Error: Adding new Host to ovirt-engine
by Ahmad Khiet
Hi,
Can't add new host to ovirt engine, because the following error:
2019-06-12 12:23:09,664 p=4134 u=engine | TASK [ovirt-host-deploy-facts :
Set facts] *************************************
2019-06-12 12:23:09,684 p=4134 u=engine | ok: [10.35.1.17] => {
"ansible_facts": {
"ansible_python_interpreter": "/usr/bin/python2",
"host_deploy_vdsm_version": "4.40.0"
},
"changed": false
}
2019-06-12 12:23:09,697 p=4134 u=engine | TASK [ovirt-provider-ovn-driver
: Install ovs] *********************************
2019-06-12 12:23:09,726 p=4134 u=engine | fatal: [10.35.1.17]: FAILED! =>
{}
MSG:
The conditional check 'cluster_switch == "ovs" or (ovn_central is defined
and ovn_central | ipaddr and ovn_engine_cluster_version is
version_compare('4.2', '>='))' failed. The error was: The ipaddr filter
requires python's netaddr be installed on the ansible controller
The error appears to be in
'/home/engine/apps/engine/share/ovirt-engine/playbooks/roles/ovirt-provider-ovn-driver/tasks/configure.yml':
line 3, column 5, but may
be elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.
The offending line appears to be:
- block:
- name: Install ovs
^ here
2019-06-12 12:23:09,728 p=4134 u=engine | PLAY RECAP
*********************************************************************
2019-06-12 12:23:09,728 p=4134 u=engine | 10.35.1.17 :
ok=3 changed=0 unreachable=0 failed=1 skipped=0 rescued=0
ignored=0
whats missing!?
Thanks
--
Ahmad Khiet
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
akhiet(a)redhat.com
M: +972-54-6225629
<https://red.ht/sig>
1 year, 8 months
[ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt Master (vdsm) ] [ 07-06-2019 ] [ 003_00_metrics_bootstrap.metrics_and_log_collector ]
by Dafna Ron
Hi,
We have a failure in vdsm project on master.
The issue is change:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/100576/ - Remove SOS VDSM plugin
which is failing on metrics as metrics is calling sos-logcollector.
The patch cannot be changed as until centos 7.7 when sos-3.7-3, which
contains vdsm plugin will come out.
so until then, we are left with no sos plugin, which is causing the metrics
test to fail.
Shirly, can you please take a look and see if we can change the test to not
call sos-logcollector?
Please note, that we are expecting 4.3 to fail on same issue very soon.
failed job can be found here:
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/14452/
ERROR from test:
lago.ssh: DEBUG: Command 8626fe70 on lago-basic-suite-master-engine errors:
ERROR: Failed to get a sosreport from:
lago-basic-suite-master-host-1; Could not parse sosreport output
ERROR: Failed to get a sosreport from: lago-basic-suite-master-host-0;
Could not parse sosreport output
lago.utils: DEBUG: Error while running thread Thread-3
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/lago/utils.py", line 58, in
_ret_via_queue
queue.put({'return': func()})
File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/basic-suite-master/test-scenarios/003_00_metrics_bootstrap.py",
line 97, in run_log_collector
'log collector failed. Exit code is %s' % result.code
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 462, in assertTrue
raise self.failureException(msg)
AssertionError: log collector failed. Exit code is 1
--------------------- >> end captured logging << ----------
Thanks,
Dafna
1 year, 8 months
Host installation error
by Charles Thao
Hi,
I have a 4.3 engine on Fedora 28 laptop and a 4.3 node running on a
virt-manager. I installed ovirt-node using the latest stable ISO image.
When I tried to connect the host to my engine, this error appeared:
*Host node installation failed. Failed to execute Ansible host-deploy role.*
I've also attached an example log file. Has anyone seen anything similar to
this?
Regards,
Charles T
1 year, 8 months
Issues when running VDSM tests
by Pavel Bar
Hi Milan,
Can you please check the following VDSM tests's failures:
*Environment:*
1) VDSM master branch;
2) Fedora 29 OS
*Execution (from root folder):*
*make check*
*Issues:*
1) An authentication pop-up window jumps when executing:
*Warning no default label for
/tmp/tmpRCRsYm/libvirtd.............................................................SS.........................................S.SS..S................S.S..................................................................SSS..SSSSS..SSSSSSS.................SSS..SSS...S..............SSSS..SS.....S.........SSSSS.S.S.........................SSSSS....SSSSSS......................................S..SSSSSSSSS.SS.........................................................................................................................................................................----------------------------------------------------------------------*
2) 2 error outputs received, the 2nd one multiple times:
*ERROR: InvocationError for command
'/home/pbar/Dev/git/vdsm/pbar/master/tests/profile network-py27 ./py-watch
600 pytest --durations=5 --cov=vdsm.network
--cov-report=html:htmlcov-network-py27 --cov-fail-under=42
network/integration network/unit' (exited with code 1)*
*E HookError: Hook Error: ('Traceback (most recent call
last):\n File "/usr/libexec/vdsm/hooks/before_nic_hotplug/50_vmfex", line
35, in <module>\n from vdsm import libvirtconnection\nImportError:
cannot import name libvirtconnection\n',)../lib/vdsm/common/hooks.py:124:
HookError*
Thank you in advance!
