Joining request
by Udayendu Sekhar kar
Hi Team,
My name is Udayendu Sekhar Kar and I am a Virtualization Specialist working
for Red Hat.
I want to join this team and want to involve myself for some of the
specific projects. Need the guidance.
Thanks
--Udayendu
11 years, 10 months
nominations
by Carl Trieloff
We had said we would start the discussion around project nominations.
Let me frame the discussion and then we can all jump in.
Firstly, there are two types of nominations
- Contributor
- Board
Let's make sure we have the criteria agreed and then we can do the
nomination based on the criteria.
For Contributor nominations I believe the criteria should be along these
lines
- Candidate should have contributed over a period and know to the
community via lists/IRC/patches etc, and align with the project
- Contributions should be considered substantive enough. (Contributions
can be from patches, to doc, to helping out, doing infra etc)
Notes:
- As the project is newer, we can be more lax on the duration and size
of contribution, and as the project matures we can raise the bar. This
is common practice with many projects I've worked with or started.
For Board nominations I believe the criteria should be along these lines
- Individual should have become known in the project and respected by
more than one sub-project
- Individual should have contributed to the well being on the project
beyond code/doc contributions. These 'beyond' contributions can be
around help evangelise the project, running meet-ups, organizing events,
soliciting additional strategic board members, looking after the well
being of the project etc.
- Individual should have contributed over a period of time.
regards,
Carl.
11 years, 10 months
Request to step down
by Jim Jagielski
I feel the need for a Mentor-as-board-member slot is no longer
required. I therefore ask to step down, unless the rest of the
board feels otherwise.
--
Jim Jagielski | jimjag(a)redhat.com | 443-324-8390 (cell)
11 years, 10 months
Re: [Users] What are you looking for from oVirt?
by Andrew Cathrow
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Romain Vrignaud" <rvrignaud(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Dave Neary" <dneary(a)redhat.com>, "arch" <arch(a)ovirt.org>,
> "Users" <users(a)ovirt.org>, "board" <board(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 4:13:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] What are you looking for from oVirt?
> Hello,
> I don't run currently any oVirt deployement in production but I have
> a lab.
> I used to run in production the old oVirt product (in rails).
> My best wishes for the future release of oVirt are :
> * GluserFS support as many of us
> * Nova (OpenStack Hypervisor) driver support (
> http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/selecting...
> ).
> I choose oVirt because my first goal is to manage a virtualized
> datacenter with OSS. But we begin to look at private cloud
> deployement.
> I think Aeolus would work with oVirt virtualization backend but AFAIK
> it only support redhat based linux which is not possible for us as
> we run
> Aelous has a RHEVM/oVirt driver that works today.
> If there are problems getting Aeolus working with oVirt we should dig
> into it, there shouldn't be any issues.
> almost only debian server except for virtualisation layer. So we
> would like to deploy OpenStack but to rely on oVirt for KVM
> hypervisors.
> Out of interest what are you getting from OpenStack that you don't
> get from oVirt
> * Fully supported stateless ovirt-node
> Regards,
> Romain
> 2012/6/28 Robert Middleswarth < robert(a)middleswarth.net >
> > On 06/15/2012 06:23 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
> >
>
> > > On 06/13/2012 04:28 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
> >
>
> > > > So - how are you using oVirt? Why did you choose it over
> > > > alternatives?
> > >
> >
>
> > > > What do you like about it? and what would you like to see
> > > > change,
> > >
> >
>
> > > > whether that is in terms of technical, process, or marketing
> > > > changes?
> > >
> >
>
> > > > I'm here to help, but to do so I need your help first!
> > >
> >
>
> > > Thank you to all those who have replied, on and off list, so far.
> > > For
> > > those of you who sent me private messages, I'll be (anonymously)
> > > collating your feedback and forwarding it on.
> >
>
> > > The range of users who have replied so far includes:
> >
>
> > > * Sysadmin at small web hosting business
> >
>
> > > * Cost-sensitive IT department of an unrelated industry
> >
>
> > That would be me.
>
> > > * Hosting provider specialising in HA
> >
>
> > > * Running a private cloud
> >
>
> > > * Test lab set-up considering for production deployment
> >
>
> > Well no one should be crazy enough to go live with a product they
> > haven't at least ran inside a testing lab.
>
> > > And the top features you've cited are:
> >
>
> > > * Stateless hypervisor
> >
>
> > > * Ability to migrate VMs
> >
>
> > Number one reason I am working with oVirt
>
> > > * RHEL and KVM
> >
>
> > We are a debian based org so changing over to the RHEL based OS's
> > is
> > more a pain then a benefit. KVM is still kinda young compared to
> > both Xen / Vmware it seems to work well but there aren't as many
> > os's covered by the vitro drivers and there seem to be more bugs /
> > race conditions but that has been steadily changing as it has been
> > getting more mature
>
> > > * Cost
> >
>
> > > * The ability to have your preferred OS as both hypervisor and
> > > guest
> > > as a first class citizen
> >
>
> > > * Aimed for data center use-case rather than cloud
> >
>
> > This would be number 2 in the list.
