- Devel - oVirt List Archives

oVirt PPC support
by Alexandre Bencz 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

Hi I have a IBM Power7 machine, I saw that oVirt support is for PPC8, but, I would like to know if it is possible to use oVirt in PowerPC 7, if there is any internal limitation on the implementation of oVirt to not work in PPC7

1 0

Failing OST patches
by Kaustav Majumder 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

Recently I have pushed 2 patches for OST[1][2], both are failing in CI. Though unrelated failures I find the errors in "add_hosts" test beacuse the host is non operation within the asserted time.I have added the link for the jenkins log [3]. [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95327/ [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95347/ [3] https://pastebin.com/MVpws4Et Any advice? -- KAUSTAV MAJUMDER ASSOCIATE SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat India PVT LTD. <https://www.redhat.com/> kmajumder(a)redhat.com M: 08981884037 IM: IRC: kmajumder <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> @redhatway <https://twitter.com/redhatway> @redhatinc <https://instagram.com/redhatinc> @redhatsnaps <https://snapchat.com/add/redhatsnaps>

4 6

Re: Any way to make VM Hidden/Locked for access
by Pavan Chavva 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

+Ovirt Devel and Adelino. FYI. Best, Pavan. On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:21 AM Mahesh Falmari <Mahesh.Falmari(a)veritas.com> wrote: > Hi Nir, > > Just wanted to check if there is any way to create a VM through API and > make this VM hidden or locked so that it is not shown/accessible to the > users until we explicitly enable it again. > > The use case here is of VM recovery, where we would like to create a VM > first and wanted to check if there is any issue in VM creation and then > fail in the first phase itself before the actual data transfer takes place. > But the issue we may see here is that once VM gets created, it becomes > accessible to users who may play with it and it would impact the subsequent > recovery operations. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Mahesh Falmari > > > -- PAVAN KUMAR CHAVVA ENGINEERING PARTNER MANAGER Red Hat pchavva(a)redhat.com M: 4793219099 IM: pchavva

3 2

[Ovirt] [CQ weekly status] [30-11-2018]
by Dafna Ron 02 Dec '18

02 Dec '18

Hi, This mail is to provide the current status of CQ and allow people to review status before and after the weekend. Please refer to below colour map for further information on the meaning of the colours. *CQ-4.2*: RED (#1) I checked last date ovirt-engine and vdsm passed and moved packages to tested as they are the bigger projects and it was on the 27-11-218. We have been having sporadic failures for most of the projects on test check_snapshot_with_memory. We have deducted that this is caused by a code regression in storage based on the following things: 1.Evgheni and Gal helped debug this issue to rule out lago and infra issue as the cause of failure and both determined the issue is a code regression - most likely in storage. 2. The failure only happens on 4.2 branch. 3. the failure itself is cannot run a vm due to low disk space in storage domain and we cannot see any failures which would leave any leftovers in the storage domain. Dan and Ryan are actively involved in trying to find the regression but the consensus is that this is a storage related regression and* we are having a problem getting the storage team to join us in debugging the issue. * I prepared a patch to skip the test in case we cannot get cooperation from storage team and resolve this regression in the next few days: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95889/ *CQ-Master:* YELLOW (#1) We have failures which CQ is still bisecting and until its done we cannot point to any specific failing projects. Happy week! Dafna ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COLOUR MAP Green = job has been passing successfully ** green for more than 3 days may suggest we need a review of our test coverage 1. 1-3 days GREEN (#1) 2. 4-7 days GREEN (#2) 3. Over 7 days GREEN (#3) Yellow = intermittent failures for different projects but no lasting or current regressions ** intermittent would be a healthy project as we expect a number of failures during the week ** I will not report any of the solved failures or regressions. 1. Solved job failures YELLOW (#1) 2. Solved regressions YELLOW (#2) Red = job has been failing ** Active Failures. The colour will change based on the amount of time the project/s has been broken. Only active regressions would be reported. 1. 1-3 days RED (#1) 2. 4-7 days RED (#2) 3. Over 7 days RED (#3)

