- Devel - oVirt List Archives

is this for a bug report?
by lejeczek 14 Oct '25

14 Oct '25

Hi guys. It might Centos's repo/packages related - I'm not sure how this worsk - so, where to send/file a bug report with issue like this: ... [ INFO ] ok: [localhost] [ INFO ] TASK [ovirt.ovirt.engine_setup : Install oVirt Engine package] [ ERROR ] fatal: [localhost -> 192.168.1.90]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Failed to download metadata for repo 'centos-ceph-pacific': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8-stream&arch=x86_64&repo=storage-cep… <http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8-stream&arch=x86_64&repo=storage-cep…> [Could not resolve host: mirrorlist.centos.org <http://mirrorlist.centos.org>]", "rc": 1, "results": []} [ INFO ] TASK [ovirt.ovirt.hosted_engine_setup : Sync on engine machine] ... thanks, L.

1 0

Re: Engine planning guide has the following - is this still correct.
by Sandro Bonazzola 18 Mar '25

18 Mar '25

ppc64le support was contributed by IBM https://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/9-stream/virt/ppc64le/kvm-common/ but the latest qemu-kvm there is 7.0 from 2022. ARM packages for ovirt are still being built in COPR and in CentOS Virtualization SIG, not sure if someone ever gave them a try -- Sandro Bonazzola

1 0

Engine planning guide has the following - is this still correct.
by Geoff O'Callaghan 17 Mar '25

17 Mar '25

Hi team, The planning guide has: Enterprise Linux 9 doesn’t support virtualization for ppc64le: CentOS Virtualization SIG<https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization> is working on re-introducing virtualization support but it’s not ready yet. The oVirt project also provides packages for the 64-bit ARM architecture (ARM 64) but only as a Technology Preview. Ie. Do we / are we going to support ppc ? Unlikely, or ARM - quite possible ? Thanks Geoff

1 0

Problems installing ovirt-hosted-engine-setup
by Harald Schwier 07 Oct '24

07 Oct '24

Hello, >08107301-ovirt-engine/ 2024-Oct-04 07:41:25 -- Directory >08107317-ovirt-engine/ 2024-Oct-04 08:02:14 -- Directory >08107446-ovirt-engine/ 2024-Oct-04 08:43:45 -- Directory since the changes made three days ago,it is no longer possible to install ovirt-hosted-engine-setup with Rocky 9: # dnf install ovirt-hosted-engine-setup Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:29 ago on Mon 07 Oct 2024 03:20:46 PM CEST. Error: Problem: package ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.7.2-0.0.master.20231129144914.gitdda363b.el9.noarch from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:ovirt:ovirt-master-snapshot requires ovirt-hosted-engine-ha >= 2.4, but none of the providers can be installed - package ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.5.0-0.0.master.20211124111936.el9.noarch from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires vdsm >= 4.40.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.5.0-1.el9.noarch from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires vdsm >= 4.40.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.5.1-1.el9.noarch from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires vdsm >= 4.40.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.5.2-0.0.master.20231129140104.20231129140102.git146da71.el9.noarch from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:ovirt:ovirt-master-snapshot requires vdsm >= 4.40.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.10-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.11-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.12-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.13-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.6-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.7-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.0.8-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.1.1-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.1.2-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.1.3-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.1.4-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.2.1-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.2.2-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.3-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.3.1-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.3.2-1.git545b51151.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.3.4-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.5.1-1.el9.x86_64 from ovirt-master-centos-stream-ovirt45-testing requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - package vdsm-4.50.6-8.git4d11cae0b.el9.x86_64 from copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:ovirt:ovirt-master-snapshot requires libvirt-lock-sanlock, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides libvirt-libs = 10.0.0-6.6.el9_4 needed by libvirt-daemon-plugin-sanlock-10.0.0-6.6.el9_4.x86_64 from crb The same installation worked four days ago. Kind regards Harald Schwier

