- Users - oVirt List Archives

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Strahil 24 Jul '19

24 Jul '19

I forgot to mention that LVM config has to be modified in order to 'inform' local LVM stack to rely on clvmd/dlm for locking purposes. Yet, this brings abother layer of complexity which I prefer to avoid , thus I use HA-LVM on my pacemaker clusters. @Martin, Check the link from Benny and if possible check if the 2 cases are related. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 24, 2019 11:07, Benny Zlotnik <bzlotnik(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > We have seen something similar in the past and patches were posted to deal with this issue, but it's still in progress[1] > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553133 > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:07 PM Strahil <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> I have a theory... But after all without any proof it will remain theory. >> >> The storage volumes are just VGs over a shared storage.The SPM host is supposed to be the only one that is working with the LVM metadata, but I have observed that when someone is executing a simple LVM command (for example -lvs, vgs or pvs ) while another one is going on on another host - your metadata can corrupt, due to lack of clvmd. >> >> As a protection, I could offer you to try the following solution: >> 1. Create new iSCSI lun >> 2. Share it to all nodes and create the storage domain. Set it to maintenance. >> 3. Start dlm & clvmd services on all hosts >> 4. Convert the VG of your shared storage domain to have a 'cluster'-ed flag: >> vgchange -c y mynewVG >> 5. Check the lvs of that VG. >> 6. Activate the storage domain. >> >> Of course test it on a test cluster before inplementing it on Prod. >> This is one of the approaches used in Linux HA clusters in order to avoid LVM metadata corruption. >> >> Best Regards, >> Strahil Nikolov >> >> On Jul 22, 2019 15:46, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Op 22-7-2019 om 14:30 schreef Strahil: >>>> >>>> If you can give directions (some kind of history) , the dev might try to reproduce this type of issue. >>>> >>>> If it is reproduceable - a fix can be provided. >>>> >>>> Based on my experience, if something as used as Linux LVM gets broken, the case is way hard to reproduce. >>> >>> >>> Yes, I'd think so too, especially since this activity (online moving of disk images) is done all the time, mostly without problems. In this case, there was a lot of activity on all storage domains, because I'm moving all my storage (> 10TB in 185 disk images) to a new storage platform. During the online move of one the images, the metadata checksum became corrupted and the storage domain went offline. >>> >>> Of course, I could dig up the engine logs and vdsm logs of when it happened, but that would be some work and I'm not very confident that the actual cause would be in there. >>> >>> If any oVirt devs are interested in the logs, I'll provide them, but otherwise I think I'll just see it as an incident and move on. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Martijn. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 22, 2019 10:17, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about 'pvmove', thanks. >>>>> >>>>> In the mean time, I managed to get it fixed by restoring the VG metadata on the iSCSI server, so on the underlying Zvol directly, rather than via the iSCSI session on the oVirt host. That allowed me to perform the restore without bringing all VMs down, which was important to me, because if I had to shut down VMs, I was sure I wouldn't be able to restart them before the storage domain was back online. >>>>> >>>>> Of course this is a more a Linux problem than an oVirt problem, but oVirt did cause it ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Martijn. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op 19-7-2019 om 19:06 schreef Strahil Nikolov: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Martin, >>>>>> >>>>>> First check what went wrong with the VG -as it could be something simple. >>>>>> vgcfgbackup -f VGname will create a file which you can use to compare current metadata with a previous version. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you have Linux boxes - you can add disks from another storage an

1 0

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Martijn Grendelman 24 Jul '19

24 Jul '19

Op 24-7-2019 om 10:07 schreef Benny Zlotnik: We have seen something similar in the past and patches were posted to deal with this issue, but it's still in progress[1] [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553133 That's some interesting reading, and it sure looks like the problem I had. Thanks! Best regards, Martijn. On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:07 PM Strahil <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com<mailto:hunter86_bg@yahoo.com>> wrote: I have a theory... But after all without any proof it will remain theory. The storage volumes are just VGs over a shared storage.The SPM host is supposed to be the only one that is working with the LVM metadata, but I have observed that when someone is executing a simple LVM command (for example -lvs, vgs or pvs ) while another one is going on on another host - your metadata can corrupt, due to lack of clvmd. As a protection, I could offer you to try the following solution: 1. Create new iSCSI lun 2. Share it to all nodes and create the storage domain. Set it to maintenance. 3. Start dlm & clvmd services on all hosts 4. Convert the VG of your shared storage domain to have a 'cluster'-ed flag: vgchange -c y mynewVG 5. Check the lvs of that VG. 6. Activate the storage domain. Of course test it on a test cluster before inplementing it on Prod. This is one of the approaches used in Linux HA clusters in order to avoid LVM metadata corruption. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Jul 22, 2019 15:46, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl<mailto:Martijn.Grendelman@isaac.nl>> wrote: Hi, Op 22-7-2019 om 14:30 schreef Strahil: If you can give directions (some kind of history) , the dev might try to reproduce this type of issue. If it is reproduceable - a fix can be provided. Based on my experience, if something as used as Linux LVM gets broken, the case is way hard to reproduce. Yes, I'd think so too, especially since this activity (online moving of disk images) is done all the time, mostly without problems. In this case, there was a lot of activity on all storage domains, because I'm moving all my storage (> 10TB in 185 disk images) to a new storage platform. During the online move of one the images, the metadata checksum became corrupted and the storage domain went offline. Of course, I could dig up the engine logs and vdsm logs of when it happened, but that would be some work and I'm not very confident that the actual cause would be in there. If any oVirt devs are interested in the logs, I'll provide them, but otherwise I think I'll just see it as an incident and move on. Best regards, Martijn. On Jul 22, 2019 10:17, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl><mailto:Martijn.Grendelman@isaac.nl> wrote: Hi, Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about 'pvmove', thanks. In the mean time, I managed to get it fixed by restoring the VG metadata on the iSCSI server, so on the underlying Zvol directly, rather than via the iSCSI session on the oVirt host. That allowed me to perform the restore without bringing all VMs down, which was important to me, because if I had to shut down VMs, I was sure I wouldn't be able to restart them before the storage domain was back online. Of course this is a more a Linux problem than an oVirt problem, but oVirt did cause it ;-) Thanks, Martijn. Op 19-7-2019 om 19:06 schreef Strahil Nikolov: Hi Martin, First check what went wrong with the VG -as it could be something simple. vgcfgbackup -f VGname will create a file which you can use to compare current metadata with a previous version. If you have Linux boxes - you can add disks from another storage and then pvmove the data inside the VM. Of course , you will need to reinstall grub on the new OS disk , or you won't be able to boot afterwards. If possible, try with a test VM before proceeding with important ones. Backing up the VMs is very important , because working on LVM metada _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/37UDAWDXON3UR… -- Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, [Martijn]<mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> Martijn Grendelman Infrastructure Architect T: +31 (0)40 264 94 44 [ISAAC]<https://www.isaac.nl> ISAAC Marconilaan 16 5621 AA Eindhoven The Netherlands T: +31 (0)40 290 89 79 www.isaac.nl<https://www.isaac.nl> [ISAAC #1 Again!]<https://www.isaac.nl/nl/over-ons/nieuws/isaac-news/ISAAC-voor-tweede-keer-n…> Dit e-mail bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bedoeld wordt u verzocht de afzender hiervan op de hoogte te stellen door het bericht te retourneren en de inhoud niet te gebruiken. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

1 0

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Strahil 24 Jul '19

24 Jul '19

I have a theory... But after all without any proof it will remain theory. The storage volumes are just VGs over a shared storage.The SPM host is supposed to be the only one that is working with the LVM metadata, but I have observed that when someone is executing a simple LVM command (for example -lvs, vgs or pvs ) while another one is going on on another host - your metadata can corrupt, due to lack of clvmd. As a protection, I could offer you to try the following solution: 1. Create new iSCSI lun 2. Share it to all nodes and create the storage domain. Set it to maintenance. 3. Start dlm & clvmd services on all hosts 4. Convert the VG of your shared storage domain to have a 'cluster'-ed flag: vgchange -c y mynewVG 5. Check the lvs of that VG. 6. Activate the storage domain. Of course test it on a test cluster before inplementing it on Prod. This is one of the approaches used in Linux HA clusters in order to avoid LVM metadata corruption. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 22, 2019 15:46, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > Op 22-7-2019 om 14:30 schreef Strahil: >> >> If you can give directions (some kind of history) , the dev might try to reproduce this type of issue. >> >> If it is reproduceable - a fix can be provided. >> >> Based on my experience, if something as used as Linux LVM gets broken, the case is way hard to reproduce. > > > Yes, I'd think so too, especially since this activity (online moving of disk images) is done all the time, mostly without problems. In this case, there was a lot of activity on all storage domains, because I'm moving all my storage (> 10TB in 185 disk images) to a new storage platform. During the online move of one the images, the metadata checksum became corrupted and the storage domain went offline. > > Of course, I could dig up the engine logs and vdsm logs of when it happened, but that would be some work and I'm not very confident that the actual cause would be in there. > > If any oVirt devs are interested in the logs, I'll provide them, but otherwise I think I'll just see it as an incident and move on. > > Best regards, > Martijn. > > > > > On Jul 22, 2019 10:17, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about 'pvmove', thanks. >>> >>> In the mean time, I managed to get it fixed by restoring the VG metadata on the iSCSI server, so on the underlying Zvol directly, rather than via the iSCSI session on the oVirt host. That allowed me to perform the restore without bringing all VMs down, which was important to me, because if I had to shut down VMs, I was sure I wouldn't be able to restart them before the storage domain was back online. >>> >>> Of course this is a more a Linux problem than an oVirt problem, but oVirt did cause it ;-) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martijn. >>> >>> >>> >>> Op 19-7-2019 om 19:06 schreef Strahil Nikolov: >>>> >>>> Hi Martin, >>>> >>>> First check what went wrong with the VG -as it could be something simple. >>>> vgcfgbackup -f VGname will create a file which you can use to compare current metadata with a previous version. >>>> >>>> If you have Linux boxes - you can add disks from another storage and then pvmove the data inside the VM. Of course , you will need to reinstall grub on the new OS disk , or you won't be able to boot afterwards. >>>> If possible, try with a test VM before proceeding with important ones. >>>> >>>> Backing up the VMs is very important , because working on LVM metada

2 1

USB turns off and wont come alive
by Darin Schmidt 24 Jul '19

24 Jul '19

I have 2 usb controllers installed via a riser card plugged into a M.2 slot. (Like those used for mining with GPU's). Everything works great for a long time, then my Windows 10 VM freezes and I lose all USB activity. LSPCI still sees the devices: 0a:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1142 USB 3.1 Host Controller 0b:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1142 USB 3.1 Host Controller 43:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1142 USB 3.1 Host Controller 44:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1142 USB 3.1 Host Controller I assume a and b are the same physical card as its supposed to have 2 channels each, same with 44 and 43. I tried for both 44 and 43 echo "1" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:43\:00.0/remove echo "1" > /sys/bus/pci/rescan echo "1" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:43\:00.0/reset This did not work. I cannot determine if its just the VM thats no longer seeing/using the hardware or if its the hardware itself. I wonder if its a power state thing as well? Nothing I plug into the card seems to be recognized. Any Suggestions? rebooting the VM doesnt help either. It appears the hardware is functioning, but anything you plug into it isnt being detected.

2 1

Import VM from ovirt-exported ova
by david.paning＠gmx.ch 24 Jul '19

24 Jul '19

Hello, i installed a new oVirt 4.3.4 from scratch and am attempting to restore the VMs which ran perfectly fine on my last oVirt 4.2.8, where i exported the VM to the export domain and also as an OVA file. Importing the export domain fails, which i plan to debug later. But importing the OVA file via the Administration Portal also fails with Error ID: 1153 Message: Failed to import the VM to Data Center, Cluster. The VM name is still recognised by the import routine, which tells me the file is readable... Now my questions: Is there any option to try the same from CLI, hoping to get better clues for what is going on? Are there specific log options which could give some clues? Would it be better in general to import the VM from an export-storage domain instead of using a OVA export? Any hint would highly appreciated. Best

3 2

Re: major network changes
by Strahil 23 Jul '19

23 Jul '19

Hi Carl, I think there is another thread here related to the migration to another network. As far as I know, the check liveliness try's to access the ovirt's health page. Does the new engine's ip has A/PTR record setup? Also, check the engine logs, once the HostedEngine VM is up and running. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 23, 2019 16:13, carl langlois <crl.langlois(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > We have managed to stabilize the DNS udpate in out network. Now the current situation is. > I have 3 hosts that can run the engine (hosted-engine). > They were all in the 10.8.236.x. Now i have moved one of them in the 10.16.248.x. > > If i boot the engine on one of the host that is in the 10.8.236.x the engine is going up with status "good". I can access the engine UI. I can see all my hosts even the one in the 10.16.248.x network. > > But if i boot the engine on the hosted-engine host that was switch to the 10.16.248.x the engine is booting. I can ssh to it but the status is always " fail for liveliness check". > The main difference is that when i boot on the host that is in the 10.16.248.x network the engine gets a address in the 248.x network. > > On the engine i have this in the /var/log/ovirt-engine-dwh/ovirt-engine-dwhd.log > 019-07-23 09:05:30|MFzehi|YYTDiS|jTq2w8|OVIRT_ENGINE_DWH|SampleTimeKeepingJob|Default|5|tWarn|tWarn_1|Can not sample data, oVirt Engine is not updating the statistics. Please check your oVirt Engine status.|9704 > the engine.log seems okey. > > So i need to understand what this " liveliness check" do(or try to do) so i can investigate why the engine status is not becoming good. > > The initial deployment was done in the 10.8.236.x network. Maybe is as something to do with that. > > Thanks & Regards > > Carl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:53 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:50 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso >> <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 1:57 PM carl langlois <crl.langlois(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Miguel, >> > > >> > > I have managed to change the config for the ovn-controler. >> > > with those commands >> > > ovs-vsctl set Open_vSwitch . external-ids:ovn-remote=ssl:10.16.248.74:6642 >> > > ovs-vsctl set Open_vSwitch . external-ids:ovn-encap-ip=10.16.248.65 >> > > and restating the services >> > >> > Yes, that's what the script is supposed to do, check [0]. >> > >> > Not sure why running vdsm-tool didn't work for you. >> > >> > > >> > > But even with this i still have the "fail for liveliness check" when starting the ovirt engine. But one thing i notice with our new network is that the reverse DNS does not work(IP -> hostname). The forward is working fine. I am trying to see with our IT why it is not working. >> > >> > Do you guys use OVN? If not, you could disable the provider, install >> > the hosted-engine VM, then, if needed, re-add / re-activate it . >> >> I'm assuming it fails for the same reason you've stated initially - >> i.e. ovn-controller is involved; if it is not, disregard this msg :) >> > >> > [0] - https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-provider-ovn/blob/master/driver/scripts/setu… >> > >> > > >> > > Regards. >> > > Carl >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:03 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 7:07 PM carl langlois <crl.langlois(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > Here is the output of the command >> > >> > >> > >> > [root@ovhost1 ~]# vdsm-tool --vvverbose ovn-config 10.16.248.74 ovirtmgmt >> > >> > MainThread::DEBUG::2019-07-17 13:02:52,

1 0

Stuck in "Finalizing" disk upload phase
by Vrgotic, Marko 23 Jul '19

23 Jul '19

Dear oVIrt, I initiated upload of qcow2 disk image for Centos 6.5: It reached finalizing phase and than started throwing following errors: 2019-07-17 14:40:51,480Z INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-86) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Finalizing successful transfer for Upload disk 'av-07-centos-65-base' (disk id: '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8', image id: 'b44659a9-607a-4eeb-a255-99532fd4fce4') 2019-07-17 14:40:51,480Z WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-86) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Failed to stop image transfer session. Ticket does not exist for image '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8' 2019-07-17 14:41:01,572Z INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-19) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Finalizing successful transfer for Upload disk 'av-07-centos-65-base' (disk id: '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8', image id: 'b44659a9-607a-4eeb-a255-99532fd4fce4') 2019-07-17 14:41:01,574Z WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-19) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Failed to stop image transfer session. Ticket does not exist for image '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8' 2019-07-17 14:41:11,690Z INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-7) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Finalizing successful transfer for Upload disk 'av-07-centos-65-base' (disk id: '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8', image id: 'b44659a9-607a-4eeb-a255-99532fd4fce4') 2019-07-17 14:41:11,690Z WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-7) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Failed to stop image transfer session. Ticket does not exist for image '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8' 2019-07-17 14:41:21,781Z INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Finalizing successful transfer for Upload disk 'av-07-centos-65-base' (disk id: '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8', image id: 'b44659a9-607a-4eeb-a255-99532fd4fce4') 2019-07-17 14:41:21,782Z WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.TransferDiskImageCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [a43180ec-afc7-429e-9f30-9e851eaf7ce7] Failed to stop image transfer session. Ticket does not exist for image '3452459d-aec6-430e-9509-1d9ca815b2d8' I can not cancel it, can not stop it, not via UI not via force option using ovirt_disk module. Help! oVIrt 4.3.4.3-1 version running with CentOS 7.6 Hosts. Kindly awaiting your reply. — — — Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Marko Vrgotic ActiveVideo

3 17

major network changes
by carl langlois 23 Jul '19

23 Jul '19

Hi We are in a process of changing our network connection. Our current network is using 10.8.256.x and we will change to 10.16.248.x. We have a HA ovirt cluster (around 10 nodes) currently configure on the 10.8.256.x. So my question is is it possible to relocate the ovirt cluster to the 10.16.248.x. We have tried to move everything to the new network without success. All the node seem to boot up properly, our gluster storage also work properly. When we try to start the hosted-engine it goes up but fail the liveliness check. We have notice in the /var/log/openvswitch/ovn-controller.log that he is triying to connect to the hold ip address of the hosted-engine vm. 019-07-16T18:41:29.483Z|01992|reconnect|INFO|ssl:10.8.236.244:6642: waiting 8 seconds before reconnect 2019-07-16T18:41:37.489Z|01993|reconnect|INFO|ssl:10.8.236.244:6642: connecting... 2019-07-16T18:41:45.497Z|01994|reconnect|INFO|ssl:10.8.236.244:6642: connection attempt timed out So my question is were is the 10.8.236.244 come from. The routing table for one of our host look like this estination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface default gateway 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ovirtmgmt 10.16.248.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ovirtmgmt link-local 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eno1 link-local 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eno2 link-local 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1025 0 0 ovirtmgmt Any help would be really appreciated. Regards Carl

3 12

Attach the snapshot to the backup virtual machine and activate the disk
by smidhunraj＠gmail.com 23 Jul '19

23 Jul '19

This is the doubt regarding to the rest api <https://ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Backups_and_Migration.html…> Can you please tell me what would be the response of the api request of step 4 ((will it be a success or a error)) ===================================================================== Attach the snapshot to the backup virtual machine and activate the disk: POST /api/vms/22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222/disks/ HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml <disk id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"> <snapshot id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"/> <active>true</active> </disk> ============================================================================================== if we are setting up a bare VM without any backup mechanism in it and try to attach a vm to it.

1 0

Re: ovirt-engine-appliance ova
by Strahil 23 Jul '19

23 Jul '19

It looks like a kickstart error. Maybe a parameter in the kickstart is missing ? Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 23, 2019 09:08, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:53 PM Jingjie Jiang <jingjie.jiang(a)oracle.com> wrote: >> >> Hi David, > > > (Actually it's "Yedidyah" or "Didi") > >> >> Thanks for your info. >> >> Please check my reply inline. >> >> >> -Jingjie >> >> On 7/16/19 3:55 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:46 PM <jingjie.jiang(a)oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Can someone tell me how to generate ovirt-engine-appliance ova file in ovirt-engine-appliance-4.3-20190610.1.el7.x86_64.rpm? >>>> >>> You might want to check the project's source code: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/ovirt/ovirt-appliance/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Or study the logs of a CI build of it: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-appliance_master_build-artifacts-el7-x8… >>> >>> >>> >>> I never tried building it myself locally, though. >> >> I tried to build after checked out the source code from https://github.com/ovirt/ovirt-appliance/, >> >> but the build failed. >> >> # make >> livemedia-creator --make-disk --ram=2048 --vcpus=4 --iso=boot.iso --ks=ovirt-engine-appliance.ks --qcow2 --image-name=ovirt-engine-appliance.qcow2 >> 2019-07-22 12:34:00,095: livemedia-creator 19.7.19-1 >> 2019-07-22 12:34:00,154: disk_size = 51GiB >> 2019-07-22 12:34:00,154: disk_img = /var/tmp/ovirt-engine-appliance.qcow2 >> 2019-07-22 12:34:00,154: install_log = /root/ovirt/ovirt-appliance/engine-appliance/virt-install.log >> mount: /dev/loop0 is write-protected, mounting read-only >> Formatting '/var/tmp/ovirt-engine-appliance.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=54760833024 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off >> 2019-07-22 12:34:10,195: Running virt-install. >> >> Starting install... >> Retrieving file vmlinuz... | 6.3 MB 00:00 >> Retrieving file initrd.img... | 50 MB 00:00 >> Domain installation still in progress. You can reconnect to >> the console to complete the installation process. >> ...... >> 2019-07-22 12:35:15,281: Installation error detected. See logfile. >> 2019-07-22 12:35:15,283: Shutting down LiveOS-27f2dc2b-4b30-4eb1-adcd-b5ab50fdbf55 >> Domain LiveOS-27f2dc2b-4b30-4eb1-adcd-b5ab50fdbf55 destroyed >> >> Domain LiveOS-27f2dc2b-4b30-4eb1-adcd-b5ab50fdbf55 has been undefined >> >> 2019-07-22 12:35:15,599: unmounting the iso >> 2019-07-22 12:35:20,612: Install failed: virt_install failed >> 2019-07-22 12:35:20,613: Removing bad disk image >> 2019-07-22 12:35:20,613: virt_install failed >> make: *** [ovirt-engine-appliance.qcow2] Error 1 >> >> In the log I found the error as following from virt-install.log: >> >> 16:35:07,472 ERR anaconda:CmdlineError: The following mandatory spokes are not completed:#012Installation source#012Software selection >> 16:35:07,472 DEBUG anaconda:running handleException >> 16:35:07,473 CRIT anaconda:Traceback (most recent call last):#012#012 File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pyanaconda/ui/tui/simpleline/base.py", line 352, in _mainloop#012 prompt = last_screen.prompt(self._screens[-1][1])#012#012 File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pyanaconda/ui/tui/hubs/summary.py", line 107, in prompt#012 raise CmdlineError(errtxt)#012#012CmdlineError: The following mandatory spokes are not completed:#012Installation source#012Software selection >> 16:35:08,020 DEBUG anaconda:Gtk cannot be initialized >> 16:35:08,020 DEBUG anaconda:In the main thread, running exception handler >> 16:35:08,386 NOTICE multipathd:zram0: add path (uevent) >> 16:35:08,386 NOTICE multipathd:zram0: spurious uevent, path already in pathvec >> 16:35:08,386 NOTICE multipathd:zram0: HDIO_GETGEO failed with 25 >> 16:35:08,386 ERR multipathd:zram0: failed to get path uid >> 16:35:08,388 ERR multipathd:uevent trigger error >> >> Can you help me to fix the issue? > > > Sorry, I never tried to build it myself, nor have experience with livemedia-creator. As I wrote above, I suggest to compare your output/result with that of oVirt CI. Otherwise, I'd probably start debugging by searching the net for the error messages you received. > > Good luck and best regards, > >> >> >>>> I tried to import ovirt-engine-appliance ova(ovirt-engine-appliance-4.3-20190610.1.el7.ova) from ovirt-engine, but I got error as following: >>>> >>>> Failed to load VM configuration from OVA file: /var/tmp/ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20190121.1.el7.ova >>>> >>> No idea why this failed. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I guess ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20190121.1.el7.ova has more than CentOS7.6. >>>> >>> It has CentOS + oVirt engine. >>> >>> >>> >>> The only major use for it is by hosted-engine --deploy. In theory you >>> >>> can try importing it elsewhere, but I do not recall reports about >>> >>> people that tried this and whether it works. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> > > > -- > Didi

