- Users - oVirt List Archives

[Users] received packet with own address as source address
by H. Haven Liu 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Hello, I have a oVirt installation with 6 CentOS 6.4 hosts. Some (not all) hosts are receiving these error messages, at a frequency of once every other minute: [root@vhost1 ~]# grep "source address" /var/log/messages | tail Aug 17 11:19:20 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:21:24 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:23:29 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:25:34 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:27:39 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:29:44 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:31:49 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:33:54 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:35:59 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address Aug 17 11:38:04 vhost1 kernel: em1: received packet with own address as source address These error messages are accompanied with loss of connectivity, with duration varies between a few seconds to minutes. The loss of connectivity would start just before the above error message. I don't *think* it's hardware because the "received packet with own address" error message would disappear from one of the hosts after a while. These error messages are also present whether or not any VM is running on the particular host. Here are some configurations: [root@vhost1 ~]# ifconfig em1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f1 inet6 addr: aaaa::bbbb:cccc:dddd:eee1/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:37413202 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:17822315 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:32444347931 (30.2 GiB) TX bytes:13715272213 (12.7 GiB) Interrupt:16 em2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f2 inet6 addr: aaaa::bbbb:cccc:dddd:eee2/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:21878 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:526 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:1598070 (1.5 MiB) TX bytes:40526 (39.5 KiB) Interrupt:17 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:9236 (9.0 KiB) TX bytes:9236 (9.0 KiB) ovirtmgmt Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f1 inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.yyy Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: aaaa::bbbb:cccc:dddd:eeee/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:22623881 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:9990988 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:28427312067 (26.4 GiB) TX bytes:13112553784 (12.2 GiB) private_lan Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f2 inet addr:10.0.1.12 Bcast:10.0.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: aaaa::bbbb:cccc:dddd:eee2/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:19771 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:1080512 (1.0 MiB) TX bytes:468 (468.0 b) [root@vhost1 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 ONBOOT=yes HWADDR=aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f2 BRIDGE=ovirtmgmt NM_CONTROLLED=no UUID=c25b1ad1-9646-4126-9149-be5f68bae36c DNS2=www.www.www.www DNS1=www.www.www.www HOSTNAME=vhost1.mydomain.com MTU=1500 IPV6INIT=no [root@vhost1 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ovirtmgmt DEVICE=ovirtmgmt ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Bridge DELAY=0 IPADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx NETMASK=255.255.255.0 GATEWAY=xxx.xxx.xxx.1 BOOTPROTO=none NM_CONTROLLED=no UUID=c25b1ad1-9646-4126-9149-be5f68bae36c DNS2=www.www.www.www DNS1=www.www.www.www HOSTNAME=vhost1.mydomain.com MTU=1500 IPV6INIT=no [root@vhost1 ~]# Any help is appreciated.

2 6

[Users] How to define max number of running VMs on a host?
by lof yer 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

I didn't see anything like this in engine-config. Is it possible to do that without using host-hooks?

3 4

[Users] When adding another storage domain (gluster), knocks all storage(NFS, Gluster, etc) offline in Data Center and then fails to add new storage domain
by Bert Magleo 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CE9261.810E3CC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vdsm log =20 Aug 5 21:51:25 vh02 sanlock[1388]: 2013-08-05 21:51:25-0700 358 [3568]: write_sectors delta_leader offset 0 rv -22 /rhev/data-center/mnt/10.10.35.58:storage02/4705355f-1d03-4754-89e4-cf08 f6f6caca/dom_md/ids Aug 5 21:51:26 vh02 sanlock[1388]: 2013-08-05 21:51:26-0700 359 [1404]: s2 add_lockspace fail result -22 Aug 5 21:51:26 vh02 vdsm TaskManager.Task ERROR Task=3D`99f801b2-e56b-4c5f-b6a0-d12b29e7d6bb`::Unexpected error Aug 5 21:51:26 vh02 vdsm Storage.Dispatcher.Protect ERROR {'status': {'message': "Cannot acquire host id: ('4705355f-1d03-4754-89e4-cf08f6f6caca', SanlockException(22, 'Sanlock lockspace add failure', 'Invalid argument'))", 'code': 661}} Aug 5 21:51:27 vh02 vdsm TaskManager.Task ERROR Task=3D`c08cc772-cb5c-49a1-9e65-bb45c82a2709`::Unexpected error Aug 5 21:51:27 vh02 vdsm Storage.Dispatcher.Protect ERROR =20 Any ideas on how I can fix this issue? ------_=_NextPart_001_01CE9261.810E3CC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta = http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 = (filtered medium)"><style></style></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue = vlink=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1>Vdsm = log<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>Aug  5 21:51:25 vh02 sanlock[1388]: 2013-08-05 = 21:51:25-0700 358 [3568]: write_sectors delta_leader offset 0 rv -22 = /rhev/data-center/mnt/10.10.35.58:storage02/4705355f-1d03-4754-89e4-cf08f= 6f6caca/dom_md/ids<o:p></o:p>Aug  5 = 21:51:26 vh02 sanlock[1388]: 2013-08-05 21:51:26-0700 359 [1404]: s2 = add_lockspace fail result -22<o:p></o:p>Aug  5 21:51:26 vh02 vdsm TaskManager.Task ERROR = Task=3D`99f801b2-e56b-4c5f-b6a0-d12b29e7d6bb`::Unexpected = error<o:p></o:p>Aug  5 21:51:26 vh02 vdsm = Storage.Dispatcher.Protect ERROR {'status': {'message': "Cannot = acquire host id: ('4705355f-1d03-4754-89e4-cf08f6f6caca', = SanlockException(22, 'Sanlock lockspace add failure', 'Invalid = argument'))", 'code': 661}}<o:p></o:p>Aug  5 21:51:27 vh02 vdsm TaskManager.Task ERROR = Task=3D`c08cc772-cb5c-49a1-9e65-bb45c82a2709`::Unexpected = error<o:p></o:p>Aug  5 21:51:27 vh02 vdsm = Storage.Dispatcher.Protect ERROR<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p>Any ideas on = how I can fix this issue?<o:p></o:p></div></body></html> ------_=_NextPart_001_01CE9261.810E3CC0--

2 1

[Users] cant remove disks from iscsi domain
by Yuriy Demchenko 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Hi, I've recently encountered a problem with removing disks from iscsi domain in my test lab - just cant remove any. Remove operation fails with message "User admin@internal failed to initiate removing of disk pg-slave1_opt from domain iscsi-store" and re-elections of SPM. After that - disk is marked as "illegal" in ovirt webinterface, however, it is _in fact_ removed from storage - lvdisplay doesn't show it and free space is updated correctly. And this happens with just about every disk/vm i try to remove. ovirt 3.2.2-el6 centos 6.4 vdsm-4.10.3-17.el6 lvm2-2.02.98-9.el6 Any tips? logs in attach -- Yuriy Demchenko

6 13

[Users] oVirt and Infiniband
by René Koch (ovido) 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Hi, Does anyone have oVirt (or a plain KVM hypervisor) running on Infiniband where the virtual machines are bridged to an Infiniband interface (with EoIB kernel module)? I'm having issues in such a setup where vms can't communicate over this bridge... Regards, René

4 5

[Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-08-21
by Mike Burns 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-08-21-14.01.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-08-21-14.01.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-08-21-14.01.log.html ============================ #ovirt: oVirt Weekly Meeting ============================ Meeting started by oschreib at 14:01:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2013/ovirt.2013-08-21-14.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * agenda and roll call (oschreib, 14:01:34) * 3.3 status update (oschreib, 14:01:42) * infra team update (oschreib, 14:02:04) * Conference and Workshop (oschreib, 14:02:11) * Other Topics (oschreib, 14:02:19) * 3.3 Release update (oschreib, 14:11:44) * ovirt 3.3 releae page and tracker: (oschreib, 14:11:57) * LINK: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management (oschreib, 14:12:04) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918494 (oschreib, 14:12:12) * GA is one week from now (oschreib, 14:12:35) * RC build has been uploaded to ovirt.org, thanks mburns (oschreib, 14:13:00) * Blocker review (oschreib, 14:13:43) * Bug 988299 - Impossible to start VM from Gluster Storage Domain (engine, MODIFIED) (oschreib, 14:14:02) * probably fixed (oschreib, 14:16:19) * ACTION: sahina to verify 988299 is pushed (oschreib, 14:16:37) * Bug 994523 - [vdsm][multiple gateways] Keep ovirt management as default in the main routing table always (engine, MODIFIED) (oschreib, 14:17:08) * patch for 988299 is not merged yet ( http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/17994/ ) (mburns, 14:23:34) * need new vdsm build with this patch (mburns, 14:23:43) * Bug 994604 - Users cannot log into UserPortal (engine, MODIFIED) (oschreib, 14:24:52) * ACTION: ecohen to push into 3.3 branch (oschreib, 14:26:18) * ACTION: oschreib to rebuild engine afterwards (oschreib, 14:26:31) * Bug 997362 - [engine-config] /var/log/ovirt-engine/engine-config.log doesn't exist (engine, MODIFIED) (oschreib, 14:27:46) * ACTION: emesika to check with 997362 (oschreib, 14:32:10) * Blocker review done (oschreib, 14:32:18) * ACTION: oschreib to send mail on release go/no-go meeting (oschreib, 14:40:29) * workshops and conferences (mburns, 14:42:03) * ovirt developer meetings and planning to happen at KVM Forum (21-23 October in Edinburgh) (mburns, 14:42:36) * there will be additional oVirt content during KVM Forum as well (mburns, 14:43:27) * dneary to make sure everyone that should be there is in attendance for ovirt dev meetings (mburns, 14:45:45) * jbrooks has been working on release notes, announcement, etc (mburns, 14:48:17) * ACTION: oschreib to check about 3.3 live distro (oschreib, 14:51:10) * infra update (mburns, 14:52:40) * extra storage in rackspace servers, so backups will be migrated there (mburns, 14:55:39) * new centos 6.4 slaves are only (mburns, 14:55:47) * new puppet classes added to manage jenkins slaves (mburns, 14:55:57) * more room for additional jenkins slaves (mburns, 14:56:04) * jenkins updates to latest LTS (long term stable) (mburns, 14:56:40) * hosted-engine-setup and ha builds are now built nightly and pushed to nightly repos (mburns, 14:58:03) * in process of adding network functional testing to jenkins (mburns, 14:58:56) * Other Topics (mburns, 14:59:49) * no other topics (mburns, 15:02:04) Meeting ended at 15:02:09 UTC. Action Items ------------ * sahina to verify 988299 is pushed * ecohen to push into 3.3 branch * oschreib to rebuild engine afterwards * emesika to check with 997362 * oschreib to send mail on release go/no-go meeting * oschreib to check about 3.3 live distro Action Items, by person ----------------------- * ecohen * ecohen to push into 3.3 branch * emesika * emesika to check with 997362 * oschreib * oschreib to rebuild engine afterwards * oschreib to send mail on release go/no-go meeting * oschreib to check about 3.3 live distro * sahina * sahina to verify 988299 is pushed * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * oschreib (75) * mburns (52) * dneary (17) * ecohen (10) * eedri (9) * jbrooks (8) * sahina (7) * awels (6) * emesika (6) * amuller (4) * sbonazzo (4) * ovirtbot (4) * sgotliv (3) * knesenko (1) * lvernia (1) * mskrivanek (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

3 2

Re: [Users] oVirt and IPA (LDAP/KERBEROS) - Invalid argument ldapervers
by H. Haven Liu 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Yair, With the latest ovirt-engine, I'm still getting the invalid argument ldapservers if I tried to use the "-ldapservers" in engine-manage-domains. # rpm -qa ovirt* ovirt-host-deploy-java-1.0.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-userportal-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-setup-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-sdk-3.2.0.10-1.el6.noarch ovirt-log-collector-3.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-backend-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-genericapi-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-image-uploader-3.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-cli-3.2.0.11-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-restapi-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-release-el6-7-1.noarch ovirt-host-deploy-1.0.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-iso-uploader-3.2.2-1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch ovirt-engine-tools-3.2.2-1.1.el6.noarch Thanks,

3 4

Re: [Users] VM Console access with isolated virtual hosts
by Peter Bahlyi 21 Aug '13

21 Aug '13

--========GMXBoundary311121377085884405691 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Itamar, thanks for reply. I have actually found that and tried. The issue is that client (remote-viewer on F19) still keeps trying to contact directly the hosts. What I also do not understand is an overall idea behind. As far as I have noticed, RHEV-m does not provide spice-proxy functionality on it's own. If I understand well, it only directs clients to a proxy which sits somewhere else, right? If so, what are pre-requisities on such a proxy solution? What should it be? Regards, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: Itamar Heim Sent: 08/21/13 01:23 PM To: Peter Bahlyi Subject: Re: [Users] VM Console access with isolated virtual hosts On 08/21/2013 04:37 AM, Peter Bahlyi wrote: > Hi everybody, > I've got a question - what if my hosts are isolated from the rest of > network but I still need to access consoles of my virtual machines with > spice protocol? How to get this solved? As far as I've noticed the > clients (remote-viewer) connect remotely to the hosts on ports assigned > to virtual machines (5900, 5901, 5902) that are in my case unaccessible. > I've found something about spice-proxy but there is not any > documentation around. Does anybody have experience with this? > > Thanks for any info. > > Regards, > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > have you reviewed http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Spice_Proxy ? hmmm, it seems to lack information on client version to support this --========GMXBoundary311121377085884405691 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Itama= r, thanks for reply. I have actually found that and tried. The issue is tha= t client (remote-viewer on F19) still keeps trying to contact directly the = hosts. What I also do not understand is an overall idea behind. As far as I= have noticed, RHEV-m does not provide spice-proxy functionality on it's ow= n. If I understand well, it only directs clients to a proxy which sits some= where else, right? If so, what are pre-requisities on such a proxy solution= ? What should it be? Regards, Peter =C2=A0=C2=A0<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 1px solid= #CCC; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top:= 0px; margin-right: 0px;" type=3D"cite">----= - Original Message -----Fr= om: Itamar Heim<sp= an style=3D"font-family:Verdana">Sent: 08/21= /13 01:23 PMTo: Peter Bahl= yiSubject: Re: [Users] VM = Console access with isolated virtual hosts=C2=A0<div><div= ><pre style=3D"white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word; font-size:11;p= re">On 08/21/2013 04:37 AM, Peter Bahlyi wrote:=20 > Hi everybody,=20 > I've got a question - what if my hosts are isolated from the rest of= =20 > network but I still need to access consoles of my virtual machines wit= h=20 > spice protocol? How to get this solved? As far as I've noticed the=20 > clients (remote-viewer) connect remotely to the hosts on ports assigne= d=20 > to virtual machines (5900, 5901, 5902) that are in my case unaccessibl= e.=20 > I've found something about spice-proxy but there is not any=20 > documentation around. Does anybody have experience with this?=20 >=20 > Thanks for any info.=20 >=20 > Regards,=20 > Peter=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________=20 > Users mailing list=20 > Users(a)ovirt.org=20 > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users=20 >=20 have you reviewed http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Spice_Proxy ?=20 hmmm, it seems to lack information on client version to support this</pre><= /div></div></blockquote>=C2=A0</= span> --========GMXBoundary311121377085884405691--

2 1

[Users] VM Console access with isolated virtual hosts
by Peter Bahlyi 21 Aug '13

21 Aug '13

--========GMXBoundary311151377074232974700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi everybody, I've got a question - what if my hosts are isolated from the rest of network but I still need to access consoles of my virtual machines with spice protocol? How to get this solved? As far as I've noticed the clients (remote-viewer) connect remotely to the hosts on ports assigned to virtual machines (5900, 5901, 5902) that are in my case unaccessible. I've found something about spice-proxy but there is not any documentation around. Does anybody have experience with this? Thanks for any info. Regards, Peter --========GMXBoundary311151377074232974700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi every= body, I've got a question - what if my hosts are isolated from the res= t of network but I still need to access consoles of my virtual machines wit= h spice protocol? How to get this solved? As far as I've noticed the client= s (remote-viewer) connect remotely to the hosts on ports assigned to virtua= l machines (5900, 5901, 5902) that are in my case unaccessible. I've found = something about spice-proxy but there is not any documentation around. Does= anybody have experience with this? Thanks for any info. <b= r />Regards, Peter --========GMXBoundary311151377074232974700--

2 1

[Users] Feedback/ input needed on Host power management
by Malini Rao 21 Aug '13

21 Aug '13

Hello all, In taking a look at the current implementation of Hosts> Power management, we have come up with a couple of approaches on improving this from a UX perspective -http://www.ovirt.org/Talk:Community#UXD_Proposals_for_Host_Power_management. We want your thoughts and input on what approach makes more sense from a user's perspective before fine tuning the UI. Thanks Malini User Experience designer

6 7