April 2018 - Devel - oVirt List Archives

Terraform provider for oVirt
by Sandro Bonazzola 15 May '18

15 May '18

Hi, just following up from twitter[1], if any developer within oVirt knows about Terraform, there's interest on their side for collaboration developing a provider. For more info, see the github issue: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/16150 [1] https://twitter.com/jepeltw/status/955647436931858432 -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

3 7

[ANNOUNCE] Introducing STDCI V2
by Barak Korren 13 May '18

13 May '18

The CI team is thrilled to announce the general availability of the second version of the oVirt CI standard. Work on this version included almost a complete rewrite of the CI backend. The major user-visible features are: - Project maintainers no longer need to maintain YAML in the ‘jenkins’ repository. Details that were specified there, including targeted distributions, architectures and oVirt versions should now be specified in a YAML file under the project’s own repository (In a different syntax). - We now support “sub stages” which provide the ability to run multiple different scripts in parallel within the same STDCI stage. There is also a conditional syntax which allows controlling which scripts get executed according to which files were changed in the patch being tested. - The STDCI script file names and locations can now be customized via the above mentioned YAML file. This means that for e.g. using the same script for different stages can now be done by assigning it to the stages in the YAML file instead of by using symlinks. Inspecting job results in STDCI V2 ---------------------------------- As already mentioned, the work on STDCI V2 consisted of a major rewrite of the CI backend, one of the changes made is switching from using multiple “FreeStyle” type jobs per project to just two (pre-merge and post-merge) pipeline jobs. This has implications for the way job results are to be inspected. Since all the different parallel tasks now happen within the same job, looking at the job output can be rather confusing as it includes the merged output of all the tasks. Instead, the “Blue Ocean” view should be used. The “Blue Ocean” view displays a graphical layout of the job execution allowing one to quickly learn which parts of the job failed. It also allows drilling down and viewing the logs of individual parts of the job. Apart from using the “Blue Ocean” view, job logs are also stored as artifact files. The ‘exported-artifacts’ directory seen in the job results will now include different subdirectories for the different parts of the job. Assuming we have a ‘check-patch’ stage script running on ‘el7/x86_64’, we can find its output under ‘exported-artifacts’ in: check-patch.el7.x86_64/mock_logs/script/stdout_stderr.log Any additional artifacts generated by the script would be present in the ‘check-patch.el7.x86-64’ directory as well. I have a CI YAML file in my project already, is this really new? ---------------------------------------------------------------- We’ve been working on this for a while, and occasionally introduced V2 features into individual projects as needed. In particular, our GitHub support was always based on STDCI V2 code, so all GitHub projects (except Lago, which is ‘special’…) are already using STDCI V2. A few Gerrit-based projects have already been converted to V2 as well as part of our efforts to test and debug the V2 code. Most notably, the “OST” and “Jenkins” projects have been switched, although they are running the STDCI V1 jobs as well for the time being. What is the process for switching my project to STDCI V2? --------------------------------------------------------- The CI team is going to proactively work with project maintainers to switch them to V2. The process for switching is as follows: - Send a one-line patch to the ‘jenkins’ repo to enable the V2 jobs for the project - at this point the V2 jobs will run side-by-side with the V1 jobs, and will execute the STDCI scripts on el7/x86_64. - Create an STDCI YAML file to define the target distributions, architectures and oVirt versions for the project. (See below for a sample file that would be equivalent to what many projects have defined in V1 currently). As soon as a patch with the new YAML file is submitted to the project, the V2 job will parse it and follow the instructions in it. This allows for an easy verification of the file functionality in CI. - Remove the STDCI V1 job configuration from the ‘jenkins’ repo. This should be the last patch project maintainers have to send to the ‘jenkins’ repo. What does the new YAML file look like? -------------------------------------- We defined multiple optional names for the file, so that each project owner can choose which name seems most adequate. The following names can be used: - stdci.yaml - automation.yaml - ovirtci.yaml A dot (.) can also optionally be added at the beginning of the file name to make the file hidden, the file extension could also be “yml”. If multiple matching files exist in the project repo, the first matching file according to the order listed above will be used. The file conforms to the YAML syntax. The key names in the file are case-agnostic, and hyphens (-) underscores (_) and spaces ( ) in key names are ignored. Additionally we support multiple forms of the same word so you don’t need to remember if the key should be ‘distro’, ‘distros’, ‘distributions’, ‘operating-systems’ or ‘OperatingSystems’ as all these forms (and others) will work and mean the same thing. To create complex test/build matrices, ‘stage’, ‘distribution’, ‘architecture’ and ‘sub-stage’ definitions can be nested within one another. We find this to be more intuitive than having to maintain tedious ‘exclude’ lists as was needed in V1. Here is an example of an STDCI V2 YAML file that is compatible with the current master branch V1 configuration of many oVirt projects: --- Architectures: - x86_64: Distributions: [ "el7", "fc27" ] - ppc64le: Distribution: el7 - s390x: Distribution: fc27 Release Branches: master: ovirt-master Note: since the file is committed into the project’s own repo, having different configuration for different branches can be done by simply having different files in the different branches, so there is no need for a big convoluted file to configure all branches. Since the above file does not mention stages, any STDCI scripts that exists in the project repo and belong to a particular stage will be run on all specified distribution and architecture combinations. Since it is sometimes desired to run ‘check-patch.sh’ on less platforms then build-artifacts for example, a slightly different file would be needed: --- Architectures: - x86_64: Distributions: [ “el7”, “fc27” ] - ppc64le: Distribution: el7 - s390x: Distribution: fc27 Stages: - check-patch: Architecture: x86_64 Distribution: el7 - build-artifacts Release Branches: master: ovirt-master The above file makes ‘check-patch’ run only on el7/x86_64, while build-artifacts runs on all platforms specified and check-merged would not run at all because it is not listed in the file. Great efforts have been made to make the file format very flexible but intuitive to use. Additionally there are many defaults in place to allow specifying complex behaviours with very brief YAML code. For further details about the file format, please see the documentation linked below. About the relation between STDCI V2 and the change-queue -------------------------------------------------------- In STDCI V1 the change queue that would run the OST tests and release a given patch was determined by looking at the “version” part of the name of the project’s build-artifacts jobs that got invoked for the patch. This was confusing for people as most people understood “version” to mean the internal version for their own project rather then the oVirt version. In V2 we decided to be more explicit and simply include a map from branches to change queues in the YAML configuration under the “release-branches” option, as can be seen in the examples above. We also chose to no longer allow specifying the oVirt version as a shorthand for the equivalent queue name (E.g specifying ‘4.2’ instead of ‘ovirt-4.2’), this should reduce the chance for confusing between project versions and queue names, and also allows us to create and use change queues for projects that are not oVirt. A project can choose not to include a “release-branches” option, in which case its patches will not get submitted to any queues. Further information ------------------- The documentation for STDCI can be found at [1]. The documentation update for V2 are still in progress and expected to be merged soon. In the meatine, the GitHub-specific documentation [2] already provides a great deal of information which is relevant for V2. [1]: http://ovirt-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/CI/Build_and_test_standards [2]: http://ovirt-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/CI/Using_STDCI_with_GitHub --- Barak Korren RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi Red Hat EMEA redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted

3 4

dynamic ownership changes
by Martin Polednik 04 May '18

04 May '18

Hey, I've created a patch[0] that is finally able to activate libvirt's dynamic_ownership for VDSM while not negatively affecting functionality of our storage code. That of course comes with quite a bit of code removal, mostly in the area of host devices, hwrng and anything that touches devices; bunch of test changes and one XML generation caveat (storage is handled by VDSM, therefore disk relabelling needs to be disabled on the VDSM level). Because of the scope of the patch, I welcome storage/virt/network people to review the code and consider the implication this change has on current/future features. [0] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89830/ mpolednik

8 25

OST Failure - Weekly update [/04/2018-20/04/2018]
by Dafna Ron 30 Apr '18

30 Apr '18

Hi, I wanted to give a short status on this week's failures and OST current status. I am glad to report that the issue with CQ alerts was resolved thanks to Barak and Evgheni. You can read more about the issue and how it was resolved here: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1974 Currently we have one on-going possible regression which was reported to the list and to Arik. the change reported: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89852/ - examples: upload ova as a virtual machine template. you can view the details in this Jira: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OFT-648 The majority of issues we had this week were failed-build artifacts for fc27. There were two different cases, one was reported to Francesco who was already working on a fix to the issue and the second started and resolved during the evening/night of Apr 26-27. You can see the Jira to these two issues here: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OFT-605 https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OFT-612 There was an infra issue with Mirrors not being available for a few minutes. the issue was momentarily and was resolved on its own. https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OFT-606 *Below you can see the chart for this week's resolved issues but cause of failure:**Code* = regression of working components/functionalities *Infra* = infrastructure/OST Infrastructure/Lago related issues/Power outages *OST Tests* = package related issues, failed build artifacts *Below is a chart showing failures by suite type: * *Below is a chart showing failures by version type: * *Below you can see the number of reported failures by resolution status:* Thanks, Dafna

4 5

Update: HC suites failing for 3 weeks ( was: [OST][HC] HE fails to deploy )
by Eyal Edri 30 Apr '18

30 Apr '18

FYI, I've disabled the 4.2 and master HC suites nightly run on CI as they are constantly failing for almost 3 weeks and spamming the mailing lists. I think this should get higher priority for a fix if we want it to provide any value, Work can continue using the manual jobs or via check-patch. On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Gal Ben Haim <gbenhaim(a)redhat.com> wrote: > Any update on https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/88887/ ? > The HC suites still failing and it's hard to understand why without the > logs from the engine VM. > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 7:19 AM, Sahina Bose <sabose(a)redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Sahina Bose <sabose(a)redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 2018-04-05 20:46:52,773-0400 INFO otopi.ovirt_hosted_engine_setup.ansible_utils ansible_utils._process_output:100 TASK [Get local VM IP] >>>> 2018-04-05 20:55:28,217-0400 DEBUG otopi.ovirt_hosted_engine_setup.ansible_utils ansible_utils._process_output:94 {u'_ansible_parsed': True, u'stderr_lines': [], u'cmd': u"virsh -r net-dhcp-leases default | grep -i 00:16:3e:24:d3:63 | awk '{ print $5 }' | cut -f1 -d'/'", u'end': u'2018-04-05 20:55:28.046320', u'_ansible_no_log': False, u'stdout': u'', u'changed': True, u'invocation': {u'module_args': {u'warn': True, u'executable': None, u'_uses_shell': True, u'_raw_params': u"virsh -r net-dhcp-leases default | grep -i 00:16:3e:24:d3:63 | awk '{ print $5 }' | cut -f1 -d'/'", u'removes': None, u'creates': None, u'chdir': None, u'stdin': None}}, u'start': u'2018-04-05 20:55:28.000470', u'attempts': 50, u'stderr': u'', u'rc': 0, u'delta': u'0:00:00.045850', u'stdout_lines': []} >>>> 2018-04-05 20:55:28,318-0400 ERROR otopi.ovirt_hosted_engine_setup.ansible_utils ansible_utils._process_output:98 fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"attempts": 50, "changed": true, "cmd": "virsh -r net-dhcp-leases default | grep -i 00:16:3e:24:d3:63 | awk '{ print $5 }' | cut -f1 -d'/'", "delta": "0:00:00.045850", "end": "2018-04-05 20:55:28.046320", "rc": 0, "start": "2018-04-05 20:55:28.000470", "stderr": "", "stderr_lines": [], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []} >>>> >>>> Both the 4.2 and master suites are failing on getting local VM IP. >>>> Any idea what changed or if I have to change the test? >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> >>> >>> Hi Sahina, >>> 4.2 and master suite non HC are correctly running this morning. >>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/job/ovi >>> rt-system-tests_he-basic-ansible-suite-master/146/ >>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/oVirt%20system%20tests/job/ovi >>> rt-system-tests_he-basic-ansible-suite-4.2/76/ >>> >>> I'll try to check the difference with HC suites. >>> >>> Are you using more than one subnet in the HC suites? >>> >> >> No, I'm not. And we havent's changed anything related to network in the >> test suite. >> >> >> > > > -- > *GAL bEN HAIM* > RHV DEVOPS > -- Eyal edri MANAGER RHV DevOps EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)

3 8

Mailing-Lists upgrade
by Marc Dequènes (Duck) 28 Apr '18

28 Apr '18

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IfGqXrbgT9wNNdIsvS8kI8WdhEQHlgkiq Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="AUFHCWPQQknM84fF2kF4uGjIv4blC9bMv"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYyBEZXF1w6huZXMgKER1Y2sp?= <duck(a)redhat.com> To: oVirt Infra <infra(a)ovirt.org>, users <users(a)ovirt.org>, devel <devel(a)ovirt.org> Message-ID: <c5c71fce-0290-e97a-ddd0-eab0e6fccea4(a)redhat.com> Subject: Mailing-Lists upgrade --AUFHCWPQQknM84fF2kF4uGjIv4blC9bMv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quack, On behalf of the oVirt infra team, I'd like to announce the current Mailing-Lists system is going to be upgraded to a brand new Mailman 3 installation on Monday during the slot 11:00-12:00 JST. It should not take a full hour to migrate as we already made incremental synchronization with the current system but better keep some margin. The system will then take over delivery of the mails but might be a bit slow at first as it needs to reindex all the archived mails (which might take a few hours). To manage your subscriptions and delivery settings you can do this easily on the much nicer web interface (https://lists.ovirt.org) There is a notion of account so you don't need to login separately for each ML.= You can Sign In using Fedora, GitHub or Google or create a local account if you prefer. Please keep in mind signing in with a different method would create separate accounts (which cannot be merged at the moment). But you can easily link your account to other authentication methods in your settings (click on you name in the up-right corner -> Account -> Account Connections). As for the original mail archives, because the previous system did not have stable URLs, we cannot create mappings to the new pages. We decided to keep the old archives around on the same URL (/pipermail), so the Internet links would still work fine. Hope you'd be happy with the new system. \_o< --AUFHCWPQQknM84fF2kF4uGjIv4blC9bMv-- --IfGqXrbgT9wNNdIsvS8kI8WdhEQHlgkiq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcpcqg+UmRT3yiF+BVen596wcRD8FAlmwx0MACgkQVen596wc RD9LTQ/+LtUncsq9K8D/LX8wqUTd6VyPwAD5UnAk5c3H/2tmyVA0u7FIfhEyPsXs Z//LE9FEneTDqDVRi1Dw9I54K0ZwxPBemi71dXfwgBI7Ay0ezkbLWrA168Mt9spE tHAODEuxPt2to2aqaS4ujogrkp/gvEP8ILoxPEqoTPCJ/eDTPAu/I1a2JzjMPK3n 2BBS6D8z0TLAf7w1n72TsgX2QzJW57ig/0HELyjvat2/K8V3HSrkwiKlsdULQDWe zB+aMde7r6UoyVKHqlu4asTl2tU/lGZ+e31Hd9Bnx1/oZOJdzslGOhEo9Qoz6763 AHWU9LKiK4NtxYHj2UQTWhndr8PiTtTmR73eIDmkb0cuRXxzjl9VQbwYJ0Kbrmfp attTqpc2CnEojTNXUUNSmNxotZoYXZiX8ZvjPfSgRVr15TUYujzlOfG+lUynbQMV 9rQ9/m58wgwYUymMpOIsRGaIcAKzjm+WpuuVnO+bS2AfmcBkGMQRoIhfV+3SkS8q kT9cDXgcDZOzVFcnZZB4EjbycMcPgZDcoHxU88VdYH+jFJYvvb21esgswVF/wJ2Z uEI/chp4+ADaQhl8ehZNWMSZq125v6SeirPhBNgLG7zFVZI1S9Tm/6qFmH+ajQY7 nCk1X9HZlB1ubex1X+HibRz9QKOilkMgkADyJ4yMDckwYj93sx0= =l6uN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IfGqXrbgT9wNNdIsvS8kI8WdhEQHlgkiq--

2 4

[ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt Master (ovirt-engine-sdk) ] [ 27-04-2018 ] [ 004_basic_sanity.verify_vm_import ]
by Dafna Ron 27 Apr '18

27 Apr '18

Hi, CQ reported a failure for test 004_basic_sanity.verify_vm_import on basic suite. It seems to me that its related to the reported change. can you please have a look? *Link and headline of suspected patches: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89852/ <https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89852/> - examples: upload ova as a virtual machine template Link to Job:* * http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/7166/ <http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/7166/>Link to all logs:http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/7166/art… <http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/7166/artifact…>(Relevant) error snippet from the log: <error>vdsm: * *2018-04-27 10:26:03,131-0400 INFO (jsonrpc/6) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call Host.dumpxmls succeeded in 0.00 seconds (__init__:311)2018-04-27 10:26:04,825-0400 DEBUG (tasks/8) [root] FAILED: <err> = "virt-sparsify: error: libguestfs error: guestfs_launch failed.\nThis usually means the libguestfs appliance failed to start or crashed.\nDo:\n export LIBGUESTFS_DEBUG=1 LIBGUESTFS_TRACE=1\nand run the command again. For further information, read:\n http://libguestfs.org/guestfs-faq.1.html#debugging-libguestfs\nYou <http://libguestfs.org/guestfs-faq.1.html#debugging-libguestfs\nYou> can also run 'libguestfs-test-tool' and post the *complete* output\ninto a bug report or message to the libguestfs mailing list.\n\nIf reporting bugs, run virt-sparsify with debugging enabled and include the \ncomplete output:\n\n virt-sparsify -v -x [...]\n"; <rc> = 1 (commands:87)2018-04-27 10:26:04,829-0400 INFO (tasks/8) [storage.SANLock] Releasing Lease(name='ee91b001-53e4-42b0-9dc1-3a24e5e2b273', path=u'/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share1/c4befad8-ac1e-4cf7-929e-8c26e3a12935/images/46fd673b-4e94-4bc5-aab3-f7af16f11e19/ee91b001-53e4-42b0-9dc1-3a24e5e2b273.lease', offset=0) (clusterlock:435)2018-04-27 10:26:04,835-0400 INFO (tasks/8) [storage.SANLock] Successfully released Lease(name='ee91b001-53e4-42b0-9dc1-3a24e5e2b273', path=u'/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share1/c4befad8-ac1e-4cf7-929e-8c26e3a12935/images/46fd673b-4e94-4bc5-aab3-f7af16f11e19/ee91b001-53e4-42b0-9dc1-3a24e5e2b273.lease', offset=0) (clusterlock:444)2018-04-27 10:26:04,835-0400 ERROR (tasks/8) [root] Job u'f7cc21f1-26fa-430a-93d0-671b402613d1' failed (jobs:221)Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/jobs.py", line 157, in run self._run() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/storage/sdm/api/sparsify_volume.py", line 56, in _run virtsparsify.sparsify_inplace(self._vol_info.path) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/virtsparsify.py", line 71, in sparsify_inplace raise cmdutils.Error(cmd, rc, out, err)Error: Command ['/usr/bin/virt-sparsify', '--machine-readable', '--in-place', u'/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200engine: 2018-04-27 10:16:40,016-04 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.domain.AttachStorageDomainToPoolCommand] (default task-9) [] An error occurred while fetching unregistered disks from Storage Domain id 'f25de789-f7ce-4b7a-9e92-156bae627b9c'{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "38e21a74-88e9-4f1b-a4bf-8ba61f6a0438", "error": {"message": "Image does not exist in domain: u'image=79a81745-1140-4ba8-aa6b-16ab7820df5e, domain=9729b818-49e6-4ac6-b7a6-5d634bb06a83'", "code": 268}}^@2018-04-27 10:28:00,286-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.internal.ResponseWorker] (ResponseWorker) [] Message received: {"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "38e21a74-88e9-4f1b-a4bf-8ba61f6a0438", "error": {"message": "Image does not exist in domain: u'image=79a81745-1140-4ba8-aa6b-16ab7820df5e, domain=9729b818-49e6-4ac6-b7a6-5d634bb06a83'", "code": 268}}2018-04-27 10:28:00,296-04 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [1d9c39cd] EVENT_ID: IRS_BROKER_COMMAND_FAILURE(10,803), VDSM command DeleteImageGroupVDS failed: Image does not exist in domain: u'image=79a81745-1140-4ba8-aa6b-16ab7820df5e, domain=9729b818-49e6-4ac6-b7a6-5d634bb06a83'2018-04-27 10:28:00,296-04 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.DeleteImageGroupVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [1d9c39cd] Command 'DeleteImageGroupVDSCommand( DeleteImageGroupVDSCommandParameters:{storagePoolId='42724c3b-3d09-4c1d-a716-56758c9ba2e3', ignoreFailoverLimit='false', storageDomainId='9729b818-49e6-4ac6-b7a6-5d634bb06a83', imageGroupId='79a81745-1140-4ba8-aa6b-16ab7820df5e', postZeros='false', discard='true', forceDelete='false'})' execution failed: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Image does not exist in domain: u'image=79a81745-1140-4ba8-aa6b-16ab7820df5e, domain=9729b818-49e6-4ac6-b7a6-5d634bb06a83'2018-04-27 10:28:00,296-04 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.DeleteImageGroupVDSCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [1d9c39cd] Exception: org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsOperationFailedNoFailoverException: IRSGenericException: IRSErrorException: Image does not exist in domain: u'image=79a81745-1140-4ba8-aa6b-16ab7820df5e, domain=9729b818-49e6-4ac6-b7a6-5d634bb06a83' at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.BrokerCommandBase.proceedProxyReturnValue(BrokerCommandBase.java:180) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.DeleteImageGroupVDSCommand.executeIrsBrokerCommand(DeleteImageGroupVDSCommand.java:30) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand.lambda$executeVDSCommand$0(IrsBrokerCommand.java:98) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy.runInControlledConcurrency(IrsProxy.java:274) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand.executeVDSCommand(IrsBrokerCommand.java:95) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VDSCommandBase.executeCommand(VDSCommandBase.java:65) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.VdcCommandBase.execute(VdcCommandBase.java:31) [dal.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.DefaultVdsCommandExecutor.execute(DefaultVdsCommandExecutor.java:14) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.ResourceManager.runVdsCommand(ResourceManager.java:398) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.ResourceManager$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass.runVdsCommand$$super(Unknown Source) [vdsbroker.jar:] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor271.invoke(Unknown Source) [:1.8.0_161] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [rt.jar:1.8.0_161] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) [rt.jar:1.8.0_161] at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.proxy.TerminalAroundInvokeInvocationContext.proceedInternal(TerminalAroundInvokeInvocationContext.java:49) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.proxy.AroundInvokeInvocationContext.proceed(AroundInvokeInvocationContext.java:77) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.ovirt.engine.core.common.di.interceptor.LoggingInterceptor.apply(LoggingInterceptor.java:12) [common.jar:] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor70.invoke(Unknown Source) [:1.8.0_161] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [rt.jar:1.8.0_161] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) [rt.jar:1.8.0_161] at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.reader.SimpleInterceptorInvocation$SimpleMethodInvocation.invoke(SimpleInterceptorInvocation.java:73) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.proxy.InterceptorMethodHandler.executeAroundInvoke(InterceptorMethodHandler.java:84) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.proxy.InterceptorMethodHandler.executeInterception(InterceptorMethodHandler.java:72) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.jboss.weld.interceptor.proxy.InterceptorMethodHandler.invoke(InterceptorMethodHandler.java:56) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.CombinedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.invoke(CombinedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.java:79) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.jboss.weld.bean.proxy.CombinedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.invoke(CombinedInterceptorAndDecoratorStackMethodHandler.java:68) [weld-core-impl-2.4.3.Final.jar:2.4.3.Final] at org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.ResourceManager$Proxy$_$$_WeldSubclass.runVdsCommand(Unknown Source) [vdsbroker.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.VDSBrokerFrontendImpl.runVdsCommand(VDSBrokerFrontendImpl.java:33) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.runVdsCommand(CommandBase.java:2046) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.RemoveImageCommand.performDeleteImageVdsmOperation(RemoveImageCommand.java:310) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.storage.disk.image.RemoveImageCommand.executeCommand(RemoveImageCommand.java:112) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeWithoutTransaction(CommandBase.java:1133) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeActionInTransactionScope(CommandBase.java:1286) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.runInTransaction(CommandBase.java:1935) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInSuppressed(TransactionSupport.java:164) [utils.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.transaction.TransactionSupport.executeInScope(TransactionSupport.java:103) [utils.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.execute(CommandBase.java:1346) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.CommandBase.executeAction(CommandBase.java:400) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.executor.DefaultBackendActionExecutor.execute(DefaultBackendActionExecutor.java:13) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runAction(Backend.java:450) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runActionImpl(Backend.java:432) [bll.jar:] at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.Backend.runInternalAction(Backend.java:638) [bll.jar:] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor551.invoke(Unknown Source) [:1.8.0_161] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [rt.jar:1.8.0_161] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) [rt.jar:1.8.0_161] at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceMethodInterceptor.java:52) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:422) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext$Invocation.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:509):2018-04-27 10:28:00,358-04 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.exportimport.ImportVmCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [] Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[2cf61dee-c89c-469a-8ab8-54aebd0ab875=VM, imported_vm=VM_NAME]', sharedLocks='[5e0b3417-5e0d-4f98-a3cb-1a78445de946=REMOTE_VM]'}'2018-04-27 10:28:00,372-04 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-12) [] EVENT_ID: IMPORTEXPORT_IMPORT_VM_FAILED(1,153), Failed to import Vm imported_vm to Data Center test-dc, Cluster test-cluster</error>*

1 0

Fwd: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7.4.1708 CR Available in CBS
by Sandro Bonazzola 27 Apr '18

27 Apr '18

FYI, CentOS 7.5 beta is available in CR repos. I'm going to build qemu-kvm-ev for it in CBS but it will be published to release repo only when CentOS 7.5 will go GA. Please note that test repos will be updated with this build so in order to use test repo you'll need CR repo enabled. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Brian Stinson <brian(a)bstinson.com> Date: 2018-04-26 23:16 GMT+02:00 Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7.4.1708 CR Available in CBS To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Hi Folks, The CR (https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR) repository was released earlier today. We have regenerated all the CentOS 7 buildroots in CBS so you can build against the content that will make it into the next point-release of CentOS Linux. Machines in ci.centos.org are available with CR as well so you may continue your testing. As we discussed earlier (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-April/016627.html) we are currently in Point-release Freeze which means anything tagged for release will *NOT* get pushed out to mirror.centos.org and we will be holding new push requests until we have a GA point-release. If there are any questions please find us here or in #centos-devel on Freenode. Cheers! -- Brian Stinson _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> <https://redhat.com/summit>

1 0

Changing unit labels from GB, MB, KB to GiB, MiB, KiB
by Andrej Krejcir 26 Apr '18

26 Apr '18

Hi, In the ovirt-engine UI, we use units KB, MB, GB with the meaning of powers of 1024 bytes, instead of powers of 1000. Some time ago, there was a bug[1] that has changed some of the GB labels to GiB, but not in all places. This causes inconsistent messages in the UI, where one part of a sentence uses GB and the other GiB. To make it consistent, I have posted patches[2] that change unit labels in other places as well. This change touches strings from different parts of the project, so I'm sending this email to let you know about it. Feel free to check the patches or comment if the change is correct. Andrej [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1535714 [2] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/project:ovirt-engine+topic:unit-relabel

2 1

gerrit service restart
by Evgheni Dereveanchin 26 Apr '18

26 Apr '18

Hi everyone, As you may have noticed, Gerrit is slow to respond today. I will restart the service in a few minutes to address that so if you get some failures while trying to fetch/push/review patches please re-try in a few minutes. -- Regards, Evgheni Dereveanchin

1 1