>
> > > And the top gaps you've identified so far:
> >
>
> > > * Insufficient resources (docs) to help with production
> > > deployment
> > > on
> > > ovirt.org
> >
>
> > > * Difficulty of configuration and getting started
> >
>
> > > * You'd like to see a more diverse contributor community
> >
>
> > > * Stability (unfortunately, I don't have any concrete examples of
> > > this from the commenter)
> >
>
> > > * History on resource usage in hypervisors and guests
> >
>
> > > * Integration with Gluster
> >
>
> > > * Offer choices of guest agents with other distributions than
> > > RHEL
> >
>
> > I could have created this list myself. I have hit pretty much every
> > one of these limits in the last few months working with the
> > project.
> > 3.1 adds limited support for Gluster and ovirt seems to be more
> > stable dispute F17 instability.
>
> > As for the question of stability the file storage system in 3.0 can
> > be a bit unstable. If your NFS share disappears for a few mins the
> > file system tends to go offline and wont reactivate. Not sure about
> > iscsi or FC since I don't have access to those file systems.
>
> > > This is all giving me great insight into who's here - please keep
> > > it
> > > coming!
> >
>
> > > Cheers,
> >
>
> > > Dave.
> >
>
> > ______________________________ _________________
>
> > Users mailing list
>
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
>
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/ mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Arch mailing list
> Arch(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
11 years, 10 months
oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2012-07-05
by Mike Burns
Minutes: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-07-05-14.00.html
Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-07-05-14.00.txt
Log: http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-07-05-14.00.log.html
=========================
#ovirt: ovirt weekly sync
=========================
Meeting started by mburns at 14:00:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-07-05-14.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call and agenda (mburns, 14:01:10)
* Release Status (mburns, 14:06:00)
* Current release date is July 9th (oschreib, 14:08:37)
* 9 blocker currently for 3.1 release, 5 ON_QA, 2 MODIFIED and 2 POST
(oschreib, 14:09:11)
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=822145&hide_resolved=1
(oschreib, 14:09:16)
* Blockers review (oschreib, 14:11:00)
* vdsmd init script times out due to lengthy semanage operation (vdsm,
POST) (oschreib, 14:11:16)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832199
(oschreib, 14:11:24)
* new patch should be reviewed soon (oschreib, 14:14:59)
* 3.1: sshd daemon is not starting correctly after complete the
installation of oVirt Node (ovirt-node, MODIFIED) (oschreib,
14:15:46)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832517
(oschreib, 14:15:53)
* verification blocks on BZ#837443 (oschreib, 14:17:41)
* ovirt-node fails to register with ovirt-engine (vdsm, POST)
(oschreib, 14:18:52)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837443
(oschreib, 14:18:57)
* patch in review (oschreib, 14:21:24)
* 3.1: iptables blocking communication between node and engine
(ovirt-node, MODIFIED) (oschreib, 14:21:56)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832539
(oschreib, 14:22:06)
* blocks on BZ 837443 as well (oschreib, 14:24:48)
* AGREED: release date will slip to 25 July (mburns, 14:34:46)
* Workshops and Conferences (mburns, 14:36:02)
* next workshop is August 28 in San Diego (mburns, 14:36:57)
* release announcements (mburns, 14:42:14)
* oschreib mburns to work with jbrooks to coordinate release
announcements (mburns, 14:42:53)
* ACTION: jclift and/or dneary to recruit RobertM to do feature
screencasts (mburns, 14:46:22)
Meeting ended at 14:48:44 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jclift and/or dneary to recruit RobertM to do feature screencasts
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* dneary
* jclift and/or dneary to recruit RobertM to do feature screencasts
* jclift
* jclift and/or dneary to recruit RobertM to do feature screencasts
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* oschreib (59)
* mburns (54)
* dneary (21)
* dougsland (15)
* jclift (14)
* ovirtbot (5)
* ilvovsky (4)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
11 years, 10 months
oVirt Weekly Meeting - Delayed to 2012-07-05
by Ofer Schreiber
Since today is 04-July, all US people are un-available.
The meeting will take place tomorrow, same place, same hour.
Thanks,
Ofer Schreiber
oVirt Release Manager
11 years, 10 months
oVirt Weekly Meeting -- 2012-07-04
by Mike Burns
This mail will double as a question and call for agenda items. Since
this Wednesday is 04-July, all US people will be un-available. Do we
want to reschedule the meeting?
Mike
11 years, 10 months
oVirt Workshop at LinuxCon North America
by Leslie Hawthorn
Hello everyone,
Following up from this week's IRC meeting, we've asked the Linux
Foundation to replicate the agenda from LinuxCon Japan on the LC North
America site. That's in process, but they'd like us to get the names and
bios of our confirmed speakers to them no later than next Wednesday, 27
June 2012.
I'll leave it to everyone to wrangle about who would like to speak and
cover particular sessions. My goal with this workshop is to have a more
diverse speaker line up, so please do volunteer if you're attending
LinuxCon North America and would be willing to lead a session(s).
[0] -
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan/ovirt-gluster-wo...
Cheers,
LH
--
Leslie Hawthorn
Community Action and Impact
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
identi.ca/lh
twitter.com/lhawthorn
11 years, 10 months
