further more, given the terminology of today
it's not sure if "cluster" means gluster cluster
or migration domain.
also look at my example for "host"
a "host" can be everything:
a) the machine engine runs on
b) a machine in a "cluster", running vms
c) a machine in a "cluster", as storage backend
d) some network equipment (may be virtualized)
in short: don't use any term which has to broad usage
(like "host" or "cluster"):
use: "compute node" for machines running vms
use: "migration domain" (or similar narrowed down specifc term)
for a bunch of hosts between which a vm can be migrated.
Just my opinion of course.
PS: It's no argument at all to say:
"but we did this always this way, we can't change it"
I know this can introduce a lot of work, but nameing
schemes can be converted over time or via scripts/automatism.
Am 27.05.2014 13:15, schrieb Gilad Chaplik:
Think of the time spent on that, let's take a conversation as an
example:
oVirt guy: 'create a cluster'
oVirt newcomer: 'what is a cluster?'
oVirt guy: 'cluster is a migration domain'
Takes 5 seconds right?
Now multiply that by every guy that had ever used/worked/heard/already forgot/ (newcomer)
about oVirt.
let the scoring begin: I'm -1 on Cluster.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen