- Devel - oVirt List Archives

VDSM-Gluster python 3 compatibility
by Kaustav Majumder 14 Nov '18

14 Nov '18

Hi all, I have been working on making vdsm-gluster python 3 compatible. I had some queries regarding the tool used for getting storage devices info. Till now vdsm uses python blivet for getting the device tree information. I am not sure if blivet is compatible with python 3 so I had two propositions which I want some advice on. 1) Using lsblk and parsing the output 2) Using ansible modules locally in the vdsm hosts. Although I feel the 2nd way will add more dependencies to the project but it can help us in the long run to add more functionality easily. Thanks, Kaustav

2 2

Re: [CentOS-devel] SIGs: Possibility to drop EOL content at 7.6.1810 release time
by Sandro Bonazzola 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle ore 12:33 Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com> ha scritto: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:01:51AM +0200, Anssi Johansson wrote: > ... > > For reference and inspiration, here are some directories from > > mirror.centos.org, including both up-to-date content and potentially EOL > > content. SIGs should review the list to make sure these directories can > > be copied over to 7.6.1810 when that time comes. Making the decisions > > now would save a bit of time at 7.6.1810 release time. > > > .. > > > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10 > > storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12 > > The above two can be dropped (also for CentOS 6). This includes the > centos-release-gluster310 and centos-release-gluster-312 packages in > Extras. > > Can we keep 3.12? It's still consumed by oVirt 4.2. Adding oVirt devel team, just in case we'll need urgently to rebase on newer Gluster on CentOS 7.6 GA or block upgrade to CentOS 7.6 from oVirt side till we figure out how to handle. > > storage/x86_64/gluster-4.0 > > storage/x86_64/gluster-4.1 > > storage/x86_64/gluster-5 > > These three are still maintained. > > Thanks, > Niels > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>

3 6

Upstream package missing release suffix
by Ales Musil 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Hello, ovirt-lldp-labeler is missing release suffix in nightly build [1]. This has been fixed some time ago in [2]. Any idea what could be wrong? Thank you. Regards, Ales. [1] https://plain.resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/94616/ -- ALES MUSIL Associate Software Engineer - rhv network Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> amusil(a)redhat.com IM: amusil <https://red.ht/sig>

2 1

[VDSM] Proposing Denis as vdsm gluster maintainer
by Nir Soffer 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Hi all, Denis is practically maintaining vdsm gluster code in the recent years, and it is time to make this official. Please ack, Nir

7 6

ovirt-engine has been tagged (ovirt-engine-4.2.7.5 )
by Tal Nisan 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

1 0

[ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 4.3.0 Beta preparations
by Sandro Bonazzola 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

Hi, we'd like to be ready for releasing a first oVirt 4.3.0 beta on November 26th. In order to do that, we need all packages to be ready for it by Sunday November 25th. Maintainers: please ensure your packages can be installed are feature complete with regards to ovirt-4.3.0 target and passed CI testing. An integration testing on the master nightly will be done manually on Friday November 23rd to ensure basic functionalities are working as expected. Please note we don't have any guarantee that CentOS 7.6 will be out by that time. Please check oVirt 4.3 Beta release criteria[1] and help getting ready for it. If you have something that should block the beta release please raise the issue as soon as possible. Thanks, [1] https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/releases/4.3/release-manag… -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>

3 4

amount of reports by abrt
by Piotr Kliczewski 11 Nov '18

11 Nov '18

I attended a talk about abrt and noticed there are good number of reports [1] generated by issues in ovirt. Thanks, Piotr [1] https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/

3 4

ovirt-engine external IDP (Keycloak) integration
by Ravi Shankar Nori 08 Nov '18

08 Nov '18

Hi All, Please find design document [1] for integrating ovirt-engine with Keycloak using mod_auth_openidc. Engine can be configured to use external IDP to handle user authentication while still supporting Rest API bearer authentication. There are some changes to how clients will obtain tokens to use for bearer authentication. All clients need to request tokens from the external IDP and use it to access engine. When external authentication is enabled admin@internal and all internal profiles for authentication are disabled. Please see the design document for more details. Thanks Ravi [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wio7bQNeNinx7Luj5t-KpsSYQ2Z1Y0I8UhUyJAZ… Integration Issues that need attention 1. Ovirt-engine Python, Java and Ruby SDKs need to be modified to obtain token from either engine SSO or external OpenID Connect IDP. 2. OVN if we are not using SDK needs to be modified to obtain token from either engine SSO or external OpenID Connect IDP. 3. OVN changes needed to config user admin@internal. admin@internal access will be disabled if external integration is enabled. So OVN needs to be configurable to use another user for REST API access. 4. Ansible is using SDK, if SDK is fixed to use a file the file needs to passed from ansible to SDK. 5. Cloudforms and Satellite are using Ruby SDK, we need to file a bug to fix the issue. The file with the details of external IDP URL and client-id and client-secret needs to be passed to SDK. 6. REST API SDK V3 is not going to work with password and negotiate authentication 7. VM Single Sign-on will not work as we don’t have a password. 8. VM Console needs to work, if VM console is using token and bearer authentication everything should work

3 3

Failing compilation of engine to RPM using build-artefacts.sh
by Andrej Krejcir 08 Nov '18

08 Nov '18

Hi, I use a VM with latest CentOS to compile engine to RPM. Steps: - git clone repo from my dev machine to the VM - run ovirt-engine/automation/build-artifacts.sh This used to work, but since about 2 weeks ago the build fails with an error message: + %py_byte_compile /usr/bin/python2 /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ovirt-engine-4.3.0-0.0.master.20181105130924.git58423b7.el7.x86_64/usr/share/ovirt-engine/ /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f7B35C: line 82: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f7B35C (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f7B35C (%install) Attaching the whole build log and the file '/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f7B35C'. I'm not sure how to fix this. Can anyone help? Thanks, Andrej

2 1

Fwd: [oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2 - Build # 719 - Still Failing!
by Eitan Raviv 07 Nov '18