7 13

otopi defaults again to python3
by Yedidyah Bar David 02 Dec '18

02 Dec '18

Hi all, As some of you might recall, some time ago we made otopi default to python3, and quickly reverted that, realizing this causes too much breakage. Now things should hopefully be more stable, and I now merged a patch to default to python3 again. Current status: engine-setup works with python3 on fedora. host-deploy works with python3 on fedora, with both engine being on el7 and on fedora. Didn't try on el7, might work as well. hosted-engine --deploy is most likely broken on fedora, but I think it was already broken. We are working on that, but it will require some more time - notably, having stuff from vdsm on python3 (if not fully porting vdsm to python3, which I understand will take even more time). If you want to use python2, you can do that with: OTOPI_PYTHON=/bin/python hosted-engine --deploy On el7, if you manually added python3 (which is not available in the base repos), things will break - use above workaround if needed. Best regards, -- Didi

2 2

[VDSM] test_echo(1024, False) (stomp_test.StompTests) fails
by Nir Soffer 01 Dec '18

01 Dec '18

This tests used to fail in the past, but since we fixed it or the code it never failed. Maybe the slave was overloaded? *14:19:02* ======================================================================*14:19:02* ERROR: *14:19:02* ----------------------------------------------------------------------*14:19:02* Traceback (most recent call last):*14:19:02* File "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/tests/testlib.py", line 143, in wrapper*14:19:02* return f(self, *args)*14:19:02* File "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/tests/stomp_test.py", line 95, in test_echo*14:19:02* str(uuid4())),*14:19:02* File "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/lib/yajsonrpc/jsonrpcclient.py", line 77, in callMethod*14:19:02* raise exception.JsonRpcNoResponseError(method=methodName)*14:19:02* JsonRpcNoResponseError: No response for JSON-RPC request: {'method': 'echo'}*14:19:02* -------------------- >> begin captured logging << --------------------*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,524 DEBUG (MainThread) [vds.MultiProtocolAcceptor] Creating socket (host='::1', port=0, family=10, socketype=1, proto=6) (protocoldetector:225)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,526 INFO (MainThread) [vds.MultiProtocolAcceptor] Listening at ::1:36713 (protocoldetector:183)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,535 DEBUG (MainThread) [Scheduler] Starting scheduler test.Scheduler (schedule:98)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,537 DEBUG (test.Scheduler) [Scheduler] START thread <Thread(test.Scheduler, started daemon 140562082535168)> (func=<bound method Scheduler._run of <vdsm.schedule.Scheduler object at 0x7fd74ca00390>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,538 DEBUG (test.Scheduler) [Scheduler] started (schedule:140)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,546 DEBUG (JsonRpc (StompReactor)) [root] START thread <Thread(JsonRpc (StompReactor), started daemon 140562629256960)> (func=<bound method StompReactor.process_requests of <yajsonrpc.stompserver.StompReactor object at 0x7fd74ca006d0>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,547 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting executor (executor:128)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,549 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/0 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,553 DEBUG (jsonrpc/0) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/0, started daemon 140562612471552)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/0 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74ca00650>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,554 DEBUG (jsonrpc/0) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,557 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/1 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,558 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/2 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,559 DEBUG (jsonrpc/2) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/2, started daemon 140562620864256)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/2 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74c9fb350>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,560 DEBUG (jsonrpc/2) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,561 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/3 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,562 DEBUG (jsonrpc/3) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/3, started daemon 140562124498688)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/3 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74bc80290>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,563 DEBUG (jsonrpc/3) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,564 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/4 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,565 DEBUG (jsonrpc/4) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/4, started daemon 140562116105984)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/4 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74bc80790>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,566 DEBUG (jsonrpc/4) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,568 DEBUG (jsonrpc/1) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/1, started daemon 140562132891392)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/1 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74c9fb690>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,569 DEBUG (jsonrpc/1) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,569 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/5 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,570 DEBUG (jsonrpc/5) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/5, started daemon 140562107713280)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/5 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74bc80090>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,571 DEBUG (jsonrpc/5) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,572 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/6 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,580 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Starting worker jsonrpc/7 (executor:286)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,603 DEBUG (jsonrpc/6) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/6, started daemon 140562099320576)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/6 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74d0dacd0>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,604 DEBUG (jsonrpc/6) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,615 DEBUG (jsonrpc/7) [Executor] START thread <Thread(jsonrpc/7, started daemon 140562090927872)> (func=<bound method _Worker._run of <Worker name=jsonrpc/7 waiting task#=0 at 0x7fd74bfe0310>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,616 DEBUG (JsonRpcServer) [root] START thread <Thread(JsonRpcServer, started daemon 140561730238208)> (func=<bound method JsonRpcServer.serve_requests of <yajsonrpc.JsonRpcServer object at 0x7fd74ca00690>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,618 DEBUG (MainThread) [vds.MultiProtocolAcceptor] Adding detector <yajsonrpc.stompserver.StompDetector instance at 0x7fd74c28cc68> (protocoldetector:210)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,625 INFO (Detector thread) [ProtocolDetector.AcceptorImpl] Accepted connection from ::1:52432 (protocoldetector:61)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,626 DEBUG (Detector thread) [ProtocolDetector.Detector] Using required_size=11 (protocoldetector:89)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,627 DEBUG (jsonrpc/7) [Executor] Worker started (executor:298)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,634 DEBUG (MainThread) [jsonrpc.AsyncoreClient] Sending response (stompclient:293)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,634 DEBUG (Client ::1:36713) [root] START thread <Thread(Client ::1:36713, started daemon 140561713452800)> (func=<bound method Reactor.process_requests of <yajsonrpc.betterAsyncore.Reactor object at 0x7fd74bdb1d90>>, args=(), kwargs={}) (concurrent:193)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,641 INFO (Detector thread) [ProtocolDetector.Detector] Detected protocol stomp from ::1:52432 (protocoldetector:125)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,645 INFO (Detector thread) [Broker.StompAdapter] Processing CONNECT request (stompserver:94)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,648 DEBUG (Client ::1:36713) [yajsonrpc.protocols.stomp.AsyncClient] Stomp connection established (stompclient:137)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,651 DEBUG (jsonrpc/0) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] Calling 'echo' in bridge with [u'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut en'] (__init__:328)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,652 DEBUG (jsonrpc/0) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] Return 'echo' in bridge with Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut en (__init__:355)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,653 INFO (jsonrpc/0) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] RPC call echo succeeded in 0.01 seconds (__init__:311)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,661 INFO (Detector thread) [Broker.StompAdapter] Subscribe command received (stompserver:123)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:17:54,662 DEBUG (Detector thread) [protocoldetector.StompDetector] Stomp detected from ('::1', 52432) (stompserver:412)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,649 DEBUG (MainThread) [vds.MultiProtocolAcceptor] Stopping Acceptor (protocoldetector:214)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,650 INFO (MainThread) [jsonrpc.JsonRpcServer] Stopping JsonRPC Server (__init__:441)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,651 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Stopping executor (executor:137)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,652 DEBUG (Client ::1:36713) [root] FINISH thread <Thread(Client ::1:36713, started daemon 140561713452800)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,652 DEBUG (JsonRpcServer) [root] FINISH thread <Thread(JsonRpcServer, started daemon 140561730238208)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,654 DEBUG (JsonRpc (StompReactor)) [root] FINISH thread <Thread(JsonRpc (StompReactor), started daemon 140562629256960)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,655 DEBUG (jsonrpc/2) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,658 DEBUG (jsonrpc/3) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,659 DEBUG (jsonrpc/4) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,660 DEBUG (jsonrpc/1) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,660 DEBUG (jsonrpc/5) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,660 DEBUG (jsonrpc/6) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,665 DEBUG (jsonrpc/6) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/6, started daemon 140562099320576)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,661 DEBUG (jsonrpc/7) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,662 DEBUG (jsonrpc/2) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/2, started daemon 140562620864256)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,663 DEBUG (jsonrpc/3) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/3, started daemon 140562124498688)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,663 DEBUG (jsonrpc/1) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/1, started daemon 140562132891392)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,664 DEBUG (jsonrpc/4) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/4, started daemon 140562116105984)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,664 DEBUG (jsonrpc/0) [Executor] Worker stopped (executor:303)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,665 DEBUG (jsonrpc/5) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/5, started daemon 140562107713280)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,667 DEBUG (jsonrpc/7) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/7, started daemon 140562090927872)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,667 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/0 (executor:290)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,671 DEBUG (jsonrpc/0) [Executor] FINISH thread <Thread(jsonrpc/0, started daemon 140562612471552)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,673 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/1 (executor:290)*14:19:02* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,674 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/6 (executor:290)*14:19:02* 2018-Coverage.py warning: Module /home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/vdsm was never imported. (module-not-imported)*14:19:05* pylint installdeps: pylint==1.8*14:19:22* pylint installed: The directory '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/vdsm/.cache/pip/http' or its parent directory is not owned by the current user and the cache has been disabled. Please check the permissions and owner of that directory. If executing pip with sudo, you may want sudo's -H flag.,astroid==1.6.5,backports.functools-lru-cache==1.5,backports.ssl-match-hostname==3.5.0.1,blivet==0.61.15.69,chardet==2.2.1,configparser==3.5.0,coverage==4.4.1,decorator==3.4.0,enum34==1.1.6,funcsigs==1.0.2,futures==3.2.0,iniparse==0.4,ioprocess==1.1.0,ipaddress==1.0.16,IPy==0.75,isort==4.3.4,kitchen==1.1.1,lazy-object-proxy==1.3.1,libvirt-python==3.9.0,Magic-file-extensions==0.2,mccabe==0.6.1,mock==2.0.0,netaddr==0.7.18,ovirt-imageio-common==1.4.1,pbr==3.1.1,pluggy==0.6.0,policycoreutils-default-encoding==0.1,pthreading==0.1.3,py==1.5.4,pycurl==7.19.0,pygpgme==0.3,pyinotify==0.9.4,pykickstart==1.99.66.18,pyliblzma==0.5.3,pylint==1.8.0,pyparted==3.9,python-augeas==0.5.0,python-dateutil==2.4.2,pyudev==0.15,pyxattr==0.5.1,PyYAML==3.10,requests==2.6.0,sanlock-python==3.6.0,seobject==0.1,sepolicy==1.1,singledispatch==3.4.0.3,six==1.11.0,subprocess32==3.2.6,tox==2.9.1,urlgrabber==3.10,urllib3==1.10.2,virtualenv==16.0.0,WebOb==1.2.3,wrapt==1.10.11,yum-metadata-parser==1.1.4*14:19:22* pylint runtests: PYTHONHASHSEED='528910716'*14:19:22* pylint runtests: commands[0] | pylint --errors-only static/usr/share/vdsm/sitecustomize.py lib/vdsm lib/vdsmclient lib/yajsonrpc*14:19:23* Problem importing module base.pyc: cannot import name get_node_last_lineno*14:19:24* Problem importing module base.py: cannot import name get_node_last_lineno*14:19:34* 06-27 14:18:09,674 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/7 (executor:290)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,675 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/5 (executor:290)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,675 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/2 (executor:290)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,676 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/3 (executor:290)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,676 DEBUG (MainThread) [Executor] Waiting for worker jsonrpc/4 (executor:290)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,677 DEBUG (MainThread) [Scheduler] Stopping scheduler test.Scheduler (schedule:110)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,678 DEBUG (test.Scheduler) [Scheduler] stopped (schedule:143)*14:19:34* 2018-06-27 14:18:09,679 DEBUG (test.Scheduler) [Scheduler] FINISH thread <Thread(test.Scheduler, started daemon 140562082535168)> (concurrent:196)*14:19:34* --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------

4 10

[VDSM] Fedora 28 support - updates
by Nir Soffer 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

If you want to add host running Fedora 28, you need to do few manual steps: 1. Add hosts fail to configure the firewall Do not check the "Configure filewall" checkbox Adding host will fail because engine cannot communicate with vdsm. Fix - disable the firewall on the host. $ iptables -F There is probably a better way, but I did not find it yet :-) Sandro, do we have an update about this? 2. Engine fail in Host.getCapabilties Libvirt changed the location and format of this file. This will cause Host.getCapabilties to fai, and the host will become "Unassigned" This is a new issue revealed by updating our virt-preview repo this week. Fix - install old cpu_map.xml $ wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libvirt/libvirt/18cab54c3a0bc72390f293006… -O /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml Engine should retry and succeed after that. 3. Sanlock fail to write to its pid file, connecting to storage fail Fix - set selinux to permissive mode $ setenforce 0 To make this persistent edit /etc/selinux/config SELINUX=permissive We have a bug for this. After that you should have a working system. Nir

5 8

List of Queries related to RHV
by Suchitra Herwadkar 29 Nov '18

29 Nov '18

Hi Nir, Pavan https://ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/storage/incremental-b… On reading more from the article, we have some questions which we will like to discuss in the call 1. Irrespective of the underlying storage, we will always restore the data as raw. But it’s not very clear to us how the disk format conversion will be taken care of internally by RHV. 1. Conversion from raw data to qcow format will only work for disk marked to be incremental or it is not specific to that only. Would rhv stage the data before conversion to qcow2. 1. For this feature( incremental backup) to work, disks have to be marked as such. User needs to mark those disks as incrementals while creating VM, otherwise this will not work. 1. If we use incremental backups, then will there not be a backing file. Do we have to upload the entire image and then rhv would convert to qcow. What if we want to just upload just the incremental part/changes relative to some base image. Thanks Suchitra

2 1

Need help setting default value to a dropdown variable in webadmin
by Kaustav Majumder 29 Nov '18

29 Nov '18

Hi all, Have been struggling with gwt code while trying to set a default value to a list drop down if a condition is satisfied. The class I am working on is "VmDiskPopupWidget.java" . I need to set default Allocation Policy 'volumeType' as 'Preallocated'. The select dropdown is of type 'ListModelListBoxEditor<VolumeType>' Any advice. -- KAUSTAV MAJUMDER ASSOCIATE SOFTWARE ENGINEER Red Hat India PVT LTD. <https://www.redhat.com/> kmajumder(a)redhat.com M: 08981884037 IM: IRC: kmajumder <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> @redhatway <https://twitter.com/redhatway> @redhatinc <https://instagram.com/redhatinc> @redhatsnaps <https://snapchat.com/add/redhatsnaps>

1 0

Request for reviews - vdsm-tool update-volume
by Germano Veit Michel 29 Nov '18

29 Nov '18

Hi, I'm working an a tool (vdsm-tool update-volume) to make modifying SD metadata easier and more importantly, safer. This is very useful to recover from failed LSMs or snapshot issues. The plan is to use the VDSM API (modified by some of these patches) and add a tool (vdsm-tool) that talks to the API and modifies the volumes metadata as required by the user. Currently this is done manually, i.e.: looking at MD_XXX tags, doing dd, sed and then dd back to the storage. Any wrong argument (like a skip in place of a seek) can ruin the entire metadata, so this tool can be quite handy. The code is not necessarily 100% finished yet, but I've been testing this for some time and it seems ok from a functional point of view. I'm just not sure everything I did (especially inside VDSM, example 94366) is correct. Your comments on what can/should be improved are very welcome at this point. Please see this series and help reviewing it. https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/topic:update-volume+(status:open+OR+status:mer… https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/93258/ Thanks, Germano

2 9