- Devel - oVirt List Archives

[Engine-devel] mom RPMs for 3.4
by Adam Litke 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Hi Sandro, After updating the MOM project's build system, I have used jenkins to produce a set of RPMs that I would like to tag into the oVirt 3.4 release. Please see the jenkins job [1] for the relevant artifacts for EL6[2], F19[3], and F20[4]. Dan, should I submit a patch to vdsm to make it require mom >= 0.4.0? I want to be careful to not break people's environments this late in the 3.4 release cycle. What is the best way to minimize that damage? [1] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/All/job/manual-build-tarball/179/ [2] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/All/job/manual-build-tarball/179/label=centos… [3] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/All/job/manual-build-tarball/179/label=fedora… [4] http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/All/job/manual-build-tarball/179/label=fedora…

4 9

[Engine-devel] oVirt January 2014 Updates
by Itamar Heim 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

1. VERSIONS - oVirt 3.3.3 in last phases http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3.3_release_notes - oVirt 3.4 with another slew of features is getting into test day, beta, etc. http://red.ht/1eo9TiS 2. WORKSHOPS - Fosdem - oVirt stand wass packed as well as a virt & IaaS devroom, with many oVirt talks. more details next time. - more oVirt talks in cfgmgmtcamp and infra.next this week, including: -- Hervé Leclerc "How we build a cloud with CentOS, oVirt, and Cisco-UCS" Wednesday 5th February in Infrastructure.Next Ghent http://bit.ly/1fjTJVC -- oVirt Node being used as a Discovery Node in The Foreman project talk at cfgmgmtcamp, february 3rd http://bit.ly/1gAnneI - oVirt Korea group meeting this Saturday in Seoul Register here http://onoffmix.com/event/23134 - Open Virtualization Workshop in Tehran (26,27 February 2014) & Isfahan (5,6 March 2014) http://t.co/9PR3BxOnpd 3. USING oVirt - More details on Wind River using ovirt http://bit.ly/1i2LtLI - New Case Study: Nieuwland Geo-Informati http://www.ovirt.org/Nieuwland_case_study - oVirt Node being used as a Discovery Node in The Foreman project talk at cfgmgmtcamp, february 3rd http://bit.ly/1gAnneI 4. Users - Double the amount of emails on users mailing list- up from 800 to 1600 this month! - Karli updated how to use spice with ovirt from OS X http://www.ovirt.org/SPICE_Remote-Viewer_on_OS_X - Opaque (spice android ovirt client) v1.1.8 beta released https://plus.google.com/communities/116099119712127782216 - how to deploy windows guest agent on windows: http://bit.ly/1kr5tJo - Andrew Lau posted on working through Hosted Engine with 3.4.0 beta http://bit.ly/1eobzZw - Deep Dive into oVirt 3.3.3 by Li Jiansheng (chinese) http://slidesha.re/1eFWQ8G - Matthew Bingham posted a series of video on setting up ovirt: Install oVirt 3.3.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWT-m-oWSjQ Optional export nfs mount for oVirt 3.3.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLbPln5-2jE Initial webgui oVirt 3.3.2 Steps for storage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL0_03ZICw4 Download and upload client iso to ISO_DOMAIN for oVirt 3.3.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDzTHFSmvGE

1 0

[Engine-devel] [ANN] engine-manage-domains arguments changed
by Martin Perina 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Hi, patch, that changes engine-manage-domains command line arguments from Java type (-someOption) to standard long type (--some-option), was merged today. Please consult man page or run engine-manage-domains --help to find out differences. Thanks Martin Perina

2 1

Re: [Engine-devel] mom RPMs for 3.4
by Sandro Bonazzola 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Il 03/02/2014 09:35, Amedeo Salvati ha scritto: > > Da: arch-bounces(a)ovirt.org > A: "Dan Kenigsberg" danken(a)redhat.com,"Adam Litke" alitke(a)redhat.com > Cc: engine-devel(a)ovirt.org,"arch" arch(a)ovirt.org,"VDSM Project Development" vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Data: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:50:12 +0100 > Oggetto: Re: mom RPMs for 3.4 > >> Il 01/02/2014 23:48, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto: >> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 04:56:12PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote: >> >> On 31/01/14 08:36 +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> >>> Il 30/01/2014 19:30, Adam Litke ha scritto: >> >>>> On 30/01/14 18:13 +0000, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:49:42AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote: >> >>>>>> Hi Sandro, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> After updating the MOM project's build system, I have used jenkins to >> >>>>>> produce a set of RPMs that I would like to tag into the oVirt 3.4 >> >>>>>> release. Please see the jenkins job [1] for the relevant artifacts >> >>>>>> for EL6[2], F19[3], and F20[4]. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Dan, should I submit a patch to vdsm to make it require mom >= 0.4.0? >> >>>>>> I want to be careful to not break people's environments this late in >> >>>>>> the 3.4 release cycle. What is the best way to minimize that damage? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hey, we're during beta. I prefer making this requirement explicit now >> >>>>> over having users with supervdsmd.log retate due to log spam. >> >>>> >> >>>> In that case, Sandro, can you let me know when those RPMs hit the >> >>>> ovirt repos (for master and 3.4) and then I will submit a patch to >> >>>> vdsm to require the new version. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> mom 0.4.0 has been built in last night nightly job [1] and published to nightly by publisher job [2] >> >>> so it's already available on nightly [3] >> >>> >> >>> For 3.4.0, it has been planned [4] a beta 2 release on 2014-02-06 so we'll include your builds in that release. >> >> >> >> I presume the scripting for 3.4 release rpms will produce a version >> >> without the git-rev based suffix: ie. mom-0.4.0-1.rpm? >> >> >> >> I need to figure out how to handle a problem that might be a bit >> >> unique to mom. MOM is used by non-oVirt users who install it from the >> >> main Fedora repository. I think it's fine that we are producing our >> >> own rpms in oVirt (that may have additional patches applied and may >> >> resync to upstream mom code more frequently than would be desired for >> >> the main Fedora repository). Given this, I think it makes sense to >> >> tag the oVirt RPMs with a special version suffix to indicate that >> >> these are oVirt produced and not upstream Fedora. >> >> >> >> For example: >> >> The next Fedora update will be mom-0.4.0-1.f20.rpm. >> >> The next oVirt update will be mom-0.4.0-1ovirt.f20.rpm. >> >> >> >> Is this the best practice for accomplishing my goals? One other thing >> >> I'd like to have the option of doing is to make vdsm depend on an >> >> ovirt distribution of mom so that the upstream Fedora version will not >> >> satisfy the dependency for vdsm. >> > >> > What is the motivation for this? You would not like to bother Fedora >> > users with updates that are required only for oVirt? >> > >> > Vdsm itself is built, signed, and distributed via Fedora. >> > It is also copied into the ovirt repo, for completeness sake. Could MoM >> > do the same? >> >> IMHO, if we're distributing mom and vdsm rpms through Fedora yum repository we should not duplicate it on ovirt yum repository. >> Fedora package is signed and will differ from the one we're shipping within ovirt repo (which is unsigned) >> We should provide on resource.ovirt.org only packages not available on "downstream" repositories (like nightly builds). > > why you can't sign your rpms??? We're working on that :-) > > on ovirt web page http://www.ovirt.org/Home you can change: > > Enhanced security: SELinux and Mandatory Access Control for VMs and hypervisor > > with: > > Enhanced security: SELinux and Mandatory Access Control for VMs and hypervisor (but not signed rpms) > > best regards > a > >> >> >> > >> > Dan. >> > >> >> >> -- >> Sandro Bonazzola >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >> See how it works at redhat.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Arch mailing list >> Arch(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[Engine-devel] Custom fencing
by Kristof Dufour 02 Feb '14

