- Users - oVirt List Archives

Re: DHCP Client in Guest VM does not work on ovirtmgmt
by Strahil 07 Nov '19

07 Nov '19

All my VMs are using DHCP over ovirtmgmt network. So, yes it should be possible. Are yoiu sure that your hosts' network is in sync ? Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Nov 7, 2019 00:21, Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > The output of "tcpdump -i ovirtmgmt -pvn port 67 and port 68" in https://pastebin.com/a2DEyL0e looks like the DHCP reply does not reach the ovirtmgmt bridge. > Is the ovirtmgmt bridge / network attachment on the host able to receive configuration by DHCP? > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 7:08 PM <ccesario(a)blueit.com.br> wrote: >> >> Hi Ales, have you any new tip about this? >> >> regards, >> Carlos >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org >> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ >> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >> List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/BM7J3AREZ2X6Y…

1 0

CPU Pinning topology
by Fabrice Bacchella 07 Nov '19

07 Nov '19

I'm trying to understand the field "CPU Pinning topology" in the "Ressource Allocation" tab, that looks it needed by High Performance VM. I have this hardware: # lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU(s): 48 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-47 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 12 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2 And I want to run a 22 vCPU vm on it, so no SMT, and 11 vCPU mapped to each socket. The only explanation I found about this field content was here: https://rhv.bradmin.org/ovirt-engine/docs/Virtual_Machine_Management_Guide/… and I can wrap my head around it. Do I need to given explicit mapping for all the 22 vCPU ? And dig in lscpu -e or numactl -H to find how each pCPU is identified ?

2 1

Can ovirt-node support multiple network cards ？
by wangyu13476969128＠126.com 07 Nov '19

07 Nov '19

Can ovirt-node support multiple network cards ？ I download ovirt-node-ng-installer-4.3.5-2019073010.el7.iso from ovirt site. And install on a Dell R730 Server. The version of ovirt-engine is 4.3.5.5. I found that the logic network ovirtmgmt can only point to one network card interface. Can ovirt-node support multiple network cards ？ If yes , please tell me the method.

5 15

Fw: Upgrade 4.2.6 to 4.3.x
by Srivathsa Puliyala 07 Nov '19

07 Nov '19

++ users(a)ovirt.org ________________________________ From: Srivathsa Puliyala Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 11:38 AM To: users-owner(a)ovirt.org <users-owner(a)ovirt.org> Subject: Upgrade 4.2.6 to 4.3.x Hi, I am trying to follow the documentation for the ovirt-engine upgrade (https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/upgrade-guide/appe-Upgrading_to_oVirt_E…) but unable to find the package. Could anyone please help on this? ################# No package ovirt-fast-forward-upgrade available. Error: Nothing to do ################# FYI: ovirt engine is running on CentOS Linux 7 (Core) Thank you. Srivathsa

2 1

Re: Cannot enable maintenance mode
by Martin Perina 07 Nov '19

07 Nov '19

Hi Bruno, how have you rebooted the host? Have you used Stop/Start/Restart functions from Power Management menu in host detail in webadmin? Regards, Martin On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:29 AM Bruno Martins <bruno.o.martins(a)gfi.world> wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > Thanks for your message! > > In my cluster, I have all the VM's running under "HOST2". > The issue I'm having is that I can't enable maintenance mode on "HOST1", > in order to re-add it to oVirt Manager (SSL certificate replacement stuff). > I did it successfully on "HOST2", but the other one seems to ignore my > actions, with that message in the logs... > > Cheers, > > Bruno > > From: Lukas Svaty <lsvaty(a)redhat.com> > Sent: 16 de outubro de 2019 10:49 > To: Bruno Martins <bruno.o.martins(a)gfi.world> > Cc: users(a)ovirt.org > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: Cannot enable maintenance mode > > Did you > > "Consider manual intervention" > > such as > > "stopping" or "migrating Vms" > > which are running on that host? > > If you are trying to put host to maintenance, it will migrate all the VMs > somewhere else, thus... you might have problem with migrations (try to > migrate them to other destination host) or power them off. > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:15 AM Bruno Martins <mailto: > bruno.o.martins(a)gfi.world> wrote: > Hey guys, > > There are really no options left here? Is there something else I should > check? > > Thank you! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruno Martins <mailto:bruno.o.martins@gfi.world> > Sent: 3 de outubro de 2019 22:41 > To: Benny Zlotnik <mailto:bzlotnik@redhat.com> > Cc: mailto:users@ovirt.org > Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: Cannot enable maintenance mode > > Hello Benny, > > I did. No luck, still... > > Cheers! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Benny Zlotnik <mailto:bzlotnik@redhat.com> > Sent: 2 de outubro de 2019 19:19 > To: Bruno Martins <mailto:bruno.o.martins@gfi.world> > Cc: mailto:users@ovirt.org > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: Cannot enable maintenance mode > > Did you try the "Confirm Host has been rebooted" button? > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:17 PM Bruno Martins <mailto: > bruno.o.martins(a)gfi.world> wrote: > > > > Hello guys, > > > > No ideas for this issue? > > > > Thanks for your cooperation! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruno Martins <mailto:bruno.o.martins@gfi.world> > > Sent: 29 de setembro de 2019 16:16 > > To: mailto:users@ovirt.org > > Subject: [ovirt-users] Cannot enable maintenance mode > > > > Hello guys, > > > > I am being unable to put a host from a two nodes cluster into > maintenance mode in order to remove it from the cluster afterwards. > > > > This is what I see in engine.log: > > > > 2019-09-27 16:20:58,364 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] > (org.ovirt.thread.pool-6-thread-45) [4cc251c9] Correlation ID: 4cc251c9, > Job ID: 65731fbb-db34-49a9-ab56-9fba59bc0ee0, Call Stack: null, Custom > Event ID: -1, Message: Host CentOS-H1 cannot change into maintenance mode - > not all Vms have been migrated successfully. Consider manual intervention: > stopping/migrating Vms: Non interactive user (User: admin). > > > > Host has been rebooted multiple times. vdsClient shows no VM's running. > > > > What else can I do? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Bruno Martins > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list -- mailto:users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an > > email to mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy > > Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > > oVirt Code of Conduct: > > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > > List Archives: > > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/X5FJWFW7 > > GXNW6YWRPFWOKA6VU3RH4WD3/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list -- mailto:users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an > > email to mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy > > Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > > oVirt Code of Conduct: > > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > > List Archives: > > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/DD5DW6KK > > OOHGL3WFEKIIIS57BN3VWMAQ/ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- mailto:users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email > to mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: > https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/64GZQKZA7LX7K… > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- mailto:users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email > to mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: > https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/JJPEC7RDG3AUS… > > > -- > LUKAS SVATY > RHV QE > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/YZB2L7MK6SGQI… > -- Martin Perina Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

2 1

How to pass parameters between VDSM Hooks domxml in single run
by Vrgotic, Marko 06 Nov '19

06 Nov '19

Dear oVIrt, A while ago we discussed on ways to change/update content of parameters of domxml in certain action. As I mentioned before, we have added the VDSMHook 60_nsupdate which removes the DNS record entries when a VM is destroyed: … domxml = hooking.read_domxml() name = domxml.getElementsByTagName('name')[0] name = " ".join(name.nodeValue for name in name.childNodes if name.nodeType == name.TEXT_NODE) nsupdate_commands = """server {server_ip} update delete {vm_name}.example.com a update delete {vm_name}. example.com aaaa update delete {vm_name}. example.com txt send """.format(server_ip="172.16.1.10", vm_name=name) … The goal: However, we did not want to execute remove dns records when VM is only migrated. Since its considered a “destroy” action we took following approach. * In state “before_vm_migrate_source add hook which will write flag “is_migration” to domxml * Once VM is scheduled for migration, this hook should add the flag “is_migration” to domxml * Once 60_nsupdate is triggered, it will check for the flag and if there, skip executing dns record action, but only remove the flag “is_migration” from domxml of the VM … domxml = hooking.read_domxml() migration = domxml.createElement("is_migration") domxml.getElementsByTagName("domain")[0].appendChild(migration) logging.info("domxml_updated {}".format(domxml.toprettyxml())) hooking.write_domxml(domxml) … When executing first time, we observed that flag “ <name>hookiesvm</name> <uuid>fcfa66cb-b251-43a3-8e2b-f33b3024a749</uuid> <metadata xmlns:ns0="http://ovirt.org/vm/tune/1.0" xmlns:ns1="http://ovirt.org/vm/1.0"> <ns0:qos/> <ovirt-vm:vm xmlns:ovirt-vm="http://ovirt.org/vm/1.0"> <ovirt-vm:clusterVersion>4.3</ovirt-vm:clusterVersion> <ovirt-vm:destroy_on_reboot type="bool">False</ovirt-vm:destroy_on_reboot> <ovirt-vm:launchPaused>false</ovirt-vm:launchPaused> <ovirt-vm:memGuaranteedSize type="int">1024</ovirt-vm:memGuaranteedSize> <ovirt-vm:minGuaranteedMemoryMb type="int">1024</ovirt-vm:minGuaranteedMemoryMb> ...skipping... <address bus="0x00" domain="0x0000" function="0x0" slot="0x09" type="pci"/> </rng> </devices> <seclabel model="selinux" relabel="yes" type="dynamic"> <label>system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c169,c575</label> <imagelabel>system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0:c169,c575</imagelabel> </seclabel> <seclabel model="dac" relabel="yes" type="dynamic"> <label>+107:+107</label> <imagelabel>+107:+107</imagelabel> </seclabel> <is_migration/> </domain> is added to domxml, but was present once 60_nsupdate hook was executed. The question: How do we make sure that, when domxml is updated, that the update is visible/usable by following hook, in single run? How to pass these changes between hooks? Kindly awaiting your reply. — — — Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Marko Vrgotic

2 6

Ansible setup host network fails on comparing sorted dictionaries
by Vrgotic, Marko 06 Nov '19

06 Nov '19

Dear oVirt, While deploying ovirt_infra , the role oivrt.networks fails on Setup Host Networks, with following error: TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'dict' and 'dict' Full output: TASK [ovirt.infra/roles/ovirt.networks : Setup host networks] ****************************************************************************************************************** The full traceback is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/folders/40/w2c8fp151854mddz_4n3czwm0000gn/T/ansible_ovirt_host_network_payload_s0fx52mx/__main__.py", line 396, in main (nic is None or host_networks_module.has_update(nics_service.service(nic.id))) File "/var/folders/40/w2c8fp151854mddz_4n3czwm0000gn/T/ansible_ovirt_host_network_payload_s0fx52mx/__main__.py", line 289, in has_update update = self.__compare_options(get_bond_options(bond.get('mode'), bond.get('options')), getattr(nic.bonding, 'options', [])) File "/var/folders/40/w2c8fp151854mddz_4n3czwm0000gn/T/ansible_ovirt_host_network_payload_s0fx52mx/__main__.py", line 247, in __compare_options return sorted(get_dict_of_struct(opt) for opt in new_options) != sorted(get_dict_of_struct(opt) for opt in old_options) TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'dict' and 'dict' failed: [localhost] (item={'name': 'ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv', 'check': True, 'save': True, 'bond': {'name': 'bond28', 'mode': 4, 'interfaces': ['p2p1', 'p2p2']}, 'networks': [{'name': 'backbone', 'boot_protocol': 'static', 'address': '172.17.28.212', 'netmask': '255.255.255.0', 'version': 'v4'}]}) => { "ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed": false, "invocation": { "module_args": { "bond": { "interfaces": [ "p2p1", "p2p2" ], "mode": 4, "name": "bond28" }, "check": true, "fetch_nested": false, "interface": null, "labels": null, "name": "ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv", "nested_attributes": [], "networks": [ { "address": "172.17.28.212", "boot_protocol": "static", "name": "backbone", "netmask": "255.255.255.0", "version": "v4" } ], "poll_interval": 3, "save": true, "state": "present", "sync_networks": false, "timeout": 180, "wait": true } }, "item": { "bond": { "interfaces": [ "p2p1", "p2p2" ], "mode": 4, "name": "bond28" }, "check": true, "name": "ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv", "networks": [ { "address": "172.17.28.212", "boot_protocol": "static", "name": "backbone", "netmask": "255.255.255.0", "version": "v4" } ], "save": true }, "msg": "'<' not supported between instances of 'dict' and 'dict'" } Read vars_file 'vars/engine_vars.yml' Read vars_file 'vars/secrets.yml' Read vars_file 'vars/ovirt_infra_vars.yml' Looking further into ovirt_host_network.py I found that issue is reported after following is executed: return sorted(get_dict_of_struct(opt) for opt in new_options) != sorted(get_dict_of_struct(opt) for opt in old_options) It seemed to be failing due to not getting the key value to sort the dicts, so I added sorting based on name, to test, and it worked in single test run: return sorted((get_dict_of_struct(opt) for opt in new_options), key=lambda x: x["name"]) != sorted((get_dict_of_struct(opt) for opt in old_options), key=lambda x: x["name"]) After rerun of the play, with changes above: TASK [ovirt.infra/roles/ovirt.networks : Setup host networks] ****************************************************************************************************************** task path: /Users/mvrgotic/Git/ovirt-engineering/roles/ovirt.infra/roles/ovirt.networks/tasks/main.yml:25 Using module file /Users/mvrgotic/.local/share/virtualenvs/ovirt-engineering-JaxzXThh/lib/python3.7/site-packages/ansible/modules/cloud/ovirt/ovirt_host_network.py Pipelining is enabled. <127.0.0.1> ESTABLISH LOCAL CONNECTION FOR USER: mvrgotic <127.0.0.1> EXEC /bin/sh -c '/Users/mvrgotic/.local/share/virtualenvs/ovirt-engineering-JaxzXThh/bin/python3 && sleep 0' changed: [localhost] => (item={'name': 'ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv', 'check': True, 'save': True, 'bond': {'name': 'bond28', 'mode': 4, 'interfaces': ['p2p1', 'p2p2']}, 'networks': [{'name': 'backbone', 'boot_protocol': 'static', 'address': '172.17.28.212', 'netmask': '255.255.255.0', 'version': 'v4'}]}) => { "ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed": true, "host_nic": { "ad_aggregator_id": 6, "bonding": { "ad_partner_mac": { "address": "44:31:92:7c:b3:11" }, "options": [ { "name": "mode", "type": "Dynamic link aggregation (802.3ad)", "value": "4" }, { "name": "xmit_hash_policy", "value": "2" } ], "slaves": [ { "href": "/ovirt-engine/api/hosts/aa1f7a65-a867-436a-9a7f-264068f4bdea/nics/01703220-570c-44f5-9729-6717ceead304", "id": "01703220-570c-44f5-9729-6717ceead304" }, { "href": "/ovirt-engine/api/hosts/aa1f7a65-a867-436a-9a7f-264068f4bdea/nics/e879c1c6-065d-4742-b282-fcdb477f95a7", "id": "e879c1c6-065d-4742-b282-fcdb477f95a7" } ] }, "boot_protocol": "static", "bridged": false, "custom_configuration": false, "host": { "href": "/ovirt-engine/api/hosts/aa1f7a65-a867-436a-9a7f-264068f4bdea", "id": "aa1f7a65-a867-436a-9a7f-264068f4bdea" }, "href": "/ovirt-engine/api/hosts/aa1f7a65-a867-436a-9a7f-264068f4bdea/nics/abce07fa-cb7f-46f2-b967-69d1feaa4075", "id": "abce07fa-cb7f-46f2-b967-69d1feaa4075", "ip": { "address": "172.17.28.212", "netmask": "255.255.255.0", "version": "v4" }, "ipv6": { "gateway": "::", "version": "v6" }, "ipv6_boot_protocol": "none", "mac": { "address": "b4:96:91:3f:47:1c" }, "mtu": 9000, "name": "bond28", "network": { "href": "/ovirt-engine/api/networks/f3ef80cf-bf3a-4fa5-aed9-7d9e7455f804", "id": "f3ef80cf-bf3a-4fa5-aed9-7d9e7455f804" }, "network_labels": [], "properties": [], "speed": 10000000000, "statistics": [], "status": "up" }, "id": "abce07fa-cb7f-46f2-b967-69d1feaa4075", "invocation": { "module_args": { "bond": { "interfaces": [ "p2p1", "p2p2" ], "mode": 4, "name": "bond28" }, "check": true, "fetch_nested": false, "interface": null, "labels": null, "name": "ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv", "nested_attributes": [], "networks": [ { "address": "172.17.28.212", "boot_protocol": "static", "id": "3e40ff7d-5384-45f1-b036-13e6f91aff56", "name": "backbone", "netmask": "255.255.255.0", "version": "v4" } ], "poll_interval": 3, "save": true, "state": "present", "sync_networks": false, "timeout": 180, "wait": true } }, "item": { "bond": { "interfaces": [ "p2p1", "p2p2" ], "mode": 4, "name": "bond28" }, "check": true, "name": "ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv", "networks": [ { "address": "172.17.28.212", "boot_protocol": "static", "name": "backbone", "netmask": "255.255.255.0", "version": "v4" } ], "save": true } } Read vars_file 'vars/engine_vars.yml' Read vars_file 'vars/secrets.yml' Read vars_file 'vars/ovirt_infra_vars.yml' Changes resulted in applying configuration exactly as intended. Not sure it this was the actual intention, but please let me know if the made change was as initially intended for sorted compare to work. My pipenv setup: Python 3.7 ansible==2.8.6 asn1crypto==1.1.0 bcrypt==3.1.7 cffi==1.13.1 cryptography==2.8 dnspython==1.16.0 ipaddress==1.0.23 Jinja2==2.10.3 jmespath==0.9.4 lxml==4.4.1 MarkupSafe==1.1.1 netaddr==0.7.19 ovirt-engine-sdk-python==4.3.3 paramiko==2.6.0 passlib==1.7.1 pyasn1==0.4.5 pycparser==2.19 pycurl==7.43.0.3 PyNaCl==1.3.0 PyYAML==5.1.2 six==1.12.0 Ansible vars and play: ================================= host_networks: - name: ovirt-staging-hv-02.avinity.tv check: true save: true bond: name: bond28 mode: 4 interfaces: - p2p1 - p2p2 networks: - name: backbone boot_protocol: static address: 172.17.28.212 netmask: 255.255.255.0 version: v4 ================================= - name: Setup host networks ovirt_host_network: auth: "{{ ovirt_auth }}" name: "{{ item.name }}" state: "{{ item.state | default(omit) }}" check: "{{ item.check | default(omit) }}" save: "{{ item.save | default(omit) }}" bond: "{{ item.bond | default(omit) }}" networks: "{{ item.networks | default(omit) }}" labels: "{{ item.labels | default(omit) }}" interface: "{{ item.interface | default(omit) }}" with_items: - "{{ host_networks | default([]) }}" tags: - host_networks - networks ====================================

2 3

[feedback needed] oVirt master test
by Sandro Bonazzola 05 Nov '19

05 Nov '19

Hi, as part of the 4.4 development we'd like to ask for testing current master. In order to ease the test, you can take: oVirt Node: https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/iso/ovirt-node-ng-ins… when this link won't be available anymore due to nightly build rotation you can take the latest from https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/iso/ovirt-node-ng-ins… oVirt appliance: https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el8/x86_64/ovirt-… as per oVirt Node, you can take the latest from https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el8/x86_64/ if above link doesn't work. The above 2 builds have been tested on a single host nested VM system with 70Gb disk, 8Gb of RAM and 4 cores for the node. Both oVirt Node and oVirt Engine appliance installation succeeded on 80GB NFS external storage with static IP addressing. We have a known issue on booting with more than 1 NIC that will be addressed soon, so please use a single NIC in your tests for now. Looking forward for your feedback, thanks. -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.*

1 0

[ANN] oVirt 4.3.7 First Release Candidate is now available for testing
by Sandro Bonazzola 05 Nov '19

05 Nov '19

The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the oVirt 4.3.7 First Release Candidate for testing, as of October 18th, 2019. This update is a release candidate of the seventh in a series of stabilization updates to the 4.3 series. This is pre-release software. This pre-release should not to be used in production. This release is available now on x86_64 architecture for: * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 or later (but <8) * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.7 or later (but <8) This release supports Hypervisor Hosts on x86_64 and ppc64le architectures for: * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.7 or later (but <8) * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.7 or later (but <8) * oVirt Node 4.3 (available for x86_64 only) has been built consuming CentOS 7.7 Release See the release notes [1] for known issues, new features and bugs fixed. Notes: - oVirt Appliance is already available - oVirt Node is already available Additional Resources: * Read more about the oVirt 4.3.7 release highlights: http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.3.7/ * Get more oVirt Project updates on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ovirt * Check out the latest project news on the oVirt blog: http://www.ovirt.org/blog/ [1] http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.3.7/ [2] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.3-pre/iso/ -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/>*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.*

5 8

Re: [ANN] oVirt 4.3.7 First Release Candidate is now available for testing
by Strahil 04 Nov '19

04 Nov '19

Hi Dominik, I think I found it - it seems that for some reason my gateway is missing in 'ip route'. Running 'ifdown ovirtmgmt; ifup ovirtmgmt' fixes it, which proves that network scripts read properly the ifcfg-ovirtmgmt file. Do you have any idea where to look for? Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Nov 2, 2019 17:17, Strahil <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > I think I have a theory about ovirt1 , but I have to test it. > > 1. Ovirt1 has a team device controlled by NetworkManager , but in engine those interfaces are unused > 2. I guess that when I recently 'reinstalled' the host from UI, the old teamports' ifcfg-<DEVICENAME> was moved to ifcfg-<DEVICENAME>-1 and the original file was left empty. > 3. When the system rebooted, network.service rereads all ifcfg-* files and starts the team0 , but when NetworkManager reads the empty files - he alters the /etc/resolv.conf which leads to out-of-sync status. > > Still, this is only theory and as ovirt3 has no team device (plain gluster arbiter) - I'm not sure how close is this one. > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > On Nov 2, 2019 09:50, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> I saw the hint in the Cluster's tab and then on each host. I had to put the host back to maintenance in order to sync it again. >> >> Logs attached . >> >> Best Regards, >> Strahil Nikolov >> >> В четвъртък, 31 октомври 2019 г., 16:12:53 ч. Гринуич+2, Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com> написа: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:06 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Il giorno gio 31 ott 2019 alle ore 09:45 Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com> ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi Sandro, >>>> >>>> I have just updated to latest release candidate (2 clusters in total - 1 AMD , 1 Intel). >>>> The only issue observed is that after patching every host's ovirtmgmt (I have another one that has none of the 4 roles which was OK) is out of sync and has to be synced before removing maintenance. >>>> >>>> Still the system was accessible. >>>> >>>> Can you guide me which log reports the out-of-sync in order to further investigate. >>> >>> >>> +Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso , +Dominik Holler can you please help here? >>> >>> >> >> >> Do you remember if there was a hint shown as a tooltip if you hover the >> mouse pointer over ovirtmgmt in >> "Compute > Hosts > xxx > Network Interfaces > Setup Host Networks" >> ? >> >> Are you able to share the vdsm.log and engine.log after the ovirtmgmt? >> >>

3 3