Re: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible?
by Kalil de A. Carvalho
Dear Amador.
No, unfortunately not.
This was just a friend question, because he need VM with 10GB NIC's.
Today he is using Xenserver, this solution does not attend his expedition
and he is research another solution.
I told him about oVirt/KVM but this is a prerequisite to use.
I will plan with him to try make a project to test a take the resolts.
Best regards.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Amador Segundo <asegundo(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Virtio devices does not support speed, so we fake their speeds showing
> "1000mbps" in Admin. Portal. If your boxes have 10gbps devices then your
> vms are already taking advantage of that. Did you test it? Could you share
> some results?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kalil de A. Carvalho [kalilac(a)gmail.com]
> Received: Thursday, 18 Dec 2014, 22:59
> To: users(a)ovirt.org
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible?
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> Today a follow work ask me if is possible to use vNIC or vbridge in a VM
> managed by ovirt.
>
> What he wants is to have a virtual 10gb network to some machines.
>
> All hosts NIC's are 10gb.
>
> Is this possible?
>
> If yes how can I do it?
>
> Best regards.
>
--
Atenciosamente,
Kalil de A. Carvalho
9 years, 11 months
all hosts non-operational
by Brent Hartzell
------=_NextPart_000_2B93_01D01D96.3EAE13C0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
After testing replacing a failed Gluster brick (shared ovirt/gluster) ALL
hosts in the cluster go non-responsive, storage drops off etc. Now, gluster
peer status fails, can't set any volume options, the volume randomly drops
out of oVirt (was created from oVirt), log in oVirt dashboard shows the
entry that the volume was deleted (but is there). Any gluster commands just
hang. The combination of Ovirt & Gluster seems stable until there's a
problem, then literally everything just grinds to a halt. All VM's go down,
datacenter & hosts go non-responsive and the whole thing is broke.. Any
ideas on what we should be looking for?
------=_NextPart_000_2B93_01D01D96.3EAE13C0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META =
HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 =
(filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US =
link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72"><div class=3DWordSection1><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Hello,<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>After =
testing replacing a failed Gluster brick (shared ovirt/gluster) ALL =
hosts in the cluster go non-responsive, storage drops off etc. Now, =
gluster peer status fails, can’t set any volume options, the =
volume randomly drops out of oVirt (was created from oVirt), log in =
oVirt dashboard shows the entry that the volume was deleted (but is =
there). Any gluster commands just hang. The combination of Ovirt & =
Gluster seems stable until there’s a problem, then literally =
everything just grinds to a halt. All VM’s go down, datacenter =
& hosts go non-responsive and the whole thing is broke.. Any ideas =
on what we should be looking for?<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_2B93_01D01D96.3EAE13C0--
9 years, 11 months
vm has paused due to unknown storage error
by Punit Dambiwal
Hi,
Suddenly all of my VM on one host paused with the following error :-
vm has paused due to unknown storage error
I am using glusterfs storage with distributed replicate replica=2....my
storage and compute both running on the same node...
engine logs :- http://ur1.ca/j31iu
Host logs :- http://ur1.ca/j31kk (I grep it for one Failed VM)
Thanks,
Punit
9 years, 11 months
Setup, run and access a VNC session built from script
by Nicolas Ecarnot
Hi,
Some months ago, I think I read something like that here, but I can not
find it...
We have several oVirt setups, and we can not change that.
We have several VMs on each of them, and sometimes, we have to access
their oVirt VNC console, but it is painful to know on which oVirt they
are running. At present, I either have to remember on which one it lies,
or to web-connect on every oVirt web GUI and crawl.
I thought I would be possible to have a DNS cname made like this :
c-myServerName, pointing to something leading to the VNC oVirt console
of the myServerName VM.
That ( <- ? ) would lead to asking oVirt to create a VNC session for the
correct VM, create the passwd, then run a noVNC session with the correct
credentials.
I'm used to play with simple oVirt shell commands, but I guess that many
things will happen in a HTML and WWW context, so I've started to play
with REST.
Does anybody knows if someone took the time to do similar things, or if
someone remembers having seen such a workflow?
Regards
--
Nicolas Ecarnot
9 years, 11 months
Re: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? (Darrell Budic)
by Nikolai Sednev
------=_Part_235182_797090940.1419163706720
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168478
SR-IOV target release 3.6 and you'll need appropriate NIC on your Host, supporting this functionality http://wiki.ovirt.org/Feature/SR-IOV
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Nikolai
____________________
Nikolai Sednev
Senior Quality Engineer at Compute team
Red Hat Israel
34 Jerusalem Road,
Ra'anana, Israel 43501
Tel: +972 9 7692043
Mobile: +972 52 7342734
Email: nsednev(a)redhat.com
IRC: nsednev
----- Original Message -----
From: users-request(a)ovirt.org
To: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 8:22:17 PM
Subject: Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135
Send Users mailing list submissions to
users(a)ovirt.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
users-request(a)ovirt.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
users-owner(a)ovirt.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: console viewer for ovrit engine (Yue, Cong)
2. Re: Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? (Darrell Budic)
3. Re: VM failover with ovirt3.5 (Yue, Cong)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:03:11 -0800
From: "Yue, Cong" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com>
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "users(a)ovirt.org" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
Message-ID:
<ED08B56256B38842A463A2A0804C5AC0326AEEF291(a)svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
So. It means the web-proxy should be installed into the engine inside the virt nodes where host the VM.
The ovirt engine is with centos 6.6.
I will have a try for this later.
Thanks,
Cong
-----Original Message-----
From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:31 AM
To: Yue, Cong
Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com>
> To: "Simone Tiraboschi" <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:39:39 PM
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
>
> Sorry. It is centos 7 for host.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yue, Cong
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:38 AM
> To: 'Simone Tiraboschi'
> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users(a)ovirt.org
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> Yes, I am using centos for host. What engine host in your definition?
> Is the host PC where engine VM is running on the top?
The physical host or VM witch runs the engine.
> I am doing the walkthrough as
> http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5
> /
> http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/11/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5
> -part-two/
>
> I am glad to test your new 3.5.1 in my environment.
>
> Thanks,
> Cong
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:02 AM
> To: Yue, Cong
> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users(a)ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com>
> > To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
> > Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:45:09 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
> >
> >
> >
> > I checked but also it saids there is no such package. It works now
> > with my native client.
> >
> > Some strange..
>
> The oVirt websocket proxy is part of the engine and it's by default
> installed on the engine host when you install the engine; engine-setup
> asks if you want to configure it or not.
> Than, if you really need for your network design, you can also install
> and configure the websocket proxy on a different host.
> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/WebSocketProxy_on_a_separate_host
> but this is already a special case.
>
> I read in this thread that you are using centos7 (also for the engine host?).
> We didn't release oVirt 3.5.0 for el7 but we'll do since 3.5.1 which
> is targeted just after Christmas vacation (you are welcome to help us
> testing it on centos7!) so now you still cannot find
> ovirt-websocket-proxy rpm for
> el7 on the stable branch.
> If you really need to install it right now on el7 you can try from
> nightly snapshot.
>
>
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cong
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Gianluca Cecchi [mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:07 PM
> > To: Yue, Cong
> > Cc: Donny Davis; awels(a)redhat.com; users(a)ovirt.org
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Yue, Cong <
> > Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, but it saids there is no ovirt-websocket-proxy packges.
> > I am using the repository of
> > http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release35.rpm
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cong
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The package, at least in 3.5 is
> > ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy
> >
> >
> > Gianluca
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> > reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you
> > are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of
> > this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the
> > sender's e-mail System Administrator.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the
> intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message
> is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
>
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:08:03 -0600
From: Darrell Budic <budic(a)onholyground.com>
To: "Kalil de A. Carvalho" <kalilac(a)gmail.com>
Cc: Amador Segundo <asegundo(a)redhat.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is
possible?
Message-ID: <B6ECAED5-7CE3-44D2-A4E8-90EF46B3203D(a)onholyground.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I tried a quick iperf test a while back and got 3-4Gb/sec between a pair of VMs on separate hosts with a 10G infrastructure, no real tuning and no SRIOV. That met my needs so I didn?t try anything further. If you were aiming for 10G for all, you?d want to work on SRIOV I imagine, but they get pretty good performance even without it.
> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:49 AM, Kalil de A. Carvalho <kalilac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Amador.
>
> No, unfortunately not.
>
> This was just a friend question, because he need VM with 10GB NIC's.
>
> Today he is using Xenserver, this solution does not attend his expedition and he is research another solution.
>
> I told him about oVirt/KVM but this is a prerequisite to use.
>
> I will plan with him to try make a project to test a take the resolts.
>
> Best regards.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Amador Segundo <asegundo(a)redhat.com <mailto:asegundo@redhat.com>> wrote:
> Virtio devices does not support speed, so we fake their speeds showing "1000mbps" in Admin. Portal. If your boxes have 10gbps devices then your vms are already taking advantage of that. Did you test it? Could you share some results?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kalil de A. Carvalho [kalilac(a)gmail.com <mailto:kalilac@gmail.com>]
> Received: Thursday, 18 Dec 2014, 22:59
> To: users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible?
>
>
> Hello all.
>
> Today a follow work ask me if is possible to use vNIC or vbridge in a VM managed by ovirt.
>
> What he wants is to have a virtual 10gb network to some machines.
>
> All hosts NIC's are 10gb.
>
> Is this possible?
>
> If yes how can I do it?
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Atenciosamente,
> Kalil de A. Carvalho
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141219/e2a27490/atta...>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:22:10 -0800
From: "Yue, Cong" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com>
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "users(a)ovirt.org" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5
Message-ID:
<ED08B56256B38842A463A2A0804C5AC0326AEEF2F1(a)svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks for the information. This is the log for my three ovirt nodes.
>From the output of hosted-engine --vm-status, it shows the engine state for my 2nd and 3rd ovirt node is DOWN.
Is this the reason why VM failover not work in my environment? How can I make also engine works for my 2nd and 3rd ovit nodes?
--
--== Host 1 status ==--
Status up-to-date : True
Hostname : 10.0.0.94
Host ID : 1
Engine status : {"health": "good", "vm": "up",
"detail": "up"}
Score : 2400
Local maintenance : False
Host timestamp : 150475
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=150475 (Fri Dec 19 13:12:18 2014)
host-id=1
score=2400
maintenance=False
state=EngineUp
--== Host 2 status ==--
Status up-to-date : True
Hostname : 10.0.0.93
Host ID : 2
Engine status : {"reason": "vm not running on
this host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown"}
Score : 2400
Local maintenance : False
Host timestamp : 1572
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=1572 (Fri Dec 19 10:12:18 2014)
host-id=2
score=2400
maintenance=False
state=EngineDown
--== Host 3 status ==--
Status up-to-date : False
Hostname : 10.0.0.92
Host ID : 3
Engine status : unknown stale-data
Score : 2400
Local maintenance : False
Host timestamp : 987
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=987 (Fri Dec 19 10:09:58 2014)
host-id=3
score=2400
maintenance=False
state=EngineDown
--
And the /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/agent.log for three ovirt nodes are as follows:
--
10.0.0.94(hosted-engine-1)
---
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:04,342::states::394::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)
Engine vm running on localhost
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,657::state_machine::160::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Global metadata: {'maintenance': False}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Host 10.0.0.93 (id 2): {'extra':
'metadata_parse_version=1\nmetadata_feature_version=1\ntimestamp=1448
(Fri Dec 19 10:10:14
2014)\nhost-id=2\nscore=2400\nmaintenance=False\nstate=EngineDown\n',
'hostname': '10.0.0.93', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 2, 'engine-status':
{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'bad', 'vm':
'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': False,
'host-ts': 1448}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Host 10.0.0.92 (id 3): {'extra':
'metadata_parse_version=1\nmetadata_feature_version=1\ntimestamp=987
(Fri Dec 19 10:09:58
2014)\nhost-id=3\nscore=2400\nmaintenance=False\nstate=EngineDown\n',
'hostname': '10.0.0.92', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 3, 'engine-status':
{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'bad', 'vm':
'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': False,
'host-ts': 987}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,658::state_machine::168::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
Local (id 1): {'engine-health': {'health': 'good', 'vm': 'up',
'detail': 'up'}, 'bridge': True, 'mem-free': 1079.0, 'maintenance':
False, 'cpu-load': 0.0269, 'gateway': True}
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:45,784::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:45,785::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:06,109::states::394::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)
Engine vm running on localhost
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)
----
10.0.0.93 (hosted-engine-2)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:28,651::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:28,652::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19
10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)
10.0.0.92(hosted-engine-3)
same as 10.0.0.93
--
-----Original Message-----
From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:28 AM
To: Yue, Cong
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com>
> To: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:14:33 AM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> In my environment, I have 3 ovirt nodes as one cluster. And on top of
> host-1, there is one vm to host ovirt engine.
>
> Also I have one external storage for the cluster to use as data domain
> of engine and data.
>
> I confirmed live migration works well in my environment.
>
> But it seems very buggy for VM failover if I try to force to shut down
> one ovirt node. Sometimes the VM in the node which is shutdown can
> migrate to other host, but it take more than several minutes.
>
> Sometimes, it can not migrate at all. Sometimes, only when the host is
> back, the VM is beginning to move.
Can you please check or share the logs under /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/ ?
> Is there some documentation to explain how VM failover is working? And
> is there some bugs reported related with this?
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine#Agent_State_Diagram
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Cong
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the
> intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message
> is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
End of Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135
**************************************
------=_Part_235182_797090940.1419163706720
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><body><div style=3D"font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; colo=
r: #000000"><div><a href=3D"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1=
168478" data-mce-href=3D"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1168=
478">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1168478</a></div><div><b=
r></div><div>SR-IOV target release 3.6 and you'll need appropriate NIC on y=
our Host, supporting this functionality <a href=3D"http://wiki.ovirt.o=
rg/Feature/SR-IOV" data-mce-href=3D"http://wiki.ovirt.org/Feature/SR-IOV">h=
ttp://wiki.ovirt.org/Feature/SR-IOV</a></div><div><br></div><div><span name=
=3D"x"></span><br>Thanks in advance.<br><div><br></div>Best regards,<br>Nik=
olai<br>____________________<br>Nikolai Sednev<br>Senior Quality Engineer a=
t Compute team<br>Red Hat Israel<br>34 Jerusalem Road,<br>Ra'anana, Israel =
43501<br><div><br></div>Tel: +972 9 7692043<br>=
Mobile: +972 52 7342734<br>Email: nsednev(a)redhat.com<br>IRC: nsednev<span n=
ame=3D"x"></span><br></div><div><br></div><hr id=3D"zwchr"><div style=3D"co=
lor:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-fam=
ily:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>users-request@=
ovirt.org<br><b>To: </b>users(a)ovirt.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, December 19=
, 2014 8:22:17 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135<br><di=
v><br></div>Send Users mailing list submissions to<br> &nb=
sp; users(a)ovirt.org<br><div><br></div>To subscribe o=
r unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> &nbs=
p; http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br>or, vi=
a email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>  =
; users-request(a)ovirt.org<br><div><br></div>Yo=
u can reach the person managing the list at<br> &nbs=
p; users-owner(a)ovirt.org<br><div><br></div>When replying, =
please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents =
of Users digest..."<br><div><br></div><br>Today's Topics:<br><div><br></div=
> 1. Re: console viewer for ovrit engine (Yue, Cong)<br>&=
nbsp; 2. Re: Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? (Darr=
ell Budic)<br> 3. Re: VM failover with ovirt3.5 (Yue, Con=
g)<br><div><br></div><br>--------------------------------------------------=
--------------------<br><div><br></div>Message: 1<br>Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014=
09:03:11 -0800<br>From: "Yue, Cong" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com><br>=
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com><br>Cc: "users(a)ovirt.org" =
<users(a)ovirt.org><br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ov=
rit engine<br>Message-ID:<br> &nbs=
p;<ED08B56256B38842A463A2A0804C5AC0326AEEF291(a)svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc><br=
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"<br><div><br></div>So. It means=
the web-proxy should be installed into the engine inside the virt nodes wh=
ere host the VM.<br>The ovirt engine is with centos 6.6.<br><div><br></div>=
I will have a try for this later.<br><div><br></div>Thanks,<br>Cong<br><div=
><br></div>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:st=
irabos(a)redhat.com]<br>Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:31 AM<br>To: Yue, =
Cong<br>Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users(a)ovirt.org<br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] =
console viewer for ovrit engine<br><div><br></div><br><div><br></div>----- =
Original Message -----<br>> From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.=
com><br>> To: "Simone Tiraboschi" <stirabos(a)redhat.com><br>>=
Cc: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>, users(a)ovirt.org<b=
r>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:39:39 PM<br>> Subject: RE: [o=
virt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine<br>><br>> Sorry. It is ce=
ntos 7 for host.<br>><br>><br>> -----Original Message-----<br>>=
From: Yue, Cong<br>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:38 AM<br>> =
To: 'Simone Tiraboschi'<br>> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users(a)ovirt.org<br>>=
; Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine<br>><br>>=
; Thanks for the reply.<br>> Yes, I am using centos for host. What engin=
e host in your definition?<br>> Is the host PC where engine VM is runnin=
g on the top?<br><div><br></div>The physical host or VM witch runs the engi=
ne.<br><div><br></div>> I am doing the walkthrough as<br>> http://com=
munity.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5<br>> /<br>&=
gt; http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/11/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5<=
br>> -part-two/<br>><br>> I am glad to test your new 3.5.1 in my e=
nvironment.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> Cong<br>><br>><br>> --=
---Original Message-----<br>> From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirabos@r=
edhat.com]<br>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:02 AM<br>> To: Yu=
e, Cong<br>> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users(a)ovirt.org<br>> Subject: Re: [=
ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine<br>><br>><br>><br>>=
; ----- Original Message -----<br>> > From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue@a=
lliedtelesis.com><br>> > To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi=
@gmail.com><br>> > Cc: users(a)ovirt.org<br>> > Sent: Thursday=
, December 18, 2014 12:45:09 AM<br>> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] con=
sole viewer for ovrit engine<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>>=
> I checked but also it saids there is no such package. It works now<br=
>> > with my native client.<br>> ><br>> > Some strange..<=
br>><br>> The oVirt websocket proxy is part of the engine and it's by=
default<br>> installed on the engine host when you install the engine; =
engine-setup<br>> asks if you want to configure it or not.<br>> Than,=
if you really need for your network design, you can also install<br>> a=
nd configure the websocket proxy on a different host.<br>> http://=
www.ovirt.org/Features/WebSocketProxy_on_a_separate_host<br>> but this i=
s already a special case.<br>><br>> I read in this thread that you ar=
e using centos7 (also for the engine host?).<br>> We didn't release oVir=
t 3.5.0 for el7 but we'll do since 3.5.1 which<br>> is targeted just aft=
er Christmas vacation (you are welcome to help us<br>> testing it on cen=
tos7!) so now you still cannot find<br>> ovirt-websocket-proxy rpm for<b=
r>> el7 on the stable branch.<br>> If you really need to install it r=
ight now on el7 you can try from<br>> nightly snapshot.<br>><br>><=
br>><br>><br>> > Thanks,<br>> ><br>> > Cong<br>>=
><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > From=
: Gianluca Cecchi [mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com]<br>> > Sent: Wed=
nesday, December 17, 2014 2:07 PM<br>> > To: Yue, Cong<br>> > C=
c: Donny Davis; awels(a)redhat.com; users(a)ovirt.org<br>> > Subject: Re:=
[ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine<br>> ><br>> ><br=
>> ><br>> ><br>> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Yue,=
Cong <<br>> > Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com ><br>> > wrote:=
<br>> ><br>> > Thanks, but it saids there is no ovirt-websocket=
-proxy packges.<br>> > I am using the repository of<br>> > http=
://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release35.rpm<br>> ><br>>=
; > Thanks,<br>> > Cong<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>=
> ><br>> > The package, at least in 3.5 is<br>> > ovirt-e=
ngine-websocket-proxy<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Gianluca<br>&g=
t; ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Th=
is e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)<br>> =
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any<br>> &=
gt; unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.<br>=
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender =
by<br>> > reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message=
. If you<br>> > are the intended recipient, please be advised that th=
e content of<br>> > this message is subject to access, review and dis=
closure by the<br>> > sender's e-mail System Administrator.<br>> &=
gt;<br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> &g=
t; Users mailing list<br>> > Users(a)ovirt.org<br>> > http://list=
s.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br>> ><br>><br>> This e-mail=
message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)<br>> and may c=
ontain confidential and privileged information. Any<br>> unauthorized re=
view, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If<br>> you are not=
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply<br>> e-mail =
and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the<br>> inte=
nded recipient, please be advised that the content of this message<br>> =
is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System A=
dministrator.<br>><br><div><br></div>This e-mail message is for the sole=
use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileg=
ed information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is=
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the send=
er by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you a=
re the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this messa=
ge is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail Syste=
m Administrator.<br><div><br></div>------------------------------<br><div><=
br></div>Message: 2<br>Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:08:03 -0600<br>From: Darre=
ll Budic <budic(a)onholyground.com><br>To: "Kalil de A. Carvalho" <k=
alilac(a)gmail.com><br>Cc: Amador Segundo <asegundo(a)redhat.com>, use=
rs(a)ovirt.org<br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM =
is<br> possible?<br>Message-=
ID: <B6ECAED5-7CE3-44D2-A4E8-90EF46B3203D(a)onholyground.com><br>Conten=
t-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"<br><div><br></div>I tried a quick ipe=
rf test a while back and got 3-4Gb/sec between a pair of VMs on separate ho=
sts with a 10G infrastructure, no real tuning and no SRIOV. That met my nee=
ds so I didn?t try anything further. If you were aiming for 10G for all, yo=
u?d want to work on SRIOV I imagine, but they get pretty good performance e=
ven without it.<br><div><br></div><br>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:49 AM, Kal=
il de A. Carvalho <kalilac(a)gmail.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> Dear Am=
ador.<br>> <br>> No, unfortunately not.<br>> <br>> This was jus=
t a friend question, because he need VM with 10GB NIC's.<br>> <br>> T=
oday he is using Xenserver, this solution does not attend his expedition an=
d he is research another solution.<br>> <br>> I told him about oVirt/=
KVM but this is a prerequisite to use.<br>> <br>> I will plan with hi=
m to try make a project to test a take the resolts.<br>> <br>> Best r=
egards. <br>> <br>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Amador Segundo &=
lt;asegundo(a)redhat.com <mailto:asegundo@redhat.com>> wrote:<br>>=
; Virtio devices does not support speed, so we fake their speeds showing "1=
000mbps" in Admin. Portal. If your boxes have 10gbps devices then your vms =
are already taking advantage of that. Did you test it? Could you share some=
results? <br>> <br>> <br>> -----Original Message----- <br>> Fr=
om: Kalil de A. Carvalho [kalilac(a)gmail.com <mailto:kalilac@gmail.com>=
;] <br>> Received: Thursday, 18 Dec 2014, 22:59 <br>> To: users@ovirt=
.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> <br>> Subject: [ovirt-users] Using 1=
0gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? <br>> <br>> <br>> Hello all.=
<br>> <br>> Today a follow work ask me if is possible to use vNIC or =
vbridge in a VM managed by ovirt.<br>> <br>> What he wants is to have=
a virtual 10gb network to some machines.<br>> <br>> All hosts NIC's =
are 10gb.<br>> <br>> Is this possible?<br>> <br>> If yes how ca=
n I do it?<br>> <br>> Best regards.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>>=
; <br>> -- <br>> Atenciosamente,<br>> Kalil de A. Carvalho<br>>=
<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Users mai=
ling list<br>> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org><br>> ht=
tp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mail=
man/listinfo/users><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTM=
L attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/u=
sers/attachments/20141219/e2a27490/attachment-0001.html><br><div><br></d=
iv>------------------------------<br><div><br></div>Message: 3<br>Date: Fri=
, 19 Dec 2014 10:22:10 -0800<br>From: "Yue, Cong" <Cong_Yue@alliedtelesi=
s.com><br>To: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com><br>Cc: "user=
s(a)ovirt.org" <users(a)ovirt.org><br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failo=
ver with ovirt3.5<br>Message-ID:<br> &nb=
sp; <ED08B56256B38842A463A2A0804C5AC0326AEEF2F1(a)svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc=
><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"<br><div><br></div>Thank=
s for the information. This is the log for my three ovirt nodes.<br>From th=
e output of hosted-engine --vm-status, it shows the engine state for my 2nd=
and 3rd ovirt node is DOWN.<br>Is this the reason why VM failover not work=
in my environment? How can I make also engine works for my 2nd and 3rd ovi=
t nodes?<br>--<br>--=3D=3D Host 1 status =3D=3D--<br><div><br></div>Status =
up-to-date : =
True<br>Hostname &n=
bsp; : 10.0.0.94<br>Host ID  =
; &nb=
sp;: 1<br>Engine status &n=
bsp; : {"health": "good", "vm": "up",<br>"detail": "up"=
}<br>Score &=
nbsp; : 2400<br>Local maintenance =
: False<br>Host time=
stamp =
: 150475<br>Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):<br>metadata_parse_version=
=3D1<br>metadata_feature_version=3D1<br>timestamp=3D150475 (Fri Dec 19 13:1=
2:18 2014)<br>host-id=3D1<br>score=3D2400<br>maintenance=3DFalse<br>state=
=3DEngineUp<br><div><br></div><br>--=3D=3D Host 2 status =3D=3D--<br><div><=
br></div>Status up-to-date =
: True<br>Hostname =
: 10.0.0.93<br>Host ID &nb=
sp; &=
nbsp; : 2<br>Engine status =
: {"reason": "vm not running on<br=
>this host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown"}<br>Score &=
nbsp; =
: 2400<br>Local maintenance  =
; : False<br>Host timestamp =
: 1572<br>E=
xtra metadata (valid at timestamp):<br>metadata_parse_version=3D1<br>metada=
ta_feature_version=3D1<br>timestamp=3D1572 (Fri Dec 19 10:12:18 2014)<br>ho=
st-id=3D2<br>score=3D2400<br>maintenance=3DFalse<br>state=3DEngineDown<br><=
div><br></div><br>--=3D=3D Host 3 status =3D=3D--<br><div><br></div>Status =
up-to-date : =
False<br>Hostname &=
nbsp; : 10.0.0.92<br>Host ID &nbs=
p; &n=
bsp;: 3<br>Engine status &=
nbsp; : unknown stale-data<br>Score  =
; &nb=
sp; : 2400<br>Local maintenance &n=
bsp; : False<br>Host timestamp &nb=
sp; : 987<br>Extra metadata (vali=
d at timestamp):<br>metadata_parse_version=3D1<br>metadata_feature_version=
=3D1<br>timestamp=3D987 (Fri Dec 19 10:09:58 2014)<br>host-id=3D3<br>score=
=3D2400<br>maintenance=3DFalse<br>state=3DEngineDown<br><div><br></div>--<b=
r>And the /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/agent.log for three ovirt nodes a=
re as follows:<br>--<br>10.0.0.94(hosted-engine-1)<br>---<br>MainThread::IN=
FO::2014-12-19<br>13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.=
agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state Engin=
eUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:09:33,716::hosted_e=
ngine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start=
_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThre=
ad::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engi=
ne_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state=
EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:09:44,017::ho=
sted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::=
(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>Ma=
inThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hoste=
d_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current=
state EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:09:54,3=
03::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEn=
gine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)=
<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:04,342::states::394::ovirt_hosted=
_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)<br>Engine vm running=
on localhost<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:04,617::hosted_engin=
e::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_mon=
itoring)<br>Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-=
12-19<br>13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hos=
ted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (=
id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:14,657::state_=
machine::160::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(ref=
resh)<br>Global metadata: {'maintenance': False}<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-=
12-19<br>13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hos=
ted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)<br>Host 10.0.0.93 (id 2): {'extra':<br>'=
metadata_parse_version=3D1\nmetadata_feature_version=3D1\ntimestamp=3D1448<=
br>(Fri Dec 19 10:10:14<br>2014)\nhost-id=3D2\nscore=3D2400\nmaintenance=3D=
False\nstate=3DEngineDown\n',<br>'hostname': '10.0.0.93', 'alive': True, 'h=
ost-id': 2, 'engine-status':<br>{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', '=
health': 'bad', 'vm':<br>'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'main=
tenance': False,<br>'host-ts': 1448}<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:=
10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.H=
ostedEngine::(refresh)<br>Host 10.0.0.92 (id 3): {'extra':<br>'metadata_par=
se_version=3D1\nmetadata_feature_version=3D1\ntimestamp=3D987<br>(Fri Dec 1=
9 10:09:58<br>2014)\nhost-id=3D3\nscore=3D2400\nmaintenance=3DFalse\nstate=
=3DEngineDown\n',<br>'hostname': '10.0.0.92', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 3, =
'engine-status':<br>{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'ba=
d', 'vm':<br>'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': Fa=
lse,<br>'host-ts': 987}<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:14,658::st=
ate_machine::168::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::=
(refresh)<br>Local (id 1): {'engine-health': {'health': 'good', 'vm': 'up',=
<br>'detail': 'up'}, 'bridge': True, 'mem-free': 1079.0, 'maintenance':<br>=
False, 'cpu-load': 0.0269, 'gateway': True}<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19=
<br>13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_e=
ngine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineUp (score: 24=
00)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::332::ov=
irt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<b=
r>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014=
-12-19<br>13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.ho=
sted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineUp (sco=
re: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::3=
32::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitor=
ing)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO=
::2014-12-19<br>13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.ag=
ent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineU=
p (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:35,499::hosted_eng=
ine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_m=
onitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread=
::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:45,784::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine=
_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state E=
ngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:45,785::host=
ed_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(s=
tart_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>Main=
Thread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_=
engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current s=
tate EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:10:56,070=
::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngi=
ne::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<b=
r>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:06,109::states::394::ovirt_hosted_e=
ngine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)<br>Engine vm running o=
n localhost<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:06,359::hosted_engine:=
:327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monit=
oring)<br>Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12=
-19<br>13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hoste=
d_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id=
: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:16,658::hosted_e=
ngine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start=
_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2=
014-12-19<br>13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent=
.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.=
93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:26,991::ho=
sted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::=
(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::I=
NFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha=
.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 1=
0.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:37,3=
41::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEn=
gine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineUp (score: 2400)<br>MainThr=
ead::INFO::2014-12-19<br>13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_eng=
ine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote =
host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400)<br>----<br><div><br></div>10.0.0.93 (ho=
sted-engine-2)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:18,339::hosted_engi=
ne::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_mo=
nitoring)<br>Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::20=
14-12-19<br>10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.=
hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.9=
4 (id: 1, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:28,651::hos=
ted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(=
start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::=
INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:28,652::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_h=
a.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remote host =
10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:39,=
010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedE=
ngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)<br>Main=
Thread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_=
engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Best remo=
te host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>1=
0:12:49,338::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine=
.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineDown (score: 2400)=
<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::332::ovirt=
_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>B=
est remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12=
-19<br>10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hoste=
d_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineDown (scor=
e: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::33=
2::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitori=
ng)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO:=
:2014-12-19<br>10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.age=
nt.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)<br>Current state EngineDo=
wn (score: 2400)<br>MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19<br>10:13:10,010::hosted_en=
gine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_=
monitoring)<br>Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400)<br><div><br>=
</div><br>10.0.0.92(hosted-engine-3)<br>same as 10.0.0.93<br>--<br><div><br=
></div>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stirab=
os(a)redhat.com]<br>Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:28 AM<br>To: Yue, Cong=
<br>Cc: users(a)ovirt.org<br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovir=
t3.5<br><div><br></div><br><div><br></div>----- Original Message -----<br>&=
gt; From: "Cong Yue" <Cong_Yue(a)alliedtelesis.com><br>> To: users@o=
virt.org<br>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:14:33 AM<br>> Subject=
: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5<br>><br>><br>><br>> H=
i<br>><br>><br>><br>> In my environment, I have 3 ovirt nodes a=
s one cluster. And on top of<br>> host-1, there is one vm to host ovirt =
engine.<br>><br>> Also I have one external storage for the cluster to=
use as data domain<br>> of engine and data.<br>><br>> I confirmed=
live migration works well in my environment.<br>><br>> But it seems =
very buggy for VM failover if I try to force to shut down<br>> one ovirt=
node. Sometimes the VM in the node which is shutdown can<br>> migrate t=
o other host, but it take more than several minutes.<br>><br>> Someti=
mes, it can not migrate at all. Sometimes, only when the host is<br>> ba=
ck, the VM is beginning to move.<br><div><br></div>Can you please check or =
share the logs under /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/ ?<br><div><br></div>&=
gt; Is there some documentation to explain how VM failover is working? And<=
br>> is there some bugs reported related with this?<br><div><br></div>ht=
tp://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine#Agent_State_Diagram<br><div>=
<br></div>> Thanks in advance,<br>><br>> Cong<br>><br>><br>&=
gt;<br>><br>> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended=
recipient(s)<br>> and may contain confidential and privileged informati=
on. Any<br>> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is pro=
hibited. If<br>> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the =
sender by reply<br>> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original messa=
ge. If you are the<br>> intended recipient, please be advised that the c=
ontent of this message<br>> is subject to access, review and disclosure =
by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.<br>><br>> ______________=
_________________________________<br>> Users mailing list<br>> Users@=
ovirt.org<br>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br>><br>=
<div><br></div>This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended reci=
pient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unaut=
horized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are n=
ot the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and de=
stroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient=
, please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access, =
review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.<br><div>=
<br></div>------------------------------<br><div><br></div>________________=
_______________________________<br>Users mailing list<br>Users(a)ovirt.org<br=
>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br><div><br></div><br>End of=
Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135<br>**************************************<=
br></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>
------=_Part_235182_797090940.1419163706720--
9 years, 11 months
EXTNET Hook and Libvirtd "Default" Network Setup
by Andrew Wagner
All,
I'm testing out oVirt for one of our projects that wants to try an
all-in-one setup before going to a larger deployment. For their testing,
they want to use the default NAT'd network from libvirtd on the host.
I've install oVirt, installed the extnet hook, enabled IP forwarding in
sysctl.conf and loaded the setting, and created a vm that attaches to
the libvirtd "default" network and gets an IP. The VM can ssh to the
virbr0 IP address, in this case 192.168.122.1, to access the host.
However, the VM cannot reach any IP address off of the NAT'd subnet. I
haven't changed any of the default iptables rules that oVirt and
libvirtd create. Looking at ip route and the iptables rules, I feel that
traffic should be getting directed appropriately.
Does anyone have any thoughts as to what the issue may be? For some
reason, the ovirtmgmt bridge doesn't seem to be receiving or allowing
traffic from virbr0 to pass across it. I can provide more information if
that would be helpful!
Andrew Wagner
9 years, 11 months
Can and How to move a VM from VMware to oVirt
by zhangjian2011
Hi,
I want to move a windows VM(managed by VMware Player in Windows7 host)
to oVirt, can and how can i do it?
Thanks.
--
--------------------------------------------------
Zhang Jian
Development Dept.I
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
No.6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China
TEL: +86+25-86630566-8526
FUJITSU INTERNAL: 7998-8526
FAX: +86+25-83317685
MAIL: zhangjian2011(a)cn.fujitsu.com
--------------------------------------------------
9 years, 11 months
Server 2012 R2 + Intel Conroe Cluster
by Nathan Llaneza
Hey All,
I think I have found a bug in oVirt 3.4.4. We just bought a new server that
supports the Conroe CPU model, and I am trying to install Server 2012 R2
without luck. I keep getting error code 0x000000C4. The problem is while
Windows is still to load into its pre-installation environment it cashes
and then immediately resets. This is a continuous loop. I have found a way
to install Server 2012 R2. Move the cluster away from the Conroe Family (in
my case Penryn). Thanks for all you do.
9 years, 11 months
CPU Type
by Brent Hartzell
------=_NextPart_000_0276_01D01C48.79079EF0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
Is there a way to add "Xeon" or another class of CPU Type to oVirt? We have
some test hosts, which use a combo of the following CPU types:
Xeon L5420
Xeon E5430
Xeon E5420
The only two CPU Types that will work in oVirt are Conroe & Penryn. Inside
of a VM, it reports "Core 2 Duo".
Host reports:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz
VM reports:
model name : Intel Core 2 Duo P9xxx (Penryn Class Core 2)
//
Is there a way to have the VM report the correct CPU? It doesn't appear to
cause any performance or other issues, but seems to be just a display issue.
My concern though, is that we may not be able to add other servers with
different Intels to the same cluster, for example, new hosts with E5-XXXX or
E3-XXXX processors. Can someone confirm this wouldn't be an issue?
------=_NextPart_000_0276_01D01C48.79079EF0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 =
(filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US =
link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72"><div class=3DWordSection1><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Hello,<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Is there a =
way to add “Xeon” or another class of CPU Type to oVirt? We =
have some test hosts, which use a combo of the following CPU =
types:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Xeon L5420<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Xeon =
E5430<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Xeon E5420<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>The only two =
CPU Types that will work in oVirt are Conroe & Penryn. Inside of a =
VM, it reports “Core 2 Duo”.<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Host =
reports:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>model =
name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) =
CPU =
E5430 @ 2.66GHz<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>VM =
reports:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>model =
name : Intel Core 2 Duo P9xxx (Penryn =
Class Core 2)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>//<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Is there a =
way to have the VM report the correct CPU? It doesn’t appear to =
cause any performance or other issues, but seems to be just a display =
issue. My concern though, is that we may not be able to add other =
servers with different Intels to the same cluster, for example, new =
hosts with E5-XXXX or E3-XXXX processors. Can someone confirm this =
wouldn’t be an issue?<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_0276_01D01C48.79079EF0--
9 years, 11 months
not receiveing email
by lucas castro
Hey folks,
Is there any problem on the mailing list?
since Dec 15 I've not received mail anymore.
--
contatos:
Celular: ( 99 ) 9143-5954 - Vivo
skype: lucasd3castro
msn: lucascastroborges(a)hotmail.com
9 years, 11 months
