August 2017 - Users - oVirt List Archives

supervdsmd IOError to /dev/stdout
by Richard Chan 03 Aug '17

03 Aug '17

After an upgrade to 4.0 I have a single host that cannot start supervdsmd because of IOError on /dev/stdout. All other hosts upgraded correctly. In the systemd unit I have to hack StandardOutput=null. Any thing I have overlooked? The hosts are all identical and it is just this one that has this weird behaviour. -- Richard Chan

4 7

oVirt 4.1.2 update but rubygem-fluent-plugin-viaq_data_model package missing
by Fabrice Moyen 03 Aug '17

03 Aug '17

2 3

Lost disk image on guest
by Paul-Erik Törrönen 03 Aug '17

03 Aug '17

Updated the ovirt to latest stable and after the host reboot (hardware was relocated) all of the VMs on the host are ok except one which has lost it's disk image (it still exists physically on the storage device). Uploading this image to the storage fails (I get the usual initiating - 0/XXXMB uploaded - Paused by system, the ovirt-imageio-proxy is running on the engine and has nothing in it's log), and I'm also unable to create any new disks when editing the problematic VM (the Attach/Create/+/--buttons are all grayed out). The question is: Is the only course to 'fix' this situation to delete the whole VM and install it from scratch? Poltsi

1 0

Ovirt 4.1 gluster with libgfapi
by TranceWorldLogic . 03 Aug '17

03 Aug '17

Hi, I was going through gluster document it was talking about libgfapi, that gives better performance. And I also went through many bug description and comment and mail thread in ovirt group. But still not understood, how to enable libgfapi ? Is it supported in 4.1 ? I am confuse. Please help me to understand whether it supported or not. If supported, then how can I enable it ? or use it ? Thanks, ~Rohit

4 5

After upgrading to 4.1.4 unable to start VM or migrate them
by Arman Khalatyan 02 Aug '17

02 Aug '17

Hi, I am running in to trouble with 4.1.4 after engine upgrade I am not able to start or migrate virtual machines: getting following error: General command validation failure Are there any workarounds?

5 11

oVirt 3.6.x and Centos 6.9
by Neil 02 Aug '17

02 Aug '17

Hi guys, I upgraded to the latest ovirt-engine-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch available in the ovirt 3.6 repo, however I seem to be encountering a known bug ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387949) which looks to be fixed in ovirt 3.6.9.2 but I can't seem to find out how to install this. I was hoping it was via http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.6-snapshot but this link is dead. Is anyone using ovirt 3.6.9 and how does one obtain it? The issues I'm facing is, after trying to update my cluster version to 3.6, my hosts weren't compatible, as it says they only compatible with version 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 etc. I then upgraded 1 hosts to Centos 6.9 and installed and updated the latest vdsm from the 3.6 repo, but this still didn't allow me to change my cluster version. I then rolled back the cluster version to 3.5. At the moment because I've upgraded 1 host, I can't select this host as SPM and I'm wondering if I can upgrade my remaining hosts, or will this prevent any hosts from being my SPM? I'm seeing the following error "WARNING Unrecognized protocol: 'SUBSCRI'" on my upgraded host. I'm wanting to upgrade to the latest 3.6 as well as upgrade all my hosts, so that I can start the ovirt 4 upgrade next. Please could I have some guidance on this? Thank you. Regards. Neil Wilson.

2 6

sanlock ids file broken after server crash
by Johan Bernhardsson 02 Aug '17

02 Aug '17

Hello, The ids file for sanlock is broken on one setup. The first host id in the file is wrong. >From the logfile i have: verify_leader 1 wrong space name 0924ff77-ef51-435b-b90d-50bfbf2e�ke7 0924ff77-ef51-435b-b90d-50bfbf2e8de7 /rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/ Note the broken char in the space name. This also apears. And it seams as the hostid too is broken in the ids file: leader4 sn 0924ff77-ef51-435b-b90d-50bfbf2e�ke7 rn ��7afa5-3a91-415b- a04c-221d3e060163.vbgkvm01.a ts 4351980 cs eefa4dd7 Note the broken chars there as well. If i check the ids file with less or strings the first row where my vbgkvm01 host are. That has broken chars. Can this be repaired in some way without taking down all the virtual machines on that storage? /Johan

