- Devel - oVirt List Archives

[ACTION REQUIRED] Sun-setting oVirt 4.1 in CI
by Barak Korren 21 May '18

21 May '18

Hi all, Given that oVirt 4.1 has now gone EOL, we're going to start dropping all relates assets in the CI system. This includes: - All 4.1 jobs - All 4.1 change queues - The 4.1 'tested' repositories - The 4.1 'nightly snapshot' repositores. Maintainers, if your projects have any dependencies on the resources above, please be sure to update them to more up to date or stable resources. In particular, to depend on any 4.1 packages, please use the 4.1 released repo at: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1/ Thanks, -- Barak Korren RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi Red Hat EMEA redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted

3 2

engine communication with clients
by Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya 21 May '18

21 May '18

Hello! I have a question about communication between end users (clients) and engine. From the documentation I see that it was planned to transfer everything to REST API. Is it achieved already? Or do some types of connection still use RPC protocol ( I know that engine and vdsm use libvirt, but not sure about engine and clients).

2 1

openSUSE Leap 15.0 and Tumbleweed now supported on COPR
by Neal Gompa 20 May '18

20 May '18

Hey, As of now, Fedora COPR can now build packages for openSUSE Leap 15.0 and Tumbleweed, in addition to CentOS 6/7 with EPEL, Mageia 6 and Cauldron, and of course, Fedora 26+ (including Rawhide). Sandro mentioned on IRC that it might be a good idea to mention this in the devel ML for folks who work on oVirt packaging to know about this, so that things like "ovirt-guest-agent" could be provided via COPR relatively up to date for a wider variety of Linux distributions, hence this email. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

1 0

[FYI] Blog entry about oVirt on the mainframe
by Viktor VM Mihajlovski 18 May '18

18 May '18

Hi, as some of you know the support for s390x KVM hosts has been in oVirt for a while now - without raising too much attention. The following article highlights the availability and describes how to add a mainframe to an oVirt cluster: https://kvmonz.blogspot.co.uk/2018/05/knowledge-series-managing-kvm-on-ibm-… -- Regards, Viktor Mihajlovski

2 1

Rerun-Hooks Functionality is Restored in Gerrit
by Anton Marchukov 17 May '18

17 May '18

Hello All. We have fixed the Rerun-Hooks comment functionality on gerrit.ovirt.org and you should be able to start using it now. The most common use case for this is to rerun all patchset-created hooks on a patch. Just leave a comment with: Rerun-Hooks: all and shortly you will get the hooks to be re-executed and output delivered as a gerrit comment (same as you would just submitted the patch). This also supports rerunning individual hooks. But it is a bit less straightforward as you need to know the hook file name. E.g. the following is possible: Rerun-Hooks: patchset-created.bz.1.check_bug_url, patchset-created.bz.2.check_product you can see the default hooks list at [1]. I think most of the time "Rerun-Hooks: all" will do the job and it is all you need to remember. Note that currently it is possible to rerun online patchset-created hooks. Anton. [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=gerrit-admin.git;a=tree;f=hooks/default-h… -- Anton Marchukov Team Lead - Release Management - RHV DevOps - Red Hat

2 2

Fwd: [CentOS-devel] [Storage] Mountpoint.io: Software Defined Storage event in Vancouver in August
by Sandro Bonazzola 17 May '18

17 May '18

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rich Bowen <rbowen(a)redhat.com> Date: 2018-05-16 21:47 GMT+02:00 Subject: [CentOS-devel] [Storage] Mountpoint.io: Software Defined Storage event in Vancouver in August To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Forwarding on an announcement from a colleague, for those of you interested in Software-defined Storage: Our first mountpoint is coming! Software-defined Storage (SDS) is changing the traditional way we think of storage. Decoupling software from hardware allows you to choose your hardware vendors and provides enterprises with more flexibility. Attend mountpoint on August 27 - 28, 2018 in Vancouver, BC, before Open Source Summit North America for this first time event. We are joining forces with the Ceph and Gluster communities, SDS experts, and partners to bring to you an exciting 2 day event. Help lead the conversation on open source software defined storage and share your knowledge! Our CFP is open on May 3rd through June 15th, 2018. More details available, including sponsorship: https://mountpoint.io/ -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166 _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> <https://redhat.com/summit>

1 0

Re: Mailing-Lists upgrade
by Marc Dequènes (Duck) 17 May '18

17 May '18

I forgot to cross-post to other lists. Please read announcement below. On 05/08/2018 12:45 PM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > Quack, > > On 04/28/2018 09:34 AM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > >> A few months ago we had to rollback the migration because of a nasty >> bug. This is fixed in recent versions of Mailman 3 so we're rescheduling >> it on Tuesday 8th during the slot 11:00-12:00 JST. > > Just a word to say the migration happened and no problem was detected. > > The archive posts reindexation is not finished yet, and greylisting is > slowing down things a bit, but it should soon be over. Some information > like post count and little graphs in the web UI are handled via regular > cron jobs and should also soon be accurate. > > Old links to the archives, for pre-migration posts, are still working. > Posts URLS were not stable in Mailman 2 but been synced in > https://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/ > > You can contact me directly by mail or IRC, or open a JIRA ticket if you > hit any problem. > > \_o< >

9 20

ovirt-engine travis CI
by Sandro Bonazzola 16 May '18

16 May '18

Hi, today I pushed a fix for Travis CI on oVirt Engine. While discussing the fix it has been asked why we need Travis CI in first place, isn't our Jenkins testing enough? Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> <https://redhat.com/summit>

4 6

[ANN] introducing ovirt-openshift-extensions
by Roy Golan 15 May '18

15 May '18

Hi all, Running Openshift on oVirt seems more and more attractive and is starting to get attention. It is very easy to do so today without needing any special configuration, however, to tighten the integration and to take advantage of the underlying infra provider(ovirt) we can do better. For example, oVirt can connect various storage providers, and serve disk space to containers[1][2]. Also, Openshift can ask oVirt for VMs and deploy them as master or application nodes for its usage, without making the administrator doing all that manually. This project[1] is the home for the ovirt-flexvolume-driver and ovirt-provisioner[3] and merging ovirt-cloudprovider[4] is a work in progress. The code under this repository is work-in-progress and moving quickly, however, it has automation (stdci v2 :)) and is working and does at least what you observe in the demo videos. Yet I highly appreciate if any of you that will try will provide feedback be that #ovirt channel/ mailing list or to report bugs directly in the Github project page <https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-openshift-extensions> [1] https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-openshift-extensions [2] https://ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/your-container-volumes-served-by-ovirt/ [3] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/dynamic-provisioning/ [4] https://github.com/rgolangh/ovirt-k8s-cloudprovider Thanks, Roy

1 0

Terraform provider for oVirt
by Sandro Bonazzola 15 May '18

15 May '18

Hi, just following up from twitter[1], if any developer within oVirt knows about Terraform, there's interest on their side for collaboration developing a provider. For more info, see the github issue: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/16150 [1] https://twitter.com/jepeltw/status/955647436931858432 -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

3 7