Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
On 05/28/2012 02:35 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it
explicitly, so I'll just go with that.
If someone feels strongly against, please reply.
I still like 'label' better.
it doesn't have the context of a unique id, and is much more correct to
what this is - allows the user to label a command (or a set of commands).
but also doesn't imply it's unique in any way (i.e., it's like a
"tag",
just a better, non overloaded term for it).
Ori
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Pasternak"<mpastern(a)redhat.com>
To: "Moti Asayag"<masayag(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Ori Liel"<oliel(a)redhat.com>, engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:26:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
On 05/15/2012 05:31 PM, Moti Asayag wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 02:19 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
>>> No decision about the name of the parameter yet, and this is blocking me.
>>>
>>> Names that were suggested so far:
>>>
>>> * flow-id
+1