Which bond mode do we support in ovirt 3.5?
by yangfeng
Hi
I want to confirm which bond mode do we support in ovirt 3.5?
We cannot get 3.5 doc. But from the following 3.4 doc, we get that
"Modes 1, 2, 3 and 4 support both virtual machine (bridged) and
non-virtual machine (bridgeless) network types. Modes 0, 5 and 6 support
non-virtual machine (bridgeless) networks only. "
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtuali...
But from ovirt 3.5 engine web page, we can set bond mode 1, 2, 4, 5 and
custom mode.
So we want to know which bond mode do we support in ovirt 3.5?
Thanks
Feng Yang
10 years
API for executing commands on node?
by Christopher Pereira
Hi,
What is the best practice to run custom console commands on a given
oVirt host?
Do we have some API for this?
I need to pass arguments to this remote commands/scripts.
10 years
Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 22
by Shubhendu Tripathi
----_com.android.email_477458184382010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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----_com.android.email_477458184382010
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64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----_com.android.email_477458184382010--
10 years
oVirt Engine in a container
by Fabian Deutsch
Hey,
if you are using docker or atomic, then you might be interested that you
can get a fully configured and running oVirt Engine (based on CentOS and
oVirt 3.5) from the docker repositories.
I'm not the first one who gave it a go, Moran [also] [did] this.
My work is similar to his, I just tried to leverage some enhancements
which popped up in the last 6 months - mainly the integration with the
`atomic` command and a simpler integration with systemd.
The image is based on this [Dockerfile] and [this atomic installation script]
to perform the engine setup on deployment.
With the `atomic` command the usage is quite easy:
atomic install fabiand/ovirt-engine-3.5
# or
ADMINPW=foo atomic install fabiand/ovirt-engine-3.5
With `docker` it's a few more lines:
export IMAGE=docker.io/fabiand/ovirt-engine-3.5
export NAME=ovirt-engine-3.5
# Use a transient (--rm) container to create the real the container
docker run --rm -v /:/host \
-e FQDN=$(hostname) \
-e ADMINPASSWORD=${ADMINPW:-ovirt} \
-e NAME=$NAME \
-e IMAGE=$IMAGE \
$IMAGE container/atomic-install.sh
After this run you can access oVirt Engine on port 80 and 443 of that host.
It would be great if someone could try this - also on a different distribution
than Fedora or CentOS - i.e. on Ubuntu? Gentoo? - and provide some feedback.
Greetings
fabian
--
[also](https://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/ovirt-dockerized/)
[did](https://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/ovirt-dockerized-part-2/)
[Dockerfile](https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-container-engine.git;...
[this atomic installation script](https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-container-engine.git;a=bl...
10 years
Re: [ovirt-devel] Access to ovirt-srv08.ovirt.org
by Eyal Edri
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tolik Litovsky" <tlitovsk(a)redhat.com>
> To: eedri(a)redhat.com
> Cc: infra(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 9:28:27 AM
> Subject: RE: Access to ovirt-srv08.ovirt.org
>
> The question is the nesting depth.
> We run currently in depth 2 .
> VM inside VM.
>
> Will depth of 3 will work.
>
> VM slave, and another 2 VM nesting above it.
>
> KVM people? Plz help.
adding devel, but please elaborate on the depth,
does it have to be nested or you're doing it because
you only had 1 bare metal host till now (think you'll have 2 nested vms for example)
>
>
> Tolik.
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com>
> Date: 03/06/2015 11:14 PM (GMT+02:00)
> To: tlitovsk(a)redhat.com
> Cc: infra(a)ovirt.org
> Subject: Re: Access to ovirt-srv08.ovirt.org
>
>
> I'd like to move the system testing framework to use
> nested vms instead of directly using the baremetal hosts.
>
> we did use a single host to POC the system, i think now that we're
> about to expand it will be much more managble and scalable if we'll
> start using nested VMs which will be managed via the hosted engine.
>
> e.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tolik Litvosky" <tlitovsk(a)redhat.com>
> > To: infra(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:59:36 PM
> > Subject: Access to ovirt-srv08.ovirt.org
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I need access to the ovirt-srv08.ovirt.org in order to update the
> > testenv CI repo directory.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards
> > Tolik Litovsky
> > RHEV-H Team
> > Red Hat
> >
> > Red Hat: trustworthy, transformative technology. Powered by the
> > community.
> > Connect at redhat.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Infra mailing list
> > Infra(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
> >
>
10 years
Exception request - Fedora 22 support
by Sandro Bonazzola
Hi,
we're now near to feature freeze and just one week after Fedora 22 being released.
Fedora 22 support is not completed yet and since it's still missing works on Jenkins and on integration side I don't think it will be ready for
feature freeze.
So I'm requesting exception for completing F22 support for 3.6.
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
10 years
hibernate's internal PersistentBag sent to FE
by Tomas Jelinek
Hey all,
since the org.ovirt.engine.core.common.job.Job/Step... has been moved to use the JPA we have a problem on frontend.
The problem is that the @OneToMany annotations results in a List which is of type PersistentBag. When we send this to
Frontend it fails during deserialization. It actually fails quite bad because the FE already has an ui-override of it which is not correct resulting in
a ton of NPEs in development mode.
So, there are 2 nasty fixes I have made where none of them should be merged but demonstrate the possibilities:
1: extend the FE to be able to work with the PersistentBag (https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/41682/)
not really good solution since the PersistenBag is an internal Hibernate class which is really not meant to be passed around
2: fix on the backend to not send the PersistentBag but an ArrayList. This is only a PoC fixed on a command we face the problem (https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/41797/)
Obviously this is not going to work for other commands accessing the same Job nor for other entities.
So, the first option is generic but very very bad. The second option should be used but not sure how to do this in a cheep way (e.g. without using reflection to deep traverse everything sent back to
frontend checking if it does not have a PersistentBag in it.
Any better ideas?
Thanx,
Tomas
10 years
Fedora 22
by Greg Sheremeta
Anyone upgrade to F22 yet? Looking for tips on running engine
after I upgrade. I assume I'll still have to install JDK 1.7
and JBoss 7.
Thanks.
Greg Sheremeta
Red Hat, Inc.
Sr. Software Engineer, RHEV
Cell: 919-807-1086
gshereme(a)redhat.com
10 years
