- Devel - oVirt List Archives

OST CI basic suite failure
by Artem Hrechanychenko 19 May '20

19 May '20

Hi, I'm getting failure on ci check for my patch for network suite changes https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/108317/ CI failures https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/9350/ <https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_standard-check-patch/9350/…> My patch does not change the basic-suite master and local run passed locally. Does anybody know or get something similar ?

5 7

ovirt-engine has been tagged (ovirt-engine-4.4.1)
by Tal Nisan 19 May '20

19 May '20

1 0

ssl error during host install
by Vojtech Juranek 19 May '20

19 May '20

Hi, I'm getting following SSL error when adding new host: engine: [...] 2020-05-18 18:28:35,530-04 WARN [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.utils.retry.Retryable] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-42) [762c711c] Retry failed 2020-05-18 18:28:39,033-04 WARN [org.ovirt.vdsm.jsonrpc.client.utils.retry.Retryable] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-43) [762c711c] Retry failed 2020-05-18 18:28:39,033-04 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.hostdeploy.InstallVdsInternalCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engine-Thread-3) [762c711c] Host installation failed for host 'ab082e77-315c-4cfe-8188-11fbee94c2b8', 'fc30-glance': Network error during communication with the host host (vdsm log): 2020-05-18 18:26:36,963-0400 ERROR (Reactor thread) [vds.dispatcher] uncaptured python exception, closing channel <yajsonrpc.betterAsyncore.Dispatcher connected ('::ffff:192.168.122.246', 52428, 0, 0) at 0x7f9f8c7e8d30> (<class 'ssl.SSLError'>:[X509] no certificate or crl found (_ssl.c:4053) [/usr/lib64/python3.7/asyncore.py|readwrite|110] [/usr/lib64/python3.7/asyncore.py|handle_write_event|441] [/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/yajsonrpc/betterAsyncore.py|handle_write|75] [/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/yajsonrpc/betterAsyncore.py|_delegate_call|173] [/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/vdsm/sslutils.py|handle_write|190] [/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/vdsm/sslutils.py|_handle_io|194] [/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/vdsm/sslutils.py|_set_up_socket|154]) (betterAsyncore:184) Any idea what's wrong and/or how to fix it? Both engine and host are on FC30, host is installed from standard ovirt-release44-pre repo and engine is dev build of latest engine master with glance API v2 patches [1]. Thanks Vojta [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/topic:"Image+Service+API+v2"

3 9

[Feedback needed] oVirt 4.4.0 Test week
by Sandro Bonazzola 18 May '20

18 May '20

Hi, oVirt team is planning to release oVirt 4.4.0 Ga in the next couple of weeks. oVirt 4.4.0 release candidate was released yesterday and we'd like to gather as much feedback as possible. Please join us testing this release candidate next week, starting Sunday May 10th 2020 till Friday May 15th 2020! We are going to coordinate the testing effort with a public Trello board at https://trello.com/b/5ZNJgPC3/ovirt-440-test-day You'll find instructions on how to use the board there. For joining the board you can use this link: https://trello.com/invite/b/5ZNJgPC3/f1b1826ee4902f348c44607765a15099/ovirt… If you have not an environment dedicated to testing, remember you can set up a few VMs and test the deployment with nested virtualization using your production environment creating a virtual test environment. In this case please be careful avoiding touching the production environment from the testing one. The oVirt team will monitor the Trello board, the #ovirt IRC channel on irc.oftc.net server and the users(a)ovirt.org mailing list to assist with the testing and debugging issues. Basic instructions for setting up a minimal system are available in release candidate announce at: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/announce@ovirt.org/message/3QORBKVKTA… Release notes for this release candidate are available here: https://ovirt.org/release/4.4.0/ Thanks -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/> [image: |Our code is open_] <https://www.redhat.com/en/our-code-is-open> *Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.*

1 1

are we storing the back-end fqdn (like the one used in gluster) in engine?
by Prajith Kesava Prasad 18 May '20

18 May '20

Hi all, I hope this email finds you well. I just wanted to check, does anyone know if there is a way to get the back-end hostname from the ovirt-engine?, (this scenario is most likely to occur when an external logical network is attached). I did see a way to get the network interface, with respect to each host. like Even though RHV-engine, contains logical network-attached to it, and its details (like ipv4). There is no primary key present that could help us identify that a network is gluster related or not. so we cannot actually get the details, because we won't know if a network is gluster network or something else. I just wanted to see, if there is any other way to get the details of the backend hostname? Thanks in advance, Prajith.

3 3

4.4 beta - systemd & pids - daemon fails
by lejeczek 15 May '20

15 May '20

hi devel, Some inconsistencies in systemd's daemon configs &/|| binaries? Starting Open vSwitch Database Unit... ovs|00002|daemon_unix|EMER|/var/run/openvswitch/ovsdb-server.pid.tmp: create failed (Permission denied) Starting ovsdb-server ovsdb-server: /var/run/openvswitch/ovsdb-server.pid.tmp: create failed (Permission denied) [FAILED] Any quick fix would mind to suggest? many thanks, L.

4 7

oVirt 4.4.0 GA GO / NO GO
by Sandro Bonazzola 15 May '20

15 May '20

Hi, we just released oVirt 4.4.0 RC2 fixing most of the issues reported during the test week. As of today, we have no open blocker bugs <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=target_milestone%3Aovir…> and no proposed blocker bugs <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=target_milestone%3Aovir…> . If nobody raises any flag against releasing GA, I think we can promote this release to GA next week on May 20th (note: oVirt Node and oVirt Engine Appliance will need to be rebuilt from official release repo so they'll differ only by ovirt-release44 rpm included in the build) Deadline for raising a NO GO flag is May 19th , 18:00 CEST -- Sandro Bonazzola MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com/> [image: |Our code is open_] <https://www.redhat.com/en/our-code-is-open> *Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.*

1 0

Re: [ovirt-users] POWER9 Support: VDSM requiring LVM2 package that's missing
by Amit Bawer 14 May '20

14 May '20

+devel <devel(a)ovirt.org> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:29 AM Amit Bawer <abawer(a)redhat.com> wrote: > yes it correlates to the bug mentioned, > currently the rpm for vdsm-4.30.46 is available at 4.3 pre-release repo > https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.3-pre/rpm/el7/ppc64le/ > repodata is one level up > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:26 AM Vinícius Ferrão <ferrao(a)versatushpc.com.br> > wrote: > >> Hi Amit, I think I found the answer: It’s not available yet. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829348 >> >> It's this bug right? >> >> Thanks, >> >> On 14 May 2020, at 20:14, Vinícius Ferrão <ferrao(a)versatushpc.com.br> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Amit, thanks for confirming. >> >> Do you know in which repository VDSM 4.30.36 is available? >> >> It’s not available on any of both: >> rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms/ppc64le >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 for POWER9 (RPMs) >> 9,156 >> rhel-7-server-rhv-4-mgmt-agent-for-power-9-rpms/ppc64le Red Hat >> Virtualization 4 Management Agents (for RHEL 7 Server for IBM POWER9 814 >> >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> On 14 May 2020, at 20:09, Amit Bawer <abawer(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:19 AM Vinícius Ferrão via Users < >> users(a)ovirt.org> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to know if this is a bug or not, if yes I will submit to >>> Red Hat. >>> >> Fixed on vdsm-4.30.46 >> >>> >>> I’m trying to add a ppc64le (POWER9) machine to the hosts pool, but >>> there’s missing dependencies on VDSM: >>> >>> --> Processing Dependency: lvm2 >= 7:2.02.186-7.el7_8.1 for package: >>> vdsm-4.30.44-1.el7ev.ppc64le >>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >>> Error: Package: vdsm-4.30.44-1.el7ev.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-server-rhv-4-mgmt-agent-for-power-9-rpms) >>> Requires: lvm2 >= 7:2.02.186-7.el7_8.1 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.171-8.el7.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.171-8.el7 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.177-4.el7.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.177-4.el7 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-8.el7.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-8.el7 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-10.el7_6.1.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-10.el7_6.1 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-10.el7_6.2.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-10.el7_6.2 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-10.el7_6.3.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-10.el7_6.3 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-10.el7_6.7.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-10.el7_6.7 >>> Available: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-10.el7_6.8.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-10.el7_6.8 >>> Installing: 7:lvm2-2.02.180-10.el7_6.9.ppc64le >>> (rhel-7-for-power-9-rpms) >>> lvm2 = 7:2.02.180-10.el7_6.9 >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org >>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html >>> oVirt Code of Conduct: >>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/I3YDM2VN7K2GH… >>> >> >> >>

1 0

ovirt-engine has been tagged (ovirt-engine-4.4.0.3)
by Tal Nisan 14 May '20

14 May '20

1 0

sanlock 3.8.1 is available for testing
by Nir Soffer 14 May '20

14 May '20

I pushed sanlock 3.8.1 to Fedora updates-testing. If you have a Fedora 30 setup please upgrade sanlock: sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-87665d32ca and provide feedback here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-87665d32ca The update is also available for other versions: f31: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-455253f67d f32: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-99d4242726 f33: already in stable Cheers, Nir

1 2