02 Feb '14

Hi All, I have a PDU that allows me to switch on or off all my servers, however the brand isn¹t supported by oVirt. 1. Can I create my own custom fencing script? 2. Where can I find any documentation about the syntax? 3. How can I get my script in the list of fencing methods? Hope that anyone can help me! Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Kristof Dufour

3 3

[Engine-devel] [oVirt jenkins] Weekly report on open tasks for ovirt-engine
by Jenkins ci oVirt Server 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

------=_Part_934_29336138.1391213141364 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head></head><body>Files scanned: '**/*.java, **/*.py'. Strings searched: FIXME | TODO | @deprecated Report: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt_engine_scan_open_tasks/16/tasksResult/?</body></html> ------=_Part_934_29336138.1391213141364--

1 0

[Engine-devel] bug-url requirement for stable branch backports
by Itamar Heim 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

I'm inclined to drop the "bug-url is required" for engine stable branch 3.4, until we GA 3.4, as a lot of the patches are for pre-GA features. 3.3 stable branch still has this requirement of course. thoughts anyone? Thanks, Itamar

8 9

[Engine-devel] Can not debug GWT with chrom
by Eli Mesika 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

Hi I am trying to debug GWT with google-chrome-stable-32.0.1700.77-1.x86_64 on F19 and getting the following exception onModuleLoad() threw an exception Exception while loading module com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter. See Development Mode for details. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.onLoad(ModuleSpace.java:406) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.OophmSessionHandler.loadModule(OophmSessionHandler.java:200) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.processConnection(BrowserChannelServer.java:526) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.run(BrowserChannelServer.java:364) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Deferred binding failed for 'com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter$UserAgentProperty' (did you forget to inherit a required module?) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.GWTBridgeImpl.create(GWTBridgeImpl.java:53) at com.google.gwt.core.shared.GWT.create(GWT.java:57) at com.google.gwt.core.client.GWT.create(GWT.java:85) at com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter.onModuleLoad(UserAgentAsserter.java:66) ... 9 more Caused by: com.google.gwt.core.ext.UnableToCompleteException: (see previous log entries) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.rebind(ModuleSpace.java:605) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.rebindAndCreate(ModuleSpace.java:465) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.GWTBridgeImpl.create(GWTBridgeImpl.java:49) ... 12 more any ideas ???

2 2

[Engine-devel] AppErrors properties
by Michal Skrivanek 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi, while trying to add a new message I couldn't help notice some ugliness in the code regarding our error messages in UI - why do we have @DefaultStringValue in frontend/webadmin/modules/frontend/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.java ? All strings are defined in individual properties anyway. - so we have individual properties files….3 of them REST - backend/manager/modules/dal/src/main/resources/bundles/AppErrors.properties UP - frontend/webadmin/modules/frontend/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.java WA - frontend/webadmin/modules/userportal-gwtp/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.properties funnily enough it's not that there are more messages in WA than UP, no, it's just full of random omissions, typos and discrepancies which do not make any logical sense Can't we get rid of the defaults in the interface (useless) and have just one property containing all the messages and use the sam file in all 3 places. And only if there is intentionally a different message in e.g. UP than in WA we can have an override/additional property file there (just by briefly going through most of the differences there's not a single case) Thanks, michal

2 3

[Engine-devel] proposing Arik Hadas as a maintainer of engine core
by Michal Skrivanek 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Dear engine-core maintainers, I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various areas in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than 200 patches merged to engine master alone. Tons of migration related fixes, refactoring of legacy code, but also new complex features including complementary patches in UI, REST and VDSM code (e.g. Live Snapshots with RAM, locking improvements for VM&Template operations) Thanks in advance for your response. Thanks, michal

13 12