5 Sep
2012
5 Sep
'12
9:08 p.m.
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 18:55 +0000, Benedict, Jon wrote:
On 9/5/12 11:25 AM, "Mike Burns" <mburns@redhat.com> wrote:
Correct, they can continue on if they want (if re-elected) and I suppose we could also let them resign from the post as well.
Hmmm. I figured one of the benefits of having a 2-3 month term would be that if they ~really~ didn't like it that they could see the light at the end of the tunnel and hang in for the term. But that's just me.
True, but we're supposedly moving to 6 month release cycle, after this next release. I guess the release schedule is also owned by the Project Manager too, so they can determine it. Mike
Jon