1 0

guest agent w10
by suporte＠logicworks.pt 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Hello, I installed Qemu guest agent 7.4.5 on windows 10. The service is running, but I cannot see the IP address or the FQDN on the engine. I'm running oVirt 4.3.4.3-1.el7 Am I forgetting something? Thanks -- Jose Ferradeira http://www.logicworks.pt

2 2

Request for clarification of logline
by Vrgotic, Marko 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Dear oVirt, I was not able to find out meaning behind following WARN message: WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.libvirt.VmDevicesConverter] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-50) [] unmanaged disk with path '/var/run/vdsm/payload/0687ad1a-4827-48d9-8629-b29a000df280.760410382a41ff5e6b1ee9365856517e.img' is ignored Will somebody be so kind to clarify the actual meaning of it or point me in right direction of cause? I can provide more information if required. Kindly awaiting your reply. — — — Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Marko Vrgotic ActiveVideo

3 4

Cinderlib managed block storage, ceph jewel
by mathias.schwenke＠uni-dortmund.de 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Hi. I tried to use manged block storage to connect our oVirt cluster (Version 4.3.4.3-1.el7) to our ceph storage ( version 10.2.11). I used the instructions from https://ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/storage/cinderlib-int… At the moment, in the ovirt administration portal I can create and delete ceph volumes (ovirt disks) and attach them to virtual machines. If I try to launch a vm with connected ceph block storage volume, starting fails: 2019-07-16 19:39:09,251+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.AttachManagedBlockStorageVolumeVDSCommand] (default task-53) [7cada945] Unexpected return value: Status [code=926, message=Managed Volume Helper failed.: ('Error executing helper: Command [\'/usr/libexec/vdsm/managedvolume-helper\', \'attach\'] failed with rc=1 out=\'\' err=\'oslo.privsep.daemon: Running privsep helper: [\\\'sudo\\\', \\\'privsep-helper\\\', \\\'--privsep_context\\\', \\\'os_brick.privileged.default\\\', \\\'--privsep_sock_path\\\', \\\'/tmp/tmpB6ZBAs/privsep.sock\\\']\\noslo.privsep.daemon: Spawned new privsep daemon via rootwrap\\noslo.privsep.daemon: privsep daemon starting\\noslo.privsep.daemon: privsep process running with uid/gid: 0/0\\noslo.privsep.daemon: privsep process running with capabilities (eff/prm/inh): CAP_SYS_ADMIN/CAP_SYS_ADMIN/none\\noslo.privsep.daemon: privsep daemon running as pid 112531\\nTraceback (most recent call last):\\n File "/usr/libexec/vdsm/managedvolume-help er", line 154, in <module>\\n sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))\\n File "/usr/libexec/vdsm/managedvolume-helper", line 77, in main\\n args.command(args)\\n File "/usr/libexec/vdsm/managedvolume-helper", line 137, in attach\\n attachment = conn.connect_volume(conn_info[\\\'data\\\'])\\n File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/nos_brick.py", line 96, in connect_volume\\n run_as_root=True)\\n File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/os_brick/executor.py", line 52, in _execute\\n result = self.__execute(*args, **kwargs)\\n File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/os_brick/privileged/rootwrap.py", line 169, in execute\\n return execute_root(*cmd, **kwargs)\\n File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_privsep/priv_context.py", line 205, in _wrap\\n return self.channel.remote_call(name, args, kwargs)\\n File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_privsep/daemon.py", line 202, in remote_call\\n raise exc_type(*result[2])\\noslo_concurrency.processutils.Pr ocessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command.\\nCommand: rbd map volume-a57dbd5c-2f66-460f-b37f-5f7dfa95d254 --pool ovirt-volumes --conf /tmp/brickrbd_TLMTkR --id ovirtcinderlib --mon_host 192.168.61.1:6789 --mon_host 192.168.61.2:6789 --mon_host 192.168.61.3:6789\\nExit code: 6\\nStdout: u\\\'RBD image feature set mismatch. You can disable features unsupported by the kernel with "rbd feature disable".\\\\nIn some cases useful info is found in syslog - try "dmesg | tail" or so.\\\\n\\\'\\nStderr: u\\\'rbd: sysfs write failed\\\\nrbd: map failed: (6) No such device or address\\\\n\\\'\\n\'',)] 2019-07-16 19:39:09,251+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.AttachManagedBlockStorageVolumeVDSCommand] (default task-53) [7cada945] Failed in 'AttachManagedBlockStorageVolumeVDS' method After disconnecting the disk, I can delete it (the volume disappears from ceph), but the disks stays in my oVirt administration portal as cinderlib means the disk ist still connected: 2019-07-16 19:42:53,551+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.RemoveDiskCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-487362) [887b4d11-302f-4f8d-a3f9-7443a80a47ba] Running command: RemoveDiskCommand internal: false. Entities affected : ID: a57dbd5c-2f66-460f-b37f-5f7dfa95d254 Type: DiskAction group DELETE_DISK with role type USER 2019-07-16 19:42:53,559+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.managedblock.RemoveManagedBlockStorageDiskCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-commandCoordinator-Thread-8) [] Running command: RemoveManagedBlockStorageDiskCommand internal: true. 2019-07-16 19:42:56,240+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.common.utils.cinderlib.CinderlibExecutor] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-commandCoordinator-Thread-8) [] cinderlib execution failed DBReferenceError: (psycopg2.IntegrityError) update or delete on table "volumes" violates foreign key constraint "volume_attachment_volume_id_fkey" on table "volume_attachment" 2019-07-16 19:42:55,958 - cinderlib-client - INFO - Deleting volume 'a57dbd5c-2f66-460f-b37f-5f7dfa95d254' [887b4d11-302f-4f8d-a3f9-7443a80a47ba] 2019-07-16 19:42:56,099 - cinderlib-client - ERROR - Failure occurred when trying to run command 'delete_volume': (psycopg2.IntegrityError) update or delete on table "volumes" violates foreign key constraint "volume_attachment_volume_id_fkey" on table "volume_attachment" DETAIL: Key (id)=(a57dbd5c-2f66-460f-b37f-5f7dfa95d254) is still referenced from table "volume_attachment". [SQL: 'DELETE FROM volumes WHERE volumes.deleted = false AND volumes.id = %(id_1)s'] [parameters: {'id_1': u'a57dbd5c-2f66-460f-b37f-5f7dfa95d254'}] [887b4d11-302f-4f8d-a3f9-7443a80a47ba] How are your experiences with oVirt, cinderlib and ceph? Should it work?

