- Users - oVirt List Archives

[Users] net device initialization order
by Jonathan Horne 08 Jan '13

08 Jan '13

--_000_9BE6F493F83A594DA60C45E6A09DC5AC01709419AUSP01DAG0201co_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i just did my first 3.2 install, i have a single manager and a single node. i have also just created my first VM, and it has 2 network interfaces. nic1 0aa9 =96 ovirtmgmt network nic2 0aa7 =96 iscsi network in the configuration dialog, nic2/0aa7 was the first one that was actually = added, and that was the one i wanted in the ovirtmgmt network (and subseque= ntly i will have to reverse my network cards, and i will have to see nic2 a= s my mgmt/eth0 and nic1 as my iscsi in the web page), but it looks like the= guests are initializing their pci devices in backwards order. is this something i can set somewhere, or is this a bug? [Skopos Web] JONATHAN HORNE | Systems Administrator | Skopos Web<http= ://www.skopos.us> e: jhorne(a)skopos.us<mailto:jhorne@skopos.us> t: 214.520.4600x5042 f: 2= 14.520.5079 ________________________________ This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please de= lete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in deliv= ery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKO= POS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agre= ement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for s= uch purpose. --_000_9BE6F493F83A594DA60C45E6A09DC5AC01709419AUSP01DAG0201co_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <4D552CD712ACE24C976AE09640AFDF37(a)collaborationhost.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DWindows-1= 252"> </head> <body style=3D"word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(0,0,0); font-size:14px; font= -family:Calibri,sans-serif"> <div> <div> <div>i just did my first 3.2 install, i have a single manager and a single = node.</div> <div><br> </div> <div>i have also just created my first VM, and it has 2 network interfaces.= </div> <div><br> </div> <div>nic1 0aa9 =96 ovirtmgmt network</div> <div>nic2 0aa7 =96 iscsi network</div> <div><br> </div> <div>in the configuration dialog, nic2/0aa7 was the first one that was actu= ally added, and that was the one i wanted in the ovirtmgmt network (and sub= sequently i will have to reverse my network cards, and i will have to see n= ic2 as my mgmt/eth0 and nic1 as my iscsi in the web page), but it looks like the guests are initializing t= heir pci devices in backwards order.</div> <div><br> </div> <div>is this something i can set somewhere, or is this a bug?</div> <div> <div> <div style=3D"font-family:Calibri,sans-serif; font-size:14px"></div> <div><font class=3D"Apple-style-span" face=3D"Times"> <table border=3D"0" style=3D"font-family:Times; letter-spacing:normal; orph= ans:2; text-indent:0px; text-transform:none; widows:2; word-spacing:0px; ma= rgin-top:10px; margin-left:1px; margin-bottom:10px; width:673px"> <tbody> <tr height=3D"45"> <td width=3D"40"><img src=3D"http://dl.dropbox.com/u/67303051/Logo_Signatur= e.gif" alt=3D"Skopos Web" width=3D"151" height=3D"55"></td> <td><span style=3D"font-size:12px; color:rgb(128,128,128); line-height:22px= ; font-family:'Trebuchet MS',helvetica,San-Serif"><b style=3D"color:rgb(173= ,41,17); text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:2px">JONATHAN HORNE = </b> |  Systems Administrator  | <a href=3D"http://www.= skopos.us" title=3D"visit Skopos Web" style=3D"text-decoration:initial; bor= der-bottom-width:1px; border-bottom-style:dotted; border-bottom-color:rgb(1= 36,136,136); color:rgb(136,136,136)">Skopos Web</a></span><br> <span style=3D"font-size:11px; color:rgb(178,178,178); font-family:'Trebuch= et MS',helvetica,San-Serif"><b style=3D"color:rgb(136,136,136)">e:</b>&nbsp= ; <a href=3D"mailto:jhorne@skopos.us" title=3D"email %FN%" style=3D"te= xt-decoration:initial; border-bottom-width:1px; border-bottom-style:dotted;= border-bottom-color:rgb(178,178,178); color:rgb(178,178,178)">jhorne@skopo= s.us</a>  <b style=3D"color:rgb(136,136,136)">t:</b>  2= 14.520.4600x5042  <b style=3D"color:rgb(136,136,136)">f:</b>  214.520.5079</= span></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </font></div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <br> <hr> <font color=3D"Gray" face=3D"Arial" size=3D"1">This is a PRIVATE message. I= f you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kin= dly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of con= tent, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit wri= tten agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-m= ail for such purpose.</font> </body> </html> --_000_9BE6F493F83A594DA60C45E6A09DC5AC01709419AUSP01DAG0201co_--

3 3

[Users] Ovirt Node install to USB stick - required 70GB disk space?
by Jure Kranjc 08 Jan '13

08 Jan '13

Hi, has anybody installed ovirt-node on a bootable usb stick? If the hypervisor is less than 1GB in size, why does installation require 70GB of disk space? It would be perfect to run nodes from usb without any disks. Thanks Jure Kranjc

5 5

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
by Shu Ming 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

Jiri Belka: > On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:30:12 +0800 > Shu Ming <shuming(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Jiri Belka : >>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:08:48 +0200 >>> Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what >>>> they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see >>>> improved/added in coming versions? >>> 1. Virtual Serial Port >>> * accessible via network >>> * accessible encrypted via network (qemu doesn't do it yet, >>> IIRC) >>> * vSPC-like (virtual serial port concentrator) app which would >>> act as "proxy" to access individual VM's virtual serial ports >>> >>> - vmware docs: http://tinyurl.com/7dg3ll5 >>> - vSPC 3rd party info: >>> http://isnotajoke.com/vmware_virtual_serial_ports.html >> Here is the work undergoing: >> >> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/10381/ > Hi, > > are you able to migrate such VM? If I read it correctly it is vdsm > which is doing network part to access virtual serial console which > connects to local PTY device. If the VM is migrated to another host, another host port should be reconnected. > > So the idea would be something like this? 'conserver' -> ovirt-sdk/cli > -> remote serial console via HTTP streaming handler ??? > > jbelka It is like: conserver in vdsm ---> http port multiplexing ---> remote serial console via HTTP streaming handler ovirt-sdk/cli is not necessary here, it was only used to create a sample VM in this patch test. > -- --- 舒明 Shu Ming Open Virtualization Engineerning; CSTL, IBM Corp. Tel: 86-10-82451626 Tieline: 9051626 E-mail: shuming(a)cn.ibm.com or shuming(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, PRC

1 0

[Users] Default compatibility version in ovirt nightly
by Gianluca Cecchi 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

Hello, I remember some time ago someone writing about compatibility version defaults for 3.2 that should be put to 3.2. I'm using oVirt nightly in all-in-one config as of ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130101.git2184580.fc18.noarch but compatibility versions defaults are still 3.1 both for local_datacenter and local_cluster and Default Datacenter and Cluster Gianluca

3 5

[Users] Action Needed: Upcoming Deadlines for oVirt Workshop at NetApp
by Leslie Hawthorn 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

Hello everyone, ***If you will not be attending the oVirt workshop taking place at NetApp HQ on 22-24 January 2013 [0], you can stop reading now.*** Hotel Room Block Expiring: If you require a hotel room as part of your visit for the workshop, please book your room ASAP [1], as we will be releasing extra rooms in our block at close of business tomorrow, 8 January. If you are unable to book a room by close of business tomorrow, all unbooked rooms in our block will be released. You may still request our room block rate but you will no longer be guaranteed lodging at the Country Inn and Suites as of Wednesday, 9 January. Registration Deadline: In order to have an accurate headcount for catering, please ensure you have completed your registration for the event no later than close of business on Tuesday, 15 January. [1] Please take a moment to register and to remind any friends and colleagues who would be interested in attending of our registration deadline. If you or a colleague are unable to register by Tuesday, 15 January, but would still like to attend please contact Dave Neary off-list. [2] Dave will do his best to ensure that we are able to process late registrations, though we unfortunately cannot make any guarantees. Thank you once again to Patrick Rogers, Denise Ridolfo, Jon Benedict, Talia Reyes-Ortiz and the rest of the fine folks at NetApp for hosting this workshop and all their hard work to bring the community together in Sunnyvale. If you have any questions, please let me know. I look forward to (re)meeting you at the oVirt workshop at NetApp. [0] - http://www.ovirt.org/NetApp_Workshop_January_2013 [1] - http://ovirtnetapp2013.eventbrite.com/# [2] - dneary at redhat dot com Cheers, LH -- Leslie Hawthorn Community Action and Impact Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat identi.ca/lh twitter.com/lhawthorn]

1 0

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
by Charlie 07 Jan '13

07 Jan '13

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find > good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in > coming versions? > > Thanks, > Itamar Good/useful: Open Source virtualization with a strong web management interface. Rapidly improving, too. wish improved: SPICE connection reliability and LDAPS support. wish added: native ATA-over-Ethernet SAN support. wish removed: Kerberos dependencies. Let people who want Kerb have it, but don't force it where it's not needed. LDAP over SSL is secure. Many thanks to all the oVirt team for all their hard work! --Charlie

2 1

[Users] adding iso images
by Carl T. Miller 06 Jan '13

06 Jan '13

Is there a way to add an iso image to an nfs share by simply copying a file? Or is there a command to run from one of the hosts? The only method I know is using engine-iso-uploader and it's not working in my environment. c

5 5

[Users] unable to install ovirt nightly all in one due to java dependency
by Gianluca Cecchi 06 Jan '13

06 Jan '13

Helo, on a freshly installed F18 I get this $ sudo yum install ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone ... --> Processing Dependency: java-1.7.0-openjdk >= 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.2 for package: ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130104.git2ad721c.fc18.noarch ---> Package plexus-cli.noarch 0:1.2-12.fc18 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130104.git2ad721c.fc18.noarch (ovirt-nightly) Requires: java-1.7.0-openjdk >= 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.2 Installed: 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1.x86_64 (@fedora) java-1.7.0-openjdk = 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1 My java 1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1 is requested by libreoffice... I don't see any java in ovirt repo.. Is it really true such a dependency at a low level? 1.7.0.9-2.3.3.2 vs 1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1 what an universally runnable language... ;-) If I try to remove java Dependencies Resolved ======================================================================================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================================================= Removing: java-1.7.0-openjdk x86_64 1:1.7.0.9-2.3.3.fc18.1 @fedora 89 M Removing for dependencies: icedtea-web x86_64 1.3.1-1.fc18 @fedora 873 k libreoffice-calc x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 23 M libreoffice-core x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 219 M libreoffice-draw x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 2.2 M libreoffice-graphicfilter x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 1.1 M libreoffice-impress x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 3.1 M libreoffice-langpack-en x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 0.0 libreoffice-langpack-it x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 27 M libreoffice-math x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 3.2 M libreoffice-pdfimport x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 1.5 M libreoffice-presenter-screen x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 2.2 M libreoffice-ure x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 8.6 M libreoffice-writer x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 15 M libreoffice-xsltfilter x86_64 1:3.6.3.2-8.fc18 @fedora 1.9 M Transaction Summary ======================================================================================================================================= Remove 1 Package (+14 Dependent packages)

1 1

[Users] yum repo file to be corrected n web site
by Gianluca Cecchi 06 Jan '13

06 Jan '13

Hello, I noticed that the page http://www.ovirt.org/Yum_repo_file doesn't contain correct info. for example for stable baseurl=http://ovirt.org/releases/stable/fedora/$releasever/$basearch/ instead of what contained in file generaed by installation of ovirt-release-fedora.noarch.rpm (downloaded from http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-fedora.noarch.rpm) Also wrong for nightly and missing reference for alpha and beta repos As I have rights to edit wiki, can I correct or is there any reason I don't know or change in plan? Gianluca

1 0

Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17
by Yuval M 06 Jan '13

06 Jan '13

uname -a output: Linux segfault.home 3.6.5-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 19:37:18 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and the other host: Linux kernelpanic.home 3.6.8-2.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 27 19:35:02 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux if there is any other diagnostic information required I will happily supply it, just tell me what... Yuval On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa < mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yuval, > > What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better from: > > [admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a > Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34 > UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Marcelo Barbosa > *mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com* > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M <yuvalme(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt >> system with 2 hosts. >> Both run Fedora Core 17. >> >> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web >> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them. >> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to >> believe it's not a hardware problem: >> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.) >> >> Has anyone seen something like this? >> any suggestions? >> Thanks, >> >> Yuval Meir >> Limor Gavish >> >> >> >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request >> denied due to non-unique superblock keys >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 >> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.485535] ata5: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487472] ata5: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487656] ata6: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.795437] ata6: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797325] ata6: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797583] ata7: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.105616] ata7: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.107307] ata7: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.109318] ata8: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416217] ata8: SATA link up 1.5 >> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416650] ata8.00: configured for >> UDMA/66 >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416769] ata8: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416922] ata9: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722240] ata9: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722256] ata9: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722545] ata10: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027130] ata10: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027234] ata10: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027483] ata11.00: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.331952] ata11.01: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787975] ata11.00: SATA link up >> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787989] ata11.01: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829480] ata11.00: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829487] ata11: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829638] ata12.00: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.133734] ata12.01: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589741] ata12.00: SATA link up >> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589757] ata12.01: SATA link up >> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.600049] ata12.00: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604444] ata12.01: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604450] ata12: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604745] ata13: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921125] ata13: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921144] ata13: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921300] ata14: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.377523] ata14: SATA link up 1.5 >> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.386842] ata14.00: configured for >> UDMA/100 >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.392491] ata14: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.392695] ata15: soft resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.543523] ata15: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.543727] ata16: soft resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403602.706229] ata16: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault vdsm Storage.LVM WARNING lvm vgs failed: 5 [] [' >> Volume group "78b1f41d-29cf-4e1a-a84d-fb9175f4388e" not found'] >> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.273230] ata1: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.580216] ata1: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.582803] ata1: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:16 segfault kernel: [403603.585201] ata2: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.892210] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 >> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.901635] ata2.00: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.901641] ata2: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403603.901873] ata3: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.209120] ata3: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.210966] ata3: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.211156] ata4: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.517966] ata4: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.519902] ata4: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:17 segfault kernel: [403604.520157] ata5: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403604.826862] ata5: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403604.828830] ata5: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403604.829067] ata6: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.135731] ata6: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.137698] ata6: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.137887] ata7: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.445714] ata7: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.447619] ata7: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:18 segfault kernel: [403605.449682] ata8: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.756684] ata8: SATA link up 1.5 >> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.757166] ata8.00: configured for >> UDMA/66 >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.757266] ata8: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403605.757485] ata9: hard resetting link >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.064643] ata9: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.064660] ata9: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.064839] ata10: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.369548] ata10: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.369562] ata10: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:19 segfault kernel: [403606.369842] ata11.00: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403606.675420] ata11.01: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.131342] ata11.00: SATA link up >> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.131355] ata11.01: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.248752] ata11.00: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.248759] ata11: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.249045] ata12.00: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:20 segfault kernel: [403607.554194] ata12.01: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.011215] ata12.00: SATA link up >> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.011244] ata12.01: SATA link up >> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.021439] ata12.00: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.028239] ata12.01: configured for >> UDMA/133 >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.028243] ata12: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.028442] ata13: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.345178] ata13: SATA link down >> (SStatus 0 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.345195] ata13: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:21 segfault kernel: [403608.345443] ata14: hard resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.800805] ata14: SATA link up 1.5 >> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.810109] ata14.00: configured for >> UDMA/100 >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.815632] ata14: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.815863] ata15: soft resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.966859] ata15: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403608.967054] ata16: soft resetting >> link >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault kernel: [403609.130010] ata16: EH complete >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault vdsm Storage.LVM WARNING lvm vgs failed: 5 [] [' >> Volume group "f0175c0c-75f1-4518-ba77-f7476171f6c6" not found'] >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault vdsm Storage.StorageDomain WARNING Resource >> namespace f0175c0c-75f1-4518-ba77-f7476171f6c6_imageNS already registered >> Dec 29 14:00:22 segfault vdsm Storage.StorageDomain WARNING Resource >> namespace f0175c0c-75f1-4518-ba77-f7476171f6c6_volumeNS already registered >> Dec 29 14:00:23 segfault vdsm Storage.LVM WARNING lvm vgs failed: 5 [] [' >> Volume group "78b1f41d-29cf-4e1a-a84d-fb9175f4388e" not found'] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >

2 2