- Users - oVirt List Archives

Windows 2016 guest auto shutdown
by aminur.rahman＠iongroup.com 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

I am using ovirt hosted engine 4.2 to manage 5 nodes cluster and Dell Compellent storage domain using ISCSI. The guest is running Windows 2016 OS with ovirt 4.2.4 guest tools installed. The guest presented 1.4 TB thin provision disks and very often, the VM goes offline while doing big file transfer. I didn't find any event errors on OS level. I am wondering if anyone has experienced this issue. Thanks -Aminur

3 2

Cluster Compatibility Version Upgrading Order
by Roman Last 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hello! What sequence of upgrading cluster to 4.3 version? When i click upgrade on host w or w\o host reboot it just says "Upgrade has started for" and nothing after timeout reached. When i force restart host, version 4.3 not added. Is that normal? https://prnt.sc/mki3v8

3 3

Agentless Backup update: Trilio Vault, pay $7500
by femi adegoke 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Back in June of 2018, I posted regarding Agentless backup solutions. Greg Sheremeta replied & mentioned Trilio. The rest of the story...well just read on... These guys at Trilio have turned out to be a complete waste of time. (I could use some more colorful language) After my post & reply from Greg Sheremeta, I followed up with Trilio. A lot of promises/dates were made (by Trilio) as to when a beta would be made available for testing. Needless to say, they never came through. Finally in Dec 2018, they said we are ready for the demo, we will show you a working product. The day came, Trilio said, sorry it's too close to Xmas, we will postpone the demo's till 2019. In 2019, I continued to follow up & finally they set a date for another demo - Jan 29. On Jan. 29, we get on the Webex, they said, sorry the demo just broke 10 mins prior to our call, so no demo. They show me some screenshots & their OpenStack version & again promise to get me beta software in a few days. I continue to follow up (via email) Yesterday (Feb 6), I get an email from Thomas Lahive GM; Sales and Alliance Partners....(copied & pasted below): "We started RHV betas and decided to prioritize current Trilio customers (those that purchased Triliovault for Openstack). If you would like to be part of the beta now then We can sign you up as a certified Trilio reseller which has a $7,500 Starter Fee. The $7,500 will be credited against your first customer order that is at least $7,500 so it will eventually cost you nothing. Many of our partners can apply the fee against revenue so it's a great tax incentive, but you can confirm with your finance department. Please Lmk how you would like to proceed." Please remember, I have never seen a working demo of this product, never. Is this typical behavior of RH partners?

5 7

Problems with procedure in blog post...
by Jason P. Thomas 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

rgolan asked me to post this here for him. I'm trying the procedure from this blog post: https://ovirt.org/blog/2019/01/ovirt-openshift-part-1.html Ultimate goal is to install ovirt metrics store. I've tried vars.yaml with and without the ovirt metrics stuff commented out. The errors seem to revolve around downloading the centos qcow2c image. With image_path: "{{ lookup('env', 'HOME') }}/Downloads/{{ template_name }}.qcow2" defined, I get the following error: fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"msg": "The task includes an option with an undefined variable. The error was: 'dict object' has no attribute 'isdir'\n\nThe error appears to have been in '/usr/share/ansible/roles/ovirt.image-template/tasks/qcow2_image.yml': line 12, column 3, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n\n- name: Download the qcow image\n ^ here\n"} If I comment out the above image_path line and uncomment the one at the bottom of vars.yaml that specifies /var/tmp, I get this error: fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "cmd": "/usr/bin/file /var/tmp/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.qcow2c", "msg": "[Errno 2] No such file or directory", "rc": 2} --Jason

3 4

IPTablesConfig replacement in 4.3
by Roman Last 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hello! So, i just update up in 4.3, whith auto configration iptables by vsdm. How can i make some custom rules in iptables becouse IPTablesConfigSiteCustom is now deprecated. Thanks.

3 2

Error starting hosted engine
by Endre Karlson 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BrmPYRKmzT/ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/MjfioF9-Pzk02541abKyOw Seems like it's a error with vdsmd and glusterfs ? // Endre

4 6

change cache behavior per VM?
by Hetz Ben Hamo 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

Hi, With KVM (and using tools like virt-manager) you can set the cache behavior like write-back, write-through etc. etc.. Can this be done by oVirt? looks like oVirt "kills" ZFS servers as it insists to wait until every bit has been written to disk, and I don't need it (my oVirt is not for production, and there are snapshots in ZFS for that). Thanks

1 0

Re: Creating a static route
by Lev Veyde 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

Hi Doug, Thanks, you're welcome! It's generally possible to add persistent rules by either using the legacy /etc/rc.d/rc.local boot script (chmod +x /etc/rc.d/rc.local and put the relevant commands at the end of the file, that way you can actually run any commands) or by using the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-<interface name> e.g. rule-ovirtmgmt or rule-eno3 (just put in the file "to 172.22.20.31 priority 32764" - without quotes), however of course this needs to be tested to verify that it works. I forwarded the issue to the network team and hopefully they will update soon. Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:17 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> wrote: > Lev, > > You have no idea how helpful you have been!!!!!! I’ve been having this > issue for over 2 months and starting to cause major problems. > > > > Please let me know if you find a better solution. I’m going to wait to > hear back from you before implementing. > > > > If we go with this workaround, is there a way to add the ip rule so it’s > persistent? I know how to make the ip route add persistent. > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:14 PM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > Yes, it looks like it did. > > I'll try to catch somebody from my local oVirt/RHV networking team to take > a look at this issue, maybe there is a better solution for that issue than > my workaround. > > > > But meanwhile you can use this workaround (ip route add + ip rule add), > just please be aware that these should be run after each host reboot, since > these commands are not persistent. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:07 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Here’s the results. It appears to fix the issue!! > > > > From non-working system: > > > > -bash-4.2# ip rule add to 172.22.20.31 priority 32764 > > > > -bash-4.2# traceroute 172.22.20.31 > > traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > > 1 CenteraAmesAN1.emcins.com (172.21.12.61) 0.487 ms 1.082 ms 1.313 ms > > 2 192.168.90.9 (192.168.90.9) 1.507 ms 2.090 ms 2.294 ms > > 3 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.403 ms 1.401 ms 1.348 ms > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:01 PM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > OK, I think that I have a guess of what may have happened here... > > Can you please run the following command on the (non-working) host: > > ip rule add to 172.22.20.31 priority 32764 > > > > This needs to be run in addition to the ip route add ... command. > > > > And then please run the traceroute command and let me know if that fixed > the issue. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:30 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Here you go. > > > > From non-working system > > > > -bash-4.2# ip rule > > 0: from all lookup local > > 32764: from all to 172.21.0.0/16 iif ovirtmgmt lookup 2887058719 > > 32765: from 172.21.0.0/16 lookup 2887058719 > > 32766: from all lookup main > > 32767: from all lookup default > > > > > > From working system > > > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip rule > > 0: from all lookup local > > 32766: from all lookup main > > 32767: from all lookup default > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:35 PM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > That shouldn't really matter, since ovirtmgmt is just a bridged interface, > and unless I'm missing something it shouldn't really affect routing. > > Can you please also provide the output of "ip rule" from both working and > non-working hosts ? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:01 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Here’s the ip route from the server that worked and didn’t work > > > > IP Route from server that worked > > > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route > > default via 172.21.0.250 dev eno3 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno3 scope link metric 1002 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1005 > > 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.18 > > 172.21.0.0/16 dev eno3 proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.34 > > *172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 dev eno3* > > 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.34 > > > > > > > > IP Route from server that didn't work > > > > -bash-4.2# ip route > > default via 172.21.0.250 dev ovirtmgmt > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1004 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovirtmgmt scope link metric 1021 > > 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.15 > > 172.21.0.0/16 dev ovirtmgmt proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.31 > > *172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 dev ovirtmgmt* > > 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.31 > > > > We have had our network team look and they don’t know. As I said, the was > setup by Commvault. It’s almost like the ovirtmgmt interface will not > allow a route add due to the way it’s configured? They, Commvault, are > trying different things within their software to get this working, but it’s > causing us more problems. I figured I would take a shot and see if > someone, who works with the oVirt software, would have any ideas. > > > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 11:51 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > This is indeed quite weird... > > It looks like the OS for some reason disregards the static route that you > have added. > > BTW, have you verified that it's indeed was added by running "ip route" > following the "ip route add ..." command ? > > Maybe somebody from the network team has an idea of what may be the cause > of this issue... > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:36 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > I’m showing you the same outputs (ip a, ip route, traceroute, ip route > add, and traceroute) from another server in this group that doesn’t use the > ovirtmgmt for it’s default interface. > > > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip a > > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 > > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 2: eno3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:db:bc:c0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 172.21.5.34/16 brd 172.21.255.255 scope global eno3 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fedb:bcc0/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:e8:da:03 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 172.26.5.34/16 brd 172.26.255.255 scope global eno1 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fee8:da03/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 4: eno2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN > qlen 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:e8:da:04 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > 5: eno4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:db:bc:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 172.17.53.18/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global eno4 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fedb:bcc1/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route > > default via 172.21.0.250 dev eno3 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno3 scope link metric 1002 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1005 > > 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.18 > > 172.21.0.0/16 dev eno3 proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.34 > > 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.34 > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# traceroute 172.22.20.31 > > traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > > 1 ames-acc1-agg-1.emcins.com (172.21.0.246) 1.081 ms 1.816 ms 1.832 ms > > 2 192.168.200.30 (192.168.200.30) 0.639 ms 192.168.200.14 > (192.168.200.14) 1.063 ms 1.577 ms > > 3 192.168.200.101 (192.168.200.101) 3.110 ms ames-sw-wanrtr.emcins.com > (192.168.200.97) 3.191 ms 3.277 ms > > 4 192.168.100.26 (192.168.100.26) 4.146 ms 4.273 ms 4.394 ms > > 5 192.168.100.98 (192.168.100.98) 1.893 ms 2.364 ms 2.397 ms > > 6 192.168.100.50 (192.168.100.50) 5.707 ms 192.168.100.33 > (192.168.100.33) 5.134 ms 192.168.100.50 (192.168.100.50) 4.105 ms > > 7 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.359 ms 1.374 ms 1.351 ms > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route add 172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# traceroute 172.22.20.31 > > traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > > 1 CenteraAmesAN1.emcins.com (172.21.12.61) 6.184 ms 6.475 ms 6.686 ms > > 2 192.168.90.9 (192.168.90.9) 1.770 ms 1.979 ms 2.189 ms > > 3 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.405 ms * 1.354 ms > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 11:07 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > In most cases it should not be required, especially as my guess (again it > would be easier if you could post the output of the "ip a" and "ip route") > is that the eno1 is part of the ovirtmgmt bridge. > > What is the output of the "traceroute 172.22.20.31" that you get on the > host after you have added the static route? > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:58 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > One other question, since there are multiple enabled interfaces (ovirtmgmt > and eno1), do I need to specify an interface for the route add. > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:50 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > What do you mean by "static route is refused"? > > What is the error message(s) you see? > > > > Can you please try to add the route with the following command: > > ip route add 172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 > > > > If that doesn't work, then please provide more details, i.e. what is the > exact error message(s) you see, the version of your OS and oVirt, output of > "ip a" and "ip route" on your host(s), so that it will be easier to help > you. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:43 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Thanks for your response. > > > > If I attempt to manually add the route using route add: > > > > route add -net 172.22.20.31 netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 172.21.12.61 dev > ovirtmgmt > > > > This static route is refused and all traffic is routed over the default > gateway. > > > > But if I use a server that doesn’t use the ovirtmgmt interface and set the > same static route, the required data is routed correctly over that static > route. > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:34 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > What is the exact problem you are having while attempting to add a static > route on the hosts? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:23 PM <doug.l.maxfield(a)emcins.com> wrote: > > Good Morning, > New to oVirt. We are using this with a backup solution from Commvault. > The issue that we are having is that we need to setup a static route for > specific data between 2 remote sites. The ovirtmgmt is configured with the > correct IP and gateway for the server. We need to route data over a > different gateway so that we don't "max out" the default network connection > between the 2 sites. Example below > > Ovirtmgmt IP - 172.21.5.31 > Gateway IP - 172.21.0.250 > > We need any traffic with a destination of 172.22.20.31(Remote site) to > route over this gateway, 172.21.12.61 > > There are multiple servers in this configuration. Servers that are not > using the ovirtmgmt interface for their default, we are able to route the > data. The only problem is with attempting to setup a different static > route on the ovirtmgmt interfaces. > > Thanks in advance for any help!!! > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/WGXSLHAP3X5OT… > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) is intended for a > specific individual and may contain information that is either confidential > or legally protected. If you believe that it has been sent to you in > error, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in > error, then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying > of this communication is strictly prohibited. Thank you. EMC071856 > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > -- Lev Veyde Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

2 2

vGPU remote console problems
by Edward Berger 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

A coworker and I are trying to bring up some nvidia vGPU VMs on ovirt 4.3, but are experiencing issues with the remote consoles for both Windows and Linux. A windows10 VM for example works OK with a windows remote desktop client after enabling the service inside the VM, but using the oVirt VM portal spice/vnc seems to cause the mouse pointer to disappear and clicks seem to go nowhere. We're more likely to want linux VMs though. CentOS not booting all the way to gnome desktop after installing the nvidia driver. What works well for you? Are there known tweaks I should try to make? Any helpful hints? Thanks!

1 0

Re: Creating a static route
by Lev Veyde 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

Hi Doug, Yes, it looks like it did. I'll try to catch somebody from my local oVirt/RHV networking team to take a look at this issue, maybe there is a better solution for that issue than my workaround. But meanwhile you can use this workaround (ip route add + ip rule add), just please be aware that these should be run after each host reboot, since these commands are not persistent. Thanks in advance, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:07 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> wrote: > Lev, > > Here’s the results. It appears to fix the issue!! > > > > From non-working system: > > > > -bash-4.2# ip rule add to 172.22.20.31 priority 32764 > > > > -bash-4.2# traceroute 172.22.20.31 > > traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > > 1 CenteraAmesAN1.emcins.com (172.21.12.61) 0.487 ms 1.082 ms 1.313 ms > > 2 192.168.90.9 (192.168.90.9) 1.507 ms 2.090 ms 2.294 ms > > 3 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.403 ms 1.401 ms 1.348 ms > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 2:01 PM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > OK, I think that I have a guess of what may have happened here... > > Can you please run the following command on the (non-working) host: > > ip rule add to 172.22.20.31 priority 32764 > > > > This needs to be run in addition to the ip route add ... command. > > > > And then please run the traceroute command and let me know if that fixed > the issue. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:30 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Here you go. > > > > From non-working system > > > > -bash-4.2# ip rule > > 0: from all lookup local > > 32764: from all to 172.21.0.0/16 iif ovirtmgmt lookup 2887058719 > > 32765: from 172.21.0.0/16 lookup 2887058719 > > 32766: from all lookup main > > 32767: from all lookup default > > > > > > From working system > > > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip rule > > 0: from all lookup local > > 32766: from all lookup main > > 32767: from all lookup default > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:35 PM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > That shouldn't really matter, since ovirtmgmt is just a bridged interface, > and unless I'm missing something it shouldn't really affect routing. > > Can you please also provide the output of "ip rule" from both working and > non-working hosts ? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:01 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Here’s the ip route from the server that worked and didn’t work > > > > IP Route from server that worked > > > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route > > default via 172.21.0.250 dev eno3 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno3 scope link metric 1002 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1005 > > 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.18 > > 172.21.0.0/16 dev eno3 proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.34 > > *172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 dev eno3* > > 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.34 > > > > > > > > IP Route from server that didn't work > > > > -bash-4.2# ip route > > default via 172.21.0.250 dev ovirtmgmt > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1004 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev ovirtmgmt scope link metric 1021 > > 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.15 > > 172.21.0.0/16 dev ovirtmgmt proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.31 > > *172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 dev ovirtmgmt* > > 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.31 > > > > We have had our network team look and they don’t know. As I said, the was > setup by Commvault. It’s almost like the ovirtmgmt interface will not > allow a route add due to the way it’s configured? They, Commvault, are > trying different things within their software to get this working, but it’s > causing us more problems. I figured I would take a shot and see if > someone, who works with the oVirt software, would have any ideas. > > > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 11:51 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > This is indeed quite weird... > > It looks like the OS for some reason disregards the static route that you > have added. > > BTW, have you verified that it's indeed was added by running "ip route" > following the "ip route add ..." command ? > > Maybe somebody from the network team has an idea of what may be the cause > of this issue... > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:36 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > I’m showing you the same outputs (ip a, ip route, traceroute, ip route > add, and traceroute) from another server in this group that doesn’t use the > ovirtmgmt for it’s default interface. > > > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip a > > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1 > > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > > inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 ::1/128 scope host > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 2: eno3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:db:bc:c0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 172.21.5.34/16 brd 172.21.255.255 scope global eno3 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fedb:bcc0/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:e8:da:03 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 172.26.5.34/16 brd 172.26.255.255 scope global eno1 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fee8:da03/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 4: eno2: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN > qlen 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:e8:da:04 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > 5: eno4: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen > 1000 > > link/ether 90:1b:0e:db:bc:c1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 172.17.53.18/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global eno4 > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > inet6 fe80::921b:eff:fedb:bcc1/64 scope link > > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route > > default via 172.21.0.250 dev eno3 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno3 scope link metric 1002 > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eno4 scope link metric 1005 > > 172.17.0.0/16 dev eno4 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.53.18 > > 172.21.0.0/16 dev eno3 proto kernel scope link src 172.21.5.34 > > 172.26.0.0/16 dev eno1 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.5.34 > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# traceroute 172.22.20.31 > > traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > > 1 ames-acc1-agg-1.emcins.com (172.21.0.246) 1.081 ms 1.816 ms 1.832 ms > > 2 192.168.200.30 (192.168.200.30) 0.639 ms 192.168.200.14 > (192.168.200.14) 1.063 ms 1.577 ms > > 3 192.168.200.101 (192.168.200.101) 3.110 ms ames-sw-wanrtr.emcins.com > (192.168.200.97) 3.191 ms 3.277 ms > > 4 192.168.100.26 (192.168.100.26) 4.146 ms 4.273 ms 4.394 ms > > 5 192.168.100.98 (192.168.100.98) 1.893 ms 2.364 ms 2.397 ms > > 6 192.168.100.50 (192.168.100.50) 5.707 ms 192.168.100.33 > (192.168.100.33) 5.134 ms 192.168.100.50 (192.168.100.50) 4.105 ms > > 7 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.359 ms 1.374 ms 1.351 ms > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# ip route add 172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# > > [root@paputopcomm04 ~]# traceroute 172.22.20.31 > > traceroute to 172.22.20.31 (172.22.20.31), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > > 1 CenteraAmesAN1.emcins.com (172.21.12.61) 6.184 ms 6.475 ms 6.686 ms > > 2 192.168.90.9 (192.168.90.9) 1.770 ms 1.979 ms 2.189 ms > > 3 pdputopcomm01.emcins.com (172.22.20.31) 1.405 ms * 1.354 ms > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 11:07 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > In most cases it should not be required, especially as my guess (again it > would be easier if you could post the output of the "ip a" and "ip route") > is that the eno1 is part of the ovirtmgmt bridge. > > What is the output of the "traceroute 172.22.20.31" that you get on the > host after you have added the static route? > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:58 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > One other question, since there are multiple enabled interfaces (ovirtmgmt > and eno1), do I need to specify an interface for the route add. > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:50 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > What do you mean by "static route is refused"? > > What is the error message(s) you see? > > > > Can you please try to add the route with the following command: > > ip route add 172.22.20.31 via 172.21.12.61 > > > > If that doesn't work, then please provide more details, i.e. what is the > exact error message(s) you see, the version of your OS and oVirt, output of > "ip a" and "ip route" on your host(s), so that it will be easier to help > you. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:43 PM Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)emcins.com> > wrote: > > Lev, > > Thanks for your response. > > > > If I attempt to manually add the route using route add: > > > > route add -net 172.22.20.31 netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 172.21.12.61 dev > ovirtmgmt > > > > This static route is refused and all traffic is routed over the default > gateway. > > > > But if I use a server that doesn’t use the ovirtmgmt interface and set the > same static route, the required data is routed correctly over that static > route. > > > > [image: Count On EMC] <http://www.emcins.com/> > > *Doug Maxfield *| Senior Operating Systems Analyst > > *EMC Insurance Companies *717 Mulberry St | Des Moines, IA 50265 > Tel: 515.345.4507 | Fax: 866.331.1522 > Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com | www.emcins.com > > > > > > *From:* Lev Veyde <lveyde(a)redhat.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:34 AM > *To:* Doug Maxfield <Doug.L.Maxfield(a)EMCIns.com> > *Cc:* users <users(a)ovirt.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Creating a static route > > > > Hi Doug, > > What is the exact problem you are having while attempting to add a static > route on the hosts? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:23 PM <doug.l.maxfield(a)emcins.com> wrote: > > Good Morning, > New to oVirt. We are using this with a backup solution from Commvault. > The issue that we are having is that we need to setup a static route for > specific data between 2 remote sites. The ovirtmgmt is configured with the > correct IP and gateway for the server. We need to route data over a > different gateway so that we don't "max out" the default network connection > between the 2 sites. Example below > > Ovirtmgmt IP - 172.21.5.31 > Gateway IP - 172.21.0.250 > > We need any traffic with a destination of 172.22.20.31(Remote site) to > route over this gateway, 172.21.12.61 > > There are multiple servers in this configuration. Servers that are not > using the ovirtmgmt interface for their default, we are able to route the > data. The only problem is with attempting to setup a different static > route on the ovirtmgmt interfaces. > > Thanks in advance for any help!!! > > Doug > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/WGXSLHAP3X5OT… > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) is intended for a > specific individual and may contain information that is either confidential > or legally protected. If you believe that it has been sent to you in > error, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in > error, then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying > of this communication is strictly prohibited. Thank you. EMC071856 > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > > > -- > > > > *Lev Veyde* > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com> > > lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com > > <https://red.ht/sig> > > *TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.* <https://redhat.com/trusted> > -- Lev Veyde Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP Red Hat Israel <https://www.redhat.com> lev(a)redhat.com | lveyde(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

2 1