3 3

Change vDisk ID
by Николаев Алексей 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

1 0

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Strahil 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

If you can give directions (some kind of history) , the dev might try to reproduce this type of issue. If it is reproduceable - a fix can be provided. Based on my experience, if something as used as Linux LVM gets broken, the case is way hard to reproduce. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 22, 2019 10:17, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about 'pvmove', thanks. > > In the mean time, I managed to get it fixed by restoring the VG metadata on the iSCSI server, so on the underlying Zvol directly, rather than via the iSCSI session on the oVirt host. That allowed me to perform the restore without bringing all VMs down, which was important to me, because if I had to shut down VMs, I was sure I wouldn't be able to restart them before the storage domain was back online. > > Of course this is a more a Linux problem than an oVirt problem, but oVirt did cause it ;-) > > Thanks, > Martijn. > > > > Op 19-7-2019 om 19:06 schreef Strahil Nikolov: >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> First check what went wrong with the VG -as it could be something simple. >> vgcfgbackup -f VGname will create a file which you can use to compare current metadata with a previous version. >> >> If you have Linux boxes - you can add disks from another storage and then pvmove the data inside the VM. Of course , you will need to reinstall grub on the new OS disk , or you won't be able to boot afterwards. >> If possible, try with a test VM before proceeding with important ones. >> >> Backing up the VMs is very important , because working on LVM metadata is quite risky. >> Last time I had such an issue , I was working on clustered LVs which got their PVs "Missing". For me , restore from VG backup fixed the issue - but that might not be always the case. >> >> Just get the vgcfgbackup's output and compare with diff or vimdiff and check what is different. >> >> Sadly, I think that this is more a Linux problem , than an oVirt problem. >> >> Best Regards, >> Strahil Nikolov >> >> В четвъртък, 18 юли 2019 г., 18:51:32 ч. Гринуич+3, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl> написа: >> >> >> Hi! >> >> Thanks. Like I wrote, I have metadata backups from /etc/lvm/backup and -/archive, and I also have the current metadata as it exis

1 0

LiveStoreageMigration failed
by Christoph Köhler 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Hello, I try to migrate a disk of a running vm from gluster 3.12.15 to gluster 3.12.15 but it fails. libGfApi set to true by engine-config. ° taking a snapshot first, is working. Then at engine-log: 2019-07-18 09:29:13,932+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Failed in 'VmReplicateDiskStartVDS' method 2019-07-18 09:29:13,936+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] EVENT_ID: VDS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,802), VDSM ovvirt07 command VmReplicateDiskStartVDS failed: Drive replication error 2019-07-18 09:29:13,936+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Command 'org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand' return value 'StatusOnlyReturn [status=Status [code=55, message=Drive replication error]]' 2019-07-18 09:29:13,936+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] HostName = ovvirt07 2019-07-18 09:29:13,937+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Command 'VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand(HostName = ovvirt07, VmReplicateDiskParameters:{hostId='3a7bf85c-e92d-4559-908e-5eed2f5608d4', vmId='3b79d0c0-47e9-47c3-8511-980a8cfe147c', storagePoolId='00000001-0001-0001-0001-000000000311', srcStorageDomainId='e54d835a-d8a5-44ae-8e17-fcba1c54e46f', targetStorageDomainId='4dabb6d6-4be5-458c-811d-6d5e87699640', imageGroupId='d2964ff9-10f7-4b92-8327-d68f3cfd5b50', imageId='62656632-8984-4b7e-8be1-fd2547ca0f98'})' execution failed: VDSGenericException: VDSErrorException: Failed to VmReplicateDiskStartVDS, error = Drive replication error, code = 55 2019-07-18 09:29:13,937+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] FINISH, VmReplicateDiskStartVDSCommand, return: , log id: 5b2afb0b 2019-07-18 09:29:13,937+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.lsm.LiveMigrateDiskCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Failed VmReplicateDiskStart (Disk 'd2964ff9-10f7-4b92-8327-d68f3cfd5b50' , VM '3b79d0c0-47e9-47c3-8511-980a8cfe147c') 2019-07-18 09:29:13,938+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SerialChildCommandsExecutionCallback] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Command 'LiveMigrateDisk' id: '8174c74c-8ab0-49fa-abfc-44d8b7c691e0' with children [03672b60-443b-47ba-834c-ac306d7129d0, 562522fc-6691-47fe-93bf-ef2c45e85676] failed when attempting to perform the next operation, marking as 'ACTIVE' 2019-07-18 09:29:13,938+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SerialChildCommandsExecutionCallback] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] EngineException: Drive replication error (Failed with error replicaErr and code 55): org.ovirt.engine.core.common.errors.EngineException: EngineException: Drive replication error (Failed with error replicaErr and code 55) at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.lsm.LiveMigrateDiskCommand.replicateDiskStart(LiveMigrateDiskCommand.java:526) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.lsm.LiveMigrateDiskCommand.performNextOperation(LiveMigrateDiskCommand.java:233) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SerialChildCommandsExecutionCallback.childCommandsExecutionEnded(SerialChildCommandsExecutionCallback.java:32) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.ChildCommandsCallbackBase.doPolling(ChildCommandsCallbackBase.java:77) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.tasks.CommandCallbacksPoller.invokeCallbackMethodsImpl(CommandCallbacksPoller.java:175) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.tasks.CommandCallbacksPoller.invokeCallbackMethods(CommandCallbacksPoller.java:109) [bll.jar:] at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) [rt.jar:1.8.0_212] at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308) [rt.jar:1.8.0_212] at org.glassfish.enterprise.concurrent.internal.ManagedScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ManagedScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ManagedScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:383) [javax.enterprise.concurrent-1.0.jar:] at org.glassfish.enterprise.concurrent.internal.ManagedScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ManagedScheduledFutureTask.run(ManagedScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:534) [javax.enterprise.concurrent-1.0.jar:] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) [rt.jar:1.8.0_212] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) [rt.jar:1.8.0_212] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [rt.jar:1.8.0_212] at org.glassfish.enterprise.concurrent.ManagedThreadFactoryImpl$ManagedThread.run(ManagedThreadFactoryImpl.java:250) [javax.enterprise.concurrent-1.0.jar:] at org.jboss.as.ee.concurrent.service.ElytronManagedThreadFactory$ElytronManagedThread.run(ElytronManagedThreadFactory.java:78) 2019-07-18 09:29:13,938+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.SerialChildCommandsExecutionCallback] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-84) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Command 'LiveMigrateDisk' id: '8174c74c-8ab0-49fa-abfc-44d8b7c691e0' child commands '[03672b60-443b-47ba-834c-ac306d7129d0, 562522fc-6691-47fe-93bf-ef2c45e85676]' executions were completed, status 'FAILED' 2019-07-18 09:29:15,019+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.lsm.LiveMigrateDiskCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-1) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Ending command 'org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.lsm.LiveMigrateDiskCommand' with failure. 2019-07-18 09:29:15,019+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.lsm.LiveMigrateDiskCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-1) [c957e011-37e0-43aa-abe7-9bb633c38c5f] Failed during live storage migration of disk 'd2964ff9-10f7-4b92-8327-d68f3cfd5b50' of vm '3b79d0c0-47e9-47c3-8511-980a8cfe147c', attempting to end replication before deleting the target disk // LiveStorageMigration on gluster - should that work at all? Has someone tried it? Greetings! Christoph Köhler