3 6

VDSM Command failed: Heartbeat Exceeded
by Neil 02 Aug '17

02 Aug '17

Hi guys, Please could someone assist me, my DC seems to be trying to re-negotiate SPM and apparently it's failing. I tried to delete an old autogenerated snapshot and shortly after that the issue seemed to start, however after about an hour, the snapshot said successfully deleted, and then SPM negotiated again albeit for a short period before it started trying to re-negotiate again. Last week I upgraded from ovirt 3.5 to 3.6, I also upgraded one of my 4 hosts using the 3.6 repo to the latest available from that repo and did a yum update too. I have 4 nodes and my ovirt engine is a KVM guest on another physical machine on the network. I'm using an FC SAN with ATTO HBA's and recently we've started seeing some degraded IO. The SAN appears to be alright and the disks all seem to check out, but we are having rather slow IOPS at the moment, which we trying to track down. ovirt engine CentOS release 6.9 (Final) ebay-cors-filter-1.0.1-0.1.ovirt.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-backend-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-cli-3.6.2.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-extension-aaa-jdbc-1.0.7-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-extensions-api-impl-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-jboss-as-7.1.1-1.el6.x86_64 ovirt-engine-lib-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-restapi-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.6.7.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-base-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-ovirt-engine-common-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-vmconsole-proxy-helper-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-websocket-proxy-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-backup-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-userportal-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-vmconsole-proxy-helper-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy-3.6.7.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-wildfly-8.2.1-1.el6.x86_64 ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay-8.0.5-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-1.4.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-java-1.4.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-image-uploader-3.6.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-iso-uploader-3.6.0-1.el6.noarch ovirt-release34-1.0.3-1.noarch ovirt-release35-006-1.noarch ovirt-release36-3.6.7-1.noarch ovirt-setup-lib-1.0.1-1.el6.noarch ovirt-vmconsole-1.0.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-vmconsole-proxy-1.0.2-1.el6.noarch node01 (CentOS 6.9) vdsm-4.16.30-0.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-jsonrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-6.16.el6.noarch qemu-img-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 libvirt-0.10.2-62.el6.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.10.2-62.el6.x86_64 libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.10.2-62.el6.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.10.2-62.el6.x86_64 node01 was upgraded out of desperation after I tried changing my DC and cluster version to 3.6, but then found that none of my hosts could be activated out of maintenance due to an incompatibility with 3.6 (I'm still not sure why as searching seemed to indicate Centos 6.x was compatible. I then had to remove all 4 hosts, and change the cluster version back to 3.5 and then re-add them. When I tried changing the cluster version to 3.6 I did get a complaint about using the "legacy protocol" so on each host under Advanced, I changed them to use the JSON protocol, and this seemed to resolve it, however once changing the DC/Cluster back to 3.5 the option to change the protocol back to Legacy is no longer shown. node02 (Centos 6.7) vdsm-4.16.30-0.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-jsonrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-6.14.el6.noarch qemu-img-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 node03 CentOS 6.7 vdsm-4.16.30-0.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-jsonrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.16.30-0.el6.noarch gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-6.14.el6.noarch qemu-img-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.479.el6_7.2.x86_64 libvirt-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.10.2-54.el6_7.6.x86_64 node04 (Centos 6.7) vdsm-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.x86_64 vdsm-cli-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.noarch vdsm-jsonrpc-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.noarch vdsm-python-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.noarch vdsm-python-zombiereaper-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.noarch vdsm-xmlrpc-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.noarch vdsm-yajsonrpc-4.16.20-1.git3a90f62.el6.noarch gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-6.15.el6.noarch qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.491.el6_8.1.x86_64 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.491.el6_8.1.x86_64 qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.503.el6_9.3.x86_64 libvirt-0.10.2-60.el6.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.10.2-60.el6.x86_64 libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.10.2-60.el6.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.10.2-60.el6.x86_64 I'm seeing a rather confusing error in the /var/log/messages on all 4 hosts as follows.... Jul 31 16:41:36 node01 multipathd: 36001b4d80001c80d0000000000000000: sdb - directio checker reports path is down Jul 31 16:41:41 node01 kernel: sd 7:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK Jul 31 16:41:41 node01 kernel: sd 7:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 Jul 31 16:41:41 node01 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 0 I say confusing, because I don't have a 3000GB LUN [root@node01 ~]# fdisk -l | grep 3000 Disk /dev/sdb: 3000.0 GB, 2999999528960 bytes I did have one on Friday, last week, but I trashed it and changed it to a 1500GB LUN instead, so I'm not sure if perhaps this error is still trying to connect to the old LUN perhaps? My LUNS are as follows... Disk /dev/sdb: 3000.0 GB, 2999999528960 bytes (this one doesn't actually exist anymore) Disk /dev/sdc: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sde: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdf: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdg: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdh: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdi: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdj: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdk: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdm: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdl: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdn: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdo: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdp: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdq: 1000.0 GB, 999999668224 bytes Disk /dev/sdr: 1000.0 GB, 999988133888 bytes Disk /dev/sds: 1500.0 GB, 1499999764480 bytes Disk /dev/sdt: 1500.0 GB, 1499999502336 bytes I'm quite low on SAN disk space currently so I'm a little hesitant to migrate VM's around for fear of the migrations creating too many snapshots and filling up my SAN. We are in the process of expanding the SAN Array too, but we trying to get to the bottom of the bad IOPS at the moment before adding on addition overhead. Ping tests between hosts and engine all look alright, so I don't suspect network issues. I know this is very vague, everything is currently operational, however as you can see in the attached logs, I'm getting lots of ERROR messages. Any help or guidance is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Regards. Neil Wilson.

2 2

Pass Discard guest OS support?
by Doug Ingham 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

Hi All, Just today I noticed that guests can now pass discards to the underlying shared filesystem. http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/storage/pass-disca… Is this supported by all of the main Linux guest OS's running the virt agent? And what about Windows guests? (specifically, 2012 & 2016) Cheers, -- Doug

2 1

oVirt and Foreman
by Davide Ferrari 01 Aug '17

01 Aug '17

Hello list is anybody successfully using oVirt + Foreman for VM creation + provisioning? I'm using Foremn (latest version, 1.15.2) with latest oVirt version (4.1.3) but I'm encountering several problem, especially related to disks. For example: - cannot create a VM with multiple disks though Foreman CLI (hammer) - if I create a multidisk VM from Foreman, the second disk always gets the "bootable" flag and not the primary image, making the VMs not bootable at all. Any other Foreman user sharing the pain here? Foramn's list is not so useful so I'm trying to ask here. How do you programmatically create virtual machines with oVirt and Foreman? Should I switch do directly using oVirt API? Thanks in advance Davide

5 15