- Devel - oVirt List Archives

Problems with using gwt-debug
by Amit Aviram 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

Hi all. I'm having troubles debugging oVirt's GUI with gwt-debug recently- this happens on master, it fails with the following error: ..... [INFO] diagnostic ... engine/frontend/webadmin/modules/webadmin/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/webadmin/section/main/presenter/tab/virtualMachine/SubTabVirtualMachineVirtualDiskPresenter.java:38: error: type org.ovirt.engine.ui.uicommonweb.models.vms.VmListModel does not take parameters SearchableDetailModelProvider<Disk, VmListModel<Void>, VmDiskListModel> modelProvider) { ^ ..... After going a few patches back, prior to the one which adds this code, the issue seems to be solved.. Did anybody else had the same problem/know how to fix it? or maybe that just happens to me locally.. Amit.

4 3

Re: [ovirt-devel] Intro
by ilya musayev 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

++ devel(a)ovirt.org - as i realized it got dropped by mistake.. Itamar, Please see response in-line, > On 3/2/15 2:10 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: >> On 03/02/2015 11:22 PM, ilya musayev wrote: >>> Itamar, >>> >>> Please see response in-line, >>> >>> On 3/2/15 10:34 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: >>>> On 03/02/2015 07:59 PM, ilya musayev wrote: >>>>> Hi Itamar, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for delayed response. >>>>> >>>>> We are using Apache CloudStack as a platform that can manage KVM, >>>>> Xen, >>>>> VMware and Baremetal hosts/hypervisors. >>>>> >>>>> We would like to tie in oVirt with our KVM infrastructure but we dont >>>>> want both CloudStack and oVirt to step on each other toes. >>>>> >>>>> We are thinking if there is a way to proxy specific commands from >>>>> oVirt >>>>> to CloudStack and not KVM host directly. >>>> >>>> wouldn't the "normal" architecture of CloudStack be to have an ovirt >>>> driver/plugin, so you'd use cloudstack and it will ask ovirt rest api >>>> to launch the VMs on the actual hosts? >>> It would have been "intuitive", but this is a chicken and the egg >>> situation. CloudStack has been deployed long ago, while oVirt is fairly >>> new - in our world. >>> >>> On a basic level, CloudStack can manage KVM just like oVirt does, >>> however, oVirt is more feature rich, both have their own advantages and >>> disadvantages. Combining both with least amount of complexity and >>> inter-dependency would be the proper solution for us. >>> >>> 1) Specific feature we need oVirt for is historical analysis of VMs >>> stats for resource consumption - i believe oVirt has a separate >>> interface for that. >> >> yes, the data warehouse (and potentially, the reporting server) >> >>> 2) We need a way to manage load balancing of VMs across the >>> cluster/host >>> and we are thinking this is where we need to integrate oVirt. I guess >>> i'm only considering a fraction of what oVirt has to offer, but for now >>> - this is all we need. >>> >>> What you are proposing is what Vmware vCenter does right now, it has >>> its >>> own pluses and minuses, we are leaning toward not having another >>> vCenter >>> - as it proves to be rather painful to add and manage yet another >>> dependency stack. We would prefer a parallel independent add-on (oVirt >>> talks to cloudstack to perform specific tasks, but if there are any >>> issues, we can just stop oVirt from communicating) VS in-line >>> dependency >>> (if there are any oVirt issues, we are down, until the issue is >>> resolved). >> >> well, its an different/interesting approach which wouldn't be common >> probably, but it may work. >> but ovirt needs to talk to vdsm (host agent), which talks to libvirt. >> >> so theoretical integration points are: >> 1. ovirt-->cloudstack-->libvirt ? On the high level, without having greater knowledge of oVirt, yes. Reading data: ovirt --> ovirt-agent Execution: ovirt-->cloudstack-management-->cloudstack-agent-on-kvm (uses libvirt) Only execution needs to be proxied over to cloudstack > >> >> this would require implementing most/all of vdsm verbs over >> cloudstack. I doubt the abstraction level is the same between them. >> >> 2. ovirt-->vdsm-->cloudstack-->libvirt >> >> this is possible, as vdsm supports custom hooks, but monitoring would >> still be direct to libvirt, and the custom hooks don't cover all >> features anyway. in oVirt, would it be feasable to run vm load balancing - in passive state. Proposed scenario would be, oVirt identified the VM A needs to move to KVM Host X, this recomendation message is posted to a location (be it message queue we can subscribe to, file, db or some external call), another service listens for oVirt suggestions and executes migration via cloudstack. This seems rather simple and we would not need to rewrite much assuming oVirt can only run in passive state and not actually act upon a task. We would need to lock the ability so it does not mistakenly move the VM around. >> >> (unless cloudstack impersonates libvirt, which again, probably the >> wrong abstraction level to be feasible). > CloudStack has an agent that talks to libvirt. >> >> so both paths are far from trivial. >> >> may i ask for the size of the deployment you're considering this >> effort for (number of hosts/vms)? Depending on the type of environment, lowest would be 100 or so hypervisors and 2000 or so VMs, it goes higher in numbers from then on with many different environments. Cloudstack can handle that without issues. Thanks, ilya >> >> >> >>> >>> Feedback is welcome, >>> >>> Thanks >>> ilya >>>> your path seems less intuitive - which features in ovirt are you >>>> trying to leverage? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts or pointers on this would be greatly appreciated, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> ilya >>>>> >>>>> On 2/24/15 12:20 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: >>>>>> On 02/12/2015 06:38 PM, ilya musayev wrote: >>>>>>> Hi oVirt Devel Team, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thought i would introduce myself being newbie here, my name is ilya >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> i work for one if the larger IT companies in Bay Area. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm interested in learning more about what oVirt does, >>>>>>> especially from >>>>>>> developers points of view as we may have some integration >>>>>>> initiatives. >>>>>> >>>>>> we're always happy to help with these - anything more specific on >>>>>> the >>>>>> type of integration you are interested in? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm also actively involved in Apache CloudStack project as PMC and >>>>>>> Committer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> ilya >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Devel mailing list >>>>>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org >>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >

2 2

[VDSM] dynamic tuning of logging
by Francesco Romani 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hi everyone, I'd like to allow VDSM to change the verbosity of its loggers at runtime, without restarting the daemon. Doing so, we could make the default silent, and we'll also offer a convenient way for users to enable/disable debug log. When something has to be debugged or better understood, one can temporarily increase verbosiness, and then restore the normal level, with minimal service disruption (= no vdsmd restart). Currently vdsm uses the standard 'logging' module, which, to best of my knowledge, allows to tune levels at runtime since forever. So, the main concern is the interface. I see these options, from the one I like the most to the one I like the least: 1. add a inotify helper/trigger, just reload the config file when changed. Seems safe and convenient, but will lead to a "complex" patch. 2. just add a new verb to be used by Engine/vdsClient/whatever. Tuning log levels is not more dangerous than a truckload of verbs we already expose 3. build on the manhole integration (https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/32147/) 4. use signals (SIGUSR? SIGHUP?) Thoughts welcome -- Francesco Romani RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D Phone: 8261328 IRC: fromani

4 4

[QE] oVirt 3.6.0 status
by Sandro Bonazzola 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, here's an update on 3.6 status on integration / rel-eng side The tracker bug for 3.6.0 [1] currently shows no blockers. There are 560 bugs [2] targeted to 3.6.0. NEW ASSIGNED POST Total docs 11 0 0 11 gluster 29 2 2 33 i18n 2 0 0 2 infra 81 8 7 96 integration 61 5 4 70 network 32 2 9 43 node 27 4 3 34 ppc 0 0 1 1 sla 53 3 0 56 spice 1 0 0 1 storage 72 5 6 83 ux 34 0 8 42 virt 72 6 10 88 Total 475 35 50 560 Features submission is still open until 2015-04-22 as per current release schedule. Maintainers: be sure to have your features tracked in the google doc[3] [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1155425 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=target_release%3A3.6.0%… [3] http://goo.gl/9X3G49 -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status
by Sandro Bonazzola 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, We still have one open blocker for 3.5.2[1]: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1176937 virt ASSIGNED Instance type: delta icon (new configuration for next run) does not appear on running pool VMs. ACTION: Tomas Jelinek to provide ETA for the blocker bug. We also had 4 blockers fixed since 3.5.2 RC1[2] so a new RC will be scheduled when the last blocker will be fixed and GA postponed to one week later as release criteria for RC1 are not met. We still have 16 bugs in MODIFIED and 45 on QA[8]: Whiteboard MODIFIED ON_QA Total infra 8 15 23 integration 0 4 4 network 2 3 5 node 1 0 1 sla 2 3 5 storage 3 13 16 virt 0 7 7 Total 16 45 61 ACTION: Maintainers/Assignee: please move bugs to ON_QA if they're included in 3.5.2 RC1 ACTION: Testers: you're welcome to verify bugs currently ON_QA. All remaining bugs not marked as blockers have been moved to 3.5.3. A release management entry has been added for tracking the schedule of 3.5.3[3] A bug tracker [4] has been created for 3.5.3. We have 33 bugs currently targeted to 3.5.3[5]: Whiteboard NEW ASSIGNED POST Total doc 1 0 0 1 docs 1 0 0 1 gluster 4 0 1 5 infra 2 2 0 4 integration 1 0 0 1 network 0 1 0 1 node 3 0 1 4 ppc 0 0 1 1 sla 4 0 0 4 storage 8 0 0 8 ux 0 0 1 1 virt 1 0 1 2 Total 25 3 5 33 ACTION: Maintainers / Assignee: to review the bugs targeted to 3.5.3 ensuring they're correctly targeted. ACTION: Maintainers: to fill release notes for 3.5.2, the page has been created and updated here [6] ACTION: Testers: please add yourself to the test page [7] [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1186161 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?action=wrap&bug_id=1179558%2C118817… [3] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5.z_Release_Management#oVirt_3.5.3 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1198142 [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=product%3Aovirt%20targe… [6] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.5.2_Release_Notes [7] http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/oVirt_3.5.2_Testing [8] http://goo.gl/UEVTCf -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

Where do you run oVirt? Here are the answers!
by Sandro Bonazzola 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, This is a summary of the 85 response we got to the last month poll. Thanks everyone who answered! Which distribution are you using for running ovirt-engine? Fedora 20 8 9% CentOS 6 52 61% CentOS 7 22 26% Other 3 4% Which distribution are you using for your nodes? Fedora 20 6 7% CentOS 6 40 47% CentOS 7 31 36% oVirt Node 6 7% Other 2 2% In Other: RHEL 6.6, 7.0, 7.1 and a mixed environment of CentOS 6 and 7. Do you use Hosted Engine? Yes 42 49% No 42 49% Would you like to share more info on your datacenter, vms,...? Tell us about it ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- oVirt is so AWESOME! I luv it. -- "We currently run engine on CentOS 6 as CentOS 7 was not yet supported. We plan on migrating it to a CentOS 7 machine. Our nodes are currently CentOS 6 but are planning to migrate to CentOS 7. (For the nodes a checkbox for each distribution would be better than the radiobutton, as you can have multiple clusters with different distributions)." -- FC Storage (Dell md3620f and IBM Blade-S internal SAS storage) -- Please provide ceph support and built in backup tools -- "3 separate virtual RHEV datacenters, test, dev, prod. Use direct attach fibre channel luns for application storage heavily on VMs to take advantage of snapshot/restore features on our array. Hosted Engine in test and dev. Physical manager in prod. " -- "2 nodes running centos 6.6 from SSD (i3 35w 32GB) 1x NFS datastore 1x ISO datastore 1 node running NFS (i3 35w 8GB, Dell PERC sas controller) All 3 nodes connected via 10Gb ethernet Between 9 en 15 VM's depending on my tests Always active - Zimbra - ldap/dhcp - web/php - devel/php - pfsense Develop/test - Hadoop - Openstack - Gluster - ms..." -- "- 4 nodes for KVM, 4 nodes for GlusterFS. - 1Gigabit for management and 4Gigabit channel bonding for GlusterFS replica. - Master Storage Domain lives on replica-3 GlustrerFS volume." -- "30 hvs NFS storage over infiniband, custom portal for task automation and classroom abstraction via API" -- "We use atm local storage. Current running vm count is over 100. I'd like to use EL7 platform in the future, but I'm uncertain how to best upgrade everything with a minimal downtime. we currently run ovirt-engine 3.3.3 we will stick with EL platform and not switch to fedora based, because we need the improved stability. we also do not upgrade to dot zero releases as these introduced some breakage in the past (regressions). I hope this gets better with future releases. Keep up the good work! Sven" -- "Storage GlusterFS (Virt+Gluster on Nodes), and FreeNAS via NFS" -- "- iSCSI dedicated network - 2x Poweredge M1000e chassis (so, 2 x 16 blades)" -- Yes it's NIELIT a gov agency to provide various trannig on virtual environment -- "Running production engine on CentOS6 with CentOS6 nodes. Test/Staging environemtn based on CentOS7 and CentOS7 nodes, Hosted-engine on iSCSI." -- "Mix of Dell, HP, UCS for compute Netapp for NAS, VNX for FC" -- "Cloud used for CI purpose, made from about ""old"" 50 desktop PCs (and still growing) with Celerons, i3, i5 and few i7. VMs are ""light"" nodes for Jenkins (2GB-6GB/2-4cores). Some resources are utilized for cloud's services like vpn, zabbix, httpd, etc. As storage we use MooseFS!" -- "This is a sample config for the few installes I have performed, but ideal for a small office. 2x nodes - CentOS 6 with SSD boot and 2x 2TB drives and 2 gluster volumes spread over the 2 - 1 for vm storage and 1 for file storage 1x engine (planning on changing to hosted) 5x vms - 2x DNS/DHCP/Management, 1x webserver for intranet, 1x mailserver and 1x Asterisk PBX " -- "I think that we really need more troubleshooting tools and guides more than anything. There are various logs, but there is no reason why we shouldn't be publishing some of this information to the engine UI and even automating certain self-healing. The absolute most important feature in my mind is getting the ability to auto start (restart) VMs after certain failures and attempting to unlock disks, etc.. VMware does a tremendous amount of that in order to provide better HA. We need this." -- "Have FC only. Using SVC. Behind it now DS4700. Going to have other storages too. This is BYOD. " -- "One node cluster with local storage for education, POC etc. at home." -- No -- Combo glusterfs storage and vm hosted nodes. Will be migrating engine to centos 7 at some point. Wish libgfapi was properly supported now that it's feasible. -- 3 x Supermicro A1SAi-2750F nodes (16 GiB RAM + 8 TiB storage + 8x1GiB/s Ethernet each) with hyperconverged GlusterFS (doubling as an NFS/CIFS storage cluster) -- "running 15 vms, for univ apps (LMS/SIS/etc), using dual freeIPA (vms), glusterfs (replicated-distributed-10G net)" -- "Tried to install hosted engine on Centos 7, but ran into issues and went for Fedora20 instead. Fedora20 installation was pretty much problem free. Using NFS on Synology NAS for vm disks." -- "3 clusters, 1 gluster storage cluster, 50 TB total disk space, with 4 hosts all volumes replica 3 2 virtualisation clusters, SandyBridge with 5 hosts, Nehelem with 2 hosts running about 70 mostly Linux clients, hosted engine runs on 3 of the SandyBridge nodes." -- I use oVirt since version 3.0. The evolution of this project is outstanding. The biggest unsolved problem is that there is no good backup solution for oVirt. -- Modest server with all-in-one oVirt installation. -- "oVirt is for Testing actually, I should say validate. We use Xen Open Source and plan to migrate to oVirt during this year." -- "4 nodes, 30 VM's (10 are HA), ISO and export domain on NAS, local drives shared over NFS between nodes, one FC primary storage domain 1TB. Engine is a KVM VM on a CentOS host." -- "5 hosts, FC " -- Development system for working with other Open Source projects. -- "1. DATA_DOMAIN - HP P2000 G3 FC 2. Nodes - Intel server boards SB2400BB 3. VMS - On CentOS 6.6" -- We are developing VDI solution based on oVirt/KVM/SPICE. -- So I answered for my largest oVirt cluster. I actually have several -- "Create multiple VM using ovirt in order to provide platform as a service in my campus environment. All the VM(s) created will be used to run web based application for the purpose of final year project presentation. I did this only on 1 physical server as we currently have the limitation on the hardware part." -- "small lab environment, ~10 nodes, ~20-30 VMs. " -- Ovirt 3.4.4 with 16 VDSM Nodes and 170 virtual machines. We currently use Direct attached disks from our ISCSI SAN and we use the snapshot and replication features of the SAN (Dell Equallogic). -- "Lab @Home SuperMicro mainboard with 1 x Xeon quad core cpu (Sandy Bridge) 32 GB RAM Synology NAS with storage for oVirt through iSCSI" -- "IBM Blade Center. 1 Engine 2 Ovirt Nodes 1 NAS for NFS" -- "We started looking at OVIRT a while ago and it had come a long way. My only objection to migrating it into our production is the issues we have with the network interfaces (bonded VLAN tags on the mgmt) and their removal on boot/reboot. Other than that we have fully tested multi-cluster glusterized environments successfully. Again outside of the networks the only other feature I would suggest is gluster storage for the hosted engine. " -- Storage is ZFS shared over NFS via dual 10 gbit links. Running 15 nodes now. -- We will upgrade up CentOS7 soon -- "2 FC datacenters, 4 VNX SAN, 2 4To Lun, 25 hosts on 2 physical sites, 180 centos server vms. We used to recycle all our old servers (1950, 2950, G6 etc..) to get additional vCPU and RAM, but it has no more interest since we got 4 new r630 chassis with 128 Go of RAM and 40 vCPUs per server. So the goal is to reduce the number of hosts when keeping the same capacities." -- "2 production setups in different DC, beginning their history from ovirt-3.2, thus centos6 and no hosted-engine. dell m1000e bladesystem + fc storage in first one; hp dl580 g7 + fc storage in second. ~150 vms in each" -- Storage is ZFS shared over NFS via dual 10 gbit links. Running 15 nodes now. -- "Just started using Ovirt, we're using supermicro microcloud servers with 32GB memory and quad core E3-1241v3 Xeons. We're using the jenkins builds of ovirt-node since there isn't a recent ovirt-node build. " -- Hyorvisor used also as replica glusterfs nodes. -- "We run about 20 VMs on 3 proliant machines with a msa backed shared storage. We have migrated dec/jan to oVirt and I am a big fan of the virtualization solution. We ran VPS before on Virtuozzo, but it did not provide out of the box HA. The only thing I was missing is some way of automated backups. We have finally bought a proprietary backup solution ( R1soft CDP ) to run within the VMs to have disaster and file backups. Overall a great product! " -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

3 2

oVirt Community Newsletter: February 2015
by Brian Proffitt 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

February got started with many oVirt community members descended upon Brussels for FOSDEM! Our virtualization presentations were a big success, and helps get a productive month kick started. ------------------------- oVirt Software Milestones ------------------------- On Feb 27, oVirt 3.5.2 RC was released! http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/announce/2015-February/000159.html Meanwhile, planning for oVirt 3.6 includes some very cool new features... including support for Ubuntu Hosts! http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.6_Release_Management#Key_Proposed_Changes Here's when 3.6 should be rolling out... http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-February/031491.html Check out oVirt 3.5.1.1 Live on a CentOS7 host today! http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_Live moVirt is now an official oVirt incubator project! http://www.ovirt.org/Project_moVirt ---------------- In the Community ---------------- VDI in the largest Spanish university made easy with oVirt. http://www.ovirt.org/Universidad_de_Sevilla_Case_Study Red Hat Launches Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3.5 http://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-launches-red-hat-ente… FOSDEM Virtualization: Docker Integration in oVirt and Live Migration of Containers with CRIU http://www.infoq.com/news/2015/02/fosdem-ovirt-criu Fosdem and oVirt [Trip Report] http://dougsland.livejournal.com/124182.html Get involved in oVirt project! March edition http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-March/031631.html Step by Step - Reusing Old Features to Build New Ones http://www.slideshare.net/AllonMureinik/step-bystep-ovirtlivemerge oVirt is happy to announce its participation in the next round of the Outreachy program. Register today! http://www.ovirt.org/Outreachy FOSDEM Videos: Fabricate Your Automated DevOps Environment Using Python http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/fosdem//2015/lightning_talks/automated_devops_env… Validate Your Gerrit Patches Automatically Using Magic Hooks http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/fosdem/2015/lightning_talks/gerrit_hooks.mp4 Upcoming oVirt Events: * FOSSAsia, March 13-15, 2015, Singapore http://fossasia.org/ * oVirt Workshop, March 14, 2015, Singapore http://www.meetup.com/FOSSASIA-Singapore-Open-Technology-Meetup/events/2201… ------------------------------------ Deep Dives and Technical Discussions ------------------------------------ Red Hat: Traditional virtualisation isn't going anywhere http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2396980/red-hat-traditional-virtua… Trying out oVirt's Probabilistic Optimizer http://community.redhat.com/blog/2015/02/trying-out-ovirts-probabalistic-op… moVirt + bVNC @ tablet, phone and smart watch http://youtu.be/QnD9v70oefA Import esxi VM to oVirt http://youtu.be/dHJv7zydZEM VirtZine #48: Alternative Virtualization Platforms! http://youtu.be/ISWN6Frp9cg oVirt and OpenStack network integración via Neutron SDN using OriginStack http://youtu.be/P0_s6JjFM1o -- Brian Proffitt Community Liaison oVirt Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Phone: +1 574 383 9BKP IRC: bkp @ OFTC

1 0

Proposing Sahina Bose as oVirt core maintainer
by Oved Ourfali 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hi all! I would like to propose Sahina Bose as an engine-core maintainer, with regards to Gluster related code. Sahina joined the oVirt project two years ago, and has since contributed over 150 patches, and has been instrumental in reviews of all Gluster patches. Will appreciate your response! Thanks, Oved

10 9

Want to Be Mentor?
by Brian Proffitt 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

oVirt is pleased to announce it will be participating in the May-August 2015 round of Outreachy, organized by the GNOME Foundation, Software Freedom Conservancy, and Red Hat. Outreachy helps women (cis and trans) and genderqueer get involved in free and open source software. The program provides a supportive community for beginning to contribute any time throughout the year and offers focused internship opportunities twice a year with a number of free software organizations. If anyone has a project they'd like to add to the list of ideas at[1], there is still time. Applications will open tomorrow. Right now we are confirmed for at least one intern, but there should be funding for at least one more. Thanks! Brian [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Outreachy -- Brian Proffitt Community Liaison oVirt Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Phone: +1 574 383 9BKP IRC: bkp @ OFTC

1 0

oVirt Node Weekly Meeting -- 2015-03-02
by Fabian Deutsch 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2015/ovirt.2015-03-02-15.23.html Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2015/ovirt.2015-03-02-15.23.txt Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2015/ovirt.2015-03-02-15.23.log.html ================================= #ovirt: oVirt Node Weekly Meeting ================================= Meeting started by fabiand at 15:23:37 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2015/ovirt.2015-03-02-15.23.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (fabiand, 15:23:55) * oVirt 3.5 (fabiand, 15:24:00) * oVirt 3.6 planning (fabiand, 15:24:04) * Other Items (fabiand, 15:24:08) * oVirt 3.5 (fabiand, 15:24:15) * 3.5 jobs are broken due to missing node rpms (fabiand, 15:28:21) * ACTION: tlitovsk to create a job to build jobs which can then be used by the nightly publishers (fabiand, 15:28:39) * oVirt 3.6 Planning (fabiand, 15:31:56) * LINK: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/009934.html (fabiand, 15:32:39) * ACTION: fabiand to create the anaconda feature page (fabiand, 15:34:17) * LINK: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node/DbusBackend (rbarry, 15:36:54) * dougsland working on ovirt-node pacjkage refactoring (fabiand, 15:38:10) * rbarry working on a dbus backend for the config classes (fabiand, 15:38:17) * LINK: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node/DbusBackend (fabiand, 15:38:21) * Other Items (fabiand, 15:38:54) * ACTION: tlitovsk to send csmock and infos to devel(a)ovirt.org (fabiand, 15:40:21) Meeting ended at 15:41:42 UTC. Action Items ------------ * tlitovsk to create a job to build jobs which can then be used by the nightly publishers * fabiand to create the anaconda feature page * tlitovsk to send csmock and infos to devel(a)ovirt.org Action Items, by person ----------------------- * fabiand * fabiand to create the anaconda feature page * tlitovsk * tlitovsk to create a job to build jobs which can then be used by the nightly publishers * tlitovsk to send csmock and infos to devel(a)ovirt.org * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * fabiand (61) * tlitovsk (12) * sbonazzo (5) * rbarry (4) * dougsland (2) * ovirtbot (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0