4 5

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Martijn Grendelman 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Hi, Thanks for the tips! I didn't know about 'pvmove', thanks. In the mean time, I managed to get it fixed by restoring the VG metadata on the iSCSI server, so on the underlying Zvol directly, rather than via the iSCSI session on the oVirt host. That allowed me to perform the restore without bringing all VMs down, which was important to me, because if I had to shut down VMs, I was sure I wouldn't be able to restart them before the storage domain was back online. Of course this is a more a Linux problem than an oVirt problem, but oVirt did cause it ;-) Thanks, Martijn. Op 19-7-2019 om 19:06 schreef Strahil Nikolov: Hi Martin, First check what went wrong with the VG -as it could be something simple. vgcfgbackup -f VGname will create a file which you can use to compare current metadata with a previous version. If you have Linux boxes - you can add disks from another storage and then pvmove the data inside the VM. Of course , you will need to reinstall grub on the new OS disk , or you won't be able to boot afterwards. If possible, try with a test VM before proceeding with important ones. Backing up the VMs is very important , because working on LVM metadata is quite risky. Last time I had such an issue , I was working on clustered LVs which got their PVs "Missing". For me , restore from VG backup fixed the issue - but that might not be always the case. Just get the vgcfgbackup's output and compare with diff or vimdiff and check what is different. Sadly, I think that this is more a Linux problem , than an oVirt problem. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В четвъртък, 18 юли 2019 г., 18:51:32 ч. Гринуич+3, Martijn Grendelman <Martijn.Grendelman(a)isaac.nl><mailto:Martijn.Grendelman@isaac.nl> написа: Hi! Thanks. Like I wrote, I have metadata backups from /etc/lvm/backup and -/archive, and I also have the current metadata as it exists on disk. What I'm most concerned about, is the proposed procedure. I would create a backup of the VG, but I'm not sure what would be the most sensible way to do it. I could make a new iSCSI target and simply 'dd' the whole disk over, but that would take quite some time (it's 2,5 TB) and there are VMs that can't really be down for that long. And I'm not even sure that dd'ing the disk like that is a sensible strategy. Moving disks out of the domain is currently not possible. oVirt says 'Source Storage Domain is not active'. Thanks, Martijn. Op 18-7-2019 om 17:44 schreef Strahil Nikolov: Can you check the /etc/lvm/backup and /etc/lvm/archive on your SPM host (check the other hosts, just in case you find anything useful) ? Usually LVM makes backup of everything. I would recommend you to: 1. Create a backup of the problematic VG 2. Compare the backup file and a file from backup/archive folders for the same VG Check what is different with diff/vimdiff . It might give you a clue. I had some issues (non-related to oVirt) and restoring the VG from older backup did help me .Still ,any operation on block devices should be considered risky and a proper backup is needed. You could try to move a less important VM's disks out of this storage domain to another one. If it succeeds - then you can evacuate all VMs away before you can start "breaking" the storage domain. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В четвъртък, 18 юли 2019 г., 16:59:46 ч. Гринуич+3, Martijn Grendelman <martijn.grendelman(a)isaac.nl><mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> написа: Hi, It appears that O365 has trouble delivering mails to this list, so two earlier mails of mine are still somewhere in a queue and may yet be delivered. This mail has all of the content of 3 successive mails. I apologize for this format. Op 18-7-2019 om 11:20 schreef Martijn Grendelman: Op 18-7-2019 om 10:16 schreef Martijn Grendelman: Hi, For the first time in many months I have run into some trouble with oVirt (4.3.4.3) and I need some help. Yesterday, I noticed one of my iSCSI storage domains was almost full, and tried to move a disk image off of it, to another domain. This failed, and somewhere in the process, the whole storage domain went to status 'Inactive'. From engine.log: 2019-07-17 16:30:35,319+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] starting processDomainRecovery for domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02'. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,337+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] Domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02' was reported by all hosts in status UP as problematic. Moving the domain to NonOperational. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,410+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [5f6fd35e] EVENT_ID: SYSTEM_DEACTIVATED_STORAGE_DOMAIN(970), Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) was deactivated by system because it's not visible by any of the hosts. The thing is, the domain is still functional on all my hosts. It carries over 50 disks, and all involved VMs are up and running, and don't seem to have any problems. Also, 'iscsiadm' on all hosts seems to indiciate that everything is fine with this specific target and reading from the device with dd, or getting its size with 'blockdev' all works without issue. When I try to reactivate the domain, these errors are logged: 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: IRS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,803), VDSM command ActivateStorageDomainVDS failed: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] IrsBroker::Failed::ActivateStorageDomainVDS: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Failed to ActivateStorageDomainVDS, error = Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',), code = 358 2019-07-18 09:34:53,648+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: USER_ACTIVATE_STORAGE_DOMAIN_FAILED(967), Failed to activate Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) by martijn@-authz On the SPM host, there are errors that indicate problems with the LVM volume group: 2019-07-18 09:34:50,462+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] START activateStorageDomain(sdUUID=u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429', spUUID=u'aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78', options=None) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:48) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,464+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.StoragePool] sdUUID=875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429 spUUID=aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78 (sp:1125) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 WARN (jsonrpc/2) [storage.LVM] Reloading VGs failed (vgs=[u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429'] rc=5 out=[] err=[' /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832', " Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463.", ' Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG.', ' Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Volume group "875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429" not found', ' Cannot process volume group 875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429']) (lvm:442) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:52) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') Unexpected error (task:875) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in _run return fn(*args, **kargs) File "<string>", line 2, in activateStorageDomain File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in method ret = func(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1262, in activateStorageDomain pool.activateSD(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line 79, in wrapper return method(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 1127, in activateSD dom = sdCache.produce(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 110, in produce domain.getRealDomain() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 51, in getRealDomain return self._cache._realProduce(self._sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 134, in _realProduce domain = self._findDomain(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 151, in _findDomain return findMethod(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1807, in findDomain return BlockStorageDomain(BlockStorageDomain.findDomainPath(sdUUID)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1665, in findDomainPath raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID) StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') aborting: Task is aborted: "Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',)" - code 358 (task:1181) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) (dispatcher:83) I need help getting this storage domain back online. Can anyone here help me? If you need any additional information, please let me know! It appears the VG metadata is corrupt: /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832 Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463. Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG. Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Is this fixable? If so, how? So, I have found some information online, that suggests that PV metadata can be fixed by recreating the PV label using the correct PVID and a backup of the LVM metadata, like so: pvcreate -u <pv_uuid> --restorefile <lvm_metadata_backup> /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Now I have the following two files: * An LVM metadata backup of yesterday 10:35, about 6 hours before the problem occurred. * The actual metadata found on the PV at offset 2748693688832 (obtained with hexedit on the block device). These are largely the same, but there are differences: * seqno = 1854 in the backup and 1865 in the actual metadata. * 3 logical volumes that are not present in the backup, but are in the actual metadata. I suspect that these are related to snapshots that were created for live storage migration, but I am not sure. In any case, I did NOT create any new disk images on this domain, so that can't be it. Now, support I wanted to try the 'pvcreate' route, then: * what would be the chances of success? Is this procedure at all advisable, or is there an alternative? * which restore file (1854 or 1865) should I use for the restore? * can I do this while the VG is in use? I tried running the command without --force, and it said 'Can't open /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 exclusively. Mounted filesystem?'. I didn't dare to try it with '--force'. I could really use some advice on how to proceed. This are about 36 VMs that have one or more disks on this domain. I could bring them down, although doing so for extended amounts of time would be problematic. I want to be careful, obviously, especially since the actual storage doesn't seem to be impacted at this time. The VMs are all still running without issue, and if I'm about to embark on a dangerous journey that could cause data loss, I need a contingency / recovery plan. Hoping someone can help... Best regards, Martijn Grendelman _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AKWOTMY6MKDEQ… -- Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, [Martijn]<mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> Martijn Grendelman Infrastructure Architect T: +31 (0)40 264 94 44 [ISAAC]<https://www.isaac.nl> ISAAC Marconilaan 16 5621 AA Eindhoven The Netherlands T: +31 (0)40 290 89 79 www.isaac.nl<https://www.isaac.nl> [ISAAC #1 Again!]<https://www.isaac.nl/nl/over-ons/nieuws/isaac-news/ISAAC-voor-tweede-keer-n…> Dit e-mail bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bedoeld wordt u verzocht de afzender hiervan op de hoogte te stellen door het bericht te retourneren en de inhoud niet te gebruiken. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, [Martijn]<mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> Martijn Grendelman Infrastructure Architect T: +31 (0)40 264 94 44 [ISAAC]<https://www.isaac.nl> ISAAC Marconilaan 16 5621 AA Eindhoven The Netherlands T: +31 (0)40 290 89 79 www.isaac.nl<https://www.isaac.nl> [ISAAC #1 Again!]<https://www.isaac.nl/nl/over-ons/nieuws/isaac-news/ISAAC-voor-tweede-keer-n…> Dit e-mail bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bedoeld wordt u verzocht de afzender hiervan op de hoogte te stellen door het bericht te retourneren en de inhoud niet te gebruiken. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

1 0

NVMe disk cause kernel panic in installer
by bossman90＠gmail.com 21 Jul '19

21 Jul '19

Hey, I have problems with running oVirt installer on my H370M-ITX mobo. I have installed NVMe disk in it (which I want to use to install oVirt there) and installer crashes with kernel panic: https://photos.app.goo.gl/AY9T93bEs8sCQzRF7 Is there any issues with compatibility oVirt and NVMe?

3 6

Re: NVMe disk cause kernel panic in installer
by Strahil 20 Jul '19

20 Jul '19

Then, you can try a newer version of the kernel from epel repo. Also, check in the CentOS forum - maybe someone had a similar issue. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Jul 20, 2019 03:27, bossman90(a)gmail.com wrote: > > Unfortunately, it didn't help. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/2YSRWPT536PAE…

1 0

What values should i give in this ovirt api to get the correct response
by midhun raj 20 Jul '19

20 Jul '19

I am following this link. https://ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Backups_and_Migration.html… I got response for GET /api/vms/4ef8b995-ae58-49d6-8980-ef0fa6688d92/snapshots/1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e/disks HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml Identify disk id "Array ( [disk] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [actual_size] => 0 [alias] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [format] => cow [image_id] => a42bda58-7556-4ebe-a54d-03dc0a3b1f54 [propagate_errors] => false [provisioned_size] => 8589934592 [read_only] => false [shareable] => false [sparse] => true [status] => ok [storage_type] => image [wipe_after_delete] => false [snapshot] => Array ( [id] => 1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e ) [storage_domains] => Array ( [storage_domain] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => ad6aea6d-ff90-457f-98eb-99380949e23a ) ) ) [name] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [description] => CentOS 7 Generic Cloud Image v1711 for x86_64 (8700235) [id] => dded245b-4a73-48b4-a1b4-ba98c37490ad ) What is the values that i have to give to the POST request in this api POST /api/vms/22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222/disks/ HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml <disk id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"> <snapshot id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"/> <active>true</active> </disk> to replace 1)vms ===>> 22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222 2)disk id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111 3)snapshot id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111

1 0

Re: Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Martijn Grendelman 19 Jul '19

19 Jul '19

Hi! Thanks. Like I wrote, I have metadata backups from /etc/lvm/backup and -/archive, and I also have the current metadata as it exists on disk. What I'm most concerned about, is the proposed procedure. I would create a backup of the VG, but I'm not sure what would be the most sensible way to do it. I could make a new iSCSI target and simply 'dd' the whole disk over, but that would take quite some time (it's 2,5 TB) and there are VMs that can't really be down for that long. And I'm not even sure that dd'ing the disk like that is a sensible strategy. Moving disks out of the domain is currently not possible. oVirt says 'Source Storage Domain is not active'. Thanks, Martijn. Op 18-7-2019 om 17:44 schreef Strahil Nikolov: Can you check the /etc/lvm/backup and /etc/lvm/archive on your SPM host (check the other hosts, just in case you find anything useful) ? Usually LVM makes backup of everything. I would recommend you to: 1. Create a backup of the problematic VG 2. Compare the backup file and a file from backup/archive folders for the same VG Check what is different with diff/vimdiff . It might give you a clue. I had some issues (non-related to oVirt) and restoring the VG from older backup did help me .Still ,any operation on block devices should be considered risky and a proper backup is needed. You could try to move a less important VM's disks out of this storage domain to another one. If it succeeds - then you can evacuate all VMs away before you can start "breaking" the storage domain. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov В четвъртък, 18 юли 2019 г., 16:59:46 ч. Гринуич+3, Martijn Grendelman <martijn.grendelman(a)isaac.nl><mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> написа: Hi, It appears that O365 has trouble delivering mails to this list, so two earlier mails of mine are still somewhere in a queue and may yet be delivered. This mail has all of the content of 3 successive mails. I apologize for this format. Op 18-7-2019 om 11:20 schreef Martijn Grendelman: Op 18-7-2019 om 10:16 schreef Martijn Grendelman: Hi, For the first time in many months I have run into some trouble with oVirt (4.3.4.3) and I need some help. Yesterday, I noticed one of my iSCSI storage domains was almost full, and tried to move a disk image off of it, to another domain. This failed, and somewhere in the process, the whole storage domain went to status 'Inactive'. From engine.log: 2019-07-17 16:30:35,319+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] starting processDomainRecovery for domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02'. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,337+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] Domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02' was reported by all hosts in status UP as problematic. Moving the domain to NonOperational. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,410+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [5f6fd35e] EVENT_ID: SYSTEM_DEACTIVATED_STORAGE_DOMAIN(970), Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) was deactivated by system because it's not visible by any of the hosts. The thing is, the domain is still functional on all my hosts. It carries over 50 disks, and all involved VMs are up and running, and don't seem to have any problems. Also, 'iscsiadm' on all hosts seems to indiciate that everything is fine with this specific target and reading from the device with dd, or getting its size with 'blockdev' all works without issue. When I try to reactivate the domain, these errors are logged: 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: IRS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,803), VDSM command ActivateStorageDomainVDS failed: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] IrsBroker::Failed::ActivateStorageDomainVDS: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Failed to ActivateStorageDomainVDS, error = Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',), code = 358 2019-07-18 09:34:53,648+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: USER_ACTIVATE_STORAGE_DOMAIN_FAILED(967), Failed to activate Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) by martijn@-authz On the SPM host, there are errors that indicate problems with the LVM volume group: 2019-07-18 09:34:50,462+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] START activateStorageDomain(sdUUID=u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429', spUUID=u'aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78', options=None) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:48) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,464+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.StoragePool] sdUUID=875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429 spUUID=aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78 (sp:1125) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 WARN (jsonrpc/2) [storage.LVM] Reloading VGs failed (vgs=[u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429'] rc=5 out=[] err=[' /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832', " Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463.", ' Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG.', ' Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Volume group "875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429" not found', ' Cannot process volume group 875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429']) (lvm:442) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:52) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') Unexpected error (task:875) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in _run return fn(*args, **kargs) File "<string>", line 2, in activateStorageDomain File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in method ret = func(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1262, in activateStorageDomain pool.activateSD(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line 79, in wrapper return method(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 1127, in activateSD dom = sdCache.produce(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 110, in produce domain.getRealDomain() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 51, in getRealDomain return self._cache._realProduce(self._sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 134, in _realProduce domain = self._findDomain(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 151, in _findDomain return findMethod(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1807, in findDomain return BlockStorageDomain(BlockStorageDomain.findDomainPath(sdUUID)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1665, in findDomainPath raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID) StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') aborting: Task is aborted: "Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',)" - code 358 (task:1181) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) (dispatcher:83) I need help getting this storage domain back online. Can anyone here help me? If you need any additional information, please let me know! It appears the VG metadata is corrupt: /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832 Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463. Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG. Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Is this fixable? If so, how? So, I have found some information online, that suggests that PV metadata can be fixed by recreating the PV label using the correct PVID and a backup of the LVM metadata, like so: pvcreate -u <pv_uuid> --restorefile <lvm_metadata_backup> /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 Now I have the following two files: * An LVM metadata backup of yesterday 10:35, about 6 hours before the problem occurred. * The actual metadata found on the PV at offset 2748693688832 (obtained with hexedit on the block device). These are largely the same, but there are differences: * seqno = 1854 in the backup and 1865 in the actual metadata. * 3 logical volumes that are not present in the backup, but are in the actual metadata. I suspect that these are related to snapshots that were created for live storage migration, but I am not sure. In any case, I did NOT create any new disk images on this domain, so that can't be it. Now, support I wanted to try the 'pvcreate' route, then: * what would be the chances of success? Is this procedure at all advisable, or is there an alternative? * which restore file (1854 or 1865) should I use for the restore? * can I do this while the VG is in use? I tried running the command without --force, and it said 'Can't open /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 exclusively. Mounted filesystem?'. I didn't dare to try it with '--force'. I could really use some advice on how to proceed. This are about 36 VMs that have one or more disks on this domain. I could bring them down, although doing so for extended amounts of time would be problematic. I want to be careful, obviously, especially since the actual storage doesn't seem to be impacted at this time. The VMs are all still running without issue, and if I'm about to embark on a dangerous journey that could cause data loss, I need a contingency / recovery plan. Hoping someone can help... Best regards, Martijn Grendelman _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org<mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AKWOTMY6MKDEQ… -- Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, [Martijn]<mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> Martijn Grendelman Infrastructure Architect T: +31 (0)40 264 94 44 [ISAAC]<https://www.isaac.nl> ISAAC Marconilaan 16 5621 AA Eindhoven The Netherlands T: +31 (0)40 290 89 79 www.isaac.nl<https://www.isaac.nl> [ISAAC #1 Again!]<https://www.isaac.nl/nl/over-ons/nieuws/isaac-news/ISAAC-voor-tweede-keer-n…> Dit e-mail bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bedoeld wordt u verzocht de afzender hiervan op de hoogte te stellen door het bericht te retourneren en de inhoud niet te gebruiken. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

2 1

Doubt regarding ovirt api
by midhun raj 19 Jul '19

19 Jul '19

following the step 3 of api This is the response i got for GET /api/vms/4ef8b995-ae58-49d6-8980-ef0fa6688d92/snapshots/1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e/disks HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml Identify disk id "Array ( [disk] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [actual_size] => 0 [alias] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [format] => cow [image_id] => a42bda58-7556-4ebe-a54d-03dc0a3b1f54 [propagate_errors] => false [provisioned_size] => 8589934592 [read_only] => false [shareable] => false [sparse] => true [status] => ok [storage_type] => image [wipe_after_delete] => false [snapshot] => Array ( [id] => 1b94ca4e-8c03-4166-8d29-2b831e24b90e ) [storage_domains] => Array ( [storage_domain] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => ad6aea6d-ff90-457f-98eb-99380949e23a ) ) ) [name] => GlanceDisk-8700235 [description] => CentOS 7 Generic Cloud Image v1711 for x86_64 (8700235) [id] => dded245b-4a73-48b4-a1b4-ba98c37490ad ) ) ) " What is the values that i have to give to the POST request in this api POST /api/vms/22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222/disks/ HTTP/1.1 Accept: application/xml Content-type: application/xml <disk id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"> <snapshot id="11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111"/> <active>true</active> </disk> to replace 1)vms ===>> 22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222 2)disk id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111 3)snapshot id 11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111

1 0

Storage domain 'Inactive' but still functional
by Martijn Grendelman 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi, For the first time in many months I have run into some trouble with oVirt (4.3.4.3) and I need some help. Yesterday, I noticed one of my iSCSI storage domains was almost full, and tried to move a disk image off of it, to another domain. This failed, and somewhere in the process, the whole storage domain went to status 'Inactive'. From engine.log: 2019-07-17 16:30:35,319+02 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] starting processDomainRecovery for domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02'. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,337+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [] Domain '875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429:HQST0_ISCSI02' was reported by all hosts in status UP as problematic. Moving the domain to NonOperational. 2019-07-17 16:30:35,410+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-1836383) [5f6fd35e] EVENT_ID: SYSTEM_DEACTIVATED_STORAGE_DOMAIN(970), Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) was deactivated by system because it's not visible by any of the hosts. The thing is, the domain is still functional on all my hosts. It carries over 50 disks, and all involved VMs are up and running, and don't seem to have any problems. Also, 'iscsiadm' on all hosts seems to indiciate that everything is fine with this specific target and reading from the device with dd, or getting its size with 'blockdev' all works without issue. When I try to reactivate the domain, these errors are logged: 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: IRS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,803), VDSM command ActivateStorageDomainVDS failed: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:53,631+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] IrsBroker::Failed::ActivateStorageDomainVDS: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Failed to ActivateStorageDomainVDS, error = Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',), code = 358 2019-07-18 09:34:53,648+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43475) [79e386e] EVENT_ID: USER_ACTIVATE_STORAGE_DOMAIN_FAILED(967), Failed to activate Storage Domain HQST0_ISCSI02 (Data Center ISAAC01) by martijn@-authz On the SPM host, there are errors that indicate problems with the LVM volume group: 2019-07-18 09:34:50,462+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] START activateStorageDomain(sdUUID=u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429', spUUID=u'aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78', options=None) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:48) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,464+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.StoragePool] sdUUID=875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429 spUUID=aefd5844-6e01-4070-b3b9-c0d73cc40c78 (sp:1125) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 WARN (jsonrpc/2) [storage.LVM] Reloading VGs failed (vgs=[u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429'] rc=5 out=[] err=[' /dev/mapper/23536316636393463: Checksum error at offset 2748693688832', " Couldn't read volume group metadata from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463.", ' Metadata location on /dev/mapper/23536316636393463 at 2748693688832 has invalid summary for VG.', ' Failed to read metadata summary from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Failed to scan VG from /dev/mapper/23536316636393463', ' Volume group "875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429" not found', ' Cannot process volume group 875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429']) (lvm:442) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [vdsm.api] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) from=::ffff:172.17.1.140,56570, flow_id=197dadec, task_id=51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8 (api:52) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') Unexpected error (task:875) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 882, in _run return fn(*args, **kargs) File "<string>", line 2, in activateStorageDomain File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/common/api.py", line 50, in method ret = func(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1262, in activateStorageDomain pool.activateSD(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/securable.py", line 79, in wrapper return method(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 1127, in activateSD dom = sdCache.produce(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 110, in produce domain.getRealDomain() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 51, in getRealDomain return self._cache._realProduce(self._sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 134, in _realProduce domain = self._findDomain(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdc.py", line 151, in _findDomain return findMethod(sdUUID) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1807, in findDomain return BlockStorageDomain(BlockStorageDomain.findDomainPath(sdUUID)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 1665, in findDomainPath raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID) StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 INFO (jsonrpc/2) [storage.TaskManager.Task] (Task='51107845-d80b-47f4-aed8-345aaa49f0f8') aborting: Task is aborted: "Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',)" - code 358 (task:1181) 2019-07-18 09:34:50,629+0200 ERROR (jsonrpc/2) [storage.Dispatcher] FINISH activateStorageDomain error=Storage domain does not exist: (u'875847b6-29a4-4419-be92-9315f4435429',) (dispatcher:83) I need help getting this storage domain back online. Can anyone here help me? If you need any additional information, please let me know! Best regards, Martijn Grendelman ISAAC

3 3

assign vm traffic to a physical NIC and Storage traffic to another NIC
by Erick Perez 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi, fresh install I have created a network called "storage" and another called "vms" and both have vlan 102 tag. Only the "vms" network have the check on "vm network". then on Compute---Hosts---hvm001---setup_host_network physical nic enp3s0f0 has ovirtmgmt and vms networks defined physical nic enp3s0f1 has storage network defined Question is how do I tell ovirt that I want the STORAGE traffic to use enp3s0f1 ? I am using NFS data domains and I cannot find a place to tell the network/physical nic my NFS traffic should use. thanks,

2 1

LDAP Group issue with rfc2307bis
by Timmi 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi oVirt List, I'm currently working on my new oVirt setup and want to integrate it into our LDAP server. Accounts are working fine but I have problems to get the groups working correctly. The LDAP server is base on ClearOS which is using the rfc2307bis setup. Means I don't have MemberOf inside my users. The user DN is as Member inside the group. I manage that oVirt is able to read the groups while overwriting: search.rfc2307-resolve-groups-memberUid.search-request.filter = &(objectClass=posixGroup)(memberUid=${seq:_rfc2307_uid_encoded}) with search.rfc2307-resolve-groups-memberUid.search-request.filter = &(objectClass=posixGroup)(member=${seq:_rfc2307_dn}) This is working absolutely fine for my admin group in "Administrator Portal". I can asign the group to the system permission "SuperUser" and everything is working great. My problem is with the "VM Portal" I have assigned "PowerUser" rights to a quota and it is possible to login but I receive the following error in the engine.log. 2019-07-18 07:38:12,317+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.GetPermissionsForObjectQuery] (default task-5) [a6828f8b-8ded-422f-a216-5e5406d7bf20] Query execution failed due to insufficient permissions. 2019-07-18 07:38:12,319+02 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.api.restapi.resource.AbstractBackendResource] (default task-5) [] Operation Failed: query execution failed due to insufficient permissions. I'm able to see the group permission in the user details. So I guess that something is already working. But I guess the error is preventing me to have the "create VM" button on the "VM Portal". Would be great if someone could help me out. I'm running the latest 4.3.4 version. Best regards Christoph

1 0