1 0

Re: Yuriy about NVMe over fabrics for oVirt
by Nir Soffer 12 Aug '24

12 Aug '24

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 4:40 PM Yuriy <ykhokhlov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nir! > > This is Yuriy. > We agreed to continue the subject via email. > So the options are: 1. Using Managed Block Storage (cinderlib) with a driver that supports NVMe/TCP. Lastest oVirt has the needed changes to configure this. Benny and I tested with Lightbits[1] driver in a virtualized environment. This is basically a POC that may work for you or not, or require more work that you will have to do yourself since not much development is happening now in oVirt. 2. Using the devices via multipath Legacy storage domains are based on multipath. It may be possible to use multipath on top of NVMe devices, and in this case they look like a normal LUN so you can create a storage domain from such devices. oVirt will not handle connections for you, and all the devices must be connected to all nodes at the same time, just like FC/iSCSI LUNs. You will likely not get the performance benefit of NVMe/TCP. 3. Using host devices If what you need is using some devices (which happen to be connected via be NVMe/TCP), maybe you can attach them to a VM directly (using host devices). This gives the best possible performance but no features (snapshots, backup, live migration, live storage migration, etc.) [1] https://www.lightbitslabs.com/ Nir

2 3

Reminder: CentOS Stream 8 is now EOL
by Sandro Bonazzola 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Hi, just a reminder that CentOS Stream 8 reached its end of life at the end of last month on Friday, May 31, 2024. As it has been announced by CentOS project[1], all the CentOS Stream 8 repositories are going to be archived at vault.centos.org . Who didn't update yet to CentOS Stream 9 will probably hit several errors related to this archiving: you'll need to manually adjust the repository url to point to the new location at vault.centos.org. The archiving is going to happen today [2] with the decommissioning of the nodes used by the CentOS Community Build System used for oVirt builds for Stream 8 within the CentOS Virtualization SIG. At this point, the recommendation is to upgrade to CentOS Stream 9 (or derived) as soon as practical. For those who are pushing changes to the oVirt project, please note GitHub actions may start to fail on CentOS Stream 8 (and with that, the builds for oVirt Node and oVirt Appliance). It's up to you to decide if you want to change the config there to use a different el8 distribution for running the tests or just turn off el8 and rely only on CentOS Stream 9 tests. [1] https://lists.centos.org/hyperkitty/list/announce@lists.centos.org/thread/D… [2] https://lists.centos.org/hyperkitty/list/devel@lists.centos.org/thread/P3HD… -- Sandro Bonazzola

1 0

Re: storage domains (obsolete)
by Wild Star 17 May '24

17 May '24

I know they have been deprecated and can be replaced with Data, but we still use the ISO and Export domain types and like having them. Cheers! ... Wild

2 1

Re: Can someone assign https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/issues/3156 to me
by Sandro Bonazzola 14 May '24

14 May '24

Couldn't set you as assignee here as well. Il giorno mar 14 mag 2024 alle ore 17:08 Geoff O'Callaghan < geoffocallaghan(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > @gocallag as i've fixed it and would like to close. > Thanks > Geoff > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/NU4LIIYEKMNSJ… > -- Sandro Bonazzola

1 0

Re: Can someone assign me https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/issues/3165
by Sandro Bonazzola 14 May '24

14 May '24

In this one I was able to set you as an assignee. The only difference I see compared to the other issues is that in this one there was one comment from you. Il giorno mar 14 mag 2024 alle ore 17:15 Geoff O'Callaghan < geoffocallaghan(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > It's all working and i'd like to close the issue. Or someone can just > close it. > > Thanks > Geoff > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/OJ447BNKWDOQO… > -- Sandro Bonazzola

1 0

Re: Can someone assign https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/issues/3159 to me as i've fixed it.
by Sandro Bonazzola 14 May '24

14 May '24

Looks like I'm not allowed to set you as assignee there, but I closed it mentioning you and your PR there. If I figure out how to set you as an assignee there, I'll be more than happy to do that. Il giorno mar 14 mag 2024 alle ore 17:12 Geoff O'Callaghan < geoffocallaghan(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > @gocallag in github. > > Thanks > Geoff > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list -- devel(a)ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/HI7PNYVBMCXJ5… > -- Sandro Bonazzola

1 0