07 Nov '18

Hi, We have a failure on OST/network-suite-master for several days now. My suspicions of the cause are detailed below. Can you have a look? Thanks ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Eitan Raviv <eraviv(a)redhat.com> Date: Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:39 AM Subject: Re: [oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2 - Build # 719 - Still Failing! To: Ori Liel <oliel(a)redhat.com> Hi, Can you have a look? Thanks On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:08 AM Eitan Raviv <eraviv(a)redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Ondra, > > We have above failure on OST network-suite-4.2 [1] due to: > Fault reason is "Request syntactically incorrect.". Fault detail is "For > correct usage, see: > https://192.168.201.4/ovirt-engine/apidoc#services/vm/methods/preview_snaps… > " > > and I see in engine.log [2]: > > javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException: unexpected element (uri:"", local:"disks") > > at the same time I see in model_4.2 [3] that a change was done to add the disks, but if i am not mistaken the ovirt-engine-sdk pom.xml [4] was not bumped to reflect this change. > > Can you please check? > > Thanks > > [1] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2/719/arti… > [2] > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2/717/arti… > [3] > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/project:ovirt-engine-api-model+branch:model_4.2 > [4] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/project:ovirt-engine-sdk+branch:sdk_4.2 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Edward Haas <edwardh(a)redhat.com> > Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:35 AM > Subject: Fwd: [oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2 - Build > # 719 - Still Failing! > To: <rhevm-network-staff(a)redhat.com> > > > FYI > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <jenkins(a)jenkins.phx.ovirt.org> > Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 6:02 AM > Subject: [oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2 - Build # > 719 - Still Failing! > To: <lgoldber(a)redhat.com>, <edwardh(a)redhat.com>, <infra(a)ovirt.org> > > > Project: > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2/ > Build: > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_network-suite-4.2/719/ > Build Number: 719 > Build Status: Still Failing > Triggered By: Started by timer > > ------------------------------------- > Changes Since Last Success: > ------------------------------------- > Changes for Build #717 > [Marcin Sobczyk] Change logging level for 'schema.inconsistency' > > > Changes for Build #718 > [Ales Musil] master: Update master suite compatibility version > > > Changes for Build #719 > [Ales Musil] master: Update master suite compatibility version > > > > > ----------------- > Failed Tests: > ----------------- > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: > network-suite-4.2.tests.test_mac_pools.test_undo_preview_snapshot_when_mac_used_reassigns_a_new_mac > > Error Message: > Error: Fault reason is "Request syntactically incorrect.". Fault detail is > "For correct usage, see: > https://192.168.201.4/ovirt-engine/apidoc#services/vm/methods/preview_snaps…". > HTTP response code is 400. > > Stack Trace: > system = <lib.system.SDKSystemRoot object at 0x7fc7f91f48d0> > default_cluster = <lib.clusterlib.Cluster object at 0x7fc7f91f4bd0> > ovirtmgmt_vnic_profile = <lib.netlib.VnicProfile object at 0x7fc7f81b3710> > cirros_template = 'Cirros_0_4_0' > > def test_undo_preview_snapshot_when_mac_used_reassigns_a_new_mac( > system, default_cluster, ovirtmgmt_vnic_profile, > cirros_template): > with virtlib.vm_pool(system, size=2) as (vm_0, vm_1): > vm_0.create(vm_name=VM0, > cluster=default_cluster, > template=cirros_template) > vm_0.wait_for_down_status() > > vm_0.run() > vm_0.wait_for_up_status() > > nicless_snapshot = _create_snapshot(vm_0) > > vm_0.create_vnic(NIC_NAME_1, ovirtmgmt_vnic_profile, > MAC_ADDR_1) > vm_0.stop() > vm_0.wait_for_down_status() > > > nicless_snapshot.preview() > > network-suite-4.2/tests/test_mac_pools.py:124: > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > _ _ _ > network-suite-4.2/lib/virtlib.py:243: in preview > snapshot=self.get_sdk_type() > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/services.py:31091: in > preview_snapshot > return self._internal_action(action, 'previewsnapshot', None, headers, > query, wait) > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:299: in > _internal_action > return future.wait() if wait else future > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:55: in wait > return self._code(response) > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:296: in callback > self._check_fault(response) > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:132: in > _check_fault > self._raise_error(response, body) > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > _ _ _ > > response = <ovirtsdk4.http.Response object at 0x7fc7f81b3350> > detail = <ovirtsdk4.types.Fault object at 0x7fc7f81b39d0> > > @staticmethod > def _raise_error(response, detail=None): > """ > Creates and raises an error containing the details of the > given HTTP > response and fault. > > This method is intended for internal use by other components > of the > SDK. Refrain from using it directly, as backwards > compatibility isn't > guaranteed. > """ > fault = detail if isinstance(detail, types.Fault) else None > > msg = '' > if fault: > if fault.reason: > if msg: > msg += ' ' > msg = msg + 'Fault reason is "%s".' % fault.reason > if fault.detail: > if msg: > msg += ' ' > msg = msg + 'Fault detail is "%s".' % fault.detail > if response: > if response.code: > if msg: > msg += ' ' > msg = msg + 'HTTP response code is %s.' % response.code > if response.message: > if msg: > msg += ' ' > msg = msg + 'HTTP response message is "%s".' % > response.message > > if isinstance(detail, six.string_types): > if msg: > msg += ' ' > msg = msg + detail + '.' > > class_ = Error > if response is not None: > if response.code in [401, 403]: > class_ = AuthError > elif response.code == 404: > class_ = NotFoundError > > error = class_(msg) > error.code = response.code if response else None > error.fault = fault > > raise error > E Error: Fault reason is "Request syntactically incorrect.". Fault > detail is "For correct usage, see: > https://192.168.201.4/ovirt-engine/apidoc#services/vm/methods/preview_snaps…". > HTTP response code is 400. > > /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk4/service.py:118: Error >

4 7