 15:03:01)
Meeting ended at 15:04:21 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* fabiand (172)
* tlitovsk (16)
* rbarry (15)
* dougsland (13)
* ovirtbot (4)
* sbonazzo (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
10 years
How To Auto Set oVirt RESTApi Session？
by 王成俊
Dear Sir：
I am a new one in studing ovirt engine.Now,I have a Servlet in
org.ovirt.engine.ui.frontend.server.gwt package.
I want to call
*Frontend.getInstance().getLoginHandler().**onLoginSuccess(userName,
password, domain)* to set session for restapi in this servlet.
But when I visit this servlet,it occur to show me an error which
just like "*JBWEB000071: root cause java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.ovirt.engine.ui.uicompat.IFrontendActionAsyncCallback from [Module
"deployment.engine.ear.webadmin.war:main" from Service Module
Loader]*". I found that this error is occured by calling*
Frontend.getInstance()*.
Can you tell me how to resolve this problem or a new way to set
and resume restapi session in a servlet package of
org.ovirt.engine.ui.front.server.gwt like the RestApiSessionManager in
org.ovirt.engine.ui.webadmin.plugin.restapi package?
thanks!
Best Regards!
10 years
Frontend code - introducing GinUiBinder
by Vojtech Szocs
Hi guys,
Martin's GinUiBinder patch [1] just landed into master branch.
[1] http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/34954/
This patch allows the use of dependency injection for widgets
declared in GWT UiBinder templates.
Let's take a look at AbstractVmPopupWidget.ui.xml template:
<vm:SerialNumberPolicyWidget ui:field="serialNumberPolicyEditor"/>
Inside the "owner" widget, AbstractVmPopupWidget class:
@UiField(provided = true) // we need manual instantiation
public SerialNumberPolicyWidget serialNumberPolicyEditor;
We use "provided = true" in order to manually instantiate
SerialNumberPolicyWidget, because this widget accepts some
constructor parameters:
public SerialNumberPolicyWidget(
CommonApplicationTemplates applicationTemplates,
...
)
So in AbstractVmPopupWidget, we need to do following:
serialNumberPolicyEditor = new SerialNumberPolicyWidget(...)
The "provided = true" + "new SerialNumberPolicyWidget(...)"
is essentially a boilerplate that adds to overall complexity.
Now, let's revisit above example using GinUiBinder. First,
in AbstractVmPopupWidget class:
@UiField // no need for manual instantiation
public SerialNumberPolicyWidget serialNumberPolicyEditor;
Then, in SerialNumberPolicyWidget class:
@Inject // inject dependencies into this widget
public SerialNumberPolicyWidget(
CommonApplicationTemplates applicationTemplates,
...
)
And finally, we can remove following line:
// this is no longer needed, GinUiBinder handles it for us
serialNumberPolicyEditor = new SerialNumberPolicyWidget(...)
The complete example can be seen here:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/34954/4/frontend/webadmin/modules/gwt-common/...
I encourage every UI maintainer to revisit existing code with
regard to @UiField(provided = true) and refactor/improve it to
take advantage of @Inject in specific widget classes.
Let me (or Martin) know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Vojtech
10 years
Fwd: Got an error after buuilding VDSM on latest upstream commit
by ybronhei
forwarding to devels
anyone familiar with the issue already ? any ready patch?
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Got an error after buuilding VDSM on latest upstream commit
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 05:54:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Eli Mesika <emesika(a)redhat.com>
To: Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com>, Saggi Mizrahi
<smizrahi(a)redhat.com>, ybronhei <ybronhei(a)redhat.com>, Dima Kuznetsov
<dkuznets(a)redhat.com>
CC: Oved Ourfali <oourfali(a)redhat.com>, Barak Azulay <bazulay(a)redhat.com>
vdsm: Running restore_nets
libvirt: Network Driver error : Network not found: no network with
matching name 'vdsm-ovirtmgmt'
^X^CTraceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vdsm-restore-net-config", line 139, in <module>
restore()
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vdsm-restore-net-config", line 125, in restore
unified_restoration()
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vdsm-restore-net-config", line 70, in
unified_restoration
setupNetworks(nets, bonds, connectivityCheck=False, _inRollback=True)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/api.py", line 715, in setupNetworks
implicitBonding=True, _netinfo=_netinfo, **d)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/api.py", line 221, in wrapped
ret = func(**attrs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/api.py", line 310, in addNetwork
netEnt.configure(**options)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/models.py", line 196, in configure
self.configurator.configureBridge(self, **opts)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/configurators/ifcfg.py", line 92, in
configureBridge
ifup(bridge.name, bridge.ipConfig.async)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/configurators/ifcfg.py", line 820, in ifup
rc, out, err = _ifup(iface)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/network/configurators/ifcfg.py", line 804, in _ifup
rc, out, err = utils.execCmd([constants.EXT_IFUP, netIf], raw=False)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/utils.py", line 622, in
execCmd
(out, err) = p.communicate(data)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/subprocess.py", line 732, in communicate
stdout, stderr = self._communicate(input, endtime)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/subprocess.py", line 1316, in _communicate
stdout, stderr = self._communicate_with_poll(input, endtime)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/subprocess.py", line 1388, in
_communicate_with_poll
ready = poller.poll(self._remaining_time(endtime))
Any ideas ???
Thanks
Eli Mesika
--
Yaniv Bronhaim.
10 years
[Localization Question] Cluster Policy "power_saving"
by Yuko Katabami
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030502000209020304030303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi oVirt developers,
I am currently translating documentation and I would like to ask you one
question on power_saving Cluster Policy,
in order to understand the mechanism properly so that I can translate
accurately.
(Please excuse me -- this might be a basic concept, but it is a bit
confusing for me)
My understanding is that when this is selected, the Manager tries to
shut down a host which has the lowest usage within the cluster (so that
it can save the power).
In order to shut it down, VMs running on that host need to be migrated
to other host.
Which host will be the destination?
Would it be the host with the second lowest usage rate?
Many thanks in advance,
Yuko Katabami
--------------030502000209020304030303
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi oVirt developers,<br>
<br>
I am currently translating documentation and I would like to ask you
one question on power_saving Cluster Policy,<br>
in order to understand the mechanism properly so that I can
translate accurately.<br>
(Please excuse me -- this might be a basic concept, but it is a bit
confusing for me)<br>
<br>
My understanding is that when this is selected, the Manager tries to
shut down a host which has the lowest usage within the cluster (so
that it can save the power). <br>
In order to shut it down, VMs running on that host need to be
migrated to other host.<br>
Which host will be the destination?<br>
Would it be the host with the second lowest usage rate?<br>
<br>
Many thanks in advance,<br>
<br>
Yuko Katabami<br>
<div class="moz-signature"><font color="#000000" face="arial,
sans-serif" size="2"><br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--------------030502000209020304030303--
10 years
