- Users - oVirt List Archives

[Users] [QE] oVirt 3.3.3 beta / RC status
by Sandro Bonazzola 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

Hi, oVirt 3.3.3 beta has been released and is actually on QA. We'll start composing oVirt 3.3.3 RC on 2014-01-21 12:00 UTC. The bug tracker [1] shows no bugs blocking the release The following is a list of the non-blocking bugs still open with target 3.3 - 3.3.3: Whiteboard Bug ID Summary integration 902979 ovirt-live - firefox doesn't trust the installed engine integration 1021805 [RFE] oVirt Live - use motd to show the admin password integration 1022440 [RFE] AIO - configure the AIO host to be a gluster cluster/host integration 1026930 Package virtio-win and put it in ovirt repositories integration 1026933 pre-populate ISO domain with virtio-win ISO integration 1050084 Tracker: oVirt 3.3.3 release network 997197 Some AppErrors messages are grammatically incorrect (singular vs plural) node 906257 USB Flash Drive install of ovirt-node created via dd fails node 923049 ovirt-node fails to boot from local disk under UEFI mode node 965583 [RFE] add shortcut key on TUI node 976675 [wiki] Update contribution page node 979350 Changes admin password in the first time when log in is failed while finished auto-install node 979390 [RFE] Split defaults.py into smaller pieces node 982232 performance page takes >1sec to load (on first load) node 984441 kdump page crashed before configuring the network after ovirt-node intalled node 986285 UI crashes when no bond name is given node 991267 [RFE] Add TUI information to log file. node 1018374 ovirt-node-iso-3.0.1-1.0.2.vdsm.fc19: Failed on Auto-install node 1018710 [RFE] Enhance API documentation node 1032035 [RFE]re-write auto install function for the cim plugin node 1033286 ovirt-node-plugin-vdsm can not be added to ovirt node el6 base image storage 987917 [oVirt] [glance] API version not specified in provider dialog virt 1007940 Cannot clone from snapshot while using GlusterFS as POSIX Storage Domain Maintainers: - We'll start composing oVirt 3.3.3 RC on 2014-01-21 12:00 UTC: all non blockers bug still open after the build will be moved to 3.3.4. - Please add the bugs to the tracker if you think that 3.3.3 should not be released without them fixed. - Please provide ETA on bugs you add as blockers - Please re-target all bugs you don't think that should block 3.3.3. - Please fill release notes, the page has been created here [3] - Please remember to rebuild your packages before 2014-01-21 12:00 UTC if you want them to be included in 3.3.3 RC. For those who want to help testing the bugs, I suggest to add yourself as QA contact for the bug and add yourself to the testing page [2]. Thanks to Gianluca Cecchi for his testing of oVirt 3.3.3 beta on Gluster storage! [1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1050084 [2] http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.3_testing [3] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3.3_release_notes Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[Users] [QE] oVirt bugzilla updates
by Sandro Bonazzola 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

Hi oVirt community, for all people interested in joining QE effort, we've created a new user in bugzilla as default QA assignee: bugs(a)ovirt.org. If you want to be updated on QE bugs activity you can just add that user to your bugzilla account watch list: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Watch user list -> add "bugs(a)ovirt.org" Any email sent by bugzilla to that user will be also sent to you. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[Users] VM start Options
by Wolfgang Bucher 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Your mail reader does not understand MIME message format. --=_B6gRzuLnmV-Qr05NuONpjAYxCVvEbGdhKKZp2OTxeHP+yFqr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello=0D=0AHow can i change VM start from aio=3Dthread to aio=3Dnative=0D= =0A=0D=0AGreetings=C2=A0=0D=0AWolfgang=0D=0A --=_B6gRzuLnmV-Qr05NuONpjAYxCVvEbGdhKKZp2OTxeHP+yFqr Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://ww= w.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"><html>=0A<head>=0A <meta name=3D"Generator"= content=3D"Zarafa WebApp v7.1.7-42779">=0A <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-= Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">=0A <title>VM start Options= </title>=0A</head>=0A<body>=0A<font face=3D"tahoma" size=3D"2">Hello</fon= t><div><font face=3D"tahoma" size=3D"2">How can i change VM start from ai= o=3Dthread to aio=3Dnative</font></div><div><font face=3D"tahoma" size=3D= "2"><br></font></div><div><font face=3D"tahoma" size=3D"2">Greetings&nbsp= ;</font></div><div><font face=3D"tahoma" size=3D"2">Wolfgang</font></div>= =0A</body>=0A</html> --=_B6gRzuLnmV-Qr05NuONpjAYxCVvEbGdhKKZp2OTxeHP+yFqr--

5 4

[Users] Horrid performance during disk I/O
by Blaster 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

This probably more appropriate for the qemu users mailing list, but that list doesn’t get much traffic and most posts go unanswered… As I’ve mentioned in the past, I’m migrating my environment from ESXi to oVirt AIO. Under ESXi I was pretty happy with the disk performance, and noticed very little difference from bare metal to HV. Under oVirt/QEMU/KVM, not so much…. Running hdparm on the disk from the HV and from the guest yields the same number, about 180MB/sec (SATA III disks, 7200RPM). The problem is, during disk activity, and it doesn’t matter if it’s Windows 7 guests or Fedora 20 (both using virtio-scsi) the qemu-system-x86 process starts consuming 100% of the hypervisor CPU. Hypervisor is a Core i7 950 with 24GB of RAM. There’s 2 Fedora 20 guests and 2 Windows 7 guests. Each configured with 4 GB of guaranteed RAM. Load averages can go up over 40 during sustained disk IO. Performance obviously suffers greatly. I have tried all combinations of having the guests on EXT 4, BTRFS and using EXT 4 and BTRFS inside the guests, as well as direct LUN. Doesn’t make any difference. Disk IO sends qemu-system-x86 to high CPU percentages. This can’t be normal, so I’m wondering what I’ve done wrong. Is there some magic setting I’m missing?

6 7

[Users] VirtIO disk latency
by Markus Stockhausen 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPartTM-000-e5c11ff1-4bb3-4471-9f08-8adebae2667b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,=0A= =0A= coming from the "low cost NFS storage thread" I will open a new one=0A= about a topic that might be interesting for others too.=0A= =0A= We see a quite a heavy latency penalty using KVM VirtIO disks in comparison= =0A= to ESX. Doing one I/O onto disk inside a VM usually adds 370us of overhead = in=0A= the virtualisation layer. This has been tested with VirtIO-SCSI and windows= =0A= guest (2K3). More here (still now answer yet):=0A= =0A= http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2013-12/msg00028.html=0A= =0A= A comparison for small sequential 1K I/Os on a NFS datastore in our setup g= ives:=0A= =0A= - access NFS inside the hypervisor - 12.000 I/Os per second - or 83us laten= cy =0A= - access DISK inside ESX VM that resides on NFS - 8000 I/Os per second - or= 125us latency=0A= - access DISK inside OVirt VM that resides on NFS - 2200 I/Os per second - = or 450us latency=0A= =0A= Even the official document at http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Virtio/Block/La= tency=0A= suggest that the several mechanisms (iothread/vcpu) at least have a overhea= d=0A= of more than 200us=0A= =0A= Has anyone experienced something simlar. If these latency are normal it wou= ld =0A= make no sense to think about SSDs inside a central storage (be it ISCSI or = NFS =0A= or whatever).=0A= =0A= Markus=0A= =0A= ------=_NextPartTM-000-e5c11ff1-4bb3-4471-9f08-8adebae2667b Content-Type: text/plain; name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt" **************************************************************************** Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung. Collogia Unternehmensberatung AG Ubierring 11 D-50678 Köln Vorstand: Kadir Akin Dr. Michael Höhnerbach Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Hans Kristian Langva Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln Registernummer: HRB 52 497 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a legally binding declaration of intention. Collogia Unternehmensberatung AG Ubierring 11 D-50678 Köln executive board: Kadir Akin Dr. Michael Höhnerbach President of the supervisory board: Hans Kristian Langva Registry office: district court Cologne Register number: HRB 52 497 **************************************************************************** ------=_NextPartTM-000-e5c11ff1-4bb3-4471-9f08-8adebae2667b--

3 3

Re: [Users] Attach NFS storage to multiple datacenter
by Amedeo Salvati 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Il 16/01/2014 18:00, users-request(a)ovirt.org ha scritto: > From: "Tobias Fiebig"<mail(a)wybt.net> > To: "Elad Ben Aharon"<ebenahar(a)redhat.com> > Cc:"Users(a)ovirt.org List" <Users(a)ovirt.org> > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 6:37:24 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] Attach NFS storage to multiple datacenter > > Heho, > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 11:10 -0500, Elad Ben Aharon wrote: >> >You don't have to attach/detach the domain for every VM export. Sorry for not being clear. You can export all your VMs to the export domain at once and then detach the export domain and attach it to the second DC. > May have miscommunicated that... > I can not do this because this kind of means that the vms will be down > during the whole movement process. I'd like to reduce the per-vm > downtime as much as possible. > > With best Regards, > Tobias you can decrease the downtime by: - live snapshot VM1; - clone VM1 from snapshot to VM1-NEW (during this process VM1 is up&running); - export VM1-NEW to export domain (VM1 up&running); - detach export domain from old DC; - attach export domain to new DC; - import VM1-NEW (VM1 still up&running); - start VM1-NEW on single mode and configure; - stop apps from VM1 (downtime); - optionally sync app data from VM1 to VM1-NEW (downtime); - start apps on VM1-NEW (apps up&running on new DC). - stop VM1 on old DC. HTH a -- Amedeo Salvati RHC{DS,E,VA} - LPIC-3 - UCP - NCLA 11 email: amedeo(a)oscert.net email: amedeo(a)linux.com http://plugcomputing.it/redhatcert.php http://plugcomputing.it/lpicert.php

1 0

[Users] Management server
by Koen Vanoppen 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Dear All, Our setup at work now is: 1 management server and 7 hyper visors. All the systems have centos 6.4 on it. Now my question is: Because of the fact that all the systems have centos on it, we can't use the reports portal and the dwh-portal. Would it be possible to add a second management server to our already existing setup (fedora 19), without !*breaking*! our existing setup, so this one can provide us with the reports and dwh-portal and can also serve as a "Back-Up" management server. If so, how do we handle this? Kind regards, Koen

3 2

[Users] oVirt 3.3.3 beta is now available
by Sandro Bonazzola 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

The oVirt team is pleased to announce that the 3.3.3 Beta is now available in beta [1] repository for testing. Feel free to join us testing it! You'll find all needed info for installing it on the release notes page, already available on the wiki [2]. A new oVirt Node build will be available soon as well. [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/beta/ [2] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3.3_release_notes -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

2 1

[Users] ovirt-engine-reports rpm for CentOS and oVirt 3.3
by Nicolas Ecarnot 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Good morning or whenever, I read what RPM I have to install here http://www.ovirt.org/Ovirt_Reports but I can not find any RPM for CentOS 6. I strongly searched around the web and in the different repo folders, as well as in the mailing list msgs, and it seems the production of RPM for CentOS has been disabled for whatever reason. Is there a private recipe to create them or get them an unofficial way (reports, dwh, jasperreports...) Thank you. -- Nicolas Ecarnot

3 4

[Users] oVirt node - network config not persisted
by Federico Alberto Sayd 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hello: I have been testing some hosts with ovirt-node (3.0.1-1.0.2.el6) and when I reboot the node the network config is not persisted. I have seen that this was commented in this list, some time ago. Was this fixed in 3.0.3-1 release? There is a 3.0.3-1.1 image in http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3/iso/, but is only Fedora Core. No el6/Centos image? Thank you Federico

3 2