----- Original Message -----
> On 12/04/2012 03:53 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Allon Mureinik" <amureini(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 1:13:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Revisiting Java7
>>>
>>> On 12/04/2012 11:20 AM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Allon Mureinik" <amureini(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 1:40:10 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Revisiting Java7
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/03/2012 04:03 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Earlier today, Java6 compatibility was broken
>>>>>> (
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9430/).
>>>>>> This was picked up on pretty quickly, and easily fixed
>>>>>> (
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9666/).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I think this is a good opportunity to revisit our
>>>>>> policy
>>>>>> towards Java 7.
>>>>>> Currently, we have an "odd" setup, where we recommend
running a
>>>>>> compiling /with/ Java 7 [1] but comply to Java 6 language level
>>>>>> [2] and JDK [3].
>>>>>> Inevitably, mistakes like the that happened today will happen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know we're holding back due to GWT issues, but looking
>>>>>> forward
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> oVirt 4.0, is Java 7 on our roadmap?
>>>>> what was the GWT issue?
>>>> GWT 2.3 that we use doesn't support java 7 syntax.
>>>> The latest version, 2.5, doesn't either.
>>>> I'm not sure, however, this is a good reason to enforce the java
>>>> 6
>>>> limitation on the entire project (including backed, rest, etc.)
>>> i agree. you can limit it to the parts used by GWT for now.
>> The major advantage to move to java7 is the try-with-resources
>> statement.
>>
>> If we can do this for 3.2 it will be great. From what I understand
>> from Allon, the only noisy change is to move the common and compat
>> out of the backend directory into its own top-level directory, so
>> we can apply a different maven policy on these two easily.
>>
>> This way the common/compat and frontend will be built using 1.6 and
>> backend will be built using 1.7.
> and searchbackend.
> asaf, is there no easier way to enable java 7 compilation/enforcement
> except for these 3?
In the long run consider having a project layer such as :
Frontend / Backend / Shared [common/compat/searchbackend] , this will allow us to use
plugins inheritance cleanly [regarding versions],
Of course inheritance is nicer but it requires a lot of movements (maybe in v4?)
For now its easy - we can just use the maven-compiler to define source/target of [v1.7]
for the root project, while defining explicitly different versions per frontend/shared
module [v1.6]
Checkstyles should be upgraded as well.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel