It seems like patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69846/ didn't add python-dateutil package to fc24 build artifacts job. https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/71208/ should fix it. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Hi, > > $subject job fails with the following exception: > > 16:19:32 make[2]: Entering directory > '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x86_64/vdsm/lib/api' > 16:19:32 Generate vdsm-api.html > 16:19:32 chmod u+w

adding Sandro According to Sandro, there was no official statement about moving master to fc25. Thanks Irit Gil On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > May I ask why was > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x86_64/ > added yesterday? Who needs f24 builds of vdsm master? > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > It seems like patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69846/ didn't add > > python-dateutil package to fc24 build artifacts job. > > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/71208/ should fix it. > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> $subject job fails with the following exception: > >> > >> 16:19:32 make[2]: Entering directory > >> '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x8 > 6_64/vdsm/lib/api' > >> 16:19:32 Generate vdsm-api.html > >> 16:19:32 chmod u+w >

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vd > sm/vdsm_standard.yaml > I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24 will also be EOL in a few months time. > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> adding Sandro >> >> According to Sandro, there was no official statement about moving master >> to fc25. >> >> Thanks Irit >> Gil >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> May I ask why was >>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x86_64/ >>> added yesterday? Who needs f24 builds of vdsm master? >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> > It seems like patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69846/ didn't add >>> > python-dateutil package to fc24 build artifacts job. >>> > >>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/71208/ should fix it. >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> $subject job fails with the following exception: >>> >> >>> >> 16:19:32 make[2]: Entering directory >>> >> '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x8 >>> 6_64/vdsm/lib/api' >>> >> 16:19:32 Generate vdsm-api.html >>> >> 16:19:32 chmod u+w >>> >> >> > > > -- > Irit Goihman > Software Engineer > Red Hat Israel Ltd. > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Eyal Edri Associate Manager RHV DevOps EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D Red Hat Israel phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told > Sandro that it is his call. > I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation > should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. > > Thanks all > Gil > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >>> >>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vd >>> sm/vdsm_standard.yaml >>> >> >> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >> >> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24 >> will also be EOL in a few months time. >> > ​As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... [1] ​ ​https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075

​ > >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> adding Sandro >>>> >>>> According to Sandro, there was no official statement about moving >>>> master to fc25. >>>> >>>> Thanks Irit >>>> Gil >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> May I ask why was >>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x86_64/ >>>>> added yesterday? Who needs f24 builds of vdsm master? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > It seems like patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69846/ didn't add >>>>> > python-dateutil package to fc24 build artifacts job. >>>>> > >>>>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/71208/ should fix it. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> $subject job fails with the following exception: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 16:19:32 make[2]: Entering directory >>>>> >> '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x8 >>>>> 6_64/vdsm/lib/api' >>>>> >> 16:19:32 Generate vdsm-api.html >>>>> >> 16:19:32 chmod u+w >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Irit Goihman >>> Software Engineer >>> Red Hat Israel Ltd. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel(a)ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eyal Edri >> Associate Manager >> RHV DevOps >> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D >> Red Hat Israel >> >> phone: +972-9-7692018 <+972%209-769-2018> >> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told >>> Sandro that it is his call. >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. >>> >>> Thanks all >>> Gil >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/ vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml >>>> >>>> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >>>> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24 >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. >> >> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... >> >> [1] >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 >

> > > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to be > able to build and run it. > We can't leave CI broken. I don't think we have a choice, we must stay with fc24 for now, and fix the automation packages. > > > >> >> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> adding Sandro >>>>>> >>>>>> According to Sandro, there was no official statement about moving >>>>>> master to fc25. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Irit >>>>>> Gil >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> May I ask why was >>>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_build-artifacts- fc24-x86_64/ >>>>>>> added yesterday? Who needs f24 builds of vdsm master? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com > >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > It seems like patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69846/ didn't add >>>>>>> > python-dateutil package to fc24 build artifacts job. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/71208/ should fix it. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Hi, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> $subject job fails with the following exception: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> 16:19:32 make[2]: Entering directory >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24- x86_64/vdsm/lib/api' >>>>>>> >> 16:19:32 Generate vdsm-api.html >>>>>>> >> 16:19:32 chmod u+w >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Irit Goihman >>>>> Software Engineer >>>>> Red Hat Israel Ltd. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devel mailing list >>>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Eyal Edri >>>> Associate Manager >>>> RHV DevOps >>>> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D >>>> Red Hat Israel >>>> >>>> phone: +972-9-7692018 >>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ) >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> Devel(a)ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told >>> Sandro that it is his call. >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. >>> >>> Thanks all >>> Gil >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/ vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml >>>> >>>> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >>>> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24 >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. >> >> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... >> >> [1] >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 > > > > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to be > able to build and run it. > We can't leave CI broken. Which CI job is broken with f25? _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py", > line 32, in <module> > from ovirt_engine import service > File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py", > line 35, in <module> > from dateutil import tz > ImportError: No module named dateutil > Fixed with a simple 'sudo dnf install python-dateutil' > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I >> told >> >>> Sandro that it is his call. >> >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this >> permutation >> >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks all >> >>> Gil >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vd >> sm/vdsm_standard.yaml >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >> >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >> >>>> >> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since >> fc24 >> >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. >> >> >> >> >> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it >> cannot be >> >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 >> > >> > >> > >> > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. >> > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI >> to be >> > able to build and run it. >> > We can't leave CI broken. >> >> Which CI job is broken with f25? >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > > > > -- > Greg Sheremeta, MBA > Red Hat, Inc. > Sr. Software Engineer > gshereme(a)redhat.com > -- Greg Sheremeta, MBA Red Hat, Inc. Sr. Software Engineer gshereme(a)redhat.com _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

So what's the verdict?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > Greg, > > I'm sorry about that, I forgot to send official announcement about that. > > I will do that asap. > > Martin > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> >>> I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error >>> >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File >>> "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py", >>> line 32, in <module> >>> from ovirt_engine import service >>> File >>> "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py", >>> line 35, in <module> >>> from dateutil import tz >>> ImportError: No module named dateutil >> >> >> Fixed with a simple 'sudo dnf install python-dateutil' >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola >>>> <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I >>>> >>> told >>>> >>> Sandro that it is his call. >>>> >>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this >>>> >>> permutation >>>> >>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thanks all >>>> >>> Gil >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman >>>> >>>> <igoihman(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vdsm/vdsm_stand... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only >>>> >>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since >>>> >>>> fc24 >>>> >>>> will also be EOL in a few months time. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it >>>> >> cannot be >>>> >> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ... >>>> >> >>>> >> [1] >>>> >> >>>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status. >>>> > Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI >>>> > to be >>>> > able to build and run it. >>>> > We can't leave CI broken. >>>> >>>> Which CI job is broken with f25? >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devel mailing list >>>> Devel(a)ovirt.org >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Greg Sheremeta, MBA >>> Red Hat, Inc. >>> Sr. Software Engineer >>> gshereme(a)redhat.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Greg Sheremeta, MBA >> Red Hat, Inc. >> Sr. Software Engineer >> gshereme(a)redhat.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> Devel(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel