- Devel - oVirt List Archives

[Engine-devel] [oVirt jenkins] Weekly report on open tasks for ovirt-engine
by Jenkins ci oVirt Server 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

------=_Part_934_29336138.1391213141364 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head></head><body>Files scanned: '**/*.java, **/*.py'. Strings searched: FIXME | TODO | @deprecated Report: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt_engine_scan_open_tasks/16/tasksResult/?</body></html> ------=_Part_934_29336138.1391213141364--

1 0

[Engine-devel] bug-url requirement for stable branch backports
by Itamar Heim 31 Jan '14

31 Jan '14

I'm inclined to drop the "bug-url is required" for engine stable branch 3.4, until we GA 3.4, as a lot of the patches are for pre-GA features. 3.3 stable branch still has this requirement of course. thoughts anyone? Thanks, Itamar

8 9

[Engine-devel] Can not debug GWT with chrom
by Eli Mesika 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi I am trying to debug GWT with google-chrome-stable-32.0.1700.77-1.x86_64 on F19 and getting the following exception onModuleLoad() threw an exception Exception while loading module com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter. See Development Mode for details. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.onLoad(ModuleSpace.java:406) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.OophmSessionHandler.loadModule(OophmSessionHandler.java:200) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.processConnection(BrowserChannelServer.java:526) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.run(BrowserChannelServer.java:364) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Deferred binding failed for 'com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter$UserAgentProperty' (did you forget to inherit a required module?) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.GWTBridgeImpl.create(GWTBridgeImpl.java:53) at com.google.gwt.core.shared.GWT.create(GWT.java:57) at com.google.gwt.core.client.GWT.create(GWT.java:85) at com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter.onModuleLoad(UserAgentAsserter.java:66) ... 9 more Caused by: com.google.gwt.core.ext.UnableToCompleteException: (see previous log entries) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.rebind(ModuleSpace.java:605) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.rebindAndCreate(ModuleSpace.java:465) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.GWTBridgeImpl.create(GWTBridgeImpl.java:49) ... 12 more any ideas ???

2 2

[Engine-devel] AppErrors properties
by Michal Skrivanek 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Hi, while trying to add a new message I couldn't help notice some ugliness in the code regarding our error messages in UI - why do we have @DefaultStringValue in frontend/webadmin/modules/frontend/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.java ? All strings are defined in individual properties anyway. - so we have individual properties files….3 of them REST - backend/manager/modules/dal/src/main/resources/bundles/AppErrors.properties UP - frontend/webadmin/modules/frontend/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.java WA - frontend/webadmin/modules/userportal-gwtp/src/main/resources/org/ovirt/engine/ui/frontend/AppErrors.properties funnily enough it's not that there are more messages in WA than UP, no, it's just full of random omissions, typos and discrepancies which do not make any logical sense Can't we get rid of the defaults in the interface (useless) and have just one property containing all the messages and use the sam file in all 3 places. And only if there is intentionally a different message in e.g. UP than in WA we can have an override/additional property file there (just by briefly going through most of the differences there's not a single case) Thanks, michal

2 3

[Engine-devel] proposing Arik Hadas as a maintainer of engine core
by Michal Skrivanek 30 Jan '14

30 Jan '14

Dear engine-core maintainers, I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various areas in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than 200 patches merged to engine master alone. Tons of migration related fixes, refactoring of legacy code, but also new complex features including complementary patches in UI, REST and VDSM code (e.g. Live Snapshots with RAM, locking improvements for VM&Template operations) Thanks in advance for your response. Thanks, michal

13 12

[Engine-devel] Predictable_vNIC_Order
by Meni Yakove 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

Hi, On oVirt 3.4 there is new feature: http://liver.englab.brq.redhat.com/redirect/?url=http://wiki.ovirt.org/Feat… Right now the feature make sure that the VNIC ordering for VM is the same after create VM from template/snapshot/import. For example: On original VM VNIC1 attached to network blue and VNIC2 attached to network red and on the VM we have two interfaces ETH0 and ETH1, after creating template from this VM and create VM from the template the order of the VNICs are the same for the new VM. On the VM from template the first VNIC is attached to blue network and the second VNIC is attached to red network but on the VM we have ETH2 and ETH3 I think that the feature should also include Sealing_Linux_VM: http://www.ovirt.org/Sealing_Linux_VM Whit this on the VM from template the interface naming will be the same as the original VM. (ETH0 and ETH1) Please share your opinion. Thanks Meni

3 2

[Engine-devel] Gerrit NEW Change Screen
by Itamar Heim 29 Jan '14

29 Jan '14

with gerrit 2.8, there is a new change screen. its not enabled by default (yet), please use and see what you think. to enable, go to settings (click the top-right arrow next to your name, and choose settings). select preferences and set "Change View:" to "New Screen". Thanks, Itamar

8 14

[Engine-devel] ovirt-3.3.3 release postponed due to blockers
by Sandro Bonazzola 28 Jan '14

28 Jan '14

Hi, oVirt 3.3.3 release need to be postponed. A recent release of python-cpopen-1.3 is breaking dependency resolution on EL6 and F19 so vdsm can't be installed and node can't be composed. A recent change in vdsm-python-cpopen added the needed conflict against python-cpopen and removed Provides / Obsoletes on python-cpopen. But no new releases of python-cpopen is available fixing the correct Provides / Obsoletes pair. oVirt 3.3.2 / stable is affected too. Please fix Bug 1056470 - python-cpopen-1.3 is not providing obsoleted package. Bug 1056464 - python-cpopen-1.3 is not providing obsoleted package. ASAP. -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0

[Engine-devel] oVirt 3.4 test day - PPC support
by Barak Azulay 27 Jan '14

27 Jan '14

Hi, I tried to test various engine features related to PPC support, However since I don't have a real Power PC HW I tried using the fake PPC configuration introduced by http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/18718 So I added the following configuration to /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf on a x86_64 host: fake_kvm_support=true fake_kvm_architecture=ppc64 And indeed it looked successful as you can see below [root@bazulay1 ~]# vdsClient -s 0 getVdsCaps | grep -i cpu cpuCores = '4' cpuFlags = 'powernv,model_POWER7_v2.3' cpuModel = 'POWER 7 (fake)' cpuSockets = '1' cpuSpeed = '3401.000' cpuThreads = '8' However after creating the appropriate cluster: CPU Architecture = ppc64 CPU name = IBM POWER 7* (meaning I tried all IBM POWER 7... cpus) Adding the host always ended in non operational status with the error: "Host bazulay1 has architecture x86_64 and cannot join Cluster TESTDAY-CLUSTER which has architecture ppc64." Thanks Barak Azulay

4 3

[Engine-devel] Bug status
by Sandro Bonazzola 27 Jan '14

27 Jan '14

Hi maintainers, since there's no automation in place for moving bz from MODIFIED to ON_QA when we build a new release, please remember to take care of your bz and move them to ON_QA when you build your packages for beta / rc testing. I can just move to ON_QA bz moved to MODIFIED before yum repository composition but it's not a good way to go. Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

1 0