Error: Adding new Host to ovirt-engine
by Ahmad Khiet
Hi,
Can't add new host to ovirt engine, because the following error:
2019-06-12 12:23:09,664 p=4134 u=engine | TASK [ovirt-host-deploy-facts :
Set facts] *************************************
2019-06-12 12:23:09,684 p=4134 u=engine | ok: [10.35.1.17] => {
"ansible_facts": {
"ansible_python_interpreter": "/usr/bin/python2",
"host_deploy_vdsm_version": "4.40.0"
},
"changed": false
}
2019-06-12 12:23:09,697 p=4134 u=engine | TASK [ovirt-provider-ovn-driver
: Install ovs] *********************************
2019-06-12 12:23:09,726 p=4134 u=engine | fatal: [10.35.1.17]: FAILED! =>
{}
MSG:
The conditional check 'cluster_switch == "ovs" or (ovn_central is defined
and ovn_central | ipaddr and ovn_engine_cluster_version is
version_compare('4.2', '>='))' failed. The error was: The ipaddr filter
requires python's netaddr be installed on the ansible controller
The error appears to be in
'/home/engine/apps/engine/share/ovirt-engine/playbooks/roles/ovirt-provider-ovn-driver/tasks/configure.yml':
line 3, column 5, but may
be elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.
The offending line appears to be:
- block:
- name: Install ovs
^ here
2019-06-12 12:23:09,728 p=4134 u=engine | PLAY RECAP
*********************************************************************
2019-06-12 12:23:09,728 p=4134 u=engine | 10.35.1.17 :
ok=3 changed=0 unreachable=0 failed=1 skipped=0 rescued=0
ignored=0
whats missing!?
Thanks
--
Ahmad Khiet
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
akhiet(a)redhat.com
M: +972-54-6225629
<https://red.ht/sig>
1 year, 4 months
Merge rights changes in the oVirt Engine project
by Tal Nisan
Hi everyone,
As you probably know we are now in a mode in which we develop our next
zstream version on the master branch as opposed to how we worked before
where the master version was dedicated for the next major version. This
makes the rapid changes in master to be delivered to customers in a much
higher cadence thus affecting stability.
Due to that we think it's best that from now on merges in the master branch
will be done only by stable branch maintainers after inspecting those
closely.
What you need to do in order to get your patch merged:
- Have it pass Jenkins
- Have it get code review +2
- Have it mark verified +1
- It's always encourage to have it tested by OST, for bigger changes it's a
must
Once you have all those covered, please add me as a reviewer and I'll
examine it and merge if everything seems right, if I haven't done it in a
timely manner feel free to ping me.
3 years, 8 months
Error Java SDK Issue??
by Geschwentner, Patrick
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen!
I am currently working with the java-sdk and I encountered a problem.
If I would like to retrieve the disk details, I get the following error:
Disk currDisk = ovirtConnection.followLink(diskAttachment.disk());
The Error is occurring in this line:
[cid:image001.png@01D44537.AF127FD0]
The getResponst looks quiet ok. (I inspected: [cid:image002.png@01D44537.AF127FD0] and it looks ok).
Error:
wrong number of arguments
The code is quiet similar to what you published on github (https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk-java/blob/master/sdk/src/test/j... ).
Can you confirm the defect?
Best regards
Patrick
3 years, 8 months
CentOS Stream support
by Michal Skrivanek
Hi all,
we would like to ask about interest in community about oVirt moving to CentOS Stream.
There were some requests before but it’s hard to see how many people would really like to see that.
With CentOS releases lagging behind RHEL for months it’s interesting to consider moving to CentOS Stream as it is much more up to date and allows us to fix bugs faster, with less workarounds and overhead for maintaining old code. E.g. our current integration tests do not really pass on CentOS 8.1 and we can’t really do much about that other than wait for more up to date packages. It would also bring us closer to make oVirt run smoothly on RHEL as that is also much closer to Stream than it is to outdated CentOS.
So..would you like us to support CentOS Stream?
We don’t really have capacity to run 3 different platforms, would you still want oVirt to support CentOS Stream if it means “less support” for regular CentOS?
There are some concerns about Stream being a bit less stable, do you share those concerns?
Thank you for your comments,
michal
3 years, 10 months
planned Jenkins restart
by Evgheni Dereveanchin
Hi everyone,
I'll be performing a planned Jenkins restart within the next hour.
No new CI jobs will be scheduled during this maintenance period.
I will inform you once it is back online.
--
Regards,
Evgheni Dereveanchin
4 years
[OST] Error updating ost images - packages with conflicts/broken deps
by Nir Soffer
Trying dnf update on ost system fails now with:
$ sudo dnf update
...
Error:
Problem 1: package
ost-images-el8-host-deps-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64 requires
ost-images-el8-upgrade = 1-202011270303, but none of the providers can
be installed
- cannot install both ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011290315.x86_64
and ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011270303.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011270303.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ost-images-el8-host-deps-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64
Problem 2: package
ost-images-el8-engine-deps-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64 requires
ost-images-el8-upgrade = 1-202011270303, but none of the providers can
be installed
- cannot install both ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011290315.x86_64
and ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011270303.x86_64
- package ost-images-el8-engine-installed-1-202011290315.x86_64
requires ost-images-el8-upgrade = 1-202011290315, but none of the
providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ost-images-el8-engine-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ost-images-el8-engine-deps-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64
Problem 3: problem with installed package
ost-images-el8-host-deps-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64
- package ost-images-el8-host-deps-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64
requires ost-images-el8-upgrade = 1-202011270303, but none of the
providers can be installed
- cannot install both ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011290315.x86_64
and ost-images-el8-upgrade-1-202011270303.x86_64
- package ost-images-el8-host-installed-1-202011290315.x86_64
requires ost-images-el8-upgrade = 1-202011290315, but none of the
providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ost-images-el8-host-installed-1-202011270303.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or
'--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
$ sudo dnf update --nobest
works, but complains about:
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
ost-images-el8-upgrade x86_64
1-202011290315 ost-images 15 M
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
ost-images-el8-engine-installed x86_64
1-202011290315 ost-images 1.0 G
ost-images-el8-host-installed x86_64
1-202011290315 ost-images 518 M
I have not tried to run ost with the updated packages yet.
Nir
4 years
