On 11/30/2011 02:03 AM, David Jorm wrote:
>> 3. these tars have basically been tested.
> Not sure what the definition of 'tested' is, probably worth expanding
> it
> a bit.
> Y.
I would think just smoke tested.
David
I would like to believe the code should pass smoke tests at all times.
When it doesn't, it's a regression we should strive to fix asap.
Y.