Pavel
1 year, 8 months
Building python 2 and python 3 packages for Fedora
by Nir Soffer
In several projects (e.g. vdsm, imageio, sanlock), we have the issue of
building python 3 packages
for Fedora.
The current build process create packages with the same name for both
python 2 and python 3.
When the packages are published to oVirt repository, the python 3 packages
overwrite the python 2
packages.
We can rename the packages properly (e.g. python2-xxx, python3-xxx) but
this requires lot of work
and typically breaks later in the code publishing the packages.
There is also the difficulty of building both python 2 and python 3
packages from same spec in the same
build. This should be possible but not easy.
Since python 2 is about to die soon, should we simplify by building python
2 *or* python 3, depending
on version?
Fedora 29: python 2.7
Fedora 30: python 3.7
CentOS 7: python 2.7
CentOS 8: python 3.6
This make it possible to test and develop on python 2.7 until vdsm is fully
functional on python 3,
and it save resources in the CI.
Thoughts?
Nir
1 year, 8 months
Failed to add fedora-29 host to oVirt
by Eyal Shenitzky
Hi,
I am trying to add fedora-29 host to me oVirt setup and failed due to the
following error (from the engine log):
2019-06-11 11:24:59,123+03 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
(VdsDeploy) [73c7d83d] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS_ERROR(511), An
error has occurred during installation of Host fedora_29: DNF Problem:
conflicting requests - package
ovirt-host-4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610132028.git410e453.fc29.x86_64 requires
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup, but none of the providers can be installed -
package ovirt-host-4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610131544.git410e453.fc29.s390x
does not have a compatible architecture - nothing provides
ovirt-host-dependencies = 4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610131544.git410e453.fc29
needed by ovirt-host-4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610131544.git410e453.fc29.s390x
- nothing provides ovirt-hosted-engine-ha >= 2.4 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190606085519.gitf8402ad.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides vdsm-python >= 4.30 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190606085519.gitf8402ad.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides ovirt-hosted-engine-ha >= 2.4 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190610121403.gitb2ee866.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides glusterfs-cli >= 5.6 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190610121403.gitb2ee866.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides vdsm-python >= 4.40.0 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190610121403.gitb2ee866.fc29.noarch.
2019-06-11 11:24:59,133+03 ERROR
[org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector]
(VdsDeploy) [73c7d83d] EVENT_ID: VDS_INSTALL_IN_PROGRESS_ERROR(511), An
error has occurred during installation of Host fedora_29: Failed to execute
stage 'Package installation': Problem: conflicting requests - package
ovirt-host-4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610132028.git410e453.fc29.x86_64 requires
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup, but none of the providers can be installed -
package ovirt-host-4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610131544.git410e453.fc29.s390x
does not have a compatible architecture - nothing provides
ovirt-host-dependencies = 4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610131544.git410e453.fc29
needed by ovirt-host-4.4.0-0.0.master.20190610131544.git410e453.fc29.s390x
- nothing provides ovirt-hosted-engine-ha >= 2.4 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190606085519.gitf8402ad.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides vdsm-python >= 4.30 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190606085519.gitf8402ad.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides ovirt-hosted-engine-ha >= 2.4 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190610121403.gitb2ee866.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides glusterfs-cli >= 5.6 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190610121403.gitb2ee866.fc29.noarch
- nothing provides vdsm-python >= 4.40.0 needed by
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.4.0-0.0.master.20190610121403.gitb2ee866.fc29.noarch.
When I try to install VDSM manually before adding the host the setup it
installed the following version: vdsm-4.18.999-447.git0bb7717.fc28.x86_64
Any suggestions?
--
Regards,
Eyal Shenitzky
1 year, 8 months
GetDeviceList and direct LUNs
by Fedor Gavrilov
Hi,
I want to implement a feature that would allow one to manually refresh sizes for direct LUNs and I am not sure if existing code in the engine codebase is gonna help with that.
RefreshLunsSizeCommand seems to be doing what is needed, but it operates on a premise that LUNs to refresh belong to a storage domain which makes most of its code irrelevant for purposes of direct LUNs.
It seems that workhorse is GetDeviceList command, but from the code I can't quite understand if it's supposed to be used with external iSCSI targets. Especially 'VDS' part here confuses me since I am not sure what VDS we're talking about in the first place when using direct LUN.
If GetDeviceList is of no use, is there anything else VDSM provides?
Thanks,
Fedor Gavrilov
1